Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynecologic malignancy and has a high mortality. Due to tissue and anatomy characteristics, the symptoms of ovarian cancer are easily ignored by patients and are not easily distinguished from other benign ovarian diseases. Most patients are diagnosed at stage III or IV. The 5-year survival rate of these patients is lower than 30% [
1‐
3], while the 5-year survival rate is over 90% for patients with stage I [
4]. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common type of ovarian cancer, as it accounts for 80–90% of cases [
5], which is further divided into serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell and other mixed or rare subtype. Among them, the serous subtype is the most aggressive.
Currently, trans-vaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and pelvic examination are the “gold standard” for detecting EOC [
1]. However, complicated invasive procedures have scared patients off, and TVUS is seldom available in small local hospitals. At present, CA125 is the most important biomarker for EOC in the clinic, and it is also the most important serum marker for assessing therapy and relapse regarding EOC [
6,
7]. However, it has many disadvantages, such as a low detection rate for early diagnosis and limited specificity [
8]. Besides, it can be detected with high levels in benign gynecological diseases, for example, pelvic infections, fibroids and endometriosis [
9,
10].
Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) was first reported in 1993 and is a fragment of cytokeratin subunit 19 [
11]. High expression of CYFRA21-1 has been investigated in squamous cell carcinoma and is usually used as a tumor biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [
12]. Keratin, which plays an important role in the structural stabilizers of epithelial cells, acts as a biomarker in the differentiation of epithelia [
13]. We hypothesize that there is a correlation between CYFRA21-1 and EOC. In the present study, we explored CYFRA21-1 expression in EOC and evaluated the value of its clinical application.
Materials and methods
Study population
After receiving the approval of the Institutional Review Board for the medical records, we retrospectively analyzed data in tumor registry and pathology databases. A total of 203 EOC patients who underwent surgical treatment, 341 serum samples from healthy women and 150 serum samples from benign ovarian diseases were recruited for this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University.
Laboratory data collection
All patients were confirmed by pathological diagnosis on surgical specimens, and all subjects had serum CYFRA21-1 and CA-125 levels recorded within 1 week before operation. None of the patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation prior to surgery. The following clinicopathological data were also collected: age at diagnosis, histological type, menopausal status, tumor grade and disease stage. The neoplasms were analyzed by histology and grade classified according to World Health Organization criteria. The grade was based on the Silverberg standard, and the stage was based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) standards. The chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) (Abbott Diagnostics Division, Chicago, USA) was used to measure serum levels of CYFRA21-1 and CA-125.
Follow-up
Follow-up with all EOC patients occurred by telephone once every 3 months in the first 2 years and every 6 months after that. The duration of overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time from diagnosis to death or the last follow-up time for the living patients.
Statistical analysis
The levels of serum CA-125 and CYFRA21-1 are expressed as the median ± IQR. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparisons with controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were generated to evaluate the diagnostic value. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were supplied by recommended cut-offs. OS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and survival curves were examined by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which factors predict OS. Analyses were all performed using SPSS software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy among women living in industrialized countries. Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent invasive female genital tract malignancies, with an estimated 22,240 cases diagnosed annually in the USA [
14]. A total of 52,100 cases and 22,500 deaths occurred annually in China [
15]. Genetic, hormonal, reproductive, environmental, and ethnic factors increase risk [
16]. Ovarian cancer is not a single-disease entity but rather comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors with distinct clinicopathological characteristics [
17‐
19]. The different histological types of ovarian cancer have a distinct biology and clinical behavior. However, previous studies have not considered biologic heterogeneity. In this article, we deliberately selected epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) as our study object to prevent the interference of heterogeneous factors.
Currently, there are many new diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer, such as mesothelin [
20], TRIM44 [
21] and BCRA1 methylation [
22]. However, they are not perfect and have a high cost and low reproducibility. CA125 is the classical marker but is not specific for EOC; it can be detected in other benign gynecologic disorders and other cancers, such as endometrial and pancreatic cancers [
4,
9]. Nearly 6% of women without ovarian cancer CA125 levels gained more than 35 U/ml [
6,
23]. Moreover, mucinous EOC and clear cell cancer do not express CA125 or express little [
18,
24]. According to research by Buys SS et al., screening with CA125 and TVU simultaneously did not reduce ovarian cancer mortality compared with usual care [
25]. Furthermore, it has been proven that screening for ovarian cancer can lead to unnecessary surgical harm for healthy women [
26].
Cytokeratins constitute the main component of keratin filaments and are key parts of the cell cytoskeleton [
27]. Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) represents the type I acidic cytokeratins that are expressed in many epithelial malignancies, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, cervical carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma [
28,
29]. The main functions of CK19 are maintaining the integrity of epithelial cell and participating in the immune response [
19,
30]. CYFRA21-1 is the cytokeratin 19 fragment that is released into the serum from epithelial cells during the late S and G2 phases [
13]. CYFRA21-1 has been known as a hopeful biomarker for many cancers, and its overexpression has been detected in lung cancer, colorectal cancer [
31] and bladder cancer [
32], especially in squamous cell carcinoma [
33]. However, to our knowledge, few comparative studies have focused on the relationship between CYFRA21-1 and EOC.
In the present study, we found that CA125 is superior to CYFRA21-1 in the diagnosis of EOC. Preoperative levels of CYFRA21-1 and CA125 were significantly higher in EOC patients than in the benign group and normal control. However, there were no significant changes in the CYFRA21-1 level between the benign group and the normal control, while the CA125 level was significantly different. However, the preoperative level of CYFRA21-1 is a good complement for CA125 to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value. In the prognostic aspect, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significant difference in median survival time between the high CYFRA21-1 group and the low CYFRA21-1 group, while CA125 was not significantly different between the two groups. Univariable analysis showed that CYFRA21-1, grade, and stage were all significantly associated with OS (Table
3). However, CA125 was not the influencing factor of OS. CA125 and its optimal usage in EOC prognosis has been controversial [
6,
7,
18]. Some scholars believe that serum CA125 has no clinical value for the follow-up monitoring of postoperative patients with EOC, which was consistent with our study (33). Thus, CYFRA 21-1 is likely to be superior to CA125 as a prognostic indicator in EOC.
This study highlights that the serum CYFRA21-1 level may be a useful noninvasive biomarker in monitoring EOC patients. We found that higher serum CYFRA21-1 levels in patients with EOC were significantly correlated with stage, grade, lymph node metastasis and ascites, thus confirming the engagement of CYFRA21-1 in tumor invasion. Taken together, our study demonstrated that CYFRA21-1 could be valuable in EOC diagnosis and prognosis. Patients with high CYFRA 21-1 levels should be followed up frequently to avoid undesirable consequences.
This study is a retrospective, single-center, small-sample study with a single source of research objects (all from the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University). The benign group has limited types of lesions, while the healthy group is only the staff of physical examination in our hospital, which has certain limitations. However, it has advantages in that it is a relatively large patient group and consistent treatment. Further prospective multicenter studies will be needed to provide more definitive data to clarify the significance of our findings.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.