Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 3/2017

25.10.2016 | Original Article

Evaluation of training programme uptake in an attempt to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries: the SUPPORT programme

verfasst von: Nadia Rahman, Latha Vinayakarao, Sangeeta Pathak, Dawn Minden, Louise Melson, Ella Vitue, A Pradhan

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess the feedback from a quality improvement training programme to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Methods

Training sessions were organised that included evidence-based information on OASIS risk factors and training on models to measure perineal body length (PBL), perform episiotomies with standard and 60° fixed angle scissors (EPISCISSORS-60®), and measure post-delivery episiotomy suture angles with protractor transparencies. Feedback forms using a Likert scale (1–4) were completed and analysed. The setting was an evidence-based quality improvement programme (Strategy for Using Practical aids for Prevention of OASIS, Recording episiotomies and clinician Training [SUPPORT]) at two National Health Service (NHS) Hospitals in the UK. The participants were midwives and doctors attending the SUPPORT training programme

Results

All of the participants (100 %) would recommend the training programme to a friend or colleague. 92 % felt that the training session improved their knowledge of the impact of PBL and perineal distension and their knowledge of the relationship between episiotomy angle and OASIS “a lot” or “somewhat”.

Conclusion

Based on this feedback, we recommend the addition of the knowledge content of the SUPPORT programme to other centres providing perineal assessment and repair courses.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: IOM; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: IOM; 2001.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ovretveit J. Does improving quality save money? A review of the evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers. London: Health Foundation; 2009. p. 8. Ovretveit J. Does improving quality save money? A review of the evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers. London: Health Foundation; 2009. p. 8.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (Green-top Guideline No. 29). London: RCOG; 2015. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, management (Green-top Guideline No. 29). London: RCOG; 2015.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Silf K, Woodhead N, Kelly J, Fryer A, Kettle C, Ismail KMK. Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model. Midwife. 2014;31:197–200.CrossRef Silf K, Woodhead N, Kelly J, Fryer A, Kettle C, Ismail KMK. Evaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training model. Midwife. 2014;31:197–200.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aytan H, Tapisiz OL, Tuncay G, Avsar FA. Severe perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy type. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:46–50.CrossRefPubMed Aytan H, Tapisiz OL, Tuncay G, Avsar FA. Severe perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy type. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:46–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dua A, Whitworth M, Dugdale A, Hill S. Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1361–4.CrossRef Dua A, Whitworth M, Dugdale A, Hill S. Perineal length: norms in gravid women in the first stage of labour. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1361–4.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Geller EJ. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631–6.CrossRefPubMed Geller EJ. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai CY, Cheung HW, His Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalizable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed Lai CY, Cheung HW, His Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY. Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalizable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizk DEE, Abadir MN, Thomas LB, Abu-Zidan F. Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:395–400.CrossRef Rizk DEE, Abadir MN, Thomas LB, Abu-Zidan F. Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:395–400.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai PS, Oyama IA, Hiraoka M, Minaglia S, Thomas J, Kaneshiro B. Perineal body length among different racial groups in the first stage of labour. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:165–7.CrossRefPubMed Tsai PS, Oyama IA, Hiraoka M, Minaglia S, Thomas J, Kaneshiro B. Perineal body length among different racial groups in the first stage of labour. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:165–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Walfisch A, Hallak M, Harley S, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Association of spontaneous perineal stretching during delivery with perineal lacerations. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:23–8.PubMed Walfisch A, Hallak M, Harley S, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I. Association of spontaneous perineal stretching during delivery with perineal lacerations. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:23–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Naidu M, Kapoor DS, Evans S, Vinayakarao L, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:813–6.CrossRefPubMed Naidu M, Kapoor DS, Evans S, Vinayakarao L, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:813–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Health Care and Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies; NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: NICE; 2014. National Institute for Health Care and Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies; NICE guidelines [CG190]. London: NICE; 2014.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat East CE, Lau R, Biro MA. Midwives’ and doctors’ perceptions of their preparation for and practice in managing the perineum in the second stage of labour: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2015;31:122–31.CrossRefPubMed East CE, Lau R, Biro MA. Midwives’ and doctors’ perceptions of their preparation for and practice in managing the perineum in the second stage of labour: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2015;31:122–31.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bick DE, Ismail KM, Macdonald S, Thomas P, Tohill S, Kettle C. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bick DE, Ismail KM, Macdonald S, Thomas P, Tohill S, Kettle C. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Löwenstein L, Drugan A, Gonen R, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Bardicef M, Jakobi P. Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:179–82.CrossRefPubMed Löwenstein L, Drugan A, Gonen R, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Bardicef M, Jakobi P. Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:179–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of training programme uptake in an attempt to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injuries: the SUPPORT programme
verfasst von
Nadia Rahman
Latha Vinayakarao
Sangeeta Pathak
Dawn Minden
Louise Melson
Ella Vitue
A Pradhan
Publikationsdatum
25.10.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3158-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.