Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 4/2019

08.01.2019 | Review Article

Evidence-based use of arthroplasty in cervical degenerative disc disease

verfasst von: Andrei F. Joaquim, Melvin C. Makhni, K. Daniel Riew

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed to decrease the rate of symptomatic adjacent-level disease while preserving motion in the cervical spine.

Methods

The objectives of this paper are to provide criteria for proper patient selection as well as to present a comprehensive literature review of the current evidence for CDA, including randomized studies, the most recent meta-analysis findings, and long-term follow-up clinical trials as well.

Results

Currently, there are several prospective randomized controlled studies of level I of evidence attesting to the safety and efficacy of CDA in the management of cervical spondylotic disease (CSD) for one- or two-level degenerative diseases. These as well as recent meta-analyses suggest that CDA is potentially similar or even superior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when considering several outcomes, including dysphagia and re-operation rate over medium-term follow-up. Less robust studies have also reported satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of CDA for hybrid procedures (ACDF combined with CDA), non-contiguous disease, and even for multilevel disease (more than 2 levels).

Conclusions

Based on this evidence we conclude that CDA is a safe and effective alternative to ACDF in properly selected patients for one- or two-level diseases. Defining superiority of specific implants and detailing optimal surgical indications will require further well-designed long-term studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the 3 intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A:607–624CrossRefPubMed Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the 3 intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A:607–624CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nanda A, Sharma M, Sonig A, Ambekar S, Bollam P (2014) Surgical complications of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disk disease: a single surgeon’s experience of 1576 patients. World Neurosurg 82(6):1380–1387CrossRefPubMed Nanda A, Sharma M, Sonig A, Ambekar S, Bollam P (2014) Surgical complications of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for cervical degenerative disk disease: a single surgeon’s experience of 1576 patients. World Neurosurg 82(6):1380–1387CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs W, Willems PC, Kruyt M, van Limbeek J, Pavlov P, Bartels R et al (2011) Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine 36(14):E950–E960CrossRefPubMed Jacobs W, Willems PC, Kruyt M, van Limbeek J, Pavlov P, Bartels R et al (2011) Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine 36(14):E950–E960CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo J, Wang H, Peng J, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Liu S et al (2018) Rate of adjacent segment degeneration of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg 113:225–231CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Wang H, Peng J, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Liu S et al (2018) Rate of adjacent segment degeneration of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg 113:225–231CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley PD, Coric D, Frank KA, Stone MB (2018) Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application. Neurosurgery Nunley PD, Coric D, Frank KA, Stone MB (2018) Cervical disc arthroplasty: current evidence and real-world application. Neurosurgery
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209CrossRefPubMed Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275–286CrossRefPubMed Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R et al (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275–286CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):101–107CrossRef Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):101–107CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV (2010) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 13(3):308–318CrossRefPubMed Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV (2010) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 13(3):308–318CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Delamarter RB, Murrey D, Janssen ME et al (2010) Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter Investigational Device Exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients. SAS J 4(4):122–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delamarter RB, Murrey D, Janssen ME et al (2010) Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter Investigational Device Exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients. SAS J 4(4):122–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358CrossRefPubMed Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93-A(18):1684–1692CrossRef Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93-A(18):1684–1692CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH et al (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):E907–E918CrossRef Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH et al (2013) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(15):E907–E918CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W et al (2013) Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(26):2227–2239CrossRef Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W et al (2013) Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(26):2227–2239CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M (2013) ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for singlelevel cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Spine 38(3):203–209CrossRefPubMed Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M (2013) ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for singlelevel cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Spine 38(3):203–209CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV (2014) Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(4):516–528CrossRefPubMed Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV (2014) Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(4):516–528CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, et al (2014) Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg 8 Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis R, et al (2014) Multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior discectomy and fusion in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. Int J Spine Surg 8
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg 97(21):1738–1747CrossRefPubMed Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg 97(21):1738–1747CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, Mcafee PC (2015) Long term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 40(10):674–683CrossRefPubMed Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, Mcafee PC (2015) Long term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 40(10):674–683CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Argires PJ, Nian H, Harrell FE (2015) Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 23(5):558–573CrossRefPubMed Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Argires PJ, Nian H, Harrell FE (2015) Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study. J Neurosurg Spine 23(5):558–573CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ et al (2015) Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(4):E237–E243CrossRefPubMed Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ et al (2015) Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(4):E237–E243CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hisey M, Zigler J, Jackson R et al (2016) Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 10:1–9CrossRef Hisey M, Zigler J, Jackson R et al (2016) Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 10:1–9CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gornet M, Burkus JK, Shaffrey M, Nian H, Harrell F (2016) Cervical disc arthroplasty with prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 10:1–22CrossRef Gornet M, Burkus JK, Shaffrey M, Nian H, Harrell F (2016) Cervical disc arthroplasty with prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 10:1–22CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(21):1738–1747CrossRefPubMed Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B (2015) ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(21):1738–1747CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghobrial GM, Lavelle WF, Florman JE, Riew KD, Levi AD (2018) Symptomatic adjacent level disease requiring surgery: analysis of 10-year results from a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical fusion. Neurosurgery Ghobrial GM, Lavelle WF, Florman JE, Riew KD, Levi AD (2018) Symptomatic adjacent level disease requiring surgery: analysis of 10-year results from a prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical fusion. Neurosurgery
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS et al (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(5):532–545CrossRefPubMed Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS et al (2013) Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(5):532–545CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis R, Nunley PD, Kim K et al (2014) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C(r) over 3-years. Coluna/Columna 12(2):97–103CrossRef Davis R, Nunley PD, Kim K et al (2014) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C(r) over 3-years. Coluna/Columna 12(2):97–103CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD et al (2015) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22(1):15–25CrossRefPubMed Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD et al (2015) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22(1):15–25CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T (2016) Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 25(2):213–224CrossRefPubMed Radcliff K, Coric D, Albert T (2016) Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 25(2):213–224CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK et al (2017) Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine 26(6):653–667CrossRefPubMed Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK et al (2017) Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine 26(6):653–667CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD (2017) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 27(1):7–19CrossRefPubMed Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD (2017) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 27(1):7–19CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD (2017) Long term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical discreplacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 27(1):7–19CrossRefPubMed Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RG, Gornet MF, McConnell J, Hodges SD (2017) Long term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical discreplacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 27(1):7–19CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N (2005) Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3:335–341CrossRefPubMed Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N (2005) Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3:335–341CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Bernard P, Dufour T, Hovorka I et al (2011) Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 20:1417–1426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Bernard P, Dufour T, Hovorka I et al (2011) Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 20:1417–1426CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo J, Wang H, Peng J, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Liu S, Wang D, Gong M, Tang S (2018) Rate of adjacent segment degeneration of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg 13:225–231CrossRef Luo J, Wang H, Peng J, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Liu S, Wang D, Gong M, Tang S (2018) Rate of adjacent segment degeneration of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg 13:225–231CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong L, Xu Z, Chen X, Wang D, Li D, Liu T, Hao D (2017) The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J 17(10):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed Dong L, Xu Z, Chen X, Wang D, Li D, Liu T, Hao D (2017) The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J 17(10):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q (2016) Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(19):1493–1502CrossRef Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q (2016) Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(19):1493–1502CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao H, Duan LJ, Gao YS, Yang YD, Tang XS, Zhao DY, Xiong Y, Hu ZG, Li CH, Yu X (2018) What is the superior surgical strategy for bi-level cervical spondylosis-anterior cervical disc replacement or anterior cervical decompression and fusion?: a meta-analysis from 11 studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(13):e0005CrossRef Zhao H, Duan LJ, Gao YS, Yang YD, Tang XS, Zhao DY, Xiong Y, Hu ZG, Li CH, Yu X (2018) What is the superior surgical strategy for bi-level cervical spondylosis-anterior cervical disc replacement or anterior cervical decompression and fusion?: a meta-analysis from 11 studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(13):e0005CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2011) What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(3):658–665CrossRefPubMed Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2011) What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(3):658–665CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Joaquim AF, Murar J, Savage JW, Patel AA (2014) Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of potential preventative measures. Spine J 14(9):2246–2260CrossRefPubMed Joaquim AF, Murar J, Savage JW, Patel AA (2014) Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of potential preventative measures. Spine J 14(9):2246–2260CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Smucker JD, Bassuener SR, Sasso RC, Riew KD (2017) Comparison of long-term differences in dysphagia: cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion. Clin Spine Surg 30(8):E1160–E1164CrossRefPubMed Smucker JD, Bassuener SR, Sasso RC, Riew KD (2017) Comparison of long-term differences in dysphagia: cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion. Clin Spine Surg 30(8):E1160–E1164CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Joaquim AF, Riew KD (2017) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 42(2):E4CrossRefPubMed Joaquim AF, Riew KD (2017) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 42(2):E4CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvin MD, Mroz TE (2014) The Mobi-C cervical disc for one-level and two-level cervical disc replacement: a review of the literature. Med Devices (Auckl) 7:397–403 Alvin MD, Mroz TE (2014) The Mobi-C cervical disc for one-level and two-level cervical disc replacement: a review of the literature. Med Devices (Auckl) 7:397–403
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Delamarter RB, Zigler J (2013) Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(9):711–717CrossRef Delamarter RB, Zigler J (2013) Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(9):711–717CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Zigler JE (2013) Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(14):1177–1182CrossRef Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Zigler JE (2013) Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(14):1177–1182CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA et al (2016) Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 24(5):734–745CrossRefPubMed Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA et al (2016) Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 24(5):734–745CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD et al (2018) Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine 28(3):252–261CrossRefPubMed Coric D, Guyer RD, Nunley PD et al (2018) Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine 28(3):252–261CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ et al (2016) A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 25(7):2263–2270CrossRefPubMed Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ et al (2016) A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 25(7):2263–2270CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorrnet MF, Buttermann GR, Wohns R et al (2018) Safety and efficiency of cervical disc arthroplasty in ambulatory surgery centers vs. hospital settings. Int J Spine Surg 2(5):557–564CrossRef Gorrnet MF, Buttermann GR, Wohns R et al (2018) Safety and efficiency of cervical disc arthroplasty in ambulatory surgery centers vs. hospital settings. Int J Spine Surg 2(5):557–564CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernström U (1966) Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 357:154–159PubMed Fernström U (1966) Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 357:154–159PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):519–528CrossRefPubMed Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):519–528CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng J, Liu H, Chen H, et al. Effect of prosthesis width and depth on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Zeng J, Liu H, Chen H, et al. Effect of prosthesis width and depth on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng J, Liu H, Chen H et al (2018) Comparison of heterotopic ossification after fixed- and mobile-core cervical disc arthroplasty. World Neurosurg S1878-8750(18):32121–32121 Zeng J, Liu H, Chen H et al (2018) Comparison of heterotopic ossification after fixed- and mobile-core cervical disc arthroplasty. World Neurosurg S1878-8750(18):32121–32121
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang PY, Chang HK, Wu JC et al (2016) Differences between C3-4 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 24(5):752–759CrossRefPubMed Chang PY, Chang HK, Wu JC et al (2016) Differences between C3-4 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 24(5):752–759CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei T, Liu Y, Wang H et al (2016) Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 40(6):1197–1203CrossRefPubMed Lei T, Liu Y, Wang H et al (2016) Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 40(6):1197–1203CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Song Q, He D, Han X, Zhang N, Wang J, Tian W (2018) Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study. Int Orthop 42(10):2389–2396CrossRefPubMed Song Q, He D, Han X, Zhang N, Wang J, Tian W (2018) Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study. Int Orthop 42(10):2389–2396CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang YC, Nie L, Cheng L, Hou Y (2009) Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up. Int Orthop 33(4):1037–1042CrossRefPubMed Yang YC, Nie L, Cheng L, Hou Y (2009) Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up. Int Orthop 33(4):1037–1042CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y (2009) Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop 33(5):1347–1351CrossRefPubMed Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y (2009) Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop 33(5):1347–1351CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Pointillart V, Castelain JE, Coudert P, Cawley DT, Gille O, Vital JM (2018) Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up. Int Orthop 42(4):851–857CrossRefPubMed Pointillart V, Castelain JE, Coudert P, Cawley DT, Gille O, Vital JM (2018) Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up. Int Orthop 42(4):851–857CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Evidence-based use of arthroplasty in cervical degenerative disc disease
verfasst von
Andrei F. Joaquim
Melvin C. Makhni
K. Daniel Riew
Publikationsdatum
08.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-04281-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

International Orthopaedics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.