Exercise and cancer mortality in Korean men and women: a prospective cohort study

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Globally, cancer accounts for approximately 8.2 million deaths in 2012, with more than 14 million new cancers diagnosed. [1]. In Korea, 180,530 deaths are predicted for all cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancer in 2035, with more than 375,250 new cancers diagnosed [1].

According to expert review by Anand et al, up to almost 95% of cancer events are attributable to lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity, cigarette smoking, poor diet, alcohol, and obesity, and thus are potentially preventable [2]. Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure, while exercise is a subcategory of physical activity, which is defined as a planned, repetitive, and purposive in the sense that improvement or maintenance of one or more components of physical fitness is an objective [3].

Association between exercise duration and cancer mortality was introduced by previous studies. According to large meta-analysis conducted by Li et al, high level of physical activity lowered the risk of cancer mortality in the general population and cancer survivors compared to inactivity, specifically individuals underwent the highest levels of physical activity had a 17% reduction in cancer mortality [4].

Convincing evidence indicates that regular participation in exercise is associated with reduced risk of mortality [5, 6], a recent meta-analysis study found regular physical activity to be protective against a wide variety of types of cancer incidence, using data pooled from 12 large prospective cohort studies comprising over 1.4 million people (with nearly 190,000 cases of cancer) from the United States and Europe [7].

A few other cohort studies [8‐12] have also demonstrated inverse associations between physical activity and cancer risk, but all prior research have used data of individuals from Western countries.

Moon et al have reported that Asians have a lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percentage body fat than whites, and have a different fat distribution from whites [13]. Wang et al. reported that Asians had more upper body subcutaneous fat than did whites [14]. Therefore, increased health risks associated with obesity appear to occur at a lower BMI in Asians. In the context of physical activity, relatively low levels of leisure time physical activity and exercise among South Asian people were reported [15]. Nonetheless, a few previous studies investigating physical activity in relation to cancer in Asian populations were either cross-sectional or had low statistical power due to the small sample size [16‐19]. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to examine the associations of exercise per week with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality using data from a large-scale prospective cohort study of Koreans.

The average (standard deviation) age of KMSMS subjects was 46.0 (10.6) years in men and 46.2 (11.3) years in women. Table 1 shows characteristics of the study participants by exercise categories. Compared to those who did not exercise, those who exercised were more likely to have higher age, BMI, and drinking rates or lower smoking rates.

During the follow-up period of 15.3 years (4,638,863 person years), a total of 16,884 (11,919 men and 4,965 among women) participants died, providing sufficient statistical power to examine the association between exercise and cancer mortality. Table 2 shows age adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios (HR) of all-cause, cancers, and cancer types by exercise status in men. Men who exercised had lower all-cause and all-cancer mortliaty rates per 100,000 person-years compared with those who did not exericse. Compared with men who did no exercise, those who exercised showed 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.73) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81) times lower hazards of all-cause and all-cancer mortality, respectively. In addition, men who exercised showed lower hazards of esophageal (HR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.97, liver (HR=0.83 95% CI: 0.74-0.94), lung (HR=0.71 95% CI: 0.64-0.79), colorectal (HR=0.65 95% CI: 0.53-0.80), and stomach cancer (HR=0.62 95% CI: 0.53-0.73) than those who did not exercise. When men who exercised were set as the reference, those who did no exercise showed 1.42 (95% CI: 1.37-1.48) times higher risk of mortality. Non-exercise prevalence was found to be 53.7%, while attributable fractions of non-exercise for all-cause and all-cancer mortality were 18.4% and 13.9%, respectively.

In addition, Table 2 shows associations between the total duration of exercise per week and mortality from all causes, cancer, and specific types of cancer in men. Regarding all-cause mortality, the exercise group showed lower rates (HR=0.69 for <150 minutes per week; HR=0.67 for 150-299 minutes per week; HR=0.67 for ≥300 minutes per week) than the non-exercise group. Analyses for all-cancer mortality showed similar rates of HR=0.74 (<150 minutes per week), HR=0.78 (150-299 minutes per week), and HR=0.73 (≥300 minutes per week).

Table 3 presents age-adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios (HR) of all-cause, cancers, and cancer types by exercise status in women. Likewise, women who exercised had lower all-cause and all-cancer mortliaty rates per 100,000 person-years compared with those who did not exericse. Table 3 also shows associations between the total duration of exercise per week and mortality from all causes, cancer, and specific types of cancer in women. Regarding all-cause mortality, the exercise group showed lower rates (HR=0.73 for <150 minutes per week; HR=0.65 for 150-299 minutes per week; HR=0.69 for ≥300 minutes per week) than the non-exercise group.

Table 4 shows associations between the total duration of exercise per week with different categories and mortality from all causes and all cancers in men and women. We found that those who did at least 100 minutes per week showed significant reduction and reduced until less than 400 minutes per week in men and women. In other words, the largest reduction in all cause and all cancer mortality risk was observed in the minimal or middle levels of duration of exercise per week rather than in the highest categories, providing J-shaped associations. In general, the intermediate levels of exercise duration (i.e. categories of 100-249min and 250-399min) showed the lowest (statistically significant) HR values for all-cause, all-cancer, and lung; the HRs in the highest duration category were slightly higher (although not significantly for all causes and all cancer (Fig. 1).

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first investigation examining the longitudinal associations of exercise with various cancer mortality outcomes in Asian adult populations. We found that over 15.3-year follow-up (4,638,863 person-years; 16,884 deaths) both men and women who exercised showed over 20% decreased hazards of all-cause and all-cancer mortality, respectively, compared to those who did no exercise. A notable observation of this study is the curvilinear associations between the total duration of exercise and cancer including all-cause, all-cancer, esophagus, lung, colorectal, and stomach cancer in men and all cause, all cancer and lung cancer in women. This finding specifically indicates that risk of cancer mortality was not lowest in the highest level of exercise, but in the minimal or intermediate level of exercise, suggesting that public and clinical efforts may not necessarily need to focus on encouraging people to participate in maximal levels of exercise in order to minimize cancer risk. Since our study merely analyzed the association in exercise, further study is required in order to examine whether the similar J-shape appears in the moderate type of physical activity like active walking, commuting activity, and household chores.

A recent systematic review showed the continuous does-response relations between physical activity and cancer including 35 articles for breast cancer and 19 for colon cancer from the study on Global Ageing and Adult health conducted in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa and US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys [20]. People who achieve total physical activity levels several times higher than 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week as recommended by World Health Organization [6, 21] showed a significant reduction in the risk of cancers studied [17]. Our results showed that individuals who accumulated 150 minutes of exercise per week had substantially lower risks of cancer mortality (i.e. HR=0.70 for all-cause death, HR=0.74 for all-cancer death). Another review study [22] synthesized and summarized evidence from 32 epidemiologic studies that evaluated exercise-cancer mortality associations in cancer patients, and showed significantly lower risks of cancer-specific mortality in cancer patients with higher exercise levels [22]. However, cautious interpretation is required in comparing the results from previously reported study due to the difference in definition between exercise and smoking. Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure, while exercise is a subcategory of physical activity, which is defined as a planned, repetitive, and purposive in the sense that improvement or maintenance of one or more components of physical fitness is an objective [3].

In contrast to the previous study [20], the present study found J-curve associations, showing maximal levels of engagement in exercise were not associated with lowest levels of cancer risk. Additional research using more rigorous methodologies (e.g., repeated measures, objectively measured exercise information) is required to further explore the true associations between exercise and cancer in Asian populations.

The results of our study regarding breast, colorectal and prostate cancer were somewhat different with the results previously reported studies. In our study, breast cancer mortality between women who exercised, compared to those who did not exercise was not statistically significant 1.06 (0.75–1.50). Also, prostate cancer risk among men was not statistically significant (0.62, 0.32-1.50). However, both men and women showed decreased mortality among those who exercised for equal or more than 100 minutes per week. However, while previously reported studies were focusing on breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer and other types of cancer, our study examined the association between exercise and cancer mortality on esophagus, lung, colorectal, and stomach cancer, thereby direct comparison between such studies are limited.

Results in our study generally demonstrated reducing cancer mortality for exercise for the above listed cancers. One thing was clear: 400-minute increase in exercise per week was not consistently associated with decreased mortality risk (Table 4).

A recent epidemiological study on exercise and all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality showed similar results as the present study in terms of identifying J-shaped associations [5, 23]. For example, the largest reduction in the risk of cancer mortality was observed in the middle categories of various running behaviors. As such, a seminal study also provided evidence on extremely high levels of exercise may not provide additional benefits for cardiovascular disease prevention [24]. However, no attention has been paid to disentangling the right amount of exercise for prevention of various types of cancer outcomes, in particular in Asian populations. In the present study using a large-scale prospective cohort of Korean adults, we provided convincing evidence for the first time that engaging in considerably high levels of exercise may not be associated with maximal reductions in risk of various cancer mortality outcomes. More research is clearly needed to confirm the J-shaped associations of various exercise indicators (including physical activity indicators) with each specific cancer outcome in Asian as well as Western populations.

To date, the mechanisms through which greater exercise levels lead to reduced risks of developing different types of cancer have been largely unknown. However, evidence suggests that engaging in exercise can cause favorable changes on body composition, sex hormone levels, systemic inflammation, and immune cell functions, all of which are important predictors of cancer [25]. Several previous studies have been proposed that may explain the mechanisms of reduction in cancer incidence or mortality by exercise [25, 26]. Natural killer cells are the most responsive immune cells to exercise, displaying an acute mobilization to circulation during physical exertion. In general, maximal mobilization of the Natural killer cells is achieved within 30 minutes of endurance training, after which continued exercise does not lead to further increase in Natural killer cell numbers [27].

There are several limitations. Information on exercise was obtained using a self-report method, so there may be measurement errors in the quantification of exercise levels due to recall bias and social desirability [28]. Self-reported activity data are deemed less accurate than objectively measured activity data using accelerometry [29]. However, contemporary accelerometers cannot distinguish exercise from physical activity although they can capture activity intensities. Hence, using self-reports in research (including the present analysis) to assess exercise as opposed to physical activity appears an inevitable, effective methodology. Another limitation is the use of data only from baseline. It is highly likely that individuals’ exercise levels and patterns change over time, but the present study was not able to take into account the variation in exercise in the analyses. Participants were recruited without employing any sampling strategy aimed at collecting a representative sample of adults. Hence, results from the present study may not be generalizable to the whole Korean adult population and adults from other countries. Also the participatns in our study had exercise and smoking data. Although physical activity involves various kinds of domain of physical activity and sedentary behavior which should be included in models to estimate mortality risk, our study only provided information on exercise. Among those who said that they had exercise, those who did not have information of the total duration of exercise per week was approximately 21%, and this might be regarded as an another limitation of our study. Our study also need to be interptreted carefully since those who exercise tend to be more interested in health, and as they are more likely to participate in health screening, they can lead to early detection of disease.

Especially, the longer the exercise period, the more pronounced this trend is. However, studies that have closely examined this mechanism are rare and need to be discussed in further studies.

In conclusion, our study using a sample of over 300,000 Korean adults over 15 years of follow-up demonstrated that individuals who exercised showed considerably lower all-cause and cancer mortality risks than those who did no exercise. However, the associations of weekly exercise or duration with cancer mortality were J-shaped: all-cause and all-cancer death rates in both men and women with 400-minute increase in exercise per week. This observation indicates that risk of cancer mortality was lowest when participating in minimal or moderate levels of exercise, not in the highest level of exercise. Clinical trials and public health policies aimed at reducing cancer risk should encourage individuals to engage in exercise. However, cancer mortality risk may be minimized when such efforts are targeted for sedentary or physically inactive individuals to perform minimal or moderate levels of exercise.