Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9/2018

01.08.2018 | Genetics

Expanded carrier screening: a current survey of physician utilization and attitudes

verfasst von: Allison Briggs, Parvaneh K. Nouri, Michael Galloway, Kathleen O’Leary, Nigel Pereira, Steven R. Lindheim

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) is an available component of preconception and prenatal care. There is complexity around offering, administering, and following-up test results. The goal of this study is to evaluate current physicians’ utilization and attitudes towards ECS in current practice.

Methods

This was a prospective qualitative survey study. A 32-question electronic survey was distributed during a 1-year period to obstetricians-gynecologists who were identified using a Qualtrics listserv database.

Results

While more than 90% of physicians offered ethnic-based carrier screening (CS), ECS was offered significantly less (2010, 20.6%, and 2016, 27.1%). Physicians who were not fellowship-trained in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) preferred ethnic-based carrier screening (95.9 vs 16.8%; P < 0.001). REI subspecialists were more likely to offer ECS (80%) compared to 70% of maternal fetal medicine physicians (MFM). Physicians were comfortable discussing negative results (53.6%) compared to positive results (48.4%). Most physicians (56%) believed that ECS should not be offered until the significance of each disease is understood; 52% believed that testing should be restricted to those conditions important to couples; while 26% felt that testing should be done regardless of the clinical significance.

Conclusions

Discussion and application of ECS has increased in clinical practice. However, lack of comfort with counseling and varying beliefs surrounding ECS continue to hinder its utilization. Further education and training programs, and subsequent evaluation are warranted.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson JL. Choosing the best prenatal screening protocol. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(19):2068–70.CrossRefPubMed Simpson JL. Choosing the best prenatal screening protocol. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(19):2068–70.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaback MM. Population-based genetic screening for reproductive counseling: the Tay-Sachs disease model. Eur J Pediatr;159 Suppl 3:S192–5. Kaback MM. Population-based genetic screening for reproductive counseling: the Tay-Sachs disease model. Eur J Pediatr;159 Suppl 3:S192–5.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cousens NE, Gaff CL, Metcalfe SA, Delatycki MB. Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(10):1077–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cousens NE, Gaff CL, Metcalfe SA, Delatycki MB. Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(10):1077–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee Opinion No. 691. Summary: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):597–9.CrossRef Committee Opinion No. 691. Summary: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):597–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA, Hateley SL, Ganusova EE, Mudge J, et al. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(65):65ra4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA, Hateley SL, Ganusova EE, Mudge J, et al. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(65):65ra4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingsmore S. Comprehensive carrier screening and molecular diagnostic testing for recessive childhood diseases. PLoS Curr. 2012;02:e4f9877ab8ffa9. Kingsmore S. Comprehensive carrier screening and molecular diagnostic testing for recessive childhood diseases. PLoS Curr. 2012;02:e4f9877ab8ffa9.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanner AK, Valencia CA, Rhodenizer D, Espirages M, Da Silva C, Borsuk L, et al. Development and performance of a comprehensive targeted sequencing assay for pan-ethnic screening of carrier status. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16(3):350–60.CrossRefPubMed Tanner AK, Valencia CA, Rhodenizer D, Espirages M, Da Silva C, Borsuk L, et al. Development and performance of a comprehensive targeted sequencing assay for pan-ethnic screening of carrier status. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16(3):350–60.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssens S, Chokoshvili D, Vears D, De Paepe A, Borry P. Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(1):63–71.CrossRefPubMed Janssens S, Chokoshvili D, Vears D, De Paepe A, Borry P. Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(1):63–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau TK. Obstetricians should get ready for expanded carrier screening. BJOG. 2016;123(Suppl 3):36–8.CrossRefPubMed Lau TK. Obstetricians should get ready for expanded carrier screening. BJOG. 2016;123(Suppl 3):36–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins-Haug L, Erickson K, Hill L, Power M, Holzman GB, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women's health. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(8):873–9.CrossRefPubMed Wilkins-Haug L, Erickson K, Hill L, Power M, Holzman GB, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women's health. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9(8):873–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J, Gregg AR, Norton ME, Rose NC, et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):653–62.CrossRefPubMed Edwards JG, Feldman G, Goldberg J, Gregg AR, Norton ME, Rose NC, et al. Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):653–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan MA, Driscoll DA, Mennuti MT, Schulkin J. Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding preconception and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Genet Med. 2004;6(5):450–5.CrossRefPubMed Morgan MA, Driscoll DA, Mennuti MT, Schulkin J. Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding preconception and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Genet Med. 2004;6(5):450–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Janssens S, De Paepe A, Borry P. Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature. J Community Genet. 2014;5(1):13–29.CrossRefPubMed Janssens S, De Paepe A, Borry P. Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature. J Community Genet. 2014;5(1):13–29.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Benn P, Chapman AR, Erickson K, Defrancesco MS, Wilkins-Haug L, Egan JF, et al. Obstetricians and gynecologists’ practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(2):145–52.CrossRefPubMed Benn P, Chapman AR, Erickson K, Defrancesco MS, Wilkins-Haug L, Egan JF, et al. Obstetricians and gynecologists’ practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(2):145–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ready K, Haque IS, Srinivasan BS, Marshall JR. Knowledge and attitudes regarding expanded genetic carrier screening among women’s healthcare providers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):407–13.CrossRefPubMed Ready K, Haque IS, Srinivasan BS, Marshall JR. Knowledge and attitudes regarding expanded genetic carrier screening among women’s healthcare providers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):407–13.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks DJ. Differences in patient screening mammography rates associated with internist gender and level of training and change following the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14(6):749–53.CrossRef Brooks DJ. Differences in patient screening mammography rates associated with internist gender and level of training and change following the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14(6):749–53.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Delgado A, Saletti-Cuesta L, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Gil-Garrido N, Luna Del Castillo Jde D. Gender inequalities in COPD decision-making in primary care. Respir Med. 2016;114:91–6.CrossRefPubMed Delgado A, Saletti-Cuesta L, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Gil-Garrido N, Luna Del Castillo Jde D. Gender inequalities in COPD decision-making in primary care. Respir Med. 2016;114:91–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for Medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat De Wert GM, Dondorp WJ, Knoppers BM. Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues. J Community Genet. 2012;3(3):221–8.CrossRefPubMed De Wert GM, Dondorp WJ, Knoppers BM. Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues. J Community Genet. 2012;3(3):221–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Raz AE, Vizner Y. Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(9):1361–9.CrossRefPubMed Raz AE, Vizner Y. Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(9):1361–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall KP. Has technology introduced new ethical problems? J Bus Ethics. 1999;19(1):81–90.CrossRef Marshall KP. Has technology introduced new ethical problems? J Bus Ethics. 1999;19(1):81–90.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Expanded carrier screening: a current survey of physician utilization and attitudes
verfasst von
Allison Briggs
Parvaneh K. Nouri
Michael Galloway
Kathleen O’Leary
Nigel Pereira
Steven R. Lindheim
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1272-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.