Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2019

13.07.2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center

verfasst von: Jennifer K. Blakemore, Paxton Voigt, Mindy R. Schiffman, Shelley Lee, Andria G. Besser, M. Elizabeth Fino

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the experiences and psychological outcomes of oocyte donors from one fertility center.

Methods

An anonymous survey was distributed via a secure email to 161 donors who underwent oocyte donation—anonymous, directed/known, and recruited agency—between January 2008 and January 2019 at the NYU Langone Fertility Center.

Results

Thirty-six donors completed the survey with the majority between 2 and 10 years since donation. Respondents reported a high prevalence of psychiatric symptoms or diagnoses post-donation. The majority of donors reported positive thoughts and feelings toward their donation process as well as to the knowledge of children born from their donation. Negative comments about donation were in the minority but focused on unexpected aspects about the process or outcome. Based on qualitative analysis, thoughts about family or “family-oriented thoughts” were the most frequent theme in respondent comments. 62.5% of respondents reporting that they would be open to identity-disclosure or open donation after experiencing the process.

Conclusions

Despite a high reported prevalence of psychiatric symptoms, the majority of respondents felt positively about the donation experience as well as the prospect of open donation or identity-disclosure post-donation. Further research on long-term psychological outcomes, related to all aspects of donation, is important as the counseling and informed consent of oocyte donors continues to evolve. These data will be particularly important with regard to the aspect of disclosure, both planned and unplanned, in the modern era of electronic information sharing.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):47–62.CrossRef Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):47–62.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Interests, obligations and rights of donor in gamete donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. 2019. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):664–70.CrossRef Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Interests, obligations and rights of donor in gamete donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. 2019. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):664–70.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Edwards RG. Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(2):279–84.PubMedCrossRef Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Edwards RG. Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(2):279–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodriff M, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):662–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Woodriff M, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):662–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):250–465.CrossRef Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):250–465.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh S, Ilioi EC, Jadva V, Golombok S. The perspective of adolescents conceived using surrogacy, egg or sperm donation. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(6):1099–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zadeh S, Ilioi EC, Jadva V, Golombok S. The perspective of adolescents conceived using surrogacy, egg or sperm donation. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(6):1099–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilioi EC, Golombok S. Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(1):84–96.PubMedCrossRef Ilioi EC, Golombok S. Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(1):84–96.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasch LA. New realities for the practice of egg donation: a family-building perspective. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1194–202.PubMedCrossRef Pasch LA. New realities for the practice of egg donation: a family-building perspective. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1194–202.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari A-M, Soderstrom-Anttila V. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(4):672–8.PubMedCrossRef Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari A-M, Soderstrom-Anttila V. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(4):672–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):455–66.PubMedCrossRef Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):455–66.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenfield DA. The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:265–8.CrossRef Greenfield DA. The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:265–8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Akker OBA, Crawshaw MA, Blyth ED, Frith LJ. Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(1):111–21.PubMedCrossRef van den Akker OBA, Crawshaw MA, Blyth ED, Frith LJ. Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(1):111–21.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper JC, Kennett D, Reisel D. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(6):1135–40.PubMedCrossRef Harper JC, Kennett D, Reisel D. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(6):1135–40.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams KE, Stemmle PG, Westphal LM, Rasgon NL. Mood disorders in oocyte donor candidates: brief report and implications for future research. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):847–52.PubMedCrossRef Williams KE, Stemmle PG, Westphal LM, Rasgon NL. Mood disorders in oocyte donor candidates: brief report and implications for future research. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):847–52.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center
verfasst von
Jennifer K. Blakemore
Paxton Voigt
Mindy R. Schiffman
Shelley Lee
Andria G. Besser
M. Elizabeth Fino
Publikationsdatum
13.07.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01527-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.