Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2018

01.12.2018

Experiences of being diagnosed with osteoporosis: a meta-synthesis

verfasst von: M. J. Rothmann, P. R. Jakobsen, C. M. Jensen, A. P. Hermann, A. C Smith, J. Clemensen

Erschienen in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

This systematic review provides synthesised knowledge and guidance to health professionals on the experiences and perspectives of being diagnosed with osteoporosis from the patient’s point of view. Using individuals’ experiences and meanings can promote tailored and targeted information and guidance on osteoporosis, bone care and treatment at different stages of the osteoporosis trajectory.

Introduction

To be diagnosed with osteoporosis with or without fragility fractures affects individuals differently. The aim of this review was firstly to aggregate existing qualitative evidence regarding an individual’s experience of being diagnosed with osteoporosis at different stages, and secondly, to use a systematic approach to develop a conceptual understanding of central issues relevant for health professionals in order to provide support and guidance to patients/individuals.

Methods

This study used a systematic review methodology and methods for qualitative synthesis as recommended by Cochrane and integrated the findings of qualitative research from eight databases (Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SweMed+, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science) to July 2016. Selection and assessment were performed by three authors while four authors were involved in the analysis. Findings were cross-checked with the original article to ensure consistency with the individual’s accounts.

Results

Our findings have revealed that individuals diagnosed with osteoporosis do not perceive osteoporosis as a biomedical trajectory but as a self-perceived continuum of severity and health. To be diagnosed with osteoporosis affects individuals differently depending on, for example, personal experience, pre-conceived notions of or knowledge about the disease, fragility fractures or pain. Hence, individuals will create a meaning of the diagnosis based on self-perceived fracture risk, self-perceived severity of osteoporosis and at the same time, self-perceived health.

Conclusions

This meta-synthesis provides knowledge for health professionals on the experiences and perspectives of being diagnosed with osteoporosis from the patient’s point of view. The experience, meaning and significance of osteoporosis must be taken into consideration and can be used to promote tailored and targeted information and guidance on osteoporosis, bone care and treatment at different stages of the osteoporosis trajectory.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16(2):134–141CrossRefPubMed Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16(2):134–141CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement 2000;17(1):1–45 Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement 2000;17(1):1–45
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz P, Jorgensen NR, Abrahamsen B (2014) Status of drug development for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin Drug Discovery 9(3):245–253CrossRef Schwarz P, Jorgensen NR, Abrahamsen B (2014) Status of drug development for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin Drug Discovery 9(3):245–253CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston JM, Norris EV, Clark EM (2011) The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. Qual Health Res 21(12):1692–1704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weston JM, Norris EV, Clark EM (2011) The invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. Qual Health Res 21(12):1692–1704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Barkmann R, Gluer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Barkmann R, Gluer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerend MA, Erchull MJ, Aiken LS, Maner JK (2006) Reasons and risk: factors underlying women’s perceptions of susceptibility to osteoporosis. Maturitas 55(3):227–237CrossRefPubMed Gerend MA, Erchull MJ, Aiken LS, Maner JK (2006) Reasons and risk: factors underlying women’s perceptions of susceptibility to osteoporosis. Maturitas 55(3):227–237CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siris ES, Gehlbach S, Adachi JD, Boonen S, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Delmas P, Díez-Pérez A, Hooven FH, LaCroix AZ, Netelenbos JC, Pfeilschifter J, Rossini M, Roux C, Saag KG, Sambrook P, Silverman S, Watts NB, Wyman A, Greenspan SL (2011) Failure to perceive increased risk of fracture in women 55 years and older: the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women (GLOW). Osteoporos Int 22(1):27–35CrossRefPubMed Siris ES, Gehlbach S, Adachi JD, Boonen S, Chapurlat RD, Compston JE, Cooper C, Delmas P, Díez-Pérez A, Hooven FH, LaCroix AZ, Netelenbos JC, Pfeilschifter J, Rossini M, Roux C, Saag KG, Sambrook P, Silverman S, Watts NB, Wyman A, Greenspan SL (2011) Failure to perceive increased risk of fracture in women 55 years and older: the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women (GLOW). Osteoporos Int 22(1):27–35CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballard K (2002) Understanding risk: women's perceived risk of menopause-related disease and the value they place on preventive hormone replacement therapy. Fam Pract 19(6):591–595CrossRefPubMed Ballard K (2002) Understanding risk: women's perceived risk of menopause-related disease and the value they place on preventive hormone replacement therapy. Fam Pract 19(6):591–595CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothmann MJ, Ammentorp J, Bech M, Gram J, Rasmussen OW, Barkmann R, Glüer CC, Hermann AP (2015) Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women’s perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE). Osteoporos Int 26(2):689–697CrossRefPubMed Rothmann MJ, Ammentorp J, Bech M, Gram J, Rasmussen OW, Barkmann R, Glüer CC, Hermann AP (2015) Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women’s perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE). Osteoporos Int 26(2):689–697CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE, Gignac MA, Frankel L, Hawker G, Beaton D, Elliot-Gibson V et al (2012) Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture—a new understanding based on fracture patients’ communication. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2829–2834CrossRefPubMed Sale JE, Gignac MA, Frankel L, Hawker G, Beaton D, Elliot-Gibson V et al (2012) Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture—a new understanding based on fracture patients’ communication. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2829–2834CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sujic R, Gignac MA, Cockerill R, Beaton DE (2013) Factors predictive of the perceived osteoporosis-fracture link in fragility fracture patients. Maturitas 76(2):179–184CrossRefPubMed Sujic R, Gignac MA, Cockerill R, Beaton DE (2013) Factors predictive of the perceived osteoporosis-fracture link in fragility fracture patients. Maturitas 76(2):179–184CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregson CL, Dennison EM, Compston JE, Adami S, Adachi JD, Anderson FA Jr et al (2014) Disease-specific perception of fracture risk and incident fracture rates: GLOW cohort study. Osteoporos Int 25(1):85–95CrossRefPubMed Gregson CL, Dennison EM, Compston JE, Adami S, Adachi JD, Anderson FA Jr et al (2014) Disease-specific perception of fracture risk and incident fracture rates: GLOW cohort study. Osteoporos Int 25(1):85–95CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Thabane L, DeBeer J, Cranney A, Dolovich L et al (2008) Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Thabane L, DeBeer J, Cranney A, Dolovich L et al (2008) Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Giangregorio L, Dolovich L, Cranney A, Adili A, Debeer J, Papaioannou A et al (2009) Osteoporosis risk perceptions among patients who have sustained a fragility fracture. Patient Educ Couns 74(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed Giangregorio L, Dolovich L, Cranney A, Adili A, Debeer J, Papaioannou A et al (2009) Osteoporosis risk perceptions among patients who have sustained a fragility fracture. Patient Educ Couns 74(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rimes KA, Salkovskis PM (2002) Prediction of psychological reactions to bone density screening for osteoporosis using a cognitive-behavioral model of health anxiety. Behav Res Ther 40(4):359–381CrossRefPubMed Rimes KA, Salkovskis PM (2002) Prediction of psychological reactions to bone density screening for osteoporosis using a cognitive-behavioral model of health anxiety. Behav Res Ther 40(4):359–381CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett CL, Redmond NM, Peters TJ, Clarke S, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Shaw ARG (2012) Acceptability of screening to prevent osteoporotic fractures: a qualitative study with older women. Fam Pract 29(2):235–242CrossRefPubMed Emmett CL, Redmond NM, Peters TJ, Clarke S, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Shaw ARG (2012) Acceptability of screening to prevent osteoporotic fractures: a qualitative study with older women. Fam Pract 29(2):235–242CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen D, Huniche L, Brixen K, Sahota O, Masud T (2013) Handling knowledge on osteoporosis—a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 27(3):516–524CrossRefPubMed Nielsen D, Huniche L, Brixen K, Sahota O, Masud T (2013) Handling knowledge on osteoporosis—a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 27(3):516–524CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Reventlow S, Bang H (2006) Brittle bones: ageing or threat of disease exploring women’s cultural models of osteoporosis. Scand J Public Health 34(3):320–326PubMed Reventlow S, Bang H (2006) Brittle bones: ageing or threat of disease exploring women’s cultural models of osteoporosis. Scand J Public Health 34(3):320–326PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Reventlow SD, Hvas L, Malterud K (2006) Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women’s bodily experiences. Soc Sci Med (1982) 62(11):2720–2731CrossRef Reventlow SD, Hvas L, Malterud K (2006) Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women’s bodily experiences. Soc Sci Med (1982) 62(11):2720–2731CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins S (2001) Women with osteoporosis: strategies for managing aging and chronic illness. J Women Aging 13(3):59–77CrossRefPubMed Wilkins S (2001) Women with osteoporosis: strategies for managing aging and chronic illness. J Women Aging 13(3):59–77CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Reventlow SD (2007) Perceived risk of osteoporosis: restricted physical activities? Qualitative interview study with women in their sixties. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(3):160–165CrossRefPubMed Reventlow SD (2007) Perceived risk of osteoporosis: restricted physical activities? Qualitative interview study with women in their sixties. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(3):160–165CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hjalmarson HV, Strandmark M, Klässbo M (2007) Healthy risk awareness motivates fracture prevention behaviour: a grounded theory study of women with osteoporosis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2(4):236–245CrossRef Hjalmarson HV, Strandmark M, Klässbo M (2007) Healthy risk awareness motivates fracture prevention behaviour: a grounded theory study of women with osteoporosis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 2(4):236–245CrossRef
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Barker KL, Toye F, Lowe CJ (2016) A qualitative systematic review of patients’ experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography. Arch Osteoporos 11(1):33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barker KL, Toye F, Lowe CJ (2016) A qualitative systematic review of patients’ experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography. Arch Osteoporos 11(1):33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Torgerson C (2003) Systematic reviews. London: Continuum International Publishing Group Torgerson C (2003) Systematic reviews. London: Continuum International Publishing Group
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Noblit G HR. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies (Qualitative Research Methods) United States of America: Saga Publications, Inc.; 1988 Noblit G HR. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies (Qualitative Research Methods) United States of America: Saga Publications, Inc.; 1988
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J (2012) Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J (2012) Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health O, Risk WHOSGoAoF, its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Assessment of Fracture R, its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal O. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO Study Group. WHO technical report series. 1994:129 s World Health O, Risk WHOSGoAoF, its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Assessment of Fracture R, its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal O. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO Study Group. WHO technical report series. 1994:129 s
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9(8):1137–1141CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9(8):1137–1141CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristiansen KM BN, Tingleff EB, Rossen CB (2008) Litteratursøgning i praksi: begreber, strategier og modeller. Sygeplejersken 108(10) Kristiansen KM BN, Tingleff EB, Rossen CB (2008) Litteratursøgning i praksi: begreber, strategier og modeller. Sygeplejersken 108(10)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Frandsen TF, Dyrvig AK, Christensen JB, Fasterholdt I, Oelholm AM (2014) A guide to obtain validity and reproducibility in systematic reviews. Ugeskr Laeger 176(7) Frandsen TF, Dyrvig AK, Christensen JB, Fasterholdt I, Oelholm AM (2014) A guide to obtain validity and reproducibility in systematic reviews. Ugeskr Laeger 176(7)
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallberg I, Ek AC, Toss G, Bachrach-Lindstrom M (2010) A striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fracture. BMC Nurs 9:7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hallberg I, Ek AC, Toss G, Bachrach-Lindstrom M (2010) A striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fracture. BMC Nurs 9:7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen C, Konradsen H, Abrahamsen B, Pedersen BD (2014) Women’s experiences of their osteoporosis diagnosis at the time of diagnosis and 6 months later: a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 9:22438CrossRefPubMed Hansen C, Konradsen H, Abrahamsen B, Pedersen BD (2014) Women’s experiences of their osteoporosis diagnosis at the time of diagnosis and 6 months later: a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well Being 9:22438CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen DS, Brixen K, Huniche L (2011) Men’s experiences of living with osteoporosis: focus group interviews. Am J Mens Health 5(2):166–176CrossRefPubMed Nielsen DS, Brixen K, Huniche L (2011) Men’s experiences of living with osteoporosis: focus group interviews. Am J Mens Health 5(2):166–176CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE, Ashe MC, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Frankel L (2016) Men’s health-seeking behaviours regarding bone health after a fragility fracture: a secondary analysis of qualitative data. Osteoporos Int 27(10):3113–3119CrossRefPubMed Sale JE, Ashe MC, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Frankel L (2016) Men’s health-seeking behaviours regarding bone health after a fragility fracture: a secondary analysis of qualitative data. Osteoporos Int 27(10):3113–3119CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE, Gignac MA, Hawker G, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Webster F et al (2014) Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk—a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int 25(1):281–288CrossRefPubMed Sale JE, Gignac MA, Hawker G, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Webster F et al (2014) Non-pharmacological strategies used by patients at high risk for future fracture to manage fracture risk—a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int 25(1):281–288CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE, Cameron C, Hawker G, Jaglal S, Funnell L, Jain R et al (2014) Strategies used by an osteoporosis patient group to navigate for bone health care after a fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(2):229–235CrossRefPubMed Sale JE, Cameron C, Hawker G, Jaglal S, Funnell L, Jain R et al (2014) Strategies used by an osteoporosis patient group to navigate for bone health care after a fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(2):229–235CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Johnell O (1999) The burden of osteoporosis. J Endocrinol Investig 22(8):583–588CrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O (1999) The burden of osteoporosis. J Endocrinol Investig 22(8):583–588CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Reventlow SD (2008) Risikoopfattelse og osteoporose hos kvinder i alderen 60–70 år: en kvalitativ undersøgelse af risikooplevelse, kulturelle forestillinger, kropslige opfattelser og kropspraksis. University of Copenhagen Reventlow SD (2008) Risikoopfattelse og osteoporose hos kvinder i alderen 60–70 år: en kvalitativ undersøgelse af risikooplevelse, kulturelle forestillinger, kropslige opfattelser og kropspraksis. University of Copenhagen
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Sale JE, Gignac MA, Hawker G, Beaton D, Frankel L, Bogoch E et al (2016) Patients do not have a consistent understanding of high risk for future fracture: a qualitative study of patients from a post-fracture secondary prevention program. Osteoporos Int 27(1):65–73CrossRefPubMed Sale JE, Gignac MA, Hawker G, Beaton D, Frankel L, Bogoch E et al (2016) Patients do not have a consistent understanding of high risk for future fracture: a qualitative study of patients from a post-fracture secondary prevention program. Osteoporos Int 27(1):65–73CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble H, Smith J (2015) Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 18(2):34–35CrossRefPubMed Noble H, Smith J (2015) Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs 18(2):34–35CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Experiences of being diagnosed with osteoporosis: a meta-synthesis
verfasst von
M. J. Rothmann
P. R. Jakobsen
C. M. Jensen
A. P. Hermann
A. C Smith
J. Clemensen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Elektronische ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0436-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.