Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2014

01.09.2014

Experiences of Work and Sickness Absence in Employees with Depression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

verfasst von: Anna Sallis, Richard Birkin

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose: The experience of employment with depression is explored to develop understanding of the mediators that may influence the management of depression-related sickness absence and improve theoretical understanding. Method: Data were collected from seven semi-structured interviews and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis used to explore the data. Results: Three interrelated themes were drawn from the participants’ accounts: (1) the interaction between depression and work; (2) illness beliefs; and (3) organisational context and depression. The analysis revealed that participants appeared to hold five key perceptions about their depression and work: low control in the workplace; lack of line manager support; diminishing ability to work; the need to address depressive symptoms; and perceptions of depression. Their strength resulted in individuals reaching sickness absence thresholds. The themes and participants’ accounts of their work and sickness absence and return to work behaviour are discussed in relation to relevant theory and evidence to understand how these perceptions and beliefs mediate behaviour. Conclusion: Individuals’ health (illness representations) and work beliefs (outcome expectancies and self-efficacy for work tasks and management of health at work) appear to influence individuals’ sickness absence decisions and experiences and these are mediated by individuals’ experiences of organisational policies, line manager support and the messages and actions of GPs.
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
Das-Munshi J, Goldberg D, Bebbington PE, Dinesh K, Bhugra DK, Traolach S, Dewey ME, Jenkins R, Stewart R, Prince M. Public health significance of mixed anxiety and depression: beyond current classification. B J Psychiatry. 2008;192:171–7.CrossRef
5.
Waddell G, Burton K. Is work good for your health and well-being?. London: The Stationary Office; 2006.
6.
Dietrich S, Deckert S, Ceynowa M, Hegerl U, Stengler K. Depression in the workplace: a systematic review of evidence based prevention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85:1–11.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Furlan AD, Gnam WH, Carnide N, Irvin E, Amick BC III, DeRango K, McMaster R, Cullen K, Slack T, Brouwer S, Bultmann U. Systematic review of intervention practices for depression in the workplace. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:312–21.PubMedCrossRef
8.
van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, de Vet HCW, Franche R-L, Schonstein E, Loisel P, van Mechelen W, Anema JR. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2009, Issue 2. Art. No: CD006955. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006955.​pub2. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.
9.
Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: The Guilford Press; 1979.
10.
11.
Waddell G, Burton K. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. London: The Stationary Office; 2004.
12.
Honey A. Benefits and drawbacks of employment: perspectives of people with mental illness. Qual Health Res. 2004;34:381–95.CrossRef
13.
Irvine A. Managing mental health and employment. Department for Work and Pensions (UK). Research Report 537: 2008b. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 2008.
14.
Michalak EE, Yatham LN, Maxwell V, Hale S, Lam RV. The impact of bipolar disorder upon work functioning: a qualitative analysis. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9:126–43.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Thomas T, Secker J, Grove B. Job retention and mental health: a review of the literature. London: IAHSP; 2002.
16.
Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 51–80.
17.
Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K, editors. Qualitative health psychology: theory and methods. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 218–40.
18.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office (UK). London: Cabinet Office (UK); 2003.
19.
Smith JA. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Langenhove LV, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage Publications; 1996. p. 9–26.
20.
Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000;320:50–2.CrossRef
21.
Michie S, Williams S. Reducing work-related psychological ill-health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:3–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Sanne B, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Moen BE, Tell GS. Testing the job demand-control-support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: the Hordaland Health Study. Occup Med. 2005;55:463–73.CrossRef
23.
Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Quart. 1979;24:285–308.CrossRef
24.
Panatik SA, O’Driscoll MP, Anderson MH. Job demands and work-related psychological responses among Malaysian technical workers: the moderating effects of self-efficacy. Work Stress. 2011;25:355–71.CrossRef
25.
Cohen S, Evans GW, Stokols D, Krantz DS. Behavior, health and environmental stress. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. p. 47–52.CrossRef
26.
27.
Millward L. Understanding occupational and organizational psychology. London: Sage Publications; 2005.
28.
D’Amato A, Zijlstra F. Toward a climate for work resumption: the nonmedical determinants of return to work. JOEM. 2010;52:67–80.PubMed
29.
Munir F, Randall R, Yarker J, Nielsen K. The influence of employer support on employee management of chronic health conditions at work. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:333–44.PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Klein HJ. An integrated control theory model of work motivation. In: Steers RM, Porter LW, Bigley GA, editors. Motivation and leadership at work. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions; 1996. p. 122–37.
32.
Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy: Exercise of control through self-belief. In J.P. Dauwalder, M. Perrez & V. Hobi (Eds). Annual series of European research in behaviour therapy. 1988a; 2:27–59. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
33.
Wood R, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. In: Steers RM, Porter LW, Bigley GA, editors. Motivation and leadership at work. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions; 1996. p. 84–94.
34.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
35.
Labriola M, Lund T, Christensen KB, Albertson K, Bultmann U, Jensen JN, Villadsen E. Does self-efficacy predict return-to-work after sickness absence? A prospective study among 930 employees with sickness absence for three weeks or more. Work. 2007;29:233–8.PubMed
36.
Dean SG, Hudson S, Hay-Smith EJ, Milosavljevic SJ. Rural workers’ experience of low back pain: exploring why they continue to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:395–409.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cooper-Patrick L, Powe NR, Jenckes MW, Gonzales JJ, Levine DM, Ford DE. Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:431–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
38.
Sainsbury R, Davidson J. Routes onto incapacity benefits: Findings from qualitative research. Department for Work and Pensions (UK). Research Report 350. Leeds: Corporate Document Services; 2006.
39.
Sainsbury R, Irvine A, Aston J, Wilson S, Williams C, Sinclair A. Mental health and employment. Department for Work and Pensions (UK). Research Report 513. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 2008.
40.
Simon D, Loh A, Wills CF, Härter M. Depressed patients’ perceptions of depression treatment decision-making. Health Expect. 2006;1:62–74.
41.
Weibe DJ, Korbel C. Defensive denial, affect and the self-regulation of health threats. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 184–203.
42.
Millward LJ, Lutte A, Purvis G. Depression and the perpetuation of an incapacitated identity as an inhibitor of return to work. J Psychiatry Mental Health Nurs. 2005;12:565–73.CrossRef
43.
Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K, Peveler R, Gabbay J, Kendrick T. Qualitative study of depression management in primary care: GP and patient goals, and the value of listening. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007;57:872–9.CrossRef
44.
Rogers A, May C, Oliver D. Experiencing depression, experiencing the depressed: the separate worlds of patients and doctors. JMH. 2001;10:317–33.
45.
Scheier MF, Carver CS. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H, editors. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 184–203.
46.
Prins M, Verhaak P, Bensing J, Van der Meer K. Health beliefs and perceived need for mental health care of anxiety and depression: the patients’ perspective explored. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:1038–58.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Dewa C, Hoch JS, Lin E, Paterson M, Goering P. Pattern of anti-depressant use and duration of depression-related absence from work. B J Psychiatry. 2003;183:507–13.CrossRef
48.
Rost K, Smith JL, Dickinson M. The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity: a randomized control trial. Med Care. 2004;42:1202–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
49.
Schoenbaum M, Unützer J, McCaffrey D, Duan N, Sherbourne C, Wells KB. The effects of primary care depression treatment on patients’ clinical status and employment. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1145–58.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
50.
Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Ther Res. 1992;16:143–63.CrossRef
51.
Hoving JL, van der Meer M, Volkova AY, Frings-Dresen MHW. Illness perceptions and work participation: a systematic review. Int Arch Occ Env Hea. 2010;83:595–605.CrossRef
52.
Boot CRL, Heijmans M, Gulden JWJ, van der Rijken M. The role of illness perceptions in labour participation of the chronically ill. Int Arch Occ Env Hea. 2008;82:13–20.CrossRef
53.
Petrie K, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Roles of patients’ view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study. BMJ. 1996;312:1191–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
54.
Petrie KJ, Cameron L, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after Myocardial Infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:580–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Experiences of Work and Sickness Absence in Employees with Depression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
verfasst von
Anna Sallis
Richard Birkin
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9481-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

The European Cancer and Work Network: CANWON

OriginalPaper

Process Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Care Program for Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Surgery

OriginalPaper

Relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity in patients with Whiplash Associated Disorder

OriginalPaper

Injured Workers’ Assessment of Vocational Rehabilitation Services Before and After Retraining

OriginalPaper

Early Psychologically Informed Interventions for Workers at Risk for Pain-Related Disability: Does Matching Treatment to Profile Improve Outcome?

OriginalPaper

Cost-Utility Analysis of a Collaborative Care Intervention for Major Depressive Disorder in an Occupational Healthcare Setting