Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 7/2021

10.01.2021 | Original Article

Experimental evaluation of the fineness of needle forceps: advantages other than minimal access

verfasst von: Kenta Doden, Noriyuki Inaki, Toshikatsu Tsuji

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Needle forceps are used to limit damage to the abdominal wall in endoscopic surgery; however, few experimental studies have evaluated the fineness and performance of needle forceps. We conducted this study to identify the advantages of needle forceps over conventional 5 mm forceps, focusing on fine grasping and needle control.

Methods

Twenty physicians executed tasks using 5 mm forceps and 2.1 mm small diameter forceps in a laparoscopic experimental setting. First, we timed the execution and recorded the number of drops in a task of grasping and moving grains of rice and red beans. Next, we measured the execution time, looseness of the knot, and the deviation from the stitching point in a suture and ligation task using suture needles with a diameter of 17 or 26 mm.

Results

The needle forceps required a significantly shorter execution time to move the rice grains (37.7 s vs. 45.8 s; p = 0.01) and a significantly higher completion rate (90% vs 20%; p < 0.01). The deviation of the stitching point using the 17 mm needle with needle forceps was significantly smaller than with the 5 mm forceps (0.5 mm vs. 1.0 mm; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Needle forceps are better for procedures requiring fine grasping and enable more accurate small diameter needle control than 5 mm forceps.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. COLOR II study group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, et al. COLOR II study group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39:2734–41.CrossRef Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39:2734–41.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9.CrossRef Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):S1350–6.CrossRef van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):S1350–6.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Doi T, et al. Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy—the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:623–5.CrossRef Watanabe Y, Sato M, Ueda S, Abe Y, Horiuchi A, Doi T, et al. Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy—the first 20 cases: is it an alternative to conventional LC. Eur J Surg. 1998;164:623–5.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:171–9.CrossRef Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:171–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Inaki N. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy: a review, techniques, and perspective. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:1–10.CrossRef Inaki N. Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy: a review, techniques, and perspective. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:1–10.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt J, Sparenberg C, Fraunhofer S, Zirngibl H. Sympathetic nervous system activity during laparoscopic and needlescopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:476–80.CrossRef Schmidt J, Sparenberg C, Fraunhofer S, Zirngibl H. Sympathetic nervous system activity during laparoscopic and needlescopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:476–80.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458–64.CrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458–64.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AC, Haddad MJ, Hanna GB. Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2086–90.CrossRef Lee AC, Haddad MJ, Hanna GB. Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2086–90.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;48:452–8.CrossRef Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;48:452–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo A, Nishizawa Y, Horikiri Y, Amemori H, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, et al. A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the foot-site monitor. Surg Today. 2019;49:965–70.CrossRef Kondo A, Nishizawa Y, Horikiri Y, Amemori H, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, et al. A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the foot-site monitor. Surg Today. 2019;49:965–70.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Firme WA, Carvalho GL, Lima DL, Lopes VG, Montandon ID, Santos Filho F, et al. Low-friction minilaparoscopy outperforms regular 5-mm and 3-mm instruments for precise tasks. JSLS. 2015;19(e2015):00067. Firme WA, Carvalho GL, Lima DL, Lopes VG, Montandon ID, Santos Filho F, et al. Low-friction minilaparoscopy outperforms regular 5-mm and 3-mm instruments for precise tasks. JSLS. 2015;19(e2015):00067.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Araujo SE, Mendes CR, Carvalho GL, Lyra M. Surgeons’ perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2331–8.CrossRef Araujo SE, Mendes CR, Carvalho GL, Lyra M. Surgeons’ perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2331–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishiyama Y, Inaki N, Bando H, Yamada T. Assessment of intracorporeal suturing in single-port surgery using an experimental suturing model. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:137–42.CrossRef Ishiyama Y, Inaki N, Bando H, Yamada T. Assessment of intracorporeal suturing in single-port surgery using an experimental suturing model. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:137–42.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang B, Hou S, Cuschieri SA. Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:46–54.CrossRef Tang B, Hou S, Cuschieri SA. Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21:46–54.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2400–4.CrossRef Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2400–4.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DJ, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Eng AK, Kim HH. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+β lymph node dissection for gastric cancers: report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:e214–6.CrossRef Park DJ, Lee JH, Ahn SH, Eng AK, Kim HH. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+β lymph node dissection for gastric cancers: report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:e214–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanehira E, Tanida T, Kamei A, Nakagi M, Yoshida T, Touma S. Needlescopic intragastric surgery facilitated by newly developed 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:210–4.CrossRef Kanehira E, Tanida T, Kamei A, Nakagi M, Yoshida T, Touma S. Needlescopic intragastric surgery facilitated by newly developed 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:210–4.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamei A, Kanehira E, Nakagi M, Tanida T. Development of scar-less laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP-252) facilitated by new 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:314–8.CrossRef Kamei A, Kanehira E, Nakagi M, Tanida T. Development of scar-less laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP-252) facilitated by new 2 mm instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:314–8.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagaya N, Kubota K. Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:137–43.CrossRef Tagaya N, Kubota K. Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:137–43.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko HJ, Chiang XH, Yang SM, Yang MC. Needlescopic-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomical lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: a bridge between multiportal and uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. Surg Today. 2019;49:49–55.CrossRef Ko HJ, Chiang XH, Yang SM, Yang MC. Needlescopic-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomical lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: a bridge between multiportal and uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. Surg Today. 2019;49:49–55.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1898–902.CrossRef Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1898–902.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan YW, Hollinsky C. Needlescopic surgery versus single-port laparoscopy for inguinal hernia. JSLS. 2015;19:e2015.00056.CrossRef Chan YW, Hollinsky C. Needlescopic surgery versus single-port laparoscopy for inguinal hernia. JSLS. 2015;19:e2015.00056.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SJ, Kim KH, An CH, Kim JS. Innovative technique of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12857–64.CrossRef Kim SJ, Kim KH, An CH, Kim JS. Innovative technique of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12857–64.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Sturla D, Serati M, et al. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. Surg Innov. 2013;20:493–501.CrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Sturla D, Serati M, et al. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. Surg Innov. 2013;20:493–501.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagaya N, Kubota K. Experience with endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy using needlescopic instruments in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:307–9.CrossRef Tagaya N, Kubota K. Experience with endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy using needlescopic instruments in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:307–9.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, MacKinnon T, Najmaldin AS, Yang GZ, et al. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. BJU Int. 2015;116:415–22.CrossRef Cundy TP, Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, MacKinnon T, Najmaldin AS, Yang GZ, et al. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. BJU Int. 2015;116:415–22.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Heo JE, Kang SK, Koh DH, Na JC, Lee YS, Han WK, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: initial experience. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60:326–30.CrossRef Heo JE, Kang SK, Koh DH, Na JC, Lee YS, Han WK, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: initial experience. Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60:326–30.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Experimental evaluation of the fineness of needle forceps: advantages other than minimal access
verfasst von
Kenta Doden
Noriyuki Inaki
Toshikatsu Tsuji
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02224-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

Surgery Today 7/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.