nach oben

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Erschienen in:

01.08.2010 | Professional Issues

Exploring Adoption with Clients: The Need for Adoption Education Within the Genetic Counseling Profession

verfasst von: Cassandra L. Perry, Martha J. Henry

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Genetic counselors and other health professionals may encounter adoption during any counseling session. They must be skilled in using appropriate language and understand how to approach and discuss this topic with clients. A thorough knowledge of adoption as an option for clients facing a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis is necessary when presenting individuals with non-biased information needed for informed decision-making. However, three preliminary studies have demonstrated an absence of graduate education and lack of a professional knowledge base regarding this option (Mates 2008; Oksala 2007; Perry 2003). We discuss the impact of medical professionals’ preconceptions on client decision-making, increasing early identification of fetal anomalies, deficiency of adoption knowledge and resources, and the resulting need for genetic counselors and other health professionals to develop their skills in discussing adoption with clients.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abramsky, L., Hall, S., Levitan, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2001). What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: Interview & questionnaire study. British Medical Journal, 322, 463–466.CrossRefPubMed

Bijma, H. H., Wildschut, H. I. J., van der Heide, A., Passchier, J., Wladimiroff, J. W., & van der Maas, P. J. (2005). Parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of a serious foetal abnormality. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 20, 321–327.CrossRefPubMed

Borders, L. D., Penny, J. M., & Portnoy, F. (2000). Adult adoptees and their friends: Current functioning and psychosocial well-being. Family Relations, 49, 407–418.CrossRef

Brownback, S. (2008). Early help. National Review Online. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://article.nationalreview.com/372485/early-help/sam-brownback.

Canick, J. A., Lambert-Messerlian, G. M., Palomaki, G. E., Neveux, L. M., Malone, F. D., Ball, R. H., et al. (2006). Comparison of serum markers in first trimester Down syndrome screening. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 1192–1199.

Carroll, J. C., Brown, J. B., Reid, A. J., & Pugh, P. (2000). Women’s experience of maternal serum screening. Canadian Family Physician, 46, 614–620.PubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2007). Birth defects: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/faq1.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Reproductive Medicine, & Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. (2007). 2005 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Chaplin, J., Schweitzer, R., & Perkoulidis, S. (2005). Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 151–162.CrossRefPubMed

Cragan, J. D., & Khoury, M. J. (2000). Effect of prenatal diagnosis on epidemiologic studies of birth defects. Epidemiology, 11, 695–699.CrossRefPubMed

Cristofalo, E. A., Dipietro, J. A., Costigan, K. A., Nelson, P., & Crino, J. (2006). Women’s response to fetal choroid plexus cysts detected by prenatal ultrasound. Journal of Perinatology, 26, 215–223.CrossRefPubMed

Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (1997). Benchmark adoption survey: First public opinion survey on American attitudes toward adoption. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/survey/baexec.html.

Finnegan, J. (1993). Shattered dreams—lonely choices: Birthparents of babies with disabilities talk about adoption. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

Garvin, B. J., & Kim, C. J. (2000). Measurement of preference for information in U.S. and Korean cardiac catheterization patients. Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 310–318.CrossRefPubMed

Glidden, L. M. (1990). The wanted ones: Families adopting children with mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), Formed families: Adoption of children with handicaps (pp. 177–205). New York: Haworth.

Hansen, M., Bower, C., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Kurinczuk, J. J. (2005). Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Human Reproduction, 20, 328–338.CrossRefPubMed

Harmon, A. (May 2007). Prenatal test puts Down syndrome in hard focus. New York Times. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/09/us/09down.html.

Helm, D. T., Miranda, S., & Chedd, N. A. (1998). Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Mothers’ reflections on supports needed from diagnosis to birth. Mental Retardation, 36, 55–61.CrossRefPubMed

Henry, M. J., & Pollack, D. (2009). Adoption in the United States: A reference for families, professionals, and students. Chicago: Lyceum Books.

Henry, M., Pollack, D., & Lazare, A. (2006). Teaching medical students about adoption and foster care. Adoption Quarterly, 10, 45–61.CrossRef

Hunt, L. M., de Voogd, K. B., & Castañeda, H. (2005). The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: Does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Education and Counseling, 56, 302–312.CrossRefPubMed

Kaunitz, A. M., Grimes, D. A., & Kaunitz, K. K. (1987). A physician’s guide to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 3537–3541.CrossRefPubMed

Kenen, R. H. (1996). The at-risk health status and technology: A diagnostic invitation and the ‘gift’ of knowing. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 1545–1553.CrossRefPubMed

Kowalcek, I., Huber, G., Bieniakiewitz, I., Lammers, C., Brunk, I., & Gembruch, U. (2003). The influence of gestational age on depressive reactions, stress, and anxiety of pregnant women and their partners in relation to prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24, 239–245.CrossRefPubMed

Lalor, J. G., Devane, D., & Begley, C. M. (2007). Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: Women’s encounters with caregivers. Birth, 34, 80–88.CrossRefPubMed

Levinson, W., Kao, A., Kuby, A., & Thisted, R. A. (2005). Not all patients want to participate in decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 531–535.CrossRefPubMed

Lindh, H. L., Steele, R., Page-Steiner, J., & Donnenfeld, A. E. (2007). Characteristics and perspectives of families waiting to adopt a child with Down syndrome. Genetics in Medicine, 9, 235–240.CrossRefPubMed

Mansfield, C., Hopfer, S., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: A systematic literature review. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 808–812.CrossRefPubMed

Marteau, T. M., & Dormandy, E. (2001). Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106, 185–190.CrossRefPubMed

Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Kirmeyer, S., et al. (2007). Births: Final data for 2005. CDC National Vital Statistics Reports, 56(6), 1–8.

Mates, K. (2008). Adoption and genetic counseling: Assessing the need for adoption education. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2002). Mean age of mother, 1970–2000. CDC National Vital Statistics Reports, 51(1), 1–4.

McCoyd, J. L. (2007). Pregnancy interrupted: Loss of a desired pregnancy after diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28, 37–48.CrossRefPubMed

Michie, S., & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Non-response bias in prospective studies of patients and health care professionals. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 203–212.

National Committee for Adoption. (1985). Adoption factbook: United States data, issues, regulations and resources.

Oksala, C. (2007). Genetic counselors’ experiences with presenting adoption after a prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormality. Unpublished master’s thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA.

Perry, C. (2003). Special needs adoption: A website for parents facing decision and health professionals caring for them. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.

Perry, C. L., & Henry, M. J. (2009). Family and professional considerations for adoptive parents of children with special needs. Marriage and Family Review, 45(5), 538–565.CrossRef

Pryde, P. G., Isada, N. B., Hallak, M., Johnson, M. P., Odgers, A. E., & Evans, M. I. (1992). Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80, 52–56.

Reefhuis, J., Honein, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Correa, A., Hobbs, C. A., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2008). Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Human Reproduction. Advance Access published November 16, 2008, doi:10.1093/humrep/den387.

Reilly, P. R. (2009). Commentary: The federal ‘Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act.’. Prenatal Diagnosis, 29, 829–832.CrossRefPubMed

Rosenthal, J. A., & Groze, V. K. (1994). A longitudinal study of special-needs adoptive families. Child Welfare, 76, 689–706.

Saltvedt, S., Almström, H., Kublickas, M., Valentin, L., & Grunewald, C. (2006). Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation—a randomized controlled trial in 39, 572 pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 664–674.PubMed

Sandelowski, M., & Jones, L. C. (1996). ‘Healing fictions’: Stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal anomalies. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 353–361.CrossRefPubMed

Schuth, W., Karck, U., Wilhelm, C., & Reisch, S. (1994). Parents’ needs after ultrasound diagnosis of a fetal malformation: An empirical deficit analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 124–129.CrossRef

Skotko, B. (2005a). Mothers of children with Down syndrome reflect on their postnatal support. Pediatrics, 115, 62–77.

Skotko, B. (2005b). Prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome: Mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192, 670–677.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, D. K., Shaw, R. W., Slack, J., & Marteau, T. M. (1995). Training obstetricians and midwives to present screening tests: Evaluation of two brief interventions. Prenatal Diagnosis, 15, 317–324.CrossRefPubMed

Strauss, R. P. (2002). Beyond easy answers: Prenatal diagnosis and counseling during pregnancy. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 39, 164–168.CrossRefPubMed

Sullivan, A. (1996). Special needs adoption: Lessons from experience. Children’s Voice. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.casanet.org/library/adoption/special-need.htm.

Susanne, G. O., Sissel, S., Ulla, W., Charlotta, G., & Sonja, O. L. (2006). Pregnant women’s responses to information about an increased risk of carrying a baby with Down syndrome. Birth, 33, 64–73.PubMedCrossRef

Van der Zalm, J. E., & Byrne, P. J. (2006). Seeing baby: Women’s experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis. Journal of Perinatology, 26, 403–408.CrossRefPubMed

Verp, M. S., Bombard, A. T., Simpson, J. L., & Elias, S. (1988). Parental decision following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormality. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 29, 613–622.CrossRefPubMed

Williams, C., Alderson, P., & Farsides, B. (2002). Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Social Science & Medicine, 54, 339–347.CrossRef

Titel: Exploring Adoption with Clients: The Need for Adoption Education Within the Genetic Counseling Profession
verfasst von: Cassandra L. Perry
Martha J. Henry
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9288-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Exploring Adoption with Clients: The Need for Adoption Education Within the Genetic Counseling Profession

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

What Facilitates or Impedes Family Communication Following Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Primary Qualitative Research

Couples’ Attributions for Work Function Changes in Prodromal Huntington Disease

Stigmatization and Male Identity: Norwegian Males’ Experience after Identification as BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Resta Rejoinder to: Taubman’s “Letter to the Editor”

What Do Genetic Counselors Learn on the Job? A Qualitative Assessment of Professional Development Outcomes

Building a Tool to Identify Risk for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals Presenting for Screening Colonoscopy

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie