Zum Inhalt

Exploring non-canonical targets in Alzheimer’s disease: a departure from the norm

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2024
  • Review
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is characterized by neurological impairments such as visual and sensory difficulties, motor dysfunction, sphincter issues, incoordination, gait abnormalities, and cognitive decline. Despite advances in understanding AD pathophysiology and the expansion of therapeutic options over the past three decades, the disease remains incurable. Current therapies, even those specifically targeting AD, often fail to significantly alter its progression, underscoring the need for innovative treatment approaches beyond symptomatic relief. This calls for a re-examination of AD pathology to identify potential therapeutic targets that go beyond conventional strategies. This review highlights four of the most promising non-canonical therapeutic targets: oligodendrocytes, the blood–brain barrier (BBB), neuroimmunometabolism, and the coagulation system. These components are crucial for maintaining the integrity and proper function of neurons and the brain, playing key roles in the progression of AD. Oligodendrocytes, for example, are essential for myelination and neuronal support, while BBB dysfunction can lead to impaired clearance of toxic proteins. Neuroimmunometabolism offers insights into how metabolic processes influence immune responses in the brain and dysregulation of the coagulation system has been linked to increased neuroinflammation and vascular abnormalities in AD. Recent discoveries in these fields provide new avenues for understanding the disease and identifying potential therapeutic targets. By exploring these non-canonical pathways, future research may offer breakthroughs in treating AD, moving beyond symptomatic management towards disease-modifying strategies.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
AD
Alzheimer’s disease
APP
Amyloid precursor protein
Amyloid-β
BBB
Blood–brain barrier
NFTs
Neurofibrillary tangles
DMTs
Disease-modifying medication
mAbs
Monoclonal antibodies
SP
Senile plaques
CAA
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy
VaD
Vascular dementia
CNS
Central nervous system
OPCs
Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
PS1
Presenilin 1
Rs-FC
Resting-state functional connectivity
DHA
Docosahexaenoic acid
EPA
Eicosapentaenoic acid
ApoE
Apolipoprotein E
CypA-MMP-9
Cyclophilin A-matrix metalloproteinase 9
PET
Positron emission tomography
GLUT1
Glucose transporter 1
GLP1
Glucagon-like peptide-1
C3a
Complement component
GLUT1
Glucose transporter 1
GLUT2
Glucose transporter 2
GLUT3
Glucose transporter 3
HIF-1
Hypoxia-inducible factor
NF-κβ
Nuclear factor kappa B
TCA
Tricarboxylic acid cycle
GWAS
Genome-wide association studies
PPAR-γ/PGC-1α
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha
TREM
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells
mTOR
Mammalian target of rapamycin
TLR4
Toll-like receptor 4
ETC
Electron transport chain
ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
NADH
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
FADH2
Flavin adenine dinucleotide
TrKB
Tyrosine receptor kinase B
PrPC
Fibrinogen and cellular prion protein
CXCL-10
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10
CCL2
Chemokine ligand 2
TGF-β
Transforming growth factor-β
EGFR
Endothelin growth factor receptor
HK
Kininogen
VCAM-1
Vascular cell adhesion protein-1
ICAM-1
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
Ca+2
Calcium ion
ROS
Reactive oxygen species
RNA
Reactive nitrogen species
aMCI
Amnestic mild cognitive impairment
PCAD
Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
TPI
Triosephosphate isomerase
GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
PGAM1
Phosphoglycerate mutase I
ER
Endoplasmic reticulum
T2DM
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
uPA
Urokinase plasminogen activator
PAI-1
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
CSF
Cerebrospinal fluid
tPA
Tissue plasminogen activator
NMDA
N-Methyl-D-aspartate
CAA
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy
MCI
Mild cognitive impairment
ERK
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a devastating and progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to cognitive impairment, behavioral disturbances, and ultimately dementia and death [1, 2]. With an estimated 5.3 million people currently affected by AD dementia globally, projections indicate this figure will rise to over 13 million by 2050 [3]. Despite substantial advancements in understanding the pathology and mechanisms underlying AD since its first diagnosis in 1907 [4], there remains no cure. This lack of viable treatments highlights the critical need for innovative approaches beyond conventional therapeutic targets, particularly as the global burden of AD continues to increase.
The predominant hypothesis for AD pathology has long centered on the amyloid cascade theory, which attributes disease progression primarily to the excessive accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, especially Aβ42. These peptides are derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP) and accumulate in the brain due to decreased clearance rates [5]. As Aβ aggregates, it triggers a series of pathological processes, including the hyperphosphorylation of tau, a microtubule-associated protein. This hyperphosphorylation leads to the detachment of tau from microtubules, allowing them to form neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), a key hallmark of AD [6]. These amyloid and tau pathologies contribute to synaptic dysfunction, neuronal death, and cognitive decline. However, despite decades of research on these canonical targets, therapeutic approaches focused solely on Aβ and tau have yielded limited clinical success. Post-mortem neuropathological assessment remains the definitive method for diagnosing AD [7]. Although research continues to explore ways to measure Aβ and tau load in living patients, the disease often remains undetected in its early, asymptomatic stages. AD is characterized by a long preclinical phase, during which individuals may appear cognitively intact but are still harboring significant pathological changes, including Aβ plaque deposition and tau tangle formation [8]. As the disease progresses, patients experience a variety of symptoms, including cognitive decline, visual and sensory disturbances, motor impairments, and sphincter dysfunction. Over time, the illness leads to significant reductions in life expectancy and imposes a tremendous burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Given the limitations of current treatment options, it is increasingly recognized that alternative therapeutic strategies are needed. AD is a multifactorial disease with a complex pathology that goes beyond Aβ and tau accumulation. Neural inflammation, oxidative stress, myelin sheath destruction, oligodendrocyte death, and progressive neuronal degeneration are all key contributors to the disease process [911]. Moreover, research has shown that AD is not confined to changes in the grey matter, which houses neurons, but also involves alterations in white matter and oligodendrocytes, which play a crucial role in maintaining myelin integrity [1214]. The early detection of axonal damage in AD patients indicates future irreversible impairments and the loss of synaptic connections, particularly in the medial temporal lobe and cerebral cortex [15]. While some compensatory mechanisms, such as oligodendrocyte-driven remyelination, can temporarily delay the clinical onset of symptoms, these processes are insufficient to halt disease progression [16]. As AD progresses, the typical cortical processing surrounding Aβ plaques is disrupted, leading to synaptic deterioration, cytoskeletal abnormalities, and atypical regenerative responses in axons [17]. Notably, this early disruption occurs without significant neuronal degeneration, which presents an opportunity for early intervention. Despite the development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) aimed at slowing AD progression, there has been limited success in achieving substantial clinical improvements. Over the last three decades, only four drugs have been approved for AD treatment, and they primarily focus on managing symptoms rather than addressing the underlying pathology [18]. Aducanumab, the first DMT approved for AD, represents a shift toward targeting Aβ plaques, but its clinical efficacy remains a subject of debate [19, 20]. Additionally, other promising DMTs, including Eli Lilly’s donanemab and Eisai’s lecanemab, are currently undergoing clinical trials and regulatory review. While these monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown potential in preclinical studies, their efficacy in clinical settings remains uncertain [21]. Given the limited success of current approaches targeting Aβ and tau, there is a growing recognition of the need to explore alternative, non-canonical therapeutic targets. Emerging research areas suggest that other mechanisms, such as neuroinflammation, blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, and metabolic dysregulation, may play critical roles in the progression of AD. Inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), for instance, is now understood to be a major driver of AD pathology, contributing to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal loss [9]. Additionally, the BBB, which regulates the exchange of molecules between the blood and the brain, becomes increasingly compromised in AD, allowing harmful substances to accumulate and exacerbating neurodegeneration [22, 23]. Another promising area of investigation is neuroimmunometabolism, which examines the relationship between immune cells and metabolic processes in the brain. Dysregulation in these pathways may contribute to the chronic inflammation observed in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Finally, the coagulation system, which plays a key role in maintaining vascular health, has also been implicated in AD. Disruptions in coagulation pathways may lead to cerebrovascular damage, further accelerating the progression of AD [24].
This review aims to highlight recent advancements in these emerging research areas, which have the potential to uncover novel molecular targets for AD therapy. By focusing on non-canonical mechanisms such as oligodendrocyte health, BBB integrity, neuroimmunometabolism, and the coagulation system (Fig. 1), we hope to pave the way for more targeted and effective treatments in the future. These research areas, ranked in decreasing order based on their potential for therapeutic advancements, represent promising new avenues for addressing the complexities of AD beyond Aβ and tau pathology. In doing so, they offer hope for developing disease-modifying treatments that could significantly alter the course of AD and improve patient outcomes.
Fig. 1
Non-canonical targets in AD
Bild vergrößern

Pathophysiology and therapeutics in AD

AD is distinguished by a primary deficit in episodic memory. The presence of this ailment frequently coincides with a variety of intellectual deficits in domains such as organizational skills, speech, visuospatial abilities, and decision-making. Therefore, AD manifests as a gradual decline in cognitive abilities, particularly impairing the individual's capacity for making decisions [25]. On average, individuals diagnosed with AD have a survival period ranging from 7 to 10 years. Furthermore, it is important to note that there is presently no definitive diagnosis for this particular illness prior to death. The existence of senile plaques (SP), neurofibrillary tangles, and synaptic loss can only be confirmed via histological examination after death. This poses significant challenges in terms of early detection and intervention [14, 26].
SP is a well-established neuropathological characteristic seen in brains afflicted by AD and continues to be a plausible source of synaptic and neuronal degeneration. SP arises from a gradual buildup of Aβ inside the parenchyma [27].
The intricate process of Aβ formation from the APP via β- and γ-secretase complexes holds crucial significance in AD. The amyloidogenic pathway’s heightened activity in AD, potentially influenced by genetic irregularities in APP or β-secretase, underscores their role in initiating this pathological cascade [28]. Despite linking most AD cases to mutations in APP and β-secretase, the root causes of dementia largely remain elusive. [29]. This mystery is compounded by the fact that 96% of dementia cases are sporadic, lacking identifiable genetic alterations. Individuals affected by these cases exhibit Aβ accumulation without clear underlying changes, highlighting the complexity of dementia’s etiology and necessitating deeper exploration beyond identified genetic factors [30].
Hence, it has been postulated that changes in the breakdown or clearance of Aβ may also have a pivotal influence on the etiology of AD. The detrimental impacts of Aβ, as shown in both human subjects and experimental animals, include a spectrum of effects ranging from freely dispersed oligomers to densely aggregated SP [31, 32]. Various forms of Aβ have been linked to synaptic deterioration and the emergence of neuritic dystrophies. Moreover, some studies have posited that the aggregation of Aβ, similar to SP, could possibly play a role in the decline of dendritic spines [32]. Furthermore, it has been shown that senile compact plaques are linked to the atypical curvature of adjacent neurites and have the potential to disrupt cortical synaptic integration. There has been a suggestion that the presence of Aβ alone may have the ability to induce neuronal cell death in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex during the progression of AD. Furthermore, these regions have significant relevance in the processes of learning and memory, rendering them very susceptible to the impact of this ailment.
Aβ deposition is seen in the cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) context, which is prevalent among the majority of individuals with AD [33, 34]. This deposition leads to the degradation or disruption of the BBB, hence impacting its overall performance. However, CAA may also manifest independently of AD, hence potentially serving as an indicator of vascular dementia (VaD) [34].
The deposition of Aβ pathology occurs prior to the occurrence of another significant neuropathological characteristic of AD, which involves the hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles. Tau is a protein that is closely connected with microtubules and is highly expressed in the brain. It interacts with tubulin, facilitating the formation of microtubules. It provides support to various cytoskeletal structures and has a regulatory role in several key activities inside neurons. The involvement of tau protein in the pathophysiology of AD is significant, since its aberrant phosphorylation leads to its accumulation as intraneuronal deposits. These deposits manifest as filamentous aggregates in the soma and proximal dendrites [35].

Oligodendrocytes in AD

Myelin, a multilayered membrane formed by specialized glial cells called mature oligodendrocytes, wraps around the axons of most neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). This essential structure is pivotal for the proper functioning of neural circuits, enhancing the transmission of nerve impulses through a process known as saltatory conduction. The efficient transmission of signals along myelinated axons is crucial for cognitive processes, motor functions, and overall neural communication. Oligodendrocytes originate from precursor cells known as oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) [36]. The transition from OPCs to mature oligodendrocytes involves several stages: proliferation, migration, and differentiation. This intricate process results in the insulation of neuronal axons, allowing for rapid and efficient signal transmission [37]. In the context of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly AD, the remodeling and integrity of myelin become increasingly critical. AD is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, which disrupt normal neuronal function and communication. Changes in myelin and oligodendrocyte function have been shown to play a significant role in the pathophysiology of AD. Studies suggest that alterations in myelin may contribute to the clinical manifestations and cognitive decline associated with the disease [38]. The myelin sheath is primarily composed of lipids, accounting for about 40% of CNS lipids. The lipid composition includes approximately 50% phospholipids, 40% glycolipids, and 10% cholesterol and cholesterol esters, along with polyunsaturated long-chain fatty acids [39]. Cholesterol, which is synthesized mainly by oligodendrocytes from ketone bodies, is critical for maintaining the structural integrity of myelin. It modulates the fluidity and permeability of the axonal membrane, thus influencing the rate of myelination and the overall health of the CNS. Notably, the predominant lipids in myelin—such as galactosyl ceramides and sulfatides—are essential for its stabilization and organization [39]. Research on the structural characteristics of the myelin sheath in AD has utilized advanced imaging techniques, including electron microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in both animal models and human subjects. For instance, the 5XFAD mouse transgenic model, which harbors multiple mutations in the APP and presenilin 1 (PS1) genes, exhibits amyloid deposits and synaptic deficits as early as 1.5 months of age [40]. Furthermore, myelin abnormalities in this model can be detected even earlier, coinciding with the onset of spatial memory deficits around 1 month of age [41]. In humans, studies have revealed a significant correlation between myelin abnormalities and the clinical manifestations of AD. Neuroimaging has shown that myelination irregularities occur in critical brain regions, particularly the hippocampus and corpus callosum—areas integral to memory and cognitive function [4244]. The presence of conformational anomalies and thinning of the myelin sheath often precede the appearance of axonal lesions, suggesting a possible link to demyelination. During the preclinical phase of AD, MRI studies reveal changes in both longitudinal and transverse relaxation times, alongside increased myelin hydration levels [45]. Irregularities in white matter structure are frequently observed across various forms of AD, potentially indicating a progressive disease process [46]. Differences in T1-weighted/T2-weighted ratios have been documented between patients at risk and healthy controls, suggesting that early changes in myelin may reflect underlying pathological processes [47]. Several studies have linked myelin structural abnormalities to autoimmune disorders and the concentrations of Aβ1-42 peptides in affected individuals [48, 49]. The evaluation of cortical layer arrangements provides insights into the extent of deterioration, complementing volumetric atrophy data [42, 50]. MRI scans have revealed increased density areas in white matter corresponding to abnormalities associated with amyloid peptides and tau proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These changes at the histological level suggest alterations in myelin structure, potentially influenced by factors such as iron ion accumulation [51]. Furthermore, diminished vascularization and oxygen delivery in hyper-dense regions are associated with axonal lesions, inflammatory responses, and disrupted blood–brain barrier permeability, culminating in micro-hemorrhagic structures [52]. Given the crucial role of oligodendrocytes and myelin in maintaining healthy neural communication, therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing the function of OPCs may hold promise for addressing myelin deficits in AD. Recent studies indicate that antimuscarinic drugs, such as clemastine fumarate and benzatropine, can promote the differentiation of OPCs into mature oligodendrocytes capable of myelination. This effect has been observed both in vitro and in vivo, mediated through interactions with cholinergic receptors on OPCs [53, 54]. Additionally, the Piezo 1 receptor, involved in mechanosensory signaling, may also play a role in OPC behavior. Pharmacological inhibition of this receptor could create a niche environment conducive to OPC rejuvenation, potentially enhancing myelination in vivo [55]. Beyond receptor modulation, the mTOR signaling pathway has been recognized as a critical regulator of OPC development. The small molecule LY294002 has shown promise as a transcriptional regulator within this pathway, rejuvenating aged OPCs by promoting a more receptive state [56].
The synthesis, wrapping, and maintenance of myelin require substantial energy and nutrient supplies [57]. Thus, oligodendrocytes have distinct nutritional prerequisites to sustain their myelination capabilities. Nutrient-based interventions for myelination aim to provide direct substrates for myelin sheath construction and maintain energy supply, ensuring optimal metabolic conditions for oligodendrocytes. Adequate provision of macro and micronutrients is essential for the manufacture and maintenance of myelin, enabling oligodendrocytes to build complex and extensive membrane structures [58]. Specialized dietary formulations and individual nutrients have demonstrated positive effects on white matter health following damage or demyelination. One notable nutritional supplement, Fortasyn® Connect, contains key nutrients such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), uridine monophosphate, choline, phospholipids, and several vitamins (B6, B12, C, E), folic acid, and selenium [59]. Developed to support synapse development in AD patients, Fortasyn® Connect has been shown to exert protective effects on cognitive performance in individuals with mild AD [60, 61]. Moreover, it has demonstrated neuroprotective properties in AD models, likely related to enhanced phospholipid metabolism and the preservation of oligodendrocyte populations following white matter damage [62, 63]. Given the potential for certain nutrients to support white matter maintenance, research into other beneficial compounds is warranted. Nutrients such as sphingomyelin [64], vitamins K and D [65], and taurine [66] have shown promise in protecting white matter from injury or demyelination. While the benefits of nutritional support in healthy aging remain speculative, there is substantial evidence indicating that dietary interventions can positively influence white matter repair and cognitive function in contexts related to white matter pathology. The role of white matter in facilitating communication between different brain regions cannot be overstated. It coordinates a range of activities, including neuronal signaling, cognitive processes, proprioception, motion coordination, and sensory transmission. Despite the limited research on oligodendrocyte function concerning brain aging, significant advancements have been made in identifying both internal and external factors influencing oligodendrocyte activity in aging brains. White matter degeneration throughout the aging process is widely recognized as a significant contributor to cognitive decline and reduced independence in later life. Future research can enhance our understanding of white matter ageing, which may lead to strategies aimed at preserving its functions by leveraging the adaptable properties of the oligodendrocyte lineage. Investigating the various factors contributing to the diminished regenerative capacity of white matter in ageing is ongoing. However, the CNS retains substantial capabilities for myelin regeneration. This assertion is supported by studies of individuals with AD, which indicate that significant myelin regeneration can occur even in advanced disease stages.
Overall, targeted treatments to promote myelin preservation in the ageing population may be crucial for maintaining white matter functions vital for optimal cognitive performance. Given the interplay between oligodendrocyte health, myelin integrity, and cognitive function in AD, further exploration into therapeutic strategies that enhance oligodendrocyte activity and myelin repair could provide valuable insights into managing this complex disease (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Multiple disease etiologies related to neuronal cells. (There are several causes and numerous cellular interactions involved in the development of AD. Harmful proteinopathies, particularly amyloid peptides, need to be incorporated into the intricate cellular milieu of the brain. The presence of several biological components contributes to the gradual and widespread deterioration of nerve cells, resulting in the irreversible symptoms of AD. This phenomenon occurs when the mechanisms responsible for eliminating hazardous peptides become overburdened, and it becomes noticeable only after a prolonged time of incubation. Modified neurons exhibit periods of reduced and increased excitability, along with impairments in the transportation of axons and synaptic activity, which impact the process of myelination/remyelination and the nourishment of oligodendrocytes. These cells are very susceptible to harm and their concentration declines significantly as one gets older. There seems to be a correlation between the level of neuronal participation and the degree of demyelination. This is particularly emphasized in AD, when there seems to be a lack of effective remyelination mechanisms. Astrocytes have a role in removing dysfunctional neurons and synapses. They play an active role in removing aberrant proteins and reducing inflammation. Similarly, the activation of microglia helps in the process of engulfing cellular waste. Similarly, these cells contribute to the initiation of the innate immune responses, the activation of the complement system, and the release of inflammatory cytokines.)
Bild vergrößern

The blood–brain barrier target

AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss, and alterations in behavior. One of the hallmark features of AD is the accumulation of Aβ plaques, which are linked to neuroinflammation and neurovascular dysfunction. Recent research has illuminated the critical role of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in AD pathology, revealing that 80–85% of Aβ types are normally eliminated by the BBB [67]. However, emerging evidence suggests that disruptions in the BBB may serve as early indicators of neurodegenerative conditions, including AD as shown in Fig. 3 [68, 69]. Neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have greatly advanced our understanding of the BBB's role in AD. These technologies allow for the observation of functional and molecular alterations in the brain associated with AD progression [70, 71]. Animal models of AD, alongside post-mortem human studies, have further highlighted significant changes that occur throughout various brain regions during the disease process [7274]. The development of advanced brain imaging methods has significantly enhanced our capacity to detect alterations in blood vessels and the corresponding changes in cerebral blood flow. For instance, Kisler and colleagues (2017) demonstrated how sophisticated imaging can track these vascular changes, providing vital insights into the mechanisms by which cerebrovascular dysfunction contributes to neurodegeneration [23]. Additionally, molecular ligands, such as Aβ and tau, along with glucose and P-glycoprotein analogues like 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-verapamil, facilitate in vivo monitoring of BBB transporters and receptor proteins [70]. These advancements have led to a deeper understanding of how dysfunction in cerebral blood vessels relates to neurodegenerative disorders. Recent studies employing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI have confirmed the collapse of the BBB, revealing heightened gadolinium leakage in individuals with early AD, particularly in both white and grey matter [22]. This breach of the BBB has been substantiated by quantifying the accumulation of neurotoxic proteins derived from the bloodstream, including fibrinogen, thrombin, albumin, and immunoglobulin G (IgG). These proteins have been found to co-localize with Aβ deposits in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of post-mortem brain tissues [75]. Furthermore, the presence of peripheral immune cells, such as macrophages [76] and neutrophils [77], indicates that BBB disruption allows for increased migration of immune cells from the periphery into the brain, amplifying neuroinflammatory responses. The disruption of the BBB in AD is further compounded by various molecular alterations linked to impaired vascular function. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) has emerged as a prominent genetic risk factor for AD, with the presence of the APOE ε4 allele associated with numerous detrimental effects, including BBB disruption, reduced cerebral blood flow, neuronal death, and impaired cognitive function, irrespective of Aβ presence [22, 73]. Research has indicated that activation of the cyclophilin A-matrix metalloproteinase 9 (CypA-MMP-9) pathways in pericytes of APOE ε4 knock-in mice leads to the degradation of tight junction proteins, such as ZO-1 and occludin, mediated by matrix metalloproteinase 9 [22, 78]. Moreover, the glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), which is crucial for glucose transport across the BBB, exhibits significantly decreased levels in brain capillaries affected by AD [79]. Alterations in glucose metabolism are observed to precede neuronal impairment in both human subjects and transgenic models of AD [70, 72]. PET imaging has been employed to quantify concentrations of radio-labelled glucose analogues, revealing significant metabolic dysfunction associated with AD. Emerging therapeutic strategies are exploring the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, such as liraglutide, to address cognitive decline in AD. Research has shown that liraglutide can successfully delay memory decline in mouse models of AD [80] and may have protective effects in humans with obesity and type 2 diabetes [81]. Recent findings indicate that GLP-1 receptor agonists may help prevent the decline of glucose transport across the BBB in patients with AD [82]. While the exact mechanisms remain unclear, it is hypothesized that these agents may enhance GLUT1 levels at the BBB [83]. Data from controlled studies have suggested that individuals with type 2 diabetes receiving GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy experience a decreased incidence of dementia [82]. Furthermore, a phase IIb clinical study demonstrated positive effects of liraglutide on cognitive performance and MRI volume in individuals with mild-to-severe AD [84]. A phase III randomized controlled study is currently underway to assess the efficacy of semaglutide in individuals with early AD (NCT04777396, Novo Nordisk A/S). Historically, the central nervous system (CNS) was considered an immunologically privileged site due to the protective nature of the BBB. However, this view has evolved, and the immune system is now recognized as a key player in the pathogenesis of AD [85]. Microglia, the resident immune cells in the CNS, are central to the neuroinflammatory response associated with AD. They actively monitor the brain environment and become activated in response to cellular damage or pathogen invasion. In the context of AD, microglial activation occurs near Aβ deposits, initiating an innate immune response characterized by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemotactic proteins that can influence peripheral immune cell dynamics. Despite the well-documented role of microglia in AD, the precise mechanisms governing their interactions with other cellular components and their contributions to disease pathology remain poorly understood. Some immune cells exert their effects locally within the brain, while others may act from distant sites [86]. Uncontrolled neuroinflammation, triggered by microglial activity in response to Aβ, can further compromise BBB integrity [87]. The interplay between vascular dysfunction and neuroinflammation is particularly relevant in AD. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, associated with Aβ accumulation, exacerbate vascular dysfunction. The presence of Aβ and its lipid carrier ApoE, both encoded by genes linked to AD susceptibility, contributes to a vicious cycle that hinders Aβ clearance by microglial and astrocytic cells, leading to endothelial cell degeneration [88]. The activation of pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells by Aβ peptides has been shown to worsen BBB integrity through the induction of vasoactivity [89]. In AD mouse models, reactive oxygen species trigger the release of endothelin-1, leading to pericyte contraction and subsequent capillary constriction, which ultimately reduces cerebral blood flow. Evidence of vascular inflammation in AD patients is accumulating, with studies reporting elevated levels of adhesion molecules associated with endothelial activation, including vascular cell adhesion protein-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and P-selectin in plasma samples [90, 91]. Recent investigations have advanced our understanding of how vascular inflammation impacts BBB permeability, highlighting the role of complement components in modulating inflammatory responses in both elderly and transgenic mice [92]. The tau protein is another critical player in AD pathophysiology and BBB integrity. Under normal conditions, tau functions to stabilize microtubules, essential for intracellular transport in CNS cells. In tauopathies like AD, tau undergoes post-translational modifications such as hyperphosphorylation and truncation, leading to its aggregation into neurofibrillary tangles. This aggregation not only disrupts neuronal function, but also activates glial cells, prompting an inflammatory response that alters BBB structure and function. This inflammatory cascade can enhance tau hyperphosphorylation and promote neurofibrillary tangles' formation, creating a detrimental feedback loop [93]. In conclusion, the intricate relationship between the BBB, neuroinflammation, and metabolic dysfunction underscores the multifaceted nature of AD pathology. Disruptions in the BBB facilitate neuroinflammatory processes and neuronal damage, while metabolic alterations, such as impaired glucose transport, further exacerbate cognitive decline. Ongoing research into therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists, holds promise for modifying disease progression and improving outcomes for individuals affected by AD.
Fig. 3
Involvement of blood–brain barrier in healthy brain and AD brain. (BBB plays a crucial role in maintaining a healthy brain and is implicated in AD. The question of whether it is a cause or effect of the illness has been a subject of controversy. Existing research suggests that disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) occurs early on before the development of AD pathology [94].)
Bild vergrößern

Neuroimmunometabolism in AD

AD is characterized by a complex interplay of pathologic features, primarily the accumulation of extracellular Aβ plaques and the formation of intracellular neurofibrillary tau tangles. Despite extensive research and the development of therapies targeting these hallmark pathologies, clinical trials have often yielded disappointing results, indicating that additional cofactors may significantly influence disease progression [95, 96]. Recent studies have increasingly focused on the relationship between inflammatory processes, immunometabolism, and the amyloid and tau pathologies observed in AD models [97, 98]. There is a growing consensus that metabolic disruptions are crucial in mediating microglial-induced neuroinflammation. For instance, Devanney and colleagues (2020) reported that such metabolic dysfunction could significantly contribute to the neuroinflammatory processes underlying AD [99].
One notable aspect of this metabolic disruption is the age-related decline in glucose metabolism in the brain, termed hypometabolism. This decline has been associated with cognitive impairments in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and AD as shown in Fig. 4 [100, 101]. Furthermore, studies by Schilling and colleagues (2019) indicated that hypometabolism correlates with Aβ deposition and white matter disruption, which can exacerbate cognitive decline [102]. There exists a significant relationship between glucose hypometabolism in AD brains and dysregulation of mitochondrial calcium in neurons, potentially leading to neuronal death [103]. Moreover, the presence of Aβ peptides in mitochondria has been suggested as a factor contributing to neuronal death [104]. Interestingly, limited evidence points to hypometabolism being associated with altered homeostasis of glucose transporters. Specifically, GLUT1 and GLUT3 levels are diminished in the cerebral cortex, while GLUT2 levels increase, presumably as a compensatory mechanism for reduced ATP production [105].
Fig. 4
Schematic diagrams of the biochemistry of glucose catabolism and ATP synthesis and their oxidative dysfunction in AD and aMCI brains. (Glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and the electron transport chain (ETC) collaborate to break down glucose and facilitate the production of ATP via the ATP synthase complex. The ETC is specifically located on the inner mitochondrial membrane. The electron transport chain (ETC) is shown, with complexes I to IV. Additionally, the image displays ATP synthase, where the α-chain undergoes oxidative modifications in the brains of individuals affected by AD. In summary, this image illustrates the conversion of glucose to pyruvate via the process of glycolysis. Pyruvate undergoes conversion to acetyl-CoA, which then enters the TCA cycle. The reducing equivalents (NADH and FADH2) produced during glycolysis and the TCA cycle are then used in the mitochondrial ETC. The inner mitochondrial membrane is not permeable to NADH. As a result, the malate-aspartate shuttle is used to produce NADH in the matrix. This is achieved by transferring NADH from the cytosol to the matrix, where it is used to convert oxygen to water. This process generates a proton gradient in the intermembrane space of the mitochondria, which is then used to drive ATP synthesis. Figure 4 shows dashed lines to indicate reactions that are catalyzed by specific enzymes or enzyme complexes that have been identified as oxidatively damaged in the brain of individuals with AD and aMCI. These damaged enzymes are likely to be dysfunctional.)
Bild vergrößern
Experimental models of AD have revealed the roles of astrocytes and microglia in disrupting metabolic processes. Exogenous Aβ has been shown to reduce GLUT1 levels, thereby impairing glycolytic capacity in cultured astrocytes derived from transgenic AD mice. This impairment hampers both glucose uptake and lactate production [106]. Additionally, calcium dysregulation within astrocytes can activate pro-inflammatory regulators through NF-κB and HIF-1 pathways, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) [107109]. These findings underscore the importance of glucose metabolism in conjunction with inflammation in the pathophysiology of AD.
Inflammatory stimuli, such as exogenous Aβ or lipopolysaccharides (LPS), have also been shown to reduce the oxidative metabolism of macrophages and microglia. This is accomplished through the activation of inflammatory cascades, resulting in inefficient metabolic glycolysis [110, 111]. Notably, a study involving a 76-year-old subject demonstrated a 28% decrease in TCA-cycle activity in neurons, while astrocytic TCA-cycle activity increased by 30% compared to a 26-year-old subject, highlighting alterations in neuro-glial metabolic flux [112].
In addition to these metabolic shifts, cultured microglia from APP/PS1 mice (a transgenic AD model) exhibited disrupted phagocytosis and chemotactic activity alongside elevated glycolytic rates, indicating a neuroimmunomodulatory phenotype that may affect AD pathophysiology [97].
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genetic risk factors associated with AD, notably variations in the APOE4, TREM2, and TLR4 genes. These genes, which are implicated in metabolic processes, are primarily expressed in microglia. For instance, the APOE gene has been shown to influence Aβ peptide production in transgenic AD mice via astrocytic cholesterol [113, 114]. The APOEε4 allele, in particular, is associated with a significantly heightened risk of developing AD, with homozygous carriers facing up to a 15-fold increased risk [100, 115, 116]. PET scans of young individuals carrying the APOEε4 allele revealed reduced glucose metabolism in the cerebral cortex, mirroring patterns observed in older AD patients [100, 117]. Furthermore, Ding and colleagues (2013) reported that hexokinase, a crucial enzyme in glucose metabolism, was downregulated in the brains of APOEε4 carriers compared to those with APOEε2 or APOEε3 alleles [118]. This downregulation led to impaired glucose metabolism, linked to the suppression of the PPAR-γ/PGC-1α signaling pathway, which is associated with AD pathogenesis [119, 120]. TREM2, another key player in AD, is expressed on microglia and has been shown to bind Aβ oligomers, facilitating the clearance of amyloid peptides from the healthy brain. Functional mutations or deficiencies in TREM2 have been linked to increased AD risk [121, 122]. Recent research demonstrated that TREM2 deficiency results in elevated cholesterol ester levels, exacerbating inflammation and burdening microglial phagocytic functions [123]. Microglia from TREM2 − / − /5XFAD mice displayed decreased glycolysis and ATP synthesis, coupled with increased autophagy, due to mTOR signaling pathway malfunctions [124]. The impairment of TREM2-mTOR signaling in AD patients correlates with fewer activated microglial cells surrounding amyloid plaques. Additionally, TREM2 knockout has been shown to elevate tau phosphorylation, leading to microglial activation in AD mice. Surprisingly, TREM2 haploinsufficiency exacerbates tau pathology and inflammatory responses more than full TREM2 knockdown in tauopathy models, indicating a nuanced role for TREM2 in regulating neuroinflammation [125, 126].
Hypoxia signaling pathways have also been implicated in the metabolic disturbances and pro-inflammatory states characteristic of AD [127, 128]. TLR4, in particular, has been highlighted for its role in the immunometabolism of Aβ-treated microglial cells via the mTOR-HIF-1α hypoxia signaling pathway. Aβ induces mTOR phosphorylation and HIF-1α production in primary microglia, activating pro-inflammatory pathways [128]. Increased mTOR-HIF-1α signaling correlates with reduced oxygen consumption and elevated extracellular acidification rates, significantly altering the glycolytic balance in these cells [124]. These observations underscore a critical neuroimmunometabolic imbalance associated with lipid and sugar metabolism that likely contributes to the pathophysiological condition’s characteristic of AD.
In conclusion, the multifaceted interactions between neuroinflammation, immunometabolism, and genetic factors underscore the complexity of AD. The intricate relationship between metabolic disruptions and inflammatory processes offers valuable insights into the pathogenesis of AD and highlights potential therapeutic avenues. Continued exploration of these interconnected pathways may pave the way for innovative strategies to mitigate the progression of this devastating disease. Understanding the roles of specific genes and metabolic alterations, particularly in microglia and astrocytes, could lead to targeted interventions aimed at restoring metabolic balance and reducing neuroinflammation in AD patients. This holistic approach may ultimately enhance our ability to treat and manage AD more effectively.

The fibrinolytic system in AD

AD is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of Aβ plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, neuroinflammation, and progressive cognitive decline. Recent research has illuminated the significant role of the fibrinolytic system, particularly fibrinogen, in the pathogenesis of AD. The fibrinolytic system is crucial for maintaining healthy blood vessel function and regulating fibrin formation, which is vital for various biological processes such as wound healing, tissue remodeling, and inflammation [129131]. The fibrinolytic system consists of several key proteins, including plasminogen, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Plasminogen is activated into plasmin by serine proteases like tPA and uPA. The plasmin produced plays a critical role in dissolving fibrin clots, which helps to prevent excessive blood clot formation that can obstruct blood flow and lead to tissue damage. Fibrinogen, a key component of the fibrinolytic system, is particularly noteworthy for its interactions with cellular prion protein (PrPC) in the context of neuroinflammation. The binding of fibrinogen to PrPC results in the overexpression of tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB) in astrocytes, which subsequently leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) [132, 133]. These molecules induce oxidative stress, which has been implicated in neurodegeneration. Furthermore, when fibrinogen binds to receptors on astrocytes such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) or PrPC, it triggers the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, CXCL-10, and CCL2. This cascade of events ultimately results in oxidative stress and the death of astrocytes [134]. Fibrinogen also can transport an inactive form of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), which becomes activated upon interaction with astrocytes. This process can contribute to the inflammatory environment observed in AD. Research has demonstrated that fibrinogen inhibits neurite development by acting as a ligand for the β3 integrin receptor on neurons. This interaction not only prevents neurite outgrowth, but also causes the phosphorylation and aggregation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), further inhibiting neurite development [135]. The implications of these findings suggest that fibrinogen's effects on neuronal development are detrimental, particularly in the context of AD, where synaptic loss is a critical feature. Moreover, fibrinogen directly interacts with neurons, activating the NF-κB transcription factor and promoting the overexpression of inflammatory cytokines such as CCL2 and IL-6. This results in an amplified neuroinflammatory response, further exacerbating neuronal damage [134]. The stimulation of ROS, nitrite, and mitochondrial superoxide production in neurons leads to increased oxidative stress, ultimately resulting in apoptosis and neuronal cell death [134]. Co-culture studies have indicated that fibrinogen-induced astrocyte activation leads to increased neuronal apoptosis, demonstrating the interconnected nature of astrocytic and neuronal health [133, 134]. Notably, inhibiting the actions of ICAM-1 or PrPC may reduce the detrimental effects of fibrinogen on neurons, offering potential therapeutic targets.
In recent years, neuroinflammation has emerged as a crucial factor in the development and progression of AD. A well-established hallmark of AD is the accumulation of fibrinogen in the brain, particularly around cerebral blood vessels. This accumulation is frequently associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy and is linked to changes in perivascular brain tissue [24, 76, 136]. Key pathological features of AD, including amyloid plaque formation, microglial activation, pericyte loss, and dystrophic neurites, are closely associated with fibrinogen deposition [24, 75, 89, 137]. Elevated fibrinogen levels have been observed in the plasma and CSF of AD patients, and these levels correlate with brain atrophy [138]. The leakage of fibrinogen into the brain parenchyma can result in fibrin deposition, which is associated with neurodegeneration and may negatively impact cognitive function. Studies have shown that fibrinogen co-localizes with areas of synaptic dysfunction in AD patients [139]. Moreover, lowering fibrinogen levels in animal models of Alzheimer's disease, such as TgCRND8 mice, has been shown to improve synaptic function, reduce Aβ deposition, and decrease neuronal death. These results indicate that targeting fibrinogen may present a promising therapeutic strategy for AD as shown in Fig. 5. Additionally, fibrinogen is known to activate microglia, leading to dendritic loss and spine elimination. This cascade contributes to neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and cognitive decline in 5XFAD mouse models [140]. Studies have shown that AD mice with impaired fibrin breakdown due to a lack of tPA or a single functioning plasminogen gene exhibit increased Aβ plaque accumulation, vascular damage, and cognitive impairment [141]. Importantly, damage to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) was significantly reduced in AD mice with just one functioning fibrinogen gene [141]. The interaction between fibrinogen and Aβ has been shown to have significant implications for AD pathology. The central region of Aβ can bind to specific domains on the fibrinogen protein, resulting in the formation of more robust and resistant fibrin networks [24]. This binding not only promotes the synthesis of Aβ fibers, but also increases the spatial extent and duration of fibrin clots within the brain [139, 142, 143]. These alterations may contribute to fibrin-induced neurotoxicity and microglial activation, amplifying the pathogenesis of AD [75, 144]. Furthermore, Aβ has been shown to interact with coagulation factor XII, leading to the activation of factor XI, thrombin production, and the formation of fibrin clots [24, 143]. Additionally, Aβ enhances the cleavage of high molecular weight kininogen (HK) via an FXII-dependent pathway [145]. Research has demonstrated that blocking HK cleavage reduces neuroinflammation, fibrinogen deposition, neuronal degeneration, and cognitive decline in AD models [146]. The accumulation of fibrinogen in the brain following vascular injury appears to be a significant pathogenic component that exacerbates inflammation and contributes to the onset and progression of AD. Targeting fibrinogen and its interactions within the fibrinolytic system may present novel therapeutic avenues for mitigating the inflammatory processes associated with AD. Therapeutic strategies that focus on reducing fibrinogen levels, inhibiting its interaction with neuronal receptors, or promoting fibrinolysis may enhance cognitive function and slow the progression of neurodegeneration. For instance, the use of agents that enhance the activity of tPA could facilitate the breakdown of fibrin deposits, thereby alleviating neuroinflammation and improving neuronal health.
Fig. 5
Fibrinogen-linked receptors and signaling cascades in CNS inflammation and AD. (Fibrinogen is integral to the processes of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and myelin destruction by interacting with receptors on key cells in the nervous system. Its binding to astrocytes, neurons, microglia, oligodendrocytes (OLs), and Schwann cells activates signaling pathways that intensify neuroinflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and cell death. Specifically, when fibrinogen binds to astrocytes, it activates the Smad pathway, which triggers the release of inflammatory mediators and inhibits neurite growth. In neurons, fibrinogen binding activates the EGFR pathway, further suppressing neurite outgrowth and initiating the NF-κB pathway, which increases levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as CCL2 and IL6, ultimately leading to neuronal death. Additionally, when fibrinogen is converted to fibrin, it reveals the γ377–395 epitope, which interacts with the CD11b/CD18 integrin receptor on microglia. This interaction stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), initiating a signaling cascade involving the Akt, RhoA, and PI3K pathways. This cascade elevates the levels of inflammatory chemokines, including CCL2 and CXCL10, worsening neuroinflammation and contributing to myelin loss. Through these interactions, fibrinogen significantly drives the progression of neurodegenerative diseases and exacerbates inflammatory damage within the nervous system.)
Bild vergrößern
The fibrinolytic system, particularly the role of fibrinogen, is intricately linked to the pathophysiology of AD. By elucidating the mechanisms through which fibrinogen influences neuroinflammation, neuronal health, and cognitive function, researchers can identify potential therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating the effects of this protein in AD. Ongoing research is essential to further understand the complex interplay between fibrinogen, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline, ultimately guiding the development of effective treatments for AD. As our understanding of these relationships deepens, new therapeutic opportunities may arise to better manage this devastating condition.

Comparative analysis of canonical and non-canonical targets in AD

In the AD treatment, traditionally, research has concentrated on canonical targets such as Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau protein, which are central to the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Aβ, resulting from the cleavage of APP, accumulates in the brain, forming plaques that disrupt synaptic function and trigger neuroinflammation [147]. Concurrently, the tau protein forms neurofibrillary tangles through hyperphosphorylation, leading to microtubule instability and neuronal death [148]. Therapeutic strategies targeting these canonical pathways include monoclonal antibodies designed to reduce Aβ levels, such as aducanumab, and small molecules aimed at inhibiting tau phosphorylation. Although some of these therapies have shown promise in clinical trials, they often encounter significant limitations, including variable efficacy in advanced stages of the disease and potential adverse effects, underscoring the need for a more comprehensive approach that addresses the multifactorial nature of AD [149, 150].
In contrast to these canonical targets, non-canonical targets encompass a wider array of mechanisms that are increasingly recognized as crucial in AD pathology. One significant aspect of non-canonical targets is neuroinflammation. Chronic inflammation mediated by activated microglia and astrocytes has been implicated in AD progression, contributing to neuronal damage [151]. Targeting neuroinflammation through anti-inflammatory agents or immune-modulating therapies presents a promising strategy for restoring CNS homeostasis and mitigating neurodegenerative processes [152]. Furthermore, metabolic dysfunction has emerged as another critical non-canonical target. Research suggests that disturbances in cellular metabolism, particularly in energy production and glucose metabolism, can exacerbate AD pathology [153, 154]. Interventions that enhance mitochondrial function or promote alternative energy sources, such as ketogenic diets, have shown the potential to improve cognitive function and address the energy deficits commonly observed in AD patients [155].
Another important consideration is the role of vascular health in AD pathology. Vascular contributions, including blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and reduced cerebral blood flow, are increasingly recognized as critical factors in AD development [156]. Preserving BBB integrity and improving cerebral perfusion can mitigate neuroinflammatory responses and enhance the delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. Strategies aimed at promoting endothelial health or stabilizing the BBB offer innovative therapeutic avenues that extend beyond classical targets. Additionally, glial cells, particularly oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, play vital roles in supporting neuronal health and synaptic function. Enhancing glial cell functionality could provide a protective effect against neurodegeneration. For instance, therapies focused on promoting oligodendrocyte myelination or supporting astrocyte-mediated neurotransmitter recycling could have significant implications for cognitive function and overall brain health [157].
The interplay between canonical and non-canonical targets is crucial in understanding AD’s complex pathology. For example, neuroinflammation can exacerbate tau pathology, while metabolic dysfunction may influence glial cell activation and overall neuronal health [158]. This interconnectedness highlights the potential for synergistic therapeutic effects when targeting multiple pathways simultaneously. Combination therapies that address both canonical and non-canonical targets may provide a more effective strategy for managing AD. For instance, interventions that lower Aβ levels while simultaneously enhancing glial cell function could yield superior outcomes compared to targeting either pathway alone [159]. Such integrative approaches are increasingly recognized as essential for personalized medicine in neurodegenerative diseases, acknowledging the multifactorial nature of AD.
In summary, while canonical targets such as Aβ and tau have historically dominated AD research, the exploration of non-canonical targets is essential for a nuanced understanding of the disease. Non-canonical pathways, including neuroinflammation, metabolic dysfunction, vascular health, and glial cell functionality, offer promising therapeutic avenues that address the broader spectrum of AD pathology. The integration of both approaches may lead to innovative interventions that improve patient outcomes. As research continues to advance, it is imperative to embrace a holistic perspective that considers the complex interplay of mechanisms driving AD, paving the way for effective therapies that genuinely address the needs of individuals affected by this devastating disease.

Conclusion

The evolving landscape of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research has illuminated key pathogenic mechanisms and identified promising therapeutic targets that underscore the urgent need for innovative treatment strategies. As we move toward a deeper understanding of AD, it is essential to not only summarize these advancements, but also to elaborate on their implications for future research and clinical practice. Recent studies have elucidated the multifaceted nature of AD, revealing that it is not merely a consequence of Aβ accumulation, but a complex interplay of neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic dysregulation, and vascular damage. Recognizing this complexity paves the way for a paradigm shift in how we approach treatment. Current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) primarily target inflammatory processes and aim to modulate immune cell populations. However, focusing solely on these inflammatory components may overlook the broader spectrum of cellular dysfunctions involved in AD pathology.
One of the most promising avenues of research lies in the modulation of cellular metabolism. By understanding how deviations in metabolic pathways contribute to AD, we can identify novel therapeutic strategies that may not only alleviate symptoms but potentially reverse neurodegeneration. For instance, interventions that target metabolic dysregulation could offer dual benefits: addressing the immediate consequences of metabolic changes while also adapting to chronic conditions that often coexist with AD, such as diabetes or hypertension. Such metabolic approaches highlight the interconnectedness of systemic health and neurodegeneration, urging researchers to explore therapeutic interventions that consider the whole patient rather than isolated disease symptoms.
In addition to metabolism, glial cell functionality presents another critical area for exploration. Oligodendrocytes and other glial cells play essential roles in maintaining brain homeostasis and supporting neuronal health. Current research has begun to shift toward enhancing the functionality of these cells as a therapeutic strategy. This approach may not only prevent neurodegeneration, but also promote regeneration and repair mechanisms within the CNS. By fostering an environment conducive to glial support, we could mitigate the progression of AD and improve overall cognitive function.
Moreover, the role of coagulation factors in AD offers a unique therapeutic target. Existing medications that have been clinically authorized for other conditions could be repurposed to address the hemostatic dysregulation observed in AD. However, careful consideration of potential adverse effects, such as bleeding complications, is essential. Future studies should rigorously evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of these agents in AD populations, with an emphasis on long-term outcomes and safety profiles.
The integrity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is another significant consideration in AD treatment. While disruption of the BBB may facilitate disease progression, maintaining its integrity could hinder immune cell infiltration and reduce neuroinflammation. Future research should explore strategies that reinforce BBB function while allowing for the selective delivery of therapeutic agents. Innovative drug delivery technologies that can traverse the BBB without compromising its protective role are essential for advancing AD therapies.
The concept of inducing immunological tolerance also warrants further investigation. This strategy could address underlying mechanisms of AD by dampening inappropriate immune responses. However, translating this approach into clinical practice poses challenges, including the need for precise modulation of immune pathways to avoid unintended consequences. Future studies should focus on identifying the most effective ways to achieve this balance, potentially leading to novel immunomodulatory therapies.
While the current study presents compelling data regarding the roles of the BBB, oligodendrocytes, neuroimmunometabolism, and fibrinolytic mechanisms in AD, the implications for future research and clinical practice are profound. There is a pressing need to validate these findings through rigorous clinical trials, particularly those that explore combinations of therapies targeting both vascular damage and Aβ pathologies. Such combinatorial approaches may yield synergistic benefits, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
Ultimately, the discovery of new therapeutic approaches that target non-traditional mechanisms in AD offers a hopeful perspective for the future of AD care. By expanding our understanding of the disease and considering a broader array of potential interventions, we can move toward more personalized and effective treatment strategies. Future research should prioritize interdisciplinary collaborations that bring together insights from neurobiology, immunology, metabolism, and vascular biology to develop comprehensive therapeutic frameworks.
In conclusion, the integration of knowledge surrounding metabolic dysregulation, glial cell functionality, coagulation factors, and BBB integrity represents a multifaceted strategy for tackling AD. As we advance our understanding of these complex interactions, the opportunity arises to transform the clinical landscape for AD patients. Continued research in these areas holds the promise not only for innovative therapies, but also for enhancing the quality of life for those affected by this devastating disease. Through a concerted effort to validate and translate these findings into clinical practice, we can aspire to significantly improve outcomes for individuals living with Alzheimer’s disease, moving closer to a future where effective treatments are within reach.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Central University of Rajasthan for providing financial support to this investigation.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Exploring non-canonical targets in Alzheimer’s disease: a departure from the norm
Verfasst von
Smita Jain
Neha Chauhan
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00908-7
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain S, Bisht A, Verma K, Negi S, Paliwal S, Sharma S. The role of fatty acid amide hydrolase enzyme inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Biochem Funct. 2021;40:106–17.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-kuraishy HM, Jabir MS, Albuhadily AK, Al-Gareeb AI, Rafeeq MF. The link between metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer disease: A mutual relationship and long rigorous investigation. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;91: 102084.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowman GL, Dayon L, Kirkland R, Wojcik J, Peyratout G, Severin IC, et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline in older adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(12):1640–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris RG, Salmon DP. The centennial of Alzheimer’s disease and the publication of “Über eine eigenartige erkankung der hirnrinde” by Alöis Alzheimer. Cortex. 2007;43(7):821–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 1992;256(5054):184–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawat P, Sehar U, Bisht J, Selman A, Culberson J, Reddy PH. Phosphorylated Tau in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):12841.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Deture MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):1–18.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Chen H, Li R, Sterling K, Song W. Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: challenges, successes and future. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1–26.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat González-Reyes RE, Nava-Mesa MO, Vargas-Sánchez K, Ariza-Salamanca D, Mora-Muñoz L. Involvement of astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease from a neuroinflammatory and oxidative stress perspective. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:1–20.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Papuc E, Rejdak K. The role of myelin damage in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16(2):345–51.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvadores N, Gerónimo-Olvera C, Court FA. Axonal degeneration in AD: the contribution of Aβ and Tau. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:1–16.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao YH, Chou MC, Chen CH, Yang YH. White matter changes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and associated factors. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):2–11.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall AC. Traditional Chinese medicine and clinical pharmacology. Drug Discov Eval Methods Clin Pharmacol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68864-0_60.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain S, Singh R, Paliwal S, Sharma S. Targeting neuroinflammation as disease-modifying approach to Alzheimer’s disease: potential and challenges. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2023;23(22):2097–116.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanaan NM, Pigino GF, Brady ST, Lazarov O, Binder LI. Abnormalities meet the axonal transport system. Exp Neurol. 2013;246:44–53.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Correale J, Marrodan M, Ysrraelit MC. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and axonal dysfunction in progressive multiple sclerosis. Biomedicines. 2019;7(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W, et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):1–40.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Geldmacher DS. Treatment guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease: Redefining perceptions in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(2):113–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings J. Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are transformative treatments that redefine Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Drugs. 2023;83(7):569–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan A, Dubey S, Jain S. Association between type 2 Diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease: common molecular mechanism and therapeutic targets. Cell Biochem Funct. 2024;42(7): e4111.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi M, Chu F, Zhu F, Zhu J. Impact of Anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies on the pathology and clinical profile of Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on aducanumab and lecanemab. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14: 870517.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Montagne A, Nikolakopoulou AM, Huuskonen MT, Sagare AP, Lawson EJ, Lazic D, et al. APOE4 accelerates advanced-stage vascular and neurodegenerative disorder in old Alzheimer’s mice via cyclophilin A independently of amyloid-β. Nat Aging. 2021;1(6):506–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kisler K, Nelson AR, Montagne A, Zlokovic BV. Cerebral blood flow regulation and neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(7):419–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortes-Canteli M, Zamolodchikov D, Ahn HJ, Strickland S, Norris EH. Fibrinogen and altered hemostasis in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012;32(3):599–608.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagliardi G, Vannini P. Episodic memory impairment mediates the loss of awareness in mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;13: 802501.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Long JM, Holtzman DM. Alzheimer disease: An update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell. 2019;179(2):312–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Perl DP. Neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Mt Sinai J Med A J Transl Pers Med. 2010;77(1):32–42.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Metaxas A, Kempf SJ. Neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease: elucidation of the molecular mechanism by immunohistochemistry and tau protein phospho-proteomics. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11(10):1579–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Panza F, Lozupone M, Solfrizzi V, Sardone R, Piccininni C, Dibello V, et al. BACE inhibitors in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018;18(11):847–57.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong F, Ge W, Ma C. Quantitative proteomics reveals the distinct composition of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2019;15(3):429–40.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahman MM, Lendel C. Extracellular protein components of amyloid plaques and their roles in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):1–30.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Iadecola C, Gottesman RF. Cerebrovascular alterations in Alzheimer disease incidental or pathogenic? Circ Res. 2018;123(4):406–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenberg SM, Bacskai BJ, Hernandez-Guillamon M, Pruzin J, Sperling R, van Veluw SJ. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer disease—one peptide, two pathways. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(1):30.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas-George S, Dave KR. Models of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related intracerebral haemorrhage. Brain Hemorrhages. 2022;3(4):189–99.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Butt AM, Papanikolaou M, Rivera A. Physiology of oligodendroglia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1175:117–28.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebel C, Deoni S. The development of brain white matter microstructure. Neuroimage. 2018;182:207–18.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Butt AM, De La Rocha IC, Rivera A. Oligodendroglial cells in Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1175:325–33.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Jellinger KA. Neuropathological assessment of the Alzheimer spectrum. J Neural Transm. 2020;127(9):1229–56.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Oakley H, Cole SL, Logan S, Maus E, Shao P, Craft J, et al. Intraneuronal β-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2006;26(40):10129–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu L, Wu D, Tang X, Qi X, Li X, Bai F, et al. Myelin changes at the early stage of 5XFAD mice. Brain Res Bull. 2018;137:285–93.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Ota K, Oishi N, Ito K, Fukuyama A. Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtypes: Stratification based on imaging biomarkers. J Alzheimer Dis. 2016;52(4):1385–401.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasrabady SE, Rizvi B, Goldman JE, Brickman AM. White matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on myelin and oligodendrocytes. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrer I, Andrés-Benito P. White matter alterations in Alzheimer’s disease without concomitant pathologies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2020;46(7):654–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouhrara M, Reiter DA, Bergeron CM, Zukley LM, Ferrucci L, Resnick SM, et al. Evidence of demyelination in mild cognitive impairment and dementia using a direct and specific magnetic resonance imaging measure of myelin content. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018;14(8):998–1004.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Poggi G, Boretius S, Möbius W, Moschny N, Baudewig J, Ruhwedel T, et al. Cortical network dysfunction caused by a subtle defect of myelination. Glia. 2016;64(11):2025–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Alvarez M, Atienza M, Cantero JL. Effects of non-modifiable risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease on intracortical myelin content. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2022;14(1):1–13.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean DC, Hurley SA, Kecskemeti SR, O’Grady JP, Canda C, Davenport-Sis NJ, et al. Association of amyloid pathology with myelin alteration in preclinical Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(1):41–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Dayon L, Núñez Galindo A, Wojcik J, Cominetti O, Corthésy J, Oikonomidi A, et al. Alzheimer disease pathology and the cerebrospinal fluid proteome. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2018;10(1):1–12.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Piersson AD, Ibrahim B, Suppiah S, Mohamad M, Hassan HA, Omar NF, et al. Multiparametric MRI for the improved diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: research protocol of a case-control study design. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9): e0252883.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Duijn S, Bulk M, Van Duinen SG, Nabuurs RJA, Van Buchem MA, Van Der Weerd L, et al. Cortical iron reflects severity of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;60(4):1533–45.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Maitre M, Jeltsch-David H, Okechukwu NG, Klein C, Patte-Mensah C, Mensah-Nyagan AG. Myelin in Alzheimer’s disease: culprit or bystander? Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023;11(1):1–18.CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Deshmukh VA, Tardif V, Lyssiotis CA, Green CC, Kerman B, Kim HJ, et al. A regenerative approach to the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat. 2013;502(7471):327–32.CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Mei F, Fancy SPJ, Shen YAA, Niu J, Zhao C, Presley B, et al. Micropillar arrays as a high-throughput screening platform for therapeutics in multiple sclerosis. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):954–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Segel M, Neumann B, Hill MFE, Weber IP, Viscomi C, Zhao C, et al. Niche stiffness underlies the ageing of central nervous system progenitor cells. Nat. 2019;573(7772):130–4.CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivera AD, Pieropan F, Chacon-De-La-Rocha I, Lecca D, Abbracchio MP, Azim K, et al. Functional genomic analyses highlight a shift in Gpr17-regulated cellular processes in oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and underlying myelin dysregulation in the aged mouse cerebrum. Ageing Cell. 2021;20(4): e13335.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartzokis G. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25(1):5–18.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefèvre-Arbogast S, Hejblum BP, Helmer C, Klose C, Manach C, Low DY, et al. Early signature in the blood lipidome associated with subsequent cognitive decline in the elderly: a case-control analysis nested within the three-city cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2021;64: 103216.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Peferoen L, Kipp M, van der Valk P, van Noort JM, Amor S. Oligodendrocyte-microglia cross-talk in the central nervous system. Immunology. 2014;141(3):302–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheltens P, Twisk JWR, Blesa R, Scarpini E, Von Arnim CAF, Bongers A, et al. Efficacy of souvenaid in mild Alzheimer’s disease: Results from a randomized, controlled trial. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012;31(1):225–36.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Zerbi V, Jansen D, Wiesmann M, Fang X, Broersen LM, Veltien A, et al. Multinutrient diets improve cerebral perfusion and neuroprotection in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(3):600–13.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Rijpma A, Van Der Graaf M, Lansbergen MM, Meulenbroek O, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Sijben JW, et al. The medical food Souvenaid affects brain phospholipid metabolism in mild Alzheimer’s disease: results from a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2017;9(1):1–11.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallier PN, Poddighe L, Zbarsky V, Kostusiak M, Choudhury R, Hart T, et al. A nutrient combination designed to enhance synapse formation and function improves outcome in experimental spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;82:504–15.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider N, Hauser J, Oliveira M, Cazaubon E, Mottaz SC, O’Neill B V., et al. Sphingomyelin in brain and cognitive development: preliminary data. eNeuro. 2019; 6(4).
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Popescu DC, Huang H, Singhal NK, Shriver L, McDonough J, Clements RJ, et al. Vitamin K enhances the production of brain sulfatides during remyelination. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0203057.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyer BA, Fang M, Sadrian B, Montenegro-Burke JR, Plaisted WC, Kok BPC, et al. Metabolomics-based discovery of a metabolite that enhances oligodendrocyte maturation. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;14(1):22–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M, et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013;342(6156):373–7.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Montagne A, Barnes SR, Sweeney MD, Halliday MR, Sagare AP, Zhao Z, et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the ageing human hippocampus. Neuron. 2015;85(2):296–302.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeney MD, Sagare AP, Zlokovic BV. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(3):133–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Protas HD, Chen K, Langbaum JBS, Fleisher AS, Alexander GE, Lee W, et al. Posterior cingulate glucose metabolism, hippocampal glucose metabolism, and hippocampal volume in cognitively normal, late-middle-aged persons at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(3):320–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailly M, Destrieux C, Hommet C, Mondon K, Cottier JP, Beaufils E, et al. Precuneus and cingulate cortex atrophy and hypometabolism in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: MRI and 18F-FDG PET quantitative analysis using FreeSurfer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1.CrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Niwa K, Kazama K, Younkin SG, Carlson GA, Iadecola C. Alterations in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;9(1):61–8.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Salloway S, Gur T, Berzin T, Zipser B, Correia S, Hovanesian V, et al. Effect of APOE genotype on microvascular basement membrane in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2002;15(203–204):183–7.CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell RD, Winkler EA, Singh I, Sagare AP, Deane R, Wu Z, et al. Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nat. 2012;485(7399):512–6.CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryu JK, McLarnon JG. A leaky blood-brain barrier, fibrinogen infiltration and microglial reactivity in inflamed Alzheimer’s disease brain. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(9a):2911–25.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Hultman K, Strickland S, Norris EH. The APOE ɛ4/ɛ4 genotype potentiates vascular fibrin(ogen) deposition in amyloid-laden vessels in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(8):1251–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Zenaro E, Pietronigro E, Bianca VD, Piacentino G, Marongiu L, Budui S, et al. Neutrophils promote Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline via LFA-1 integrin. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):880–6.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Halliday MR, Rege SV, Ma Q, Zhao Z, Miller CA, Winkler EA, et al. Accelerated pericyte degeneration and blood-brain barrier breakdown in apolipoprotein E4 carriers with Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(1):216–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson IA, Chundu KR, Davies-Hill T, Honer WG, Davies P. Decreased concentrations of GLUT1 and GLUT3 glucose transporters in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1994;35(5):546–51.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen MM, Jarmer DJ, Arslantas E, DeBaillie AC, Frederick AL, Harding M, et al. Synthesis of BACE inhibitor LY2886721. Part II. Isoxazolidines as precursors to chiral aminothiazines, selective peptide coupling, and controlled reactive crystallization. Org Process Res Dev. 2015;19(9):1214–30.CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Gejl M, Gjedde A, Egefjord L, Møller A, Hansen SB, Vang K, et al. In Alzheimer’s disease, 6-month treatment with GLP-1 analogue prevents decline of brain glucose metabolism: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8: 198350.CrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Nørgaard CH, Friedrich S, Hansen CT, Gerds T, Ballard C, Møller DV, et al. Treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incidence of dementia: data from pooled double-blind randomized controlled trials and nationwide disease and prescription registers. Alzheimer Dement Transl Res Clin Interv. 2022;8(1): e12268.CrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Gejl M, Brock B, Egefjord L, Vang K, Rungby J, Gjedde A. blood-brain glucose transfer in Alzheimer’s disease: effect of GLP-1 analogue treatment. Sci Reports. 2017;7(1):1–10.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Edison P, Femminella GD, Ritchie CW, Holmes C, Walker Z, Ridha BH, et al. Evaluation of liraglutide in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Dement. 2021;17(S9): e057848.CrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Jevtic S, Sengar AS, Salter MW, McLaurin JA. The role of the immune system in Alzheimer’s disease: etiology and treatment. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;40:84–94.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyatt-Johnson SK, Brutkiewicz RR. The complexity of microglial interactions with innate and adaptive immune cells in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12: 592359.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Zenaro E, Piacentino G, Constantin G. The blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;107:41–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurz C, Walker L, Rauchmann BS, Perneczky R. Dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from human studies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022;48(3): e12782.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher RA, Miners JS, Love S. Pathological changes within the cerebral vasculature in Alzheimer’s disease: New perspectives. Brain Pathol. 2022;32(6): e13061.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen HM, Londos E, Minthon L, Janciauskiene SM. Soluble adhesion molecules and angiotensin-converting enzyme in dementia. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;26(1):27–35.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuliani G, Cavalieri M, Galvani M, Passaro A, Munari MR, Bosi C, et al. Markers of endothelial dysfunction in older subjects with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2008;272(1–2):164–70.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Propson NE, Roy ER, Litvinchuk A, Köhl J, Zheng H. Endothelial C3a receptor mediates vascular inflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability during aging. J Clin Invest. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI140966.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Michalicova A, Majerova P, Kovac A. Tau protein and its role in blood–brain barrier dysfunction. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13: 570045.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Iturria-Medina Y, Sotero RC, Toussaint PJ, Mateos-Pérez JM, Evans AC, Weiner MW, et al. Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):1–14.CrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Banik A, Brown RE, Bamburg J, Lahiri DK, Khurana D, Friedland RP, et al. Translation of pre-clinical studies into successful clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease: what are the roadblocks and how can they be overcome? J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(4):815–43.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitra S, Banik A, Saurabh S, Maulik M, Khatri SN. Neuroimmunometabolism: a new pathological nexus underlying neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurosci. 2022;42(10):1888–907.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, McIntosh AL, Finucane OM, Mela V, Rubio-Araiz A, Timmons G, et al. Inflammatory microglia are glycolytic and iron-retentive and typify the microglia in APP/PS1 mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;68:183–96.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntosh A, Mela V, Harty C, Minogue AM, Costello DA, Kerskens C, et al. Iron accumulation in microglia triggers a cascade of events that leads to altered metabolism and compromised function in APP/PS1 mice. Brain Pathol. 2019;29(5):606–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Devanney NA, Stewart AN, Gensel JC. Microglia and macrophage metabolism in CNS injury and disease: The role of immunometabolism in neurodegeneration and neurotrauma. Exp Neurol. 2020;329: 113310.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Mosconi L, De Santi S, Li J, Tsui WH, Li Y, Boppana M, et al. Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal ageing. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29(5):676–92.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin AL, Rothman DL. What have novel imaging techniques revealed about metabolism in the aging brain? Future Neurol. 2014;9(3):341.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling LP, Pascoal TA, Zimmer ER, Mathotaarachchi S, Shin M, de Mello Rieder CR, et al. Regional Amyloid-β load and white matter abnormalities contribute to hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s Dementia. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(7):4916–24.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreira PI, Carvalho C, Zhu X, Smith MA, Perry G. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a trigger of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802(1):2–10.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha MY, Han SH, Son SM, Hong HS, Choi YJ, Byun J, et al. Mitochondria-specific accumulation of amyloid β induces mitochondrial dysfunction leading to apoptotic cell death. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4): e34929.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Szablewski L. Glucose transporters in brain: in health and in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(4):1307–20.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Issitt T, Bosseboeuf E, De Winter N, Dufton N, Gestri G, Senatore V, et al. Neuropilin-1 controls endothelial homeostasis by regulating mitochondrial function and iron-dependent oxidative stress. iScience. 2019;11:205.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Abramov AY, Canevari L, Duchen MR. Calcium signals induced by amyloid β peptide and their consequences in neurons and astrocytes in culture. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2004;1742(1–3):81–7.CrossRef
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao HY, Mak OT, Yang CS, Liu YP, Fang KM, Tzeng SF. TNF-alpha/IFN-gamma-induced iNOS expression increased by prostaglandin E2 in rat primary astrocytes via EP2-evoked cAMP/PKA and intracellular calcium signalling. Glia. 2007;55(2):214–23.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Schubert D, Soucek T, Blouw B. The induction of HIF-1 reduces astrocyte activation by amyloid beta peptide. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29(7):1323–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio-Araiz A, Finucane OM, Keogh S, Lynch MA. Anti-TLR2 antibody triggers oxidative phosphorylation in microglia and increases phagocytosis of β-amyloid. J Neuroinflamm. 2018;15:44.CrossRef
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Finucane OM, Sugrue J, Rubio-Araiz A, Guillot-Sestier MV, Lynch MA. The NLRP3 inflammasome modulates glycolysis by increasing PFKFB3 in an IL-1β-dependent manner in macrophages. Sci Reports. 2019;9(1):1–10.
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Boumezbeur F, Mason GF, De Graaf RA, Behar KL, Cline GW, Shulman GI, et al. Altered brain mitochondrial metabolism in healthy aging as assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30(1):211.PubMedCrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Kulas JA, Wang C, Holtzman DM, Ferris HA, Hansen SB. Regulation of beta-amyloid production in neurons by astrocyte-derived cholesterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(33): e2102191118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Jászberényi M, Thurzó B, Bagosi Z, Vécsei L, Tanaka M. The orexin/hypocretin system, the peptidergic regulator of vigilance, orchestrates adaptation to stress. Biomedicines. 2024;12(2):1–25.CrossRef
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumsden AL, Mulugeta A, Zhou A, Hyppönen E. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype-associated disease risks: a phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the UK Biobank. EBioMedicine. 2020;59: 102954.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Battaglia S, Avenanti A, Vécsei L, Tanaka M. Neural correlates and molecular mechanisms of memory and learning. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(5):2724.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiman EM, Chen K, Alexander GE, Caselli RJ, Bandy D, Osborne D, et al. Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(1):284–9.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Ding F, Yao J, Rettberg JR, Chen S, Brinton RD. Early decline in glucose transport and metabolism precedes shift to a ketogenic system in female ageing and Alzheimer’s mouse brain: Implication for bioenergetic intervention. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e79977.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu L, Zhang X, Zhao L. Human ApoE isoforms differentially modulate brain glucose and ketone body metabolism: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease risk reduction and early intervention. J Neurosci. 2018;38(30):6665–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka M, Szabó Á, Vécsei L, Giménez-Llort L. Emerging translational research in neurological and psychiatric diseases: from in vitro to in vivo models. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(21):15739.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson T, Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Jonsdottir I, Jonsson PV, Snaedal J, et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):107–16.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Battaglia S, Di Fazio C, Mazzà M, Tamietto M, Avenanti A. Targeting human glucocorticoid receptors in fear learning: a multiscale integrated approach to study functional connectivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):864.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang L, Lin W, Nugent CA, Hao S, Song H, Liu T, et al. Lingguizhugan decoction protects against high-fat-diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by alleviating oxidative stress and activating cholesterol secretion. Int J Genom. 2017;2017:1.CrossRef
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SCC, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL, et al. TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2017;170(4):649–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Audrain M, Haure-Mirande JV, Wang M, Kim SH, Fanutza T, Chakrabarty P, et al. Integrative approach to sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: deficiency of TYROBP in a tauopathy mouse model reduces C1q and normalizes clinical phenotype while increasing spread and state of phosphorylation of tau. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(9):1383–97.PubMedCrossRef
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Sayed FA, Telpoukhovskaia M, Kodama L, Li Y, Zhou Y, Le D, et al. Differential effects of partial and complete loss of TREM2 on microglial injury response and tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(40):10172–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazan NG, Palacios-Pelaez R, Lukiw WJ. Hypoxia signalling to genes: significance in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2002;26(2–3):283–98.PubMedCrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kang S, Lee W, Choi H, Chung S, Kim JI, et al. A breakdown in metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 2019;30(3):493–5076.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Opneja A, Kapoor S, Stavrou EX. Contribution of platelets, the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems to cutaneous wound healing. Thromb Res. 2019;179:56–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker SK, Strickland S. A critical role for plasminogen in inflammation. J Exp Med. 2020;217(4):1798–805.CrossRef
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Heissig B, Salama Y, Takahashi S, Osada T, Hattori K. The multifaceted role of plasminogen in inflammation. Cell Signal. 2020;75: 109761.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Colombo E, Cordiglieri C, Melli G, Newcombe J, Krumbholz M, Parada LF, et al. Stimulation of the neurotrophin receptor TrkB on astrocytes drives nitric oxide production and neurodegeneration. J Exp Med. 2012;209(3):521.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Charkviani M, Muradashvili N, Sulimai N, Lominadze D. Neuroscience of disease: fibrinogen-cellular prion protein complex formation on astrocytes. J Neurophysiol. 2020;124(2):536.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulimai N, Brown J, Lominadze D. Fibrinogen interaction with astrocyte ICAM-1 and PrPC results in the generation of ROS and neuronal death. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):1–16.CrossRef
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Schachtrup C, Lu P, Jones LL, Lee JK, Lu J, Sachs BD, et al. Fibrinogen inhibits neurite outgrowth via beta 3 integrin-mediated phosphorylation of the EGF receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(28):11814–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain S, Sharma S, Paliwal A, Dwivedi J, Paliwal S, Paliwal V, et al. Discovery of novel fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors as anti-Alzheimer’s agents through pharmacophore-based virtual screening, molecular docking and experimental validation. Med Chem Res. 2023;33:1–15.
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiala M, Liu QN, Sayre J, Pop V, Brahmandam V, Graves MC, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2-positive macrophages infiltrate the Alzheimer’s disease brain and damage the blood-brain barrier. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002;32(5):360–71.PubMedCrossRef
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Cryan JF, O’riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, et al. The microbiota–gut–brain axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013.PubMedCrossRef
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortes-Canteli M, Mattei L, Richards AT, Norris EH, Strickland S. Fibrin deposited in the Alzheimer’s disease brain promotes neuronal degeneration. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(2):608–17.PubMedCrossRef
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Campagna J, Spilman P, Jagodzinska B, Bai D, Hatami A, Zhu C, et al. A small molecule ApoE4-targeted therapeutic candidate that normalizes sirtuin 1 levels and improves cognition in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Sci Reports. 2018;8(1):1–15.
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul J, Strickland S, Melchor JP. Fibrin deposition accelerates neurovascular damage and neuroinflammation in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1999–2008.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortes-Canteli M, Paul J, Norris EH, Bronstein R, Ahn HJ, Zamolodchikov D, et al. Fibrinogen and beta-amyloid association alters thrombosis and fibrinolysis: a possible contributing factor to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2010;66(5):695–709.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn HJ, Zamolodchikov D, Cortes-Canteli M, Norris EH, Glickman JF, Strickland S. Alzheimer’s disease peptide β-amyloid interacts with fibrinogen and induces its oligomerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(50):21812–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Zamolodchikov D, Strickland S. Aβ delays fibrin clot lysis by altering fibrin structure and attenuating plasminogen binding to fibrin. Blood. 2012;119(14):3342–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto-Imoto H, Zamolodchikov D, Chen ZL, Bourne SL, Rizvi S, Singh P, et al. A novel detection method of cleaved plasma high-molecular-weight kininogen reveals its correlation with Alzheimer’s pathology and cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit. 2018;10:480.
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Y, Lin H, Yang H, Tan R, Bian Y, Fu T, et al. Discovery of new acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening. RSC Adv. 2017;7(6):3429–38.CrossRef
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease: genes, proteins, and therapy. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(2):741–66.PubMedCrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Iqbal K, Del C, Alonso A, Chen S, Chohan MO, El-Akkad E, Gong CX, et al. Tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1739(2–3):198–210.PubMedCrossRef
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings J, Osse AML, Cammann D, Powell J, Chen J. Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. BioDrugs. 2023;38:1–18.
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Korologou-Linden R, Kalsi J, Kafetsouli D, Olawale A, Wingfield D, Mummery D, et al. Novel blood-based biomarkers and disease modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Are we ready for the new era? J Prev Alzheimer Dis. 2024;11(4):897.
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El KJ, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):388–405.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorfi M, Maaser-Hecker A, Tanzi RE. The neuroimmune axis of Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2023;15(1):1–25.CrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu L, Liu R, Qin Y, Wang T. Brain metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease: biological mechanisms of exercise. Transl Neurodegener. 2023;12(1):1–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Ardanaz CG, Ramírez MJ, Solas M. Brain metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3785.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
155.
Zurück zum Zitat González A, Calfío C, Churruca M, Maccioni RB. Glucose metabolism and AD: evidence for a potential diabetes type 3. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2022;14(1):1–11.
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(12):723–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu Y, Chen R, Mao K, Deng M, Li Z. The role of glial cells in synaptic dysfunction: insights into Alzheimer’s disease mechanisms. Aging Dis. 2024;15(2):459–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin M, Yu H, Xie Q, Xu Z, Shang P. Role of microglia autophagy and mitophagy in age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1100133.PubMedCrossRef
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Si ZZ, Zou CJ, Mei X, Li XF, Luo H, Shen Y, et al. Targeting neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: from mechanisms to clinical applications. Neural Regen Res. 2023;18(4):708–15.PubMedCrossRef

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Neurologie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Bluttest sagt Alzheimerbeginn vorher

  • 25.03.2026
  • Demenz
  • Nachrichten

Fällt ein Bluttest auf pTau im Alter von 60 Jahren positiv aus, blieben noch rund 21 Jahre bis zum Beginn einer Demenz. 70-Jährige haben noch 17 Jahre Zeit, 90-Jährige nur noch 5 Jahre. Darauf deuten Modellrechnungen basierend auf kontinuierlich erhobenen Blutuntersuchungen.

Zur Bedeutung von Angst und Depression vor manifestem Parkinson

Eine große italienische Studie ermöglicht interessante Einblicke in die zeitliche Dynamik von affektiven Störungen vor Ausbruch einer manifesten Parkinson-Erkrankung (PD). Demnach könnten Angst und Depression unter Umständen schon bis zu zehn Jahre vor der PD auftreten. Zugleich bleiben Fragen.

Warum suizidgefährdete Ärztinnen und Ärzte keine Hilfe suchen

Gedanken an eine Selbsttötung gehen Ärztinnen und Ärzten vergleichsweise häufig durch den Kopf. Hilfe wäre möglich, wird aber selten gesucht. Warum eigentlich?

Elektronische Heilberufsausweise: Kartenaustausch jetzt beauftragen

Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten mit einem neuen Heilberufsausweis der Generation 2.1 müssen diesen jetzt mitunter nochmals tauschen. Die KBV appelliert an die Betroffenen, der Aufforderung ihres Anbieters nachzukommen und umgehend eine Austauschkarte zu beantragen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Depression Selbstmordgedanken Einsamkeit /© kinomaster / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Junge Frau in Krankenhaus-Kleidung/© gpointstudio / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell)