Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2019

20.11.2019 | Original Article

Exploring pre-surgery donor-specific antibodies in the context of organ shortage in liver transplant

verfasst von: Savio G. Barreto, Mark E. Brooke-Smith, Eu Ling Neo, Paul Dolan, Richard Leibbrandt, Tim Emery, Robert Carroll, Alan Wigg, John W. Chen

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is a growing disparity between the number of liver transplant (LT) candidates and availability of suitable liver allografts. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), secondary to positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA), remains a concern in liver transplantation. This study aimed to correlate expression of DSA on pre-transplant screening and outcomes of LT, specifically development of AMR in liver allografts and liver function profile in the post-operative period.

Methods

Data of consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic LT (OLT) at the South Australian Liver Transplant Unit was analysed. All patients underwent DSA testing pre-transplant.

Results

Within a cohort of 96 patients, over a post-OLT median follow-up of 849 days, only 2 patients (2%) developed AMR. While both patients had a positive DSA test preoperatively, overall DSA positivity was noted in 31% patients, with a specificity for prediction of AMR of 0.708. No significant association was noted between AMR (p = 0.092), T cell–mediated rejection/TCMR (p = 0.797) or late hepatic artery thrombosis/LHAT (p = 0.521). There was no significant interaction effect between DSA positivity and serum bilirubin or transaminases over a period of 100 days.

Conclusion

AMR following LT is uncommon. A positive DSA pre-transplant does not imply a definite risk of AMR. Also, there does not exist a significant interaction in time between DSA expression and serum bilirubin or transaminase levels. Until there emerges evidence to the contrary, it appears reasonable to consider DSA-positive donors within the broad context of marginal donors in the context of a worldwide shortage of LT donor allografts.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadlowiec CC, Taner T (2016) Liver transplantation: current status and challenges. World J Gastroenterol 22:4438–4445CrossRef Jadlowiec CC, Taner T (2016) Liver transplantation: current status and challenges. World J Gastroenterol 22:4438–4445CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Casavilla A, Ramirez C, Shapiro R et al (1995) Experience with liver and kidney allografts from non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation 59:197–203CrossRef Casavilla A, Ramirez C, Shapiro R et al (1995) Experience with liver and kidney allografts from non-heart-beating donors. Transplantation 59:197–203CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dasari BVM, Schlegel A, Mergental H et al (2017) The use of old donors in liver transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:211–217CrossRef Dasari BVM, Schlegel A, Mergental H et al (2017) The use of old donors in liver transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31:211–217CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Busuttil RW, Tanaka K (2003) The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9:651–663CrossRef Busuttil RW, Tanaka K (2003) The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9:651–663CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal EW, Black SM, Mumtaz K et al (2017) High center volume does not mitigate risk associated with using high donor risk organs in liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 62(9):2578-2585 Beal EW, Black SM, Mumtaz K et al (2017) High center volume does not mitigate risk associated with using high donor risk organs in liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 62(9):2578-2585
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozhathil DK, Li YF, Smith JK et al (2011) Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants. Liver Transpl 17:1191–1199CrossRef Ozhathil DK, Li YF, Smith JK et al (2011) Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants. Liver Transpl 17:1191–1199CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel R, Terasaki PI (1969) Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 280:735–739CrossRef Patel R, Terasaki PI (1969) Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 280:735–739CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Terasaki PI (2003) Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant 3:665–673CrossRef Terasaki PI (2003) Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant 3:665–673CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hubscher SG et al (2016) Comprehensive update of the Banff Working Group on liver allograft pathology: introduction of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2016(16):2816–2835CrossRef Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hubscher SG et al (2016) Comprehensive update of the Banff Working Group on liver allograft pathology: introduction of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2016(16):2816–2835CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni HS, Bemiss BC, Hachem RR (2015) Antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplantation. Curr Transplant Rep 2:316–323CrossRef Kulkarni HS, Bemiss BC, Hachem RR (2015) Antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplantation. Curr Transplant Rep 2:316–323CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetris AJ, Bellamy CO, Gandhi CR et al (2016) Functional immune anatomy of the liver-as an allograft. Am J Transplant 16:1653–1680CrossRef Demetris AJ, Bellamy CO, Gandhi CR et al (2016) Functional immune anatomy of the liver-as an allograft. Am J Transplant 16:1653–1680CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Leary JG, Michelle Shiller S, Bellamy C et al (2014) Acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an inter-institutional study of significant histopathological features. Liver Transpl 20:1244–1255CrossRef O'Leary JG, Michelle Shiller S, Bellamy C et al (2014) Acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an inter-institutional study of significant histopathological features. Liver Transpl 20:1244–1255CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Taner T, Gandhi MJ, Sanderson SO et al (2012) Prevalence, course and impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation in the first year. Am J Transplant 12:1504–1510CrossRef Taner T, Gandhi MJ, Sanderson SO et al (2012) Prevalence, course and impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation in the first year. Am J Transplant 12:1504–1510CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat EASL (2016) EASL Clinical practice guidelines: liver transplantation. J Hepatol 64:433–485CrossRef EASL (2016) EASL Clinical practice guidelines: liver transplantation. J Hepatol 64:433–485CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP (2009) Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors. Am J Transplant 9:746–757CrossRef Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP (2009) Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors. Am J Transplant 9:746–757CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Vernerey D et al (2013) Antibody-mediated vascular rejection of kidney allografts: a population-based study. Lancet 381:313–319CrossRef Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Vernerey D et al (2013) Antibody-mediated vascular rejection of kidney allografts: a population-based study. Lancet 381:313–319CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuadrado A, San Segundo D, Lopez-Hoyos M et al (2015) Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 21:11016–11026CrossRef Cuadrado A, San Segundo D, Lopez-Hoyos M et al (2015) Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 21:11016–11026CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Loupy A, Vernerey D, Tinel C et al (2015) Subclinical rejection phenotypes at 1 year post-transplant and outcome of kidney allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 26:1721–1731CrossRef Loupy A, Vernerey D, Tinel C et al (2015) Subclinical rejection phenotypes at 1 year post-transplant and outcome of kidney allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 26:1721–1731CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Orandi B, Chow E, Hsu A et al (2015) Quantifying renal allograft loss following early antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 15:489–498CrossRef Orandi B, Chow E, Hsu A et al (2015) Quantifying renal allograft loss following early antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 15:489–498CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Leary JG, Kaneku H, Demetris AJ et al (2014) Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss. Liver Transpl 20:218–227CrossRef O'Leary JG, Kaneku H, Demetris AJ et al (2014) Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss. Liver Transpl 20:218–227CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Castillo-Rama M, Castro MJ, Bernardo I et al (2008) Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility. Liver Transpl 14:554–562CrossRef Castillo-Rama M, Castro MJ, Bernardo I et al (2008) Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility. Liver Transpl 14:554–562CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Leary JG, Demetris AJ, Friedman LS et al (2014) The role of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 14:779–787CrossRef O'Leary JG, Demetris AJ, Friedman LS et al (2014) The role of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 14:779–787CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hogen R, DiNorcia J, Dhanireddy K (2017) Antibody-mediated rejection: what is the clinical relevance? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 22:97–104CrossRef Hogen R, DiNorcia J, Dhanireddy K (2017) Antibody-mediated rejection: what is the clinical relevance? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 22:97–104CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng EY (2017) The role of humoral alloreactivity in liver transplantation: lessons learned and new perspectives. J Immunol Res 2017:3234906PubMedPubMedCentral Cheng EY (2017) The role of humoral alloreactivity in liver transplantation: lessons learned and new perspectives. J Immunol Res 2017:3234906PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Bello A, Congy-Jolivet N, Muscari F et al (2014) Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant 14:867–875CrossRef Del Bello A, Congy-Jolivet N, Muscari F et al (2014) Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in maintenance liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant 14:867–875CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneku H, O'Leary JG, Banuelos N et al (2013) De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 13:1541–1548CrossRef Kaneku H, O'Leary JG, Banuelos N et al (2013) De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies decrease patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 13:1541–1548CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetris AJ, Nakamura K, Yagihashi A et al (1992) A clinicopathological study of human liver allograft recipients harboring preformed IgG lymphocytotoxic antibodies. Hepatology 16:671–681CrossRef Demetris AJ, Nakamura K, Yagihashi A et al (1992) A clinicopathological study of human liver allograft recipients harboring preformed IgG lymphocytotoxic antibodies. Hepatology 16:671–681CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitsky J, Goldberg D, Smith AR et al (2017) Acute rejection increases risk of graft failure and death in recent liver transplant recipients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:584–593 e582CrossRef Levitsky J, Goldberg D, Smith AR et al (2017) Acute rejection increases risk of graft failure and death in recent liver transplant recipients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:584–593 e582CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitsky J, Kaneku H, Jie C et al (2016) Donor-specific hla antibodies in living versus deceased donor liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 16:2437–2444CrossRef Levitsky J, Kaneku H, Jie C et al (2016) Donor-specific hla antibodies in living versus deceased donor liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 16:2437–2444CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sis B, Jhangri GS, Bunnag S et al (2009) Endothelial gene expression in kidney transplants with alloantibody indicates antibody-mediated damage despite lack of C4d staining. Am J Transplant 9:2312–2323CrossRef Sis B, Jhangri GS, Bunnag S et al (2009) Endothelial gene expression in kidney transplants with alloantibody indicates antibody-mediated damage despite lack of C4d staining. Am J Transplant 9:2312–2323CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Exploring pre-surgery donor-specific antibodies in the context of organ shortage in liver transplant
verfasst von
Savio G. Barreto
Mark E. Brooke-Smith
Eu Ling Neo
Paul Dolan
Richard Leibbrandt
Tim Emery
Robert Carroll
Alan Wigg
John W. Chen
Publikationsdatum
20.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01831-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.