Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Complex interventions can be challenging to summarise and interpret. One approach to attempt to succinctly describe such complexity is through the development of a logic model. This study considers a complex intervention that aimed to widen the role and responsibilities of housing officers, through a neighbourhood-based system.
We developed a logic model using both primary and secondary data collection alongside expert opinion in order to understand the complex relationships between the intervention being delivered and the actual and potential outcomes. Development of the model was supported by a range of data generation methods, including a scoping review of the literature, telephone survey with housing tenants, in-depth interviews with tenants and housing staff, and workshops with key stakeholders to help to develop and then validate the model.
Our logic model highlights the key role of interpersonal relationships in building coherent neighbourhoods through intervention success and tenant satisfaction. We developed our initial model from analysis of documents relating to the intervention, along with wider literature, which detailed the policy context, theoretical approach and the expected outcomes.
The process of defining our final logic model generated insights that would not have emerged from a more narrative synthesis of secondary and primary data. The most important of these was a clear message about the central role of relationships between neighbourhood officers and tenants. In similar interventions, thought needs to be given on how a relationship can be built between a tenant and a neighbourhood officer.
Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8:19–32 CrossRef
Baxter S, Killoran A, Kelly MP, Goyder E (2010) Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. Public Health 124(2):99–106 CrossRef
Beatty C, Fothergil H (2016) The uneven impact of welfare reform: the financial losses to places and people. Project Report. Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield. https://doi.org/10.7190/cresr.2017.5563239352. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
Blank L, Baxter S, Woods HB, Goyder E, Lee A, Payne N, Rimmer M (2014) Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence. Br J Gen Pract 64(629):e765–e774 CrossRef
Blank L, Baxter S, Buckley-Woods H, Fairbrother H, Bissell P, Goyder E, Salway S (2016) Multidisciplinary systematic review of the relationships between poverty and stress, low level anxiety and depression across the life course. University of Sheffield, Sheffield. https://doi.org/10.15131/SHEF.DATA.4148199. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
Blamey A, Mackenzie M (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: peas in a pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation 13:439–455 CrossRef
Crisp R, Cole I, Eadson W, Ferrari E, Powell R, While A (2017) Tackling poverty through housing and planning policy in city regions. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available online at: https://www4.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/sites/shu.ac.uk/files/jrf-tackling-poverty-housing-planning-city-regions.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, Roberts K (2001) Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract 7:125–133 CrossRef
Health Education England (2019) Making Every Contact Count. Home page at: https://www.makingeverycontactcount.co.uk/. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
Moffatt S, Lawson S, Patterson R, Holding E, Dennison A, Sowden S, Brown J (2016) A qualitative study of the impact of the UK ‘bedroom tax’. J Public Health 38(2):197–205 CrossRef
Rogers PJ (2008) Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 14:29–48 CrossRef
Rogers PJ, Weiss CH (2007) Theory-based evaluation: reflections ten years on. New Dir Eval 114:63–81 CrossRef
Vogel I (2012) Review of the use of ‘theory of change’ in international development. Review report. UK Department of International Development, London. Available online at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08a5ded915d3cfd00071a/DFID_ToC_Review_VogelV7.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
Weiss CH (1995) Nothing as practical as a good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: Connell JP, Kubisch AC, Schoor LB, Weiss CH (eds) New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, pp 65–69
- Exploring the factors that influence the public health impact of changes to the traditional housing officer’s role: insights from a logic modelling approach
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health
From Theory to Practice
Print ISSN: 2198-1833
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2238