Background
Relaxation of the detrusor muscle is a fundamental requirement for normal bladder storage function. Severe failure of this relaxation mechanism causes upper urinary tract deterioration as a result of abnormal elevation of intravesical pressure [
1]. Such extreme pathology is termed low-compliance bladder, and is typically seen in paediatric cases with congenital spinal disorders, posterior urethral valves, and also in rare forms of severe non-neurogenic neurogenic bladder (Hinman syndrome). The primary goal in treating such patients is to prevent urinary tract damage by maintaining low-pressure storage and effective bladder evacuation [
2]. This is usually achieved through medical therapy using antimuscarinic drugs combined with clean intermittent catheterization. However, if these conservative therapies fail, bladder augmentation using the digestive tract is indicated, though such surgery may lead to various long-term complications, including metabolic acidosis, bowel dysfunction, rupture, and risk of secondary malignancies [
3,
4]. However, despite these clinical problems, the molecular mechanisms underlying low-compliance end-stage bladder disease have not yet been thoroughly investigated [
4].
Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) was originally identified as a cause of hypercalcemia in paraneoplastic syndrome, [
5] and has since been found to be expressed in most systemic tissues, with diverse physiological roles [
6,
7]. We previously reported that PTHrP acted as a stretch-induced endogenous relaxant of detrusor muscle [
8]. PTHrP functions via the PTH/PTHrP receptor 1 (PTH1R), which is expressed in detrusor muscle but not in urothelium. In rat experiments, PTHrP peptide potently suppressed spontaneous contraction of detrusor muscle strips, and intravenous administration of PTHrP peptide increased bladder compliance [
8]. These results suggest that endogenous PTHrP may inhibit the abnormal decrease in bladder compliance by bladder distention. We hypothesized that PTH1R should also be expressed in human bladder detrusor muscle, and that suppression of this axis could be involved in the pathogenesis of end-stage low-compliance bladder.
In this study, we therefore investigated the expression of PTH1R in clinical specimens from patients with normally functioning bladder and those undergoing bladder augmentations, to explore the involvement of the PTHrP-PTH1R axis in normal and diseased bladder detrusor muscle.
Discussion
This paper demonstrated the expression of PTH1R in normal bladder tissue and its downregulation in end-stage low-compliance bladders requiring augmentation. Combined with the potent relaxant effect of PTHrP peptide in rat bladder reported in our previous study, [
8] these findings suggest the functional involvement of this axis in normal human bladder physiology, and its loss in severely diseased bladders with decreased compliance.
The relaxant effect of PTHrP in the bladder has been reported previously [
12,
13] Yamamoto et al. focused on stretch-induced upregulation of PTHrP in the bladder in vivo, [
12] which effect was replicated in cultured smooth muscle cells under stretch by Steers et al [
13]. However, PTHrP showed only modest suppression of carbachol-induced contraction of bladder strips in those studies, leaving the physiological relevance of this observation unanswered. In contrast, our recent study in rats showed a potent relaxant effect of PTHrP in suppressing the spontaneous contraction of detrusor strips, and thus increasing bladder compliance in vivo [
8]. Our study also demonstrated that PTH1R was expressed primarily in the muscle layer, and not in the urothelial layer. As a logical extension of this previous study, we investigated the expression of PTH1R in the human bladder, and this report supplements and advances the previous study, by investigating the clinical relevance of this axis utilizing human samples.
Detrusor muscle tissues in normal control bladders stained positive for PTH1R, especially in the cytosol. This result seems to contradict the fact that PTH1R is a membrane-anchored G protein-coupled receptor, [
14] allowing binding of PTHrP at the membrane surface. However, PTH1R translocation from the plasma membrane into the cytosol after incubation with the PTH1R agonist, PTH (1–34), and positive staining in the cytosol was also seen in other organs such as acinar cells of the prostate gland, cell clusters within the adrenal cortex and cells of the epithelial hair sheath [
11].
In sharp contrast, the detrusor muscle in augmented bladders showed negative staining for PTH1R. This lack of staining did not indicate a technical failure, given that blood vessels stained positively in seven out of 13 (53.8%) cases. The negative staining of vessels in the remaining six cases may have been associated with deterioration of the vessels themselves, or technical failure caused by different fixation conditions. If PTH1R is downregulated in these bladders, they may not be able to respond to endogenous PTHrP, which could function as a protective relaxant against excessive distention. Downregulation of PTH1R is thus consistent with low bladder compliance.
In regard of the functional effect in PTHrP-PTH1R axis in the bladder, not only the receptor PTH1R, but expression level of the ligand PTHrP, in normal and diseased bladder is also of a great interest. Perez-Martinez et al. reported about PTHrP immunostaining in rabbit bladder outlet obstruction model [
15]. However, we did not succeed in visualizing PTHrP signal in paraffin-embedded human bladder, nor in rat bladder under various fixation conditions. Therefore we did not focus on expression of PTHrP in this study.
Further physiological experiments would have been ideal to confirm these speculations, demonstrating the unresponsiveness of diseased bladder strips to PTHrP peptide. Similarly, it may be of interest whether the difference in expression level of PTH1R may be attributed to altered production, degradation, release, or removal. Unfortunately, it was practically impossible to obtain materials at the separate time of surgery and subsequently perform physiological experiment or obtain enough materials for various biochemical assays. Such mechanistic part should be better studied in experimental model system such as cultured cells and animals, as we did in our previous report, rather than in clinical samples. Therefore it is inevitable limitation of the present study design that it is unidimensional, but supplemented by our previous mechanistic study, it addresses more direct clinical relevance.
Clinical translation of the results of this study may not be straightforward. If downregulation of PTH1R is a feature of low-compliance bladders, it would be difficult to use this axis as a target for treatment. However, it is possible that bladders still positive for PTH1R may retain the ability to relax against excessive distention, while downregulation of PTH1R could be a marker for unresponsiveness to conservative therapy, indicating the need for bladder augmentation. In addition, the PTHrP-PTH1R axis could be a target for treating milder damage in bladders retaining PTH1R expression, including overactive bladder, which affects a far larger percentage of the population than severely diseased bladder. Unfortunately, currently-available PTH1R agonists have systemic side effects that preclude their use for bladder diseases, and bladder-specific derivatives are awaited to allow the clinical translation of the PTHrP-PTH1R axis for treating bladder diseases.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
NN and AK participated in the design of the study, evaluated the samples, and performed the analysis. NN drafted the manuscript. YT carried out the immunohistochemical study, and helped to draft the manuscript. RY, YY, MS, and KT provided the clinical samples and clinical data, and YY performed the urodynamic study. HN and MI critically reviewed the manuscript. OO conceived of the study, and participated in its coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.