Background
Breast cancer has the highest incidence rate for cancer in women in industrialized countries. Statistically, it is estimated that one woman out of ten will develop breast cancer at some point in her life. Evidence is accumulating for the role of ion channels in the development of cancer. The most studied ion channels in breast cancer are firstly K
+ channels, which are involved in proliferation, cell cycle progression and migration [
1‐
4], and secondly Na
+ channels which correlate with invasion [
5‐
7]. Apart from the role of intracellular calcium in MCF-7 apoptosis [
8], little is known of Ca
2+ homeostasis in breast cancer cells. The first study reported by Strobl et al., [
9], suggested that Ca
2+ is necessary for the cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells. Moreover, the early findings of Sergeev indicate that voltage-insensitive channels and Ca
2+ endoplasmic reticulum stores are the principal pathways for Ca
2+ entry in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line [
8,
10]. Recently, Guo et al., [
11], have reported that the inhibition of a voltage-independent calcium channel induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. However, until now, the channel types involved in this cationic current have remained unknown. Recent findings demonstrate that the expression and/or activity of the TRP superfamily, have been reported to be involved in colorectal, colon, thyroid, breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer [
12,
13]. Among these, prostate cancer has been the most studied [
12,
14‐
17]. Indeed, TRPV6 is strongly expressed in advanced prostate cancer, with no expression either in healthy or in benign prostate tissues [
17]. Moreover, the TRPV6 expression correlates with the Gleason score [
18], and with aggressiveness [
14,
16,
18]. Another type of TRP: TRPM8 was detected at high levels in both benign prostate hyperplasia and in prostate carcinoma cells, as well as at low levels in normal (non-carcinoma) prostate epithelial cells. According to these data, TRPM8 has recently been proposed as a molecular target [
13,
19] and TRPV6 as a general marker for neoplasma [
15,
20].
The TRPC subfamily, TRPC1 TRPC7, has mostly been implicated in regulation by G-proteins and metabolites of phosphoinositide hydrolysis. TRPC6 channels, known to be activated by the phospholipase C (PLC) product, Diacylglycerol (DAG) [
21‐
24], is abundantly expressed and plays an important role in lung tissues and in different smooth muscle cell types [
22,
25‐
27].
TRPC6 was suggested as being the molecular correlate to the α1-adrenoceptor-activated non-selective cation channel in vascular smooth muscle cells [
24,
28]. Moreover, TRPC6 is also involved in some smooth and cardiac muscle pathologies [
27,
29,
30]. TRPC6 is also expressed in epithelial human prostatic cancer cells and the Ca
2+-entry via this channel mediates the activation of calcineurin, which in turn induces proliferation via its downstream NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells) transcription factors, which are necessary and sufficient for the induction of prostatic cancer cell proliferation [
31].
Previously, we have reported that TRPC6 is expressed in MCF-7 [
32]. However, until now, little is known about the relative expression of TRPC6 in normal and cancerous breast cells.
The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to compare the expression of TRPC6 in normal and cancerous human breast tissues. On the other hand, we have sought to investigate the role of TRPC6 by using electrophysiological and molecular techniques. To do this, we used breast tissue specimens, primary cultures of human breast cancer epithelial (hBCE) cells and MCF-7 cell line.
Methods
Cell culture
MCF-7 cells were cultured in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM), supplemented with 5% foetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.06 % Hepes buffer, and maintained at 37°C in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.
Immunohistochemistry
Normal and cancerous breast tissues were obtained from fresh surgical specimens. Surgical consent forms (approved by the University Hospital of Amiens) were signed by the patients before surgery to allow the use of a portion of the tissue for research purposes.
49 normal and cancer human breast specimens were obtained from women having undergone operations at the Amiens Hospital, France. Normal breast samples were taken at a distance from the tumour. Regarding tumour grade in the 49 invasive ductal breast carcinomas, 15 were of Grade I (well-differentiated), 19 were of Grade II (moderately-differentiated) and 15 were of Grade III (poorly-differentiated). On diagnosis, 23 tumours presented lymph-node metastasis.
Immunohistochemical studies were performed using the indirect immuno-peroxidase staining technique on the paraffin-embedded material with a Ventana ES automatic analyzer (Ventana Medical Systems) and with a hematoxylin counterstain. Briefly, after blocking the endogenous peroxidase by the I-View Inhibitor (Ventana), sections were stained with an anti-TRPC6 antibody (Chemicon, 1/300) for 32 min, washed, incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (I-View Biotin Ig, Ventana) for 8 min, washed and exposed to streptavidine-peroxidase complex (I-View SA-HRP, Ventana) for 8 min. DAB/H2O2 was used as chromogen and the slides were then examined under optical microscopy. Micrograph acquisitions were performed by a camera connected to a Zeiss microscope equipped with 20 × 0.85 objective lens.
Immunostaining levels in the tumour tissue were determined by subjective visual scoring of the brown stain, and compared to the normal tissue. Scoring levels were: 0 = absence of staining; 1 = weak staining intensity (equal to normal tissue); 2 = moderate; 3 = strong staining intensity. For the quantitative analysis, we report the percentage of cases presenting an overexpression of TRPC6 (scores 2 and 3).
Peptide blocking was performed as follows. The TRPC6 peptide (1 μg, Chemicon) was incubated with the primary antibody (1 μg) for one hour at room temperature. The complex was then applied to the sections in place of the diluted primary antibody and staining was completed as already described.
Primary culture
Portions of human breast cancerous tissues were placed in transport medium and desegregated immediately or after storage at 4°C for less than 6 h. The transport medium contained RPMI 1640 medium, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 10% FBS and 0.010 mg/ml insulin. Adipose or gross and necrotic materials were removed and the tissue minced using a scalpel in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) pH 7.4 under sterile conditions. Cancerous tissues were digested in transport medium containing 1 mg/ml collagenase type I (Sigma, France) and 100 U/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma, France) overnight at 37°C. When digestion was completed, tissue suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and the pellets resuspended in sterile PBS pH 7.4. The dispersed cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min and pellets resuspended in 20% FBS growth medium (RPMI 1640 medium, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 0.005 mg/ml insulin, 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 5 μg/ml transferrin, 0.1 μM isoproterenol, 0.01 μM ethanolamine, 0.01 μM o-phosphoetanolamine) and seeded in culture flasks (Nunc, Poly Labo, Strasbourg, France) and kept at 37°C in a humidified incubator in a 95% air 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each sample was analyzed by immuno-fluorescence staining to verify the pan-cytokeratin expression, which is an epithelial marker.
We used specimens from invasive ductal breast carcinomas and clinical tumour (Grade II), from patients having undergone a mastectomy. None of the patients had a history of chemotherapy and/or anti-estrogens therapy. The absence of normal epithelial cells was confirmed by independent histologic and anatomopathologic analysis.
Electrophysiology
For electrophysiological analysis, cells were cultured in 35 mm Petri dishes at a density of 5.104 cells 2 days before patch clamp experiments. Currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode, using an Axopatch 200 B patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular devices) and a Digidata 1200 interface (Molecular device). PClamp software (v. 6.03, Molecular device) was used to control voltage, as well as to acquire and analyze data. The whole-cell mode of the patch-clamp technique was used with 3–5 MΩ resistance borosilicate fire-polished pipettes (Hirschmann®, Laborgerate). Seal resistance was typically in the 1–5 GΩ range. Whole cell currents were allowed to stabilize for 5 min before being measured. Cells were allowed to settle in Petri dishes placed at the opening of a 250 μm-inner diameter capillary for extra-cellular perfusions. The cell under investigation was continuously superfused with control or test solutions. All electrophysiological experiments were performed at room temperature.
Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription of RNA
Total RNA from MCF-7 cells and primary culture cells was extracted by the Trizol-phenol-chloroforme (Sigma Aldrich) procedure, including DNAse I treatment (0.2 U/μl, 30 min at 37°C, Promega). Total RNA was then reverse-transcribed into cDNA using oligodT primers and SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen).
RNA isolation of normal and tumour tissues was performed using the RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Pieces of tissue (20 mg) were placed in a lysis buffer and homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer (PRO-200, Fisher Bioblock Scientific), and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer s standard protocols and used (1 μg) for first-strand cDNA synthesis with oligodT primers and MultiScribeTM Reverse Transcriptase (Applied Biosystems).
Qualitative and semi-quantitative PCR
Sense and antisense PCR primers specific to TRPC3, TRPC6, TRPC7 channels, β-actin and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) were used (see Table
1: primers for PCR experiments). PCR reactions were carried out on a iCycler thermal cycler (Biorad) using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) using the following parameters: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. A total of 30 cycles for actin and 40 cycles for the other primers were performed, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis with 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Table 1
Primers for PCR experiments
hTRPC3 | NM003305 | Sense | GGAAAAACATTACCTCCACCTTTCA | |
| | | Antisense | CTCAGTTGCTTGGCTCTTGTCTTCC | 383 pb |
hTRPC6 | NM 004621 | Sense | GAACTTAGCAATGAACTGGCAGT | 625 pb for TRPC6 |
| | | Antisense | CATATCATGCCTATTACCCAGGA | 277 pb for TRPC6γ |
hTRPC7 | NM 020389 | Sense | GTCCGAATGCAAGGAAATCT | |
| | | Antisense | TGGGTTGTATTTGGCACCTC | 477 pb |
hβ-actin | NM 001101 | Sense | CAGAGCAAGAGAGGCATCCT | |
| | | Antisense | ACGTACATGGCTGGGGTG | 210 pb |
hCK19 | NM 002276 | Sense | GATTGCCACCTACCGC | |
| | | Antisense | CCATCCCTCTACCCAG | 136 pb |
For the semi-quantitative experiments, 40 cycles, 25 cycles and 35 cycles were performed for TRPC6, β-actin and CK19 respectively. After agarose gel electrophoresis, PCR products were quantified using Quantity One software (Biorad) and expressed as the ratio of TRPC6 on β-actin or CK19 referent genes. CK19 has been shown to be specific to breast epithelial cells, both normal and malignant [
33].
Western Blotting
Prostate human cancer cell line (LNCaP), MCF-7 cells and primary culture cells were lysed for 30 min on ice in RIPA buffer (1% triton ×100, 1% Na deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM PO4Na2/K pH 7.2) supplemented with Sigma P8340 inhibitor cocktail, 2 mM EDTA and 5 mM Na orthovanadate. After centrifugation at 13000 rpm, the proteins in the supernatant were quantified using the BCA method (Biorad).
Breast tissue proteins were extracted using the WCE buffer (Whole Cell Extract : 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris HCl pH7.5, 1% NP40) supplemented with Sigma P8340 inhibitors cocktail, 0.1% SDS and 1 mM Na orthovanadate. After 1 hour in lysis buffer at 4°C, tissues were homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer (PRO-200, Fisher Bioblock Scientific) and frozen 20 min at -80°C. After centrifugation at 13000 rpm, the proteins in the supernatant were quantified using the BCA method (Biorad).
Equal amounts of each protein sample (15–20 μg) were separated by electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham). Blots were incubated with antibodies raised against TRPC6 (1/300, Chemicon) or β-actin (1/1000, Santa Cruz) and developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham) using specific peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG secondary antibodies. Peptide blocking was performed as described in the immunohistochemistry section.
Solutions
External and internal solutions had the following compositions (in mM): External: NaCl 140, KCl 5, MgCl2 2, CaCl2 2, HEPES 10 and glucose 5 at pH 7.4 (NaOH). Internal: CsCl 140, CaCl2 5, ATP-K2 1, HEPES 10, EGTA 10, MgCl2 2, at pH 7.2 (CsOH). The [Ca2+]i was clamped to 85 nM and calculated with WebMaxC v2.1 (please see Availability & requirements section below).
Extracellular and intracellular osmolarity measured with a freezing-point depression were 300 mOs and 292 mOs respectively. In order to completely block K+ channels, we added TEA at 5 mM to the extracellular medium. 2-APB, SK&F 96365 and OAG (Sigma, France) were dissolved in DMSO. Final concentrations were obtained by appropriate dilution in an external control solution. The final DMSO concentration was < 0.1%.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± S.E. The Student s t test was used to compare the relative TRPC6 transcripts in normal and cancer tissues. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Immunostaining in the epithelial compartment of tumour tissues compared to normal tissues was scored visually as equal expression or overexpression of TRPC6. χ2 tests were used in GraphPad Software to estimate the correlation between TRPC6 overexpression and clinical characteristics of the carcinoma tissues. A correlation was considered significant when P < 0.05.
Discussion
Many recent works report the involvement of TRP channels in cancer. Our results point towards an aberrant expression of TRPC6 channels in breast cancer. This study shows that TRPC6 is expressed in both the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and in the primary cultures of breast cancer epithelial cells. TRPC6 appears to be functional both in MCF-7 and in hBCE. Moreover, TRPC6 is highly expressed in breast carcinoma and is not correlated with estrogen receptor expression, tumour grade, or LNM.
Our results demonstrate that the OAG-activated cationic channels both in hBCE and MCF-7 cells share the same electrophysiological (lack of voltage dependence, and a similar reversal potential) and pharmacological properties (sensitivity to 2-APB, La
3+ and SK&F 96365). The TRPC candidates activated by OAG are limited to TRPC3, TRPC6, and TRPC7 [
23,
35]. TRPC6 is expressed at mRNA and protein levels both in MCF-7 and hBCE cells. Moreover, TRPC3 is also expressed in hBCE and its expression seems weak compared to that of the TRPC6 (Fig.
3A). However, the findings that hBCE cells express both TRPC3 and TRPC6, may indicate that the OAG-gated cationic channel(s) in theses cells are probably heterotetramultimers that include TRPC6/TRPC3.
We also extended our studies to examine TRPC6 expression at the protein levels in breast cancer tissues. No specific bands were obtained when we performed Western blot analyses: (i) on lysates from LNCaP, used as negative control [
36], (ii) by omitting the primary antibody and (iii) by blocking the primary antibody with the TRPC6 peptide. In contrast, both tumour, MCF-7 and hBCE lysates produced a 97 kDa band corresponding to the expected size of full length TRPC6. Moreover, no other band was observed, suggesting that TRPC6γ splice variant is not translated into protein.
A growing number of studies demonstrate a close correlation between an overexpression of TRP channels particularly of the TRPV6 and TRPM8 families and the development of cancer [
13,
16]. However, little is known about the expression pattern of TRPC6 or its possible role in the development of cancer, and breast cancer in particular. To our knowledge, there is only one study which shows the involvement of the TRPC6 channels in the proliferation of epithelial human prostate cancer cells in primary culture [
31]. Our results clearly show that in healthy breast tissues low levels of TRPC6 are detected in all cases determined. In contrast, the breast carcinoma tissue specimens revealed a significant overexpression of TRPC6. Moreover, TRPC6 are expressed and functional in the MCF-7 cell line and in hBCE. In vivo, the upregulation of TRPC6 was much more clearly demonstrated in cardiovascular pathologies such as hypertension, hypertrophy and increased endothelial permeability [
27,
29,
30].
Few studies have compared the ionic channel expression with the tumour grade, LNM and receptor expression status. Indeed, GIRK1 was overexpressed in primary invasive breast carcinoma and correlate with LNM [
37]. Pardo s group has found there were no correlations between Eag1 expression and age, grade and site of tumour of soft tissue sarcoma [
38]. Similar results on Eag1 expression are found in colorectal cancer [
39]. In line with these studies, we show that the TRPC6 protein levels are increased in breast tumour tissues but were not correlated either with tumour grade, ER or LNM.
Evidence indicates a crucial role for TRP channels in regulating both cell growth and cell death. Recently, it was reported that TRPV6 induced cell proliferation and took part in the resistance to apoptosis in the prostate human LNCaP cancer cells [
40]. TRPC6 has been reported to be involved in primary epithelial prostate human cell proliferation induced by the α
1-adrenergic receptors [
31]. Breast cancer cells, including MCF-7 express G protein-coupled receptors including α1-adrenergic receptors [
41]. We can thus speculate that the entry of Ca
2+ through TRPC6 channel may induce breast cancer cell proliferation in response to G protein-coupled receptor signalling. More studies are needed to determine the involvement of TRPC6 in breast cell proliferation.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AG and YELH did the electrophysiological studies and MCF-7 cell culture. ID-D did the immunohistochemistry, the conventional PCR studies, and carried out the TRPC6 Western blots. NH and HK carried out the RNA extraction of the primary culture, cell line (MCF-7) and biopsy specimens. AA did the primary epithelial culture and corrected the manuscript. HS provided us with the human biopsies and allowed us to do the IHC in his laboratory. HO-A designed the studies and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript