Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2018

08.02.2018 | Original Article

External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving

verfasst von: Raj Lakshmi Nalam, Priya Chinnachamy, Paul Emmanuel

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Breech presentation is the most common abnormal presentation occurring in 3–4% of all deliveries. Incidence of caesarean section for breech presentation has increased markedly in the last few decades. Attempting external cephalic version (ECV) reduces the chance of non-cephalic presentation at term, thus reducing the rate of caesarean sections.

Methods

Prospective study was conducted in secondary healthcare centre, in rural set-up from August 2013 to August 2015. A total of 52 patients were enrolled into the study.

Results

ECV was successful in 32 out of 52 patients with overall success of 61.5%. Out of the 32 successful ECVs, 24 patients delivered vaginally (75%) (p value 0.00), 6 patients delivered by caesarean section, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Transverse lie had 100% success rate for ECV (p value 0.005). Gravidity, placental position, gestational age and use of tocolytics did not influence the success rate of ECV. Most common problem observed during the procedure was abdominal discomfort.

Conclusion

ECV is a safe procedure with high percentage of patients delivering vaginally after successful version. Hence, acquiring skills in ECV should be considered mandatory in the postgraduate training of future obstetricians.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of breech presentation. Green-top Guideline No. 20, London: RCOG Press; 2001. p. 1–8. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of breech presentation. Green-top Guideline No. 20, London: RCOG Press; 2001. p. 1–8.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRef Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–83.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller ES, Hahn K, Grobman WA. Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:789–97.CrossRef Miller ES, Hahn K, Grobman WA. Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:789–97.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000083.PubMed Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000083.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottvall T, Ginstman C. External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(12):1443–5.CrossRef Gottvall T, Ginstman C. External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(12):1443–5.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mowat A, Gardener G. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;54(1):59–63.CrossRef Mowat A, Gardener G. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;54(1):59–63.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):76–84.CrossRef Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):76–84.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, et al. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(1):49–54.CrossRef Salzer L, Nagar R, Melamed N, et al. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(1):49–54.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rita M, Sameena S, Khurshid R. A randomized trial of external cephalic version in late pregnancy. JK Sci. 2012;14(1):25–9. Rita M, Sameena S, Khurshid R. A randomized trial of external cephalic version in late pregnancy. JK Sci. 2012;14(1):25–9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilcox C, Nassar N, Roberts C. Effectiveness of nifedipinetocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review. BJOG. 2011;118:423–8.CrossRef Wilcox C, Nassar N, Roberts C. Effectiveness of nifedipinetocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review. BJOG. 2011;118:423–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, et al. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG. 2007;114:636–8.CrossRef Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, et al. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG. 2007;114:636–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogner G, Xu F, Simbrunner C, et al. Single institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;116(2):134–7.CrossRef Bogner G, Xu F, Simbrunner C, et al. Single institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;116(2):134–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving
verfasst von
Raj Lakshmi Nalam
Priya Chinnachamy
Paul Emmanuel
Publikationsdatum
08.02.2018
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1090-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.