Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015

01.08.2015

Face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site instrumentation

verfasst von: Anthony M. Jarc, Myriam Curet

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Validated training exercises are essential tools for surgeons as they develop technical skills to use robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical systems. The purpose of this study was to show face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site instrumentation.

Methods

New (N = 21) and experienced (N = 6) surgeons participated in the study. New surgeons (11 Gynecology [GYN] and 10 General Surgery [GEN]) had not completed any da Vinci Single-Site cases but may have completed multiport cases using the da Vinci system. They participated in this study prior to attending a certification course focused on da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation. Experienced surgeons (5 GYN and 1 GEN) had completed at least 25 da Vinci Single-Site cases. The surgeons completed four inanimate training exercises and then rated them with a questionnaire. Raw metrics and overall normalized scores were computed using both video recordings and kinematic data collected from the surgical system.

Results

The experienced surgeons significantly outperformed new surgeons for many raw metrics and the overall normalized scores derived from video review (p < 0.05). Only one exercise did not achieve a significant difference between new and experienced surgeons (p = 0.08) when calculating an overall normalized score using both video and advanced metrics derived from kinematic data. Both new and experienced surgeons rated the training exercises as appearing, to train and measure technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery and actually testing the technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery.

Conclusions

In summary, the four training exercises showed face, content, and construct validity. Improved overall scores could be developed using additional metrics not included in this study. The results suggest that the training exercises could be used in an overall training curriculum aimed at developing proficiency in technical skills for surgeons new to da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Haber G-P et al (2010) Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 76(6):1279–1282PubMedCrossRef Haber G-P et al (2010) Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 76(6):1279–1282PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroh M et al (2011) First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25(11):3566–3573PubMedCrossRef Kroh M et al (2011) First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25(11):3566–3573PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Finnegan KT et al (2012) da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80(2):330–336PubMedCrossRef Finnegan KT et al (2012) da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80(2):330–336PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung AJ et al (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. The Journal of urology 187(2):630–637PubMedCrossRef Hung AJ et al (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. The Journal of urology 187(2):630–637PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung AJ et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186(3):1019–1025PubMedCrossRef Hung AJ et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186(3):1019–1025PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly DC et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072PubMedCrossRef Kelly DC et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Green I et al (2013) Creating a validated robotic curriculum for resident and fellow education. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):S130–S130 Green I et al (2013) Creating a validated robotic curriculum for resident and fellow education. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):S130–S130
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarc AM, Curet M (2014) Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup. Surg Endosc 28(2):648–656PubMedCrossRef Jarc AM, Curet M (2014) Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup. Surg Endosc 28(2):648–656PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2013) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14‐society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10(3):379–384 Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2013) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14‐society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10(3):379–384
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aghazadeh M et al (2014) Multi-institutional validation of fundamental inanimate robotic skills tasks (FIRST). J Urol 191(4 Supplement):e130–e131CrossRef Aghazadeh M et al (2014) Multi-institutional validation of fundamental inanimate robotic skills tasks (FIRST). J Urol 191(4 Supplement):e130–e131CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulan G et al (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26(6):1516–1521PubMedCrossRef Dulan G et al (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26(6):1516–1521PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen J. et al. The BlueDRAGON-a system for measuring the kinematics and dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in vivo in Robotics and Automation, 2002. Proceedings. ICRA’02. IEEE International Conference on 2002: IEEE Rosen J. et al. The BlueDRAGON-a system for measuring the kinematics and dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in vivo in Robotics and Automation, 2002. Proceedings. ICRA’02. IEEE International Conference on 2002: IEEE
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruda K et al (2013) SurgTrak—a universal platform for quantitative surgical data capture. J Med Devices 7(3):030923CrossRef Ruda K et al (2013) SurgTrak—a universal platform for quantitative surgical data capture. J Med Devices 7(3):030923CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos P et al (2013) Validation of dry lab exercises for robotic training using global assessment tool. J Urol 189(4):e642CrossRef Ramos P et al (2013) Validation of dry lab exercises for robotic training using global assessment tool. J Urol 189(4):e642CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site ™ instrumentation
verfasst von
Anthony M. Jarc
Myriam Curet
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3947-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.