Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 6/2014

01.11.2014 | Original Article

Facilitators and Barriers to Service User Involvement in Mental Health Guidelines: Lessons from The Netherlands

verfasst von: Alida J. van der Ham, Laura S. Shields, Roddy van der Horst, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Maurits W. van Tulder

Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study is the first in-depth qualitative study of service user involvement in the development of multidisciplinary mental health guidelines in the Netherlands. The study comprised a desk study of guidelines (n = 12) and case studies of service user involvement in five guidelines using document analysis, interviews (n = 24) and observations. The desk study shows that all multidisciplinary mental health guidelines have taken service user perspectives into account to some extent. The five guideline case studies led to the identification of ten main themes. Findings will assist guideline developers in making early, informed decisions on involving service users effectively.
Fußnoten
1
We use the term ‘service user representatives’ to refer to service users as well as non-service users (for example family members or employees of service user organisations) who represent the service users’ perspectives in the guideline development process.
 
2
For the guideline on Employment and Severe Mental Illness, the researchers had good access to the guideline development process and were able to monitor the whole process. Because of this it was possible to conduct more interviews for this case study than for the other case studies.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., et al. (2010). Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: International experiences and future perspectives. BMJ Quality & Safety, 19(5), e22. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.034835.CrossRef Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., et al. (2010). Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: International experiences and future perspectives. BMJ Quality & Safety, 19(5), e22. doi:10.​1136/​qshc.​2009.​034835.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Broerse, J.E.W., van der Ham, L., van Veen, S., Pittens, C., van Tulder, M. (2010). Inventarisatie patiëntenparticipatie bij richtlijnontwikkeling.Onderzoeksrapport. (Inventory Patient Participation in Guideline Development. Research Report, in Dutch) Amsterdam: Athena Instituut, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Broerse, J.E.W., van der Ham, L., van Veen, S., Pittens, C., van Tulder, M. (2010). Inventarisatie patiëntenparticipatie bij richtlijnontwikkeling.Onderzoeksrapport. (Inventory Patient Participation in Guideline Development. Research Report, in Dutch) Amsterdam: Athena Instituut, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrigan, P. W., & Matthews, A. K. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 235–248.CrossRef Corrigan, P. W., & Matthews, A. K. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 235–248.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dalgin, R. S., & Gilbride, D. (2003). Perspectives of people with psychiatric disabilities on employment disclosure. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26, 306–310.PubMedCrossRef Dalgin, R. S., & Gilbride, D. (2003). Perspectives of people with psychiatric disabilities on employment disclosure. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26, 306–310.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Díaz Del Campo, P., Gracia, J., Blasco, J. A., & Andradas, E. (2011). A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: Methodological approaches. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(9), 779–784. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049031.CrossRef Díaz Del Campo, P., Gracia, J., Blasco, J. A., & Andradas, E. (2011). A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: Methodological approaches. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(9), 779–784. doi:10.​1136/​bmjqs.​2010.​049031.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jarrett, L. & Patient Involvement Unit (PIU). (2004). A report on a study to evaluate patient/carer membership of the first NICE Guideline Development. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Jarrett, L. & Patient Involvement Unit (PIU). (2004). A report on a study to evaluate patient/carer membership of the first NICE Guideline Development. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Zurück zum Zitat Kelson, M. (2001). Commissioned papers patient involvement in clinical guideline development: Where are we now? The Journal of Clinical Governance, 9(4), 169–174. Kelson, M. (2001). Commissioned papers patient involvement in clinical guideline development: Where are we now? The Journal of Clinical Governance, 9(4), 169–174.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendall, T., Crawford, M. J., Taylor, C., Whittington, C., & Rose, D. (2012). Improving the experience of care for adults using NHS mental health services: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ, 344, e1089. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1089.PubMedCrossRef Kendall, T., Crawford, M. J., Taylor, C., Whittington, C., & Rose, D. (2012). Improving the experience of care for adults using NHS mental health services: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ, 344, e1089. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e1089.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lanza, M. L., & Ericsson, A. (2000). Consumer contributions in developing clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 14(2), 33–40.PubMedCrossRef Lanza, M. L., & Ericsson, A. (2000). Consumer contributions in developing clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 14(2), 33–40.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Légaré, F., Boivin, A., van der Weijden, T., Pakenham, C., Burgers, J., Légaré, J., et al. (2011). Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: A knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Medical Decision Making, 31(6), E45–E74. doi:10.1177/0272989X11424401.PubMedCrossRef Légaré, F., Boivin, A., van der Weijden, T., Pakenham, C., Burgers, J., Légaré, J., et al. (2011). Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: A knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Medical Decision Making, 31(6), E45–E74. doi:10.​1177/​0272989X11424401​.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat National Steering Group for Multidisciplinary Guideline Development in Mental Health (NSGMH), & Trimbos Institute. (2012). GGZ-Richtlijnen [Mental Health Guidelines, in Dutch]. Retrieved from: http://www.ggzrichtlijnen.nl. National Steering Group for Multidisciplinary Guideline Development in Mental Health (NSGMH), & Trimbos Institute. (2012). GGZ-Richtlijnen [Mental Health Guidelines, in Dutch]. Retrieved from: http://​www.​ggzrichtlijnen.​nl.
Zurück zum Zitat Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2006). Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004563.pub2. Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2006). Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD004563.​pub2.
Zurück zum Zitat Owens, D. K. (1998). Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine, 23(9), 1073–1179.PubMedCrossRef Owens, D. K. (1998). Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine, 23(9), 1073–1179.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Renfrew, M. J., Dyson, L., Herbert, G., McFadden, A., McCormick, F., Thomas, J., et al. (2008). Developing evidence-based recommendations in public health—incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives. Health Expectations, 11(1), 3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00471.x.PubMedCrossRef Renfrew, M. J., Dyson, L., Herbert, G., McFadden, A., McCormick, F., Thomas, J., et al. (2008). Developing evidence-based recommendations in public health—incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives. Health Expectations, 11(1), 3–15. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1369-7625.​2007.​00471.​x.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, W. A. (2002). Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice. The British Journal of General Practice, 52(481), 663–668.PubMedPubMedCentral Rogers, W. A. (2002). Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice. The British Journal of General Practice, 52(481), 663–668.PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Sinnema, H., Franx, G., van ‘t Land, H. (2009). Trendrapportage GGz 2009. Multidisciplinaire richtlijnen in de GGz. Themarapportage. [Reporting Trends in Mental Healthcare 2009. Multidisciplinary Guidelines in Mental Healthcare. Report Themes, in Dutch]. Utrecht: Trimbos-Instituut. Sinnema, H., Franx, G., van ‘t Land, H. (2009). Trendrapportage GGz 2009. Multidisciplinaire richtlijnen in de GGz. Themarapportage. [Reporting Trends in Mental Healthcare 2009. Multidisciplinary Guidelines in Mental Healthcare. Report Themes, in Dutch]. Utrecht: Trimbos-Instituut.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat van Wersch, A., & Eccles, M. (2001). Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: Practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in Health Care, 10(1), 10–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral van Wersch, A., & Eccles, M. (2001). Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: Practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in Health Care, 10(1), 10–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat van Wersch, S.F.M., & van den Akker, P.A.M. (2005) Ervaringskennis is geen kennis!? Cliëntenparticipatie bij multidisciplinaire richtlijnontwikkeling in de GGZ. Eindrapportage. [Experience-based knowledge is no knowledge!?Client Participation in Multidisciplinary Guideline Development in Mental Health. Final Report, in Dutch]. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut. van Wersch, S.F.M., & van den Akker, P.A.M. (2005) Ervaringskennis is geen kennis!? Cliëntenparticipatie bij multidisciplinaire richtlijnontwikkeling in de GGZ. Eindrapportage. [Experience-based knowledge is no knowledge!?Client Participation in Multidisciplinary Guideline Development in Mental Health. Final Report, in Dutch]. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.
Metadaten
Titel
Facilitators and Barriers to Service User Involvement in Mental Health Guidelines: Lessons from The Netherlands
verfasst von
Alida J. van der Ham
Laura S. Shields
Roddy van der Horst
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse
Maurits W. van Tulder
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0521-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.