Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 6/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Contributions

Factors Associated with Prolonged Anesthesia Recovery Following Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Analysis

verfasst von: Toby N. Weingarten, Natasha M. Hawkins, W. Brian Beam, Heather A. Brandt, Diana J. Koepp, Todd A. Kellogg, Juraj Sprung

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Phase I postanesthesia recovery is often prolonged after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. We hypothesized that postoperative respiratory depression is a major contributor to this delayed recovery.

Methods

Medical records of all patients who had a laparoscopic bariatric surgical operation from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2012, were reviewed for clinical, anesthetic, and postanesthesia variables. Recoveries were defined as discharge from the recovery room in ≤90 min and in >90 min (prolonged postanesthesia recovery). We compared characteristics of patients without prolonged recovery to those with prolonged recovery.

Results

Of 781 bariatric patients, 304 (38.9 %) had prolonged recovery. These patients had more respiratory depression (29 vs 6 patients), more postoperative nausea and vomiting (106 vs 92 patients), more treatments of hypertension in the recovery room (49 vs 33 patients), and more opioid treatment (median intravenous morphine equivalents [interquartile range], 10.0 [3.0–15.0] vs 5.0 [0.0–10.5]) (P < 0.001 for all). On multivariable analysis, preoperative history of hypertension (P = 0.03), fewer prophylactic antiemetics received (P = 0.02), and longer surgical duration (P = 0.03) were associated with prolonged postanesthesia recovery.

Conclusions

Inadequate antiemetic prophylaxis and the treatment of postoperative hypertension were associated with prolonged postanesthesia recovery. Surprisingly, diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea was not associated with prolonged recovery, which may be attributable to use of continuous positive airway pressure devices following emergence from anesthesia. Prolonged recovery in patients treated for hypertension may be related to institutional guidelines that require additional monitoring time after these medications are administered.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung SA, Yuan H, Chung F. A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(5):1543–63.CrossRefPubMed Chung SA, Yuan H, Chung F. A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(5):1543–63.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamlin RJ, Sprung J, Hofer RE, et al. Obesity trends in the surgical population at a large academic center: a comparison between 1989-1991 to 2006-2008 epochs. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113(6):397–400.PubMed Hamlin RJ, Sprung J, Hofer RE, et al. Obesity trends in the surgical population at a large academic center: a comparison between 1989-1991 to 2006-2008 epochs. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113(6):397–400.PubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gali B, Whalen Jr FX, Gay PC, et al. Management plan to reduce risks in perioperative care of patients with presumed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(6):582–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Gali B, Whalen Jr FX, Gay PC, et al. Management plan to reduce risks in perioperative care of patients with presumed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(6):582–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroeder DR, et al. Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):869–77.CrossRefPubMed Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroeder DR, et al. Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):869–77.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Flemons WW, Whitelaw WA, Brant R, et al. Likelihood ratios for a sleep apnea clinical prediction rule. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(5 Pt 1):1279–85.CrossRefPubMed Flemons WW, Whitelaw WA, Brant R, et al. Likelihood ratios for a sleep apnea clinical prediction rule. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(5 Pt 1):1279–85.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Juvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, et al. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(3):714–9.CrossRefPubMed Juvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, et al. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(3):714–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):693–700.CrossRefPubMed Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(3):693–700.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(1):85–113.CrossRefPubMed Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(1):85–113.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat White PF, O’Hara JF, Roberson CR, et al. The impact of current antiemetic practices on patient outcomes: a prospective study on high-risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(2):452–8.CrossRefPubMed White PF, O’Hara JF, Roberson CR, et al. The impact of current antiemetic practices on patient outcomes: a prospective study on high-risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(2):452–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–44.CrossRefPubMed Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–44.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):247–54. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 7;149(7):519.CrossRefPubMed Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):247–54. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 7;149(7):519.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Management of Cancer Pain Guideline Panel (US). Management of cancer pain. Rockville (MD): Department of Health and Human Services (US), Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; c1994. Clinical practice guideline; no. 9 (AHCPR publication; no. 94-0592). Management of Cancer Pain Guideline Panel (US). Management of cancer pain. Rockville (MD): Department of Health and Human Services (US), Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; c1994. Clinical practice guideline; no. 9 (AHCPR publication; no. 94-0592).
17.
Zurück zum Zitat American Pain Society. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. 4th ed. Glenview (IL): American Pain Society; c1999. American Pain Society. Principles of analgesic use in the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. 4th ed. Glenview (IL): American Pain Society; c1999.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dexter F, Tinker JH. Analysis of strategies to decrease postanesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(1):94–101.CrossRefPubMed Dexter F, Tinker JH. Analysis of strategies to decrease postanesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(1):94–101.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddle JP, Evers AS, Piccirillo JF. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay: quantifying and assessing dependent factors. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(3):628–33.PubMed Waddle JP, Evers AS, Piccirillo JF. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay: quantifying and assessing dependent factors. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(3):628–33.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingarten TN, Flores AS, McKenzie JA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea and perioperative complications in bariatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(1):131–9.CrossRefPubMed Weingarten TN, Flores AS, McKenzie JA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea and perioperative complications in bariatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(1):131–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, et al. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2441–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, et al. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2441–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Factors Associated with Prolonged Anesthesia Recovery Following Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Analysis
verfasst von
Toby N. Weingarten
Natasha M. Hawkins
W. Brian Beam
Heather A. Brandt
Diana J. Koepp
Todd A. Kellogg
Juraj Sprung
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1468-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Obesity Surgery 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.