Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 6/2019

27.04.2018 | Original Paper

Factors influencing stereopsis in patients with both refractive accommodative esotropia and amblyopia

verfasst von: Burçin Çakır, Özlem Bursalı, Sedat Özmen, Nilgün Özkan Aksoy, Tural Babashli, Gursoy Alagöz

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Potential factors influencing stereopsis were investigated in patients with both refractive accommodative esotropia (RAE) and amblyopia.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review was performed to find out all patients with the diagnosis of both RAE and amblyopia. Patients are classified into two groups: group 1 (with stereopsis) and group 2 (without stereopsis). Onset age of RAE, history of strabismus in family members, time of amblyopia treatment, mean spherical equivalent, anisometropia, ocular movement disorders, especially, overaction of inferior oblique (IO) muscle, visual acuity difference (VAD) between eyes, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) levels of amblyopic and normal eyes and the presence of alternation of fixation (AOF) were investigated as possible factors. These factors were compared statistically between groups.

Results

Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 21 and 26 patients, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference in terms of onset age of RAE, family history, amblyopia treatment, BCVA of normal eyes and anisometropia. IO overaction and higher VAD were found to be statistically different between groups (p: 0.019, p: 0.022, respectively). Besides, there was significant difference in terms of AOF and better BCVA in amblyopic eyes (p: 0.000, p: 0.009, respectively).

Conclusion

IO overaction, BCVA in amblyopic eyes, VAD and AOF were found to be potential risk factors for the development of stereopsis in patients with both RAE and amblyopia.
Literatur
2.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Berk T, Koçak N, Ellidokuz H (2004) Treatment outcomes in refractive accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 4:384–388CrossRef Berk T, Koçak N, Ellidokuz H (2004) Treatment outcomes in refractive accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 4:384–388CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Güçlü H, Gürlü VP, Özal SA, Özkurt ZG (2015) Prognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropia. Pak J Med Sci 31(4):807–811PubMedPubMedCentral Güçlü H, Gürlü VP, Özal SA, Özkurt ZG (2015) Prognostic factors for stereopsis in refractive accommodative esotropia. Pak J Med Sci 31(4):807–811PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Uretmen O, Köse S, Öztaş S, Eğrilmez S (2007) Factors influencing stereoacuity in refractive accommodative esotropia. Can J Ophthalmol 42(4):600–604CrossRefPubMed Uretmen O, Köse S, Öztaş S, Eğrilmez S (2007) Factors influencing stereoacuity in refractive accommodative esotropia. Can J Ophthalmol 42(4):600–604CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Weakley DR Jr, Birch E, Kip K (2001) The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 5:153–157CrossRefPubMed Weakley DR Jr, Birch E, Kip K (2001) The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 5:153–157CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo T, Yamane T, Fujiwara H, Ohtsuki H, Watanabe Y (2005) Predictive factors for long term outcome of stereoacuity in Japanese patients with pure accommodative esotropia. Strabismus 13:79–84CrossRefPubMed Matsuo T, Yamane T, Fujiwara H, Ohtsuki H, Watanabe Y (2005) Predictive factors for long term outcome of stereoacuity in Japanese patients with pure accommodative esotropia. Strabismus 13:79–84CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett SL, Birch EE (2003) Risk factors for abnormal binocular vision after successful alignment of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 7:256–262CrossRefPubMed Fawcett SL, Birch EE (2003) Risk factors for abnormal binocular vision after successful alignment of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 7:256–262CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciuffreda KJ, Levi DM, Selenow A (1991) Amblyopia: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham Ciuffreda KJ, Levi DM, Selenow A (1991) Amblyopia: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dennis ML, David CK, Daphne B (2015) Stereopsis and amblyopia: a mini-review. Vis Res 114:17–30CrossRef Dennis ML, David CK, Daphne B (2015) Stereopsis and amblyopia: a mini-review. Vis Res 114:17–30CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakim OM (2007) Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44(3):174–177CrossRefPubMed Hakim OM (2007) Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44(3):174–177CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkan Turan K, Taylan Sekeroglu H, Karahan S, Sanac AS (2017) Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement. Int Ophthalmol 37:1305–1310CrossRefPubMed Erkan Turan K, Taylan Sekeroglu H, Karahan S, Sanac AS (2017) Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement. Int Ophthalmol 37:1305–1310CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Birch EE, Petrig B (1996) FPL and VEP measures of fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity in normal infants. Vis Res 36:1321–1327CrossRefPubMed Birch EE, Petrig B (1996) FPL and VEP measures of fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity in normal infants. Vis Res 36:1321–1327CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Birch EE, Fawcett S, Morale S, Jeffrey B, O’Connor A (2002) Measurement of stereoacuity outcomes during infancy: infant random dot stereocards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:A2937 Birch EE, Fawcett S, Morale S, Jeffrey B, O’Connor A (2002) Measurement of stereoacuity outcomes during infancy: infant random dot stereocards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:A2937
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett S, Leffler J, Birch EE (2000) Factors influencing stereacuity outcomes in accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 4:15–20CrossRefPubMed Fawcett S, Leffler J, Birch EE (2000) Factors influencing stereacuity outcomes in accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 4:15–20CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Weakley DR Jr, Urso RG, Dias CL (1992) Asymmetric inferior oblique overaction and its association with amblyopia in esotropia. Ophthalmology 99(4):590–593CrossRefPubMed Weakley DR Jr, Urso RG, Dias CL (1992) Asymmetric inferior oblique overaction and its association with amblyopia in esotropia. Ophthalmology 99(4):590–593CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Factors influencing stereopsis in patients with both refractive accommodative esotropia and amblyopia
verfasst von
Burçin Çakır
Özlem Bursalı
Sedat Özmen
Nilgün Özkan Aksoy
Tural Babashli
Gursoy Alagöz
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0937-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

International Ophthalmology 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.