Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

08.01.2016 | Original Article

Falope Rings or Modified Pomeroy’s Technique for Concurrent Tubal Sterilization

verfasst von: Leelavathi Basava, Priyankur Roy, V. Anusha Priya, Shubhashri Srirama

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Sonderheft 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Sterilization at caesarean section is usually performed by the modified Pomeroy’s technique. Application of Falope rings and Filshie clips may also be used for tubal sterilization at caesarean section, and these techniques are also used during laparoscopy or minilaparotomy.

Objectives

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the failure rates, complications, technical difficulties and reversibility of the Falope ring application for tubal sterilization as compared to the traditional modified Pomeroy’s technique used during caesarean sections.

Methodology

Five hundred multigravid women who underwent caesarean section for various causes and wanted concurrent tubal sterilization were recruited in the study. Two hundred and fifty women underwent tubal sterilization by Falope ring application and the other 250 by modified Pomeroy’s technique. Follow-up period ranged from 3 to 42 months. These patients’ names were checked against the antenatal booking register, the operating theatre register in case of ectopic pregnancies and a termination of pregnancy register to recognize failed sterilization.

Results

Among the 250 women who underwent Falope ring application, no major complications were noted. In the other group, women who underwent tubal sterilization by modified Pomeroy’s technique, there was one woman with serious complication, ectopic pregnancy. Falope ring application was an easy procedure to perform and also less time-consuming than modified Pomeroy’s technique.

Conclusion

Falope ring sterilization is simple, effective and safe, and the rate of subsequent pregnancy is lower than with conventional modified Pomeroy’s technique.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Engender Health. Female Sterilization. Contraceptive sterilization: global issues and trends. New York: Engender Health; 2002. Engender Health. Female Sterilization. Contraceptive sterilization: global issues and trends. New York: Engender Health; 2002.
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Male and female sterilisation. London: RCOG Press; 2004. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Male and female sterilisation. London: RCOG Press; 2004.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nwagbara PN, Stibbe HM, Browning AJ, et al. Reversal of female sterilisation experience in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:293–7.CrossRefPubMed Nwagbara PN, Stibbe HM, Browning AJ, et al. Reversal of female sterilisation experience in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:293–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1161–8.CrossRefPubMed Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1161–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohaut BA, Musselman BL, Sanchez-Ramos L et al. Randomized trial to compare perioperative outcomes of Filshie clip versus pomeroy technique for postpartum and intraoperative caesarean tubal sterilization: a pilot study. Contraception. 2004;69:267–70.CrossRefPubMed Kohaut BA, Musselman BL, Sanchez-Ramos L et al. Randomized trial to compare perioperative outcomes of Filshie clip versus pomeroy technique for postpartum and intraoperative caesarean tubal sterilization: a pilot study. Contraception. 2004;69:267–70.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM. US collaborative review of sterilization working group. the risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:762–7.CrossRefPubMed Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM. US collaborative review of sterilization working group. the risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:762–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Filshie GM. Long term experience with the Filshie clip. Gynaecol Forum. 2002;7(3):7–10. Filshie GM. Long term experience with the Filshie clip. Gynaecol Forum. 2002;7(3):7–10.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Penfield AJ. The Filshieclip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:485–9.CrossRefPubMed Penfield AJ. The Filshieclip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:485–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi IC, Petta CA, McPheeters M. A review of safety, efficacy, pros and cons, and issues of puerperal tubal sterilization—an update. Adv Contracept. 1995;11:187–206.CrossRefPubMed Chi IC, Petta CA, McPheeters M. A review of safety, efficacy, pros and cons, and issues of puerperal tubal sterilization—an update. Adv Contracept. 1995;11:187–206.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Falope Rings or Modified Pomeroy’s Technique for Concurrent Tubal Sterilization
verfasst von
Leelavathi Basava
Priyankur Roy
V. Anusha Priya
Shubhashri Srirama
Publikationsdatum
08.01.2016
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0794-6

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.