Background
1. Examine whether CO-CSAs coupled with tailored nutrition education improve dietary intake and quality among children aged 2–12 in low-income households; |
2. Examine the influence of CO-CSAs and tailored education on attitudes and behaviors related to nutrition, meal planning, and meal preparation; |
3. Contrast CSA models to understand if and how variability in operational characteristics affect participation and intervention effectiveness in low-income families with children; |
4. Estimate the economic impact of a CO-CSA program on the local economy; |
5. Evaluate options for farmers to sustain the CO-CSA, and work with an advisory board, extension, and other stakeholders (e.g. CSA networks) to disseminate findings through development of a toolkit and related electronic resources to maximize impact; and |
6. Develop and evaluate short-course modules and lectures for undergraduate and graduate students related to local food system innovations that are synergistic with the goal of obesity prevention and designed to enhance human capital relevant to U.S. agriculture. |
Methods
Component 1: Formative research with stakeholders
Study participants | Data collection method / tool to be administered |
---|---|
CSA farmers | |
CSA farmers with a CO-CSA
| • In-depth interviews covering farm and CSA operations, marketing strategies, customer profiles, most popular produce offerings, views on accepting SNAP/EBT, lessons learned, and experience using (or thoughts related to) the following options for subsidizing CSAs: work shares, sliding scales, donations, fundraising, grants, and revolving loans • Fruit and vegetable checklist regarding crops grown on their farm |
CSA farmers with no CO-CSA
| • In-depth interviews covering farm and CSA operations, marketing strategies, customer profiles, most popular produce, views on accepting SNAP/EBT, interest in implementing a CO-CSA, opinions on options for subsidizing CSAs, including work shares, sliding scales, donations, fundraising, grants, and revolving loans • Fruit and vegetable checklist regarding crops grown on their farm |
Low-income households | |
Low-income adults
| • In-depth interview covering eating and cooking habits, perceptions of healthy foods, community supports for healthy eating, children’s preferences for types of fruits and vegetables, child snacking, tools needed to prepare produce, children’s involvement in food preparation, thoughts on local farms and farmers, knowledge of seasonal produce, CO-CSA program thoughts and preferences, and what would make it easier or more challenging to participate in a CO-CSA program • Choice experiment exercise testing willingness to purchase a CSA within hypothetical scenarios regarding variations in pricing, share frequency, and share variety [70] |
Low-income children
| • Semi-structured interview covering fruit and vegetable familiarity and preferences, involvement in meal preparation, snacking habits, family and peer influences, nutrition knowledge and skills obtained through school or community, experiences with gardening and farms, and knowledge of seasonal produce |
Full-paying CSA members | • In-depth interview covering views on features of their CSA, CSA preferences, factors that influence their participation, child involvement in CSAs, food shopping preferences, opinions on food assistance programming for limited income families, willingness to help offset the price of CSA shares, and thoughts on CSA cost-offset strategies including: SNAP use, workshares, donations, fundraising, and grants • Choice experiment exercise testing willingness to purchase a CSA within hypothetical scenarios regarding variations in pricing, share frequency, and share variety [70] |
Community health educators | • Online survey with questions about their professional experience and demographic characteristics, fruits and vegetables that are familiar and appealing to low-income families in their communities, their work related to local foods promotion, and nutrition education programs that their organizations offer to low-income families • In-depth interview covering types of nutrition education they provide, where they deliver the education, participants served, and to solicit suggestions for how CSA produce could be highlighted in the curriculum • Phone focus group covering how to best promote local foods, interest in teaching about local foods, thoughts on cost-offset CSA program, engaging low-income populations in nutrition education, identifying community organizations to partner with for this type of program, and recommendations and suggestions for sustainability |
Data collection
Management and analysis of formative data
Component 2: Examination of dietary outcomes among current CO-CSA participants
Data collection and outcomes
Analysis
Component 3: Develop skill-based, CSA-tailored education curriculum
Component 4: Randomized intervention trial of CO-CSA plus tailored education
Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 – intervention | CO-CSA + Education | CO-CSA | Sustainability |
Group 2 – control | Data collection only | CO-CSA + Education | CO-CSA |
Group 3 – intervention | CO-CSA + Education | Sustainability | |
Group 4 – control | Data collection only | CO-CSA + Education |
Farms and educators
Participants
Sample size calculations
Randomization
Intervention components
Outcome | Measure | Source/Instrument |
---|---|---|
Primary outcomes | ||
Child’s fruit and vegetable intake | • Fruit and vegetable screener | • National Cancer Institute’s All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener [82]a
|
• Three dietary recalls | • Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24–2016™) [73] | |
Child’s intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks | • Beverage and snacks questionnaire | |
• Three dietary recalls | • Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24–2016™) [73] | |
Child’s caloric intake as a percent of estimated energy requirements | • Three dietary recalls | • Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24–2016™) [73] |
Child’s dermal carotenoid levels | • Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) of the palm | • Pharmanex Biophotonic Scanner S3 (NuSkin, Provo, UT) |
Child’s diet quality | • Three dietary recalls | • Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24–2016™) [73] |
• Fruit and vegetable screener | • National Cancer Institute’s All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener [82]a
| |
• Beverage and snacks questionnaire | ||
Secondary outcomes | ||
Child’s BMI percentile | • Height and weight measured by trained research staff | • Lohman [81] |
Child’s physical activity | • Questionnaire questions | |
Child’s sedentary behavior | • Questionnaire questions | • Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) questionnaire [92]a
|
Caregiver’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about fruits and vegetables | • Questionnaire module | |
Caregiver’s ability to select, store, and prepare CSA produce | • Questionnaire module | • Cooking Techniques and Meal Preparation Self-Efficacy Scale [86]a
|
Caregiver’s ability to substitute fruit and vegetables for energy-dense foods | • Questionnaire module | • Original |
Caregiver’s ability to prepare foods to minimize added (solid) fat and sugar | • Questionnaire module | • Original |
Availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables in the home | • Questionnaire module | • Scales for fruit and vegetable availability and accessibility within the home [88] |
Caregiver’s fruit and vegetable intake | • Fruit and vegetable screener | • National Cancer Institute’s All-Day Fruit and Vegetable Screener [82]a
|
Caregiver’s intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed snacks | • Beverage and snacks questionnaire | |
Caregiver’s dermal carotenoid levels | • Resonance Raman Spectroscopy (RRS) of the palm | • Pharmanex Biophotonic Scanner S3 (NuSkin, Provo, UT) |
Household food security | • Questionnaire module | • US Department of Agriculture 6-item Food Security Module with 30-day reference period [89]a
|
Assessments | Baseline | Fall | Spring |
Informed consent form |
X
| ||
Physical measurements | |||
Anthropometric measures (child) |
X
|
X
| |
Dermal carotenoid measures (caregiver and child) |
X
|
X
| |
Dietary recalls (child) |
X
|
X
| |
Online questionnaire modules | |||
Brief dietary measures (caregiver and child) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Fruit and vegetable knowledge attitudes, and beliefs (caregiver) |
X
|
X
| |
Ability to select, store, and prepare CSA produce (caregiver) |
X
|
X
| |
Ability to substitute fruit and vegetables for energy-dense foods (caregiver) |
X
|
X
| |
Ability to prepare foods to minimize added (solid) fat and sugar (caregiver) |
X
|
X
| |
Fruit and vegetable availability and accessibility within the home (household) |
X
|
X
| |
Food security (household) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Nutrition assistance and education participation (household) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Physical activity and sedentary behavior measures (child) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
General health status (caregiver and child) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Costs associated with food purchasing and preparation (household) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Costs associated with CO-CSA participation (household) |
X
a
| ||
Kitchen inventory (household) |
X
| ||
Household composition and demographics |
X
|
X
|
X
|
CSA participation (outside of/in addition to the research study; household) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |
Process evaluation | |||
Program evaluation | |||
Dose delivered |
X
|
X
|
X
|
Dose received |
X
|
X
| |
Fidelity |
X
|
X
| |
Experiences |
X
|
X
| |
Program cost |
X
| ||
Non-participation |
X
|