Erschienen in:
01.06.2014 | Original Article
FDG PET during radiochemotherapy is predictive of outcome at 1 year in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective multicentre study (RTEP2)
verfasst von:
Pierre Vera, Sandrine Mezzani-Saillard, Agathe Edet-Sanson, Jean-François Ménard, Romain Modzelewski, Sebastien Thureau, Marc-Etienne Meyer, Khadija Jalali, Stéphane Bardet, Delphine Lerouge, Claire Houzard, Françoise Mornex, Pierre Olivier, Guillaume Faure, Caroline Rousseau, Marc-André Mahé, Philippe Gomez, Isabelle Brenot-Rossi, Naji Salem, Bernard Dubray
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
|
Ausgabe 6/2014
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To assess prospectively the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) with or without concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
Patients with histological proof of invasive localized NSCLC and evaluable tumour, and who were candidates for curative-intent radiochemotherapy (RCT) or RT were preincluded after providing written informed consent. Definitive inclusion was conditional upon significant FDG uptake before RT (PET1). All included patients had a FDG PET/CT scan during RT (PET2, mean dose 43 Gy) and were evaluated by FDG PET/CT at 3 months and 1 year after RT. The main endpoint was death (from whatever cause) or tumour progression at 1 year.
Results
Of 77 patients preincluded, 52 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients, 77 % received RT with induction chemotherapy and 73 % RT with concomitant chemotherapy. At 1 year, 40 patients (77 %) had died or had tumour progression. No statistically significant association was found between stage (IIIB vs. other), histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs. other), induction or concomitant chemotherapy, and death/tumour progression at 1 year. The SUVmax in the PET2 scan was the single variable predictive of death or tumour progression at 1 year (odds ratio 1.97, 95 % CI 1.25 – 3.09, p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95 % CI 0.73 – 0.94, p < 10−4). A SUVmax value of 5.3 in the PET2 scan yielded a sensitivity of 70 % and a specificity of 92 % for predicting tumour progression or death at 1 year.
Conclusion
This prospective multicentre study demonstrated the prognostic value in terms of disease-free survival of SUVmax assessed during the 5th week of curative-intent RT or RCT in NSCLC patients (NCT01261598; RTEP2 study).