Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2018

22.02.2018

Feasibility of a novel laparoscopic technique with unidirectional knotless barbed sutures for the primary closure of duodenal ulcer perforation

verfasst von: Tae-Han Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Sang-Ho Jeong, Jin-Kwon Lee, Seung-Jin Kwag, Ju-Yeon Kim, Woohyung Lee, Jung-Woo Woo, Jae Yool Jang, Eun-Jin Song, Taejin Park, Chi-Young Jeong, Young-Tae Ju, Eun-Jung Jung, Soon-Chan Hong, Sang-Kyung Choi, Woo-Song Ha, Young-Joon Lee

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic primary repair is one of the main procedures used for perforated gastric ulcers, and this technique requires reproducible and secure suturing. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel continuous suture method with barbed sutures during laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers.

Patients and methods

Clinical data from 116 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers were collected between November 2009 and October 2015. Continuous suturing with 15-cm-long unidirectional absorbable barbed sutures was used for laparoscopic repair in the study group, termed group V (n = 51). Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair with conventional interrupted sutures were defined as group C (n = 65). The complication and operative data were compared between groups.

Results

Although there was no difference between group V and group C in the overall complication rate (15.7% vs. 24.6%; p = 0.259), the complication rate related to suturing was lower (3.9% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.04) in group V. Group V showed rates of 0% for leakage, 2% for intra-abdominal fluid collection, and 2% for stricture; the corresponding rates in group C were 3.1, 7.7, and 4.6%, respectively. Regarding operative data, the total operation time (V vs. C, 87.7 min vs. 131.2 min), total suture time (7.1 min vs. 25.3 min), and suture time per stitch (1.2 min vs. 6.2 min) were significantly shorter in group V than in group C (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The use of a continuous suture technique with unidirectional barbed sutures is as safe as the conventional suture technique and allows easier and faster suturing in the repair of perforated peptic ulcers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT (2010) Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg 251:51–58CrossRefPubMed Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT (2010) Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg 251:51–58CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MK (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:313–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MK (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:313–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC (2011) Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 84:102–113CrossRefPubMed Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden CW, Metz DC (2011) Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 84:102–113CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Widhiasmara PP, Dankelman J (2009) Requirements for the design and implementation of checklists for surgical processes. Surg Endosc 23:715–726CrossRefPubMed Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Widhiasmara PP, Dankelman J (2009) Requirements for the design and implementation of checklists for surgical processes. Surg Endosc 23:715–726CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Navez B, Navez J (2014) Laparoscopy in the acute abdomen. Best practice research. Clin Gastroenterol 28:3–17 Navez B, Navez J (2014) Laparoscopy in the acute abdomen. Best practice research. Clin Gastroenterol 28:3–17
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH (2013) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004778 Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH (2013) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004778
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C (2013) The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 27:3830–3834CrossRefPubMed Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C (2013) The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 27:3830–3834CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bush CM, Prosser JD, Morrison MP, Sandhu G, Wenger KH, Pashley DH, Birchall MA, Postma GN, Weinberger PM (2012) New technology applications: knotless barbed suture for tracheal resection anastomosis. Laryngoscope 122:1062–1066CrossRefPubMed Bush CM, Prosser JD, Morrison MP, Sandhu G, Wenger KH, Pashley DH, Birchall MA, Postma GN, Weinberger PM (2012) New technology applications: knotless barbed suture for tracheal resection anastomosis. Laryngoscope 122:1062–1066CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Girard M, Coulot M (1956) First results of laparoscopic examinations in hepato-vesicular pathology. Lyon Med 88:433–438PubMed Girard M, Coulot M (1956) First results of laparoscopic examinations in hepato-vesicular pathology. Lyon Med 88:433–438PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg N (1955) Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi. AMA Arch Surg 70:120–122CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg N (1955) Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi. AMA Arch Surg 70:120–122CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Litynski GS (1999) Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987–1988). JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3:163–167 Litynski GS (1999) Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987–1988). JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3:163–167
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2005) Real-time objective assessment of knot quality with a portable tensiometer is superior to execution time for assessment of laparoscopic knot-tying performance. Surg Innov 12:233–237CrossRefPubMed Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2005) Real-time objective assessment of knot quality with a portable tensiometer is superior to execution time for assessment of laparoscopic knot-tying performance. Surg Innov 12:233–237CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, Beck C, Zaruby J, Primavera M, Kirsch D, Miller J, Liu JJ, Bellizzi A, Melvin WS (2009) Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov 16:237–242CrossRefPubMed Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, Beck C, Zaruby J, Primavera M, Kirsch D, Miller J, Liu JJ, Bellizzi A, Melvin WS (2009) Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov 16:237–242CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ (2013) Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 27:1360–1366CrossRefPubMed Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ (2013) Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 27:1360–1366CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63CrossRefPubMed De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS (2013) Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg 23:60–63CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JS, Yoon YC (2017) Laparoscopic treatment of choledochal cyst using barbed sutures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:58–62CrossRefPubMed Lee JS, Yoon YC (2017) Laparoscopic treatment of choledochal cyst using barbed sutures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:58–62CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang SH, Jung YK, Choi SJ, Ha TK (2017) Postoperative mechanical small bowel obstruction induced by V-Loc barbed absorbable suture after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:380–382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jang SH, Jung YK, Choi SJ, Ha TK (2017) Postoperative mechanical small bowel obstruction induced by V-Loc barbed absorbable suture after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:380–382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakata S, Kabir S, Petersen D, Doudle M, Stevenson AR (2015) Are we burying our heads in the sand? Preventing small bowel obstruction from the V-loc(R) suture in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Colorectal Dis 17::O180-183CrossRef Sakata S, Kabir S, Petersen D, Doudle M, Stevenson AR (2015) Are we burying our heads in the sand? Preventing small bowel obstruction from the V-loc(R) suture in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Colorectal Dis 17::O180-183CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Haga N, Kurita N, Yanagida T, Ogawa S, Yabe M, Akaihata H, Hata J, Sato Y, Ishibashi K, Hasegawa O, Kojima Y (2017) Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5649-z Haga N, Kurita N, Yanagida T, Ogawa S, Yabe M, Akaihata H, Hata J, Sato Y, Ishibashi K, Hasegawa O, Kojima Y (2017) Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome. Surg Endosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-017-5649-z
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarin S, Lightwood RG (1989) Continuous single-layer gastrointestinal anastomosis: a prospective audit. Br J Surg 76:493–495CrossRefPubMed Sarin S, Lightwood RG (1989) Continuous single-layer gastrointestinal anastomosis: a prospective audit. Br J Surg 76:493–495CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards PC, Balch CM, Aldrete JS (1983) Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques. Ann Surg 197:238–243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richards PC, Balch CM, Aldrete JS (1983) Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques. Ann Surg 197:238–243CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Strate T, Scheurlen UJ, Schneider C, Achilles E, Wolf M, Mack D, Zornig C, Broelsch CE (1998) Laparoscopic vs open repair of gastric perforation and abdominal lavage of associated peritonitis in pigs. Surg Endosc 12:212–218CrossRefPubMed Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Strate T, Scheurlen UJ, Schneider C, Achilles E, Wolf M, Mack D, Zornig C, Broelsch CE (1998) Laparoscopic vs open repair of gastric perforation and abdominal lavage of associated peritonitis in pigs. Surg Endosc 12:212–218CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guadagni S, Cengeli I, Galatioto C, Furbetta N, Piero VL, Zocco G, Seccia M (2014) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results. Surg Endosc 28:2302–2308CrossRefPubMed Guadagni S, Cengeli I, Galatioto C, Furbetta N, Piero VL, Zocco G, Seccia M (2014) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results. Surg Endosc 28:2302–2308CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Feasibility of a novel laparoscopic technique with unidirectional knotless barbed sutures for the primary closure of duodenal ulcer perforation
verfasst von
Tae-Han Kim
Ji-Ho Park
Sang-Ho Jeong
Jin-Kwon Lee
Seung-Jin Kwag
Ju-Yeon Kim
Woohyung Lee
Jung-Woo Woo
Jae Yool Jang
Eun-Jin Song
Taejin Park
Chi-Young Jeong
Young-Tae Ju
Eun-Jung Jung
Soon-Chan Hong
Sang-Kyung Choi
Woo-Song Ha
Young-Joon Lee
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6099-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.