Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 9/2018

20.12.2017 | Original Research Article

Fetal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models: Systems Information on Fetal Biometry and Gross Composition

verfasst von: Khaled Abduljalil, Trevor N. Johnson, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Postulating fetal exposure to xenobiotics has been based on animal studies; however, inter-species differences can make this problematic. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models may capture the rapid changes in anatomical, biochemical, and physiological parameters during fetal growth over the duration of pregnancy and help with interpreting laboratory animal data. However, these models require robust information on the longitudinal variations of system parameter values and their covariates.

Objective

The objective of this study was to present an extensive analysis and integration of the available biometric data required for creating a virtual human fetal population by means of equations that define the changes of each parameter with gestational age.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was carried out on the parameters defining the growth of a fetus during in-utero life including weight, height, and body surface area in addition to other indices of fetal size, body fat, and water. Collated data were assessed and integrated through a meta-analysis to develop mathematical algorithms to describe growth with fetal age.

Results

Data for the meta-analysis were obtained from 97 publications, of these, 15 were related to fetal height or length, 32 to fetal weight, 4 to fetal body surface area, 8 to crown length, 5 to abdominal circumference, 12 to head circumference, 14 to body fat, and 12 to body water. Various mathematical algorithms were needed to describe parameter values from the time of conception to birth.

Conclusion

The collated data presented in this article enabled the development of mathematical functions to describe fetal biometry and provide a potentially useful resource for building anthropometric features of fetal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Schaefer C, Peters P, Miller RK. Drugs during pregnancy and lactation: treatment options and risk assessment. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2007.
4.
Schardein JL. Chemically induced birth defects. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2000.CrossRef
5.
Daud AN, Bergman JE, Bakker MK, Wang H, de Walle HE, Plosch T, et al. Pharmacogenetics of drug-induced birth defects: the role of polymorphisms of placental transporter proteins. Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15:1029–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bauer KS, Dixon SC, Figg WD. Inhibition of angiogenesis by thalidomide requires metabolic activation, which is species-dependent. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;55:1827–34.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Vargesson N. Thalidomide-induced limb defects: resolving a 50-year-old puzzle. Bioessays. 2009;31:1327–36.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Bailey J, Knight A, Balcomb J. The future of teratology research is in vitro. Biog Amines. 2005;19:97–145.CrossRef
9.
Ke AB, Nallani SC, Zhao P, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Unadkat JD. Expansion of a PBPK model to predict disposition in pregnant women of drugs cleared via multiple CYP enzymes, including CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;77:554–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Abduljalil K, Furness P, Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Soltani H. Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:365–96.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Gaohua L, Abduljalil K, Jamei M, Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A. A pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (p-PBPK) model for disposition of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74:873–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Lu G, Abduljalil K, Jamei M, Johnson TN, Soltani H, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for assessing the kinetics of xenobiotics during pregnancy: achievements and shortcomings. Curr Drug Metab. 2012;13:695–720.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Luecke RH, Wosilait WD, Pearce BA, Young JF. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic computer model for human pregnancy. Teratology. 1994;49:90–103.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Gentry PR, Covington TR, Clewell HJ 3rd. Evaluation of the potential impact of pharmacokinetic differences on tissue dosimetry in offspring during pregnancy and lactation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003;38:1–16.PubMedCrossRef
15.
FDA. Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products; requirements for pregnancy and lactation labeling: final rule. Fed Regist. 2014;79:72063–103.
16.
Sahin L, Nallani SC, Tassinari MS. Medication use in pregnancy and the pregnancy and lactation labeling rule. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:23–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Saint-Raymond A, de Vries CS. Medicine safety in pregnancy and ambitions for the EU medicine regulatory framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:21–3.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Silverwood RJ, Cole TJ. Statistical methods for constructing gestational age-related reference intervals and centile charts for fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:6–13.PubMedCrossRef
19.
O’Rahilly R, Muller F. Developmental stages in human embryos: revised and new measurements. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:73–84.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2013.
21.
Gabrielsson J, Weiner D. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis, concepts and applications. 3rd ed. Stockholm: Swedish Pharmaceutical Press; 2000.
22.
23.
Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142:47–54.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Woo JS, Wan CW, Cho KM. Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4:65–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, Pope M, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:365–70.PubMed
27.
Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:617–29.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N, Meurer B, Muller A, Dathe O, et al. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:159–64.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Anderson NG, Jolley IJ, Wells JE. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:173–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Macfarlane A, Mugford M. Birth counts: statistics of pregnancy and childbirth. 2nd ed. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
31.
Chow YH, Dattani N. Estimating conception statistics using gestational age information from NHS Numbers for Babies data. Health Stat Q. 2009;41:21–7.CrossRef
32.
33.
Guihard-Costa AM, Larroche JC. Growth velocity of some fetal parameters. II. Body weight, body length and head circumference. Biol Neonate. 1992;62:317–24.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST, Shapiro BS. Quantitative grading of a human blastocyst: optimal inner cell mass size and shape. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:1157–67.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Blackburn ST. Maternal, fetal and neonatal physiology: a clinical perspective. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2007.
36.
Deter RL, Buster JE, Casson PR, Carson SA. Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:90–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Vierordt H. Anatomische Physiologische Und Physikalische Daten Und Tabellen Zum Gebrauche Für Mediziner. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer; 1906.
38.
Smith DL. Amniotic fluid volume. A measurement of the amniotic fluid present in 72 pregnancies during the first half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:166–72.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Jirasek JE, Uher J, Uhrova M. Water and nitrogen content of the body of young human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;96:868–71.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Jackson CM. On the prenatal growth of the human body and the relative growth of the various organs and parts. Am J Anat. 1909;9:119–65.CrossRef
41.
Hertig AT, Rock J, Adams EC. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development. Am J Anat. 1956;98:435–93.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Gokcay G, Furman A, Neyzi O. Updated growth curves for Turkish children aged 15 days to 60 months. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34:454–63.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Al-Shehri MA, Abolfotouh MA, Nwoye LO, Eid W. Construction of intrauterine growth curves in a high altitude area of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:1723–7.PubMed
44.
Troe EJ, Raat H, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Looman CW, Moll HA, et al. Explaining differences in birthweight between ethnic populations: the Generation R Study. BJOG. 2007;114:1557–65.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Lei H, Wen SW. Ultrasonographic examination of intrauterine growth for multiple fetal dimensions in a Chinese population: Central-South China Fetal Growth Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:916–21.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Seitz L. Ueber den Einfluss der Schwerkraft auf die Entstehung der Schaedellagen. Arch Gynakol. 1908;86:114–44.CrossRef
47.
48.
49.
Deter RL, Harrist RB, Hadlock FP, Cortissoz CM, Batten GW. Longitudinal studies of fetal growth using volume parameters determined with ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984;12:313–24.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Braillon PM, Buenerd A, Lapillonne A, Bouvier R. Skeletal and total body volumes of human fetuses: assessment of reference data by spiral CT. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:354–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Levine D. Three-dimensional fetal MR imaging: will it fulfill its promise? Radiology. 2001;219:313–5.PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
Valentin J, editor. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. ICRP Publication 89. Oxford: Pergamon; 2002.
54.
Boyd E. Outline of physical growth and development. Minneapolis: Burgess; 1941.
55.
Panattoni GL. The increase of body surface area with respect to weight in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of prenatal life. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1986;62:1501–4.PubMed
56.
Panattoni GL. Body volume and surface area/volume ratio in the first trimester of prenatal life. Arch Ital Anat Embriol. 1986;91:105–12.PubMed
57.
Panattoni GL. Growth rate of body surface area and volume with respect to linear measures in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of prenatal life. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1986;62:1081–6.PubMed
58.
Ares S, Pastor I, Quero J, Morreale de Escobar G. Thyroid gland volume as measured by ultrasonography in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84:58–62.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989;5:303–11 (discussion 12–3).PubMed
60.
Weiner CP, Sabbagha RE, Vaisrub N, Socol ML. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:812–7.PubMed
61.
Higginbottom J, Slater J, Porter G, Whitfield CR. Estimation of fetal weight from ultrasonic measurement of trunk circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82:698–701.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Falcon O, Wegrzyn P, Faro C, Peralta CF, Nicolaides KH. Gestational sac volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation: relation to chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:546–50.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Dickerson JWT. Growth, development and the chemical composition of the body. In: Morgan J, Dickerson J, editors. Nutrition in early life. London: Wiley; 2003. p. 1–38.
64.
Ramel SE, Gray HL, Davern BA, Demerath EW. Body composition at birth in preterm infants between 30 and 36 weeks gestation. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(1):45–51.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Kelly HJ, Sloan RE, Hoffman W, Saunders C. Accumulation of nitrogen and six minerals in the human fetus during gestation. Hum Biol. 1951;23:61–74.PubMed
66.
Widdowson EM, Dickerson JWT. Chemical composition of the body. In: Comar CL, Bronner F, editors. Mineral metabolism. New York: Academic Press; 1964. p. 1–217.
67.
Fee BA, Weil WB Jr. Body composition of infants of diabetic mothers by direct analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963;110:869–97.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Ziegler EE, O’Donnell AM, Nelson SE, Fomon SJ. Body composition of the reference fetus. Growth. 1976;40:329–41.PubMed
69.
Ellis KJ. Body composition of the neonate. In: Cowett RM, editor. Principles of perinatal-neonatal metabolism. New York: Springer; 1998. p. 1077–95.CrossRef
70.
Gellen J, Pinter S, Falkay G, Kovacs L. Total water content and chloride concentration in embryo, placenta and decidua in the course of early human pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973;80:329–32.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Friis-Hansen B. Water distribution in the foetus and newborn infant. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1983;305:7–11.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Poissonnet CM, Burdi AR, Garn SM. The chronology of adipose tissue appearance and distribution in the human fetus. Early Hum Dev. 1984;10:1–11.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Enzi G, Zanardo V, Caretta F, Inelmen EM, Rubaltelli F. Intrauterine growth and adipose tissue development. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:1785–90.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Anblagan D, Deshpande R, Jones NW, Costigan C, Bugg G, Raine Fenning N, et al. Measurement of fetal fat in utero in normal and diabetic pregnancy using magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:335–40.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Deans HE, Smith FW, Lloyd DJ, Law AN, Sutherland HW. Fetal fat measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:603–7.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Fomon SJ, Haschke F, Ziegler EE, Nelson SE. Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;35:1169–75.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Friis CM, Qvigstad E, Paasche Roland MC, Godang K, Voldner N, Bollerslev J, et al. Newborn body fat: associations with maternal metabolic state and placental size. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57467.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Lapillonne A, Braillon P, Claris O, Chatelain PG, Delmas PD, Salle BL. Body composition in appropriate and in small for gestational age infants. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:196–200.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Catalano PM, Drago NM, Amini SB. Factors affecting fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1459–63.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Verkauskiene R, Beltrand J, Claris O, Chevenne D, Deghmoun S, Dorgeret S, et al. Impact of fetal growth restriction on body composition and hormonal status at birth in infants of small and appropriate weight for gestational age. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157:605–12.PubMedCrossRef
81.
82.
Farah N, Stuart B, Donnelly V, Rafferty G, Turner M. What is the value of ultrasound soft tissue measurements in the prediction of abnormal fetal growth? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:457–63.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Higgins MF, Russell NM, Mulcahy CH, Coffey M, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;140:43–7.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Berger-Kulemann V, Brugger PC, Reisegger M, Klein K, Hachemian N, Koelblinger C, et al. Quantification of the subcutaneous fat layer with MRI in fetuses of healthy mothers with no underlying metabolic disease vs. fetuses of diabetic and obese mothers. J Perinatal Med. 2012;40:179–84.CrossRef
85.
Parretti E, Carignani L, Cioni R, Bartoli E, Borri P, La Torre P, et al. Sonographic evaluation of fetal growth and body composition in women with different degrees of normal glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2741–8.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:28–32.PubMedCrossRef
87.
ICRP. Report of the task group on reference man. ICRP Publication 23. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1975.
88.
89.
Zhang Z, Imperial MZ, Patilea-Vrana GI, Wedagedera J, Gaohua L, Unadkat JD. Development of a novel maternal-fetal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model I: insights into factors that determine fetal drug exposure through simulations and sensitivity analyses. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45:920–38.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
90.
Won HS, Lee SJ, Jun SM. Clinical application and usefulness of XI VOCAL in volume measurement [White Paper]. Seoul: Medison Co, Ltd; 2006. p. 1–3.
91.
Cheong KB, Leung KY, Chan HY, Lee YP, Yang F, Tang MH. Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL, VOCAL and multiplanar). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:287–94.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniy SO, Ayoola OO, et al. Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25:14–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
93.
Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:304–9.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Scardo JA, Berghella V. A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:211–20.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Bernstein IM, Mohs G, Rucquoi M, Badger GJ. Case for hybrid “fetal growth curves”: a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996;5:124–7.PubMed
96.
Ehrenkranz RA. Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F161–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Wood NS, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Hennessy EM, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR. The EPICure study: growth and associated problems in children born at 25 weeks of gestational age or less. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F492–500.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
98.
Johnson MJ, Wootton SA, Leaf AA, Jackson AA. Preterm birth and body composition at term equivalent age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e640–9.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Roggero P, Gianni ML, Amato O, Orsi A, Piemontese P, Morlacchi L, et al. Is term newborn body composition being achieved postnatally in preterm infants? Early Hum Dev. 2009;85:349–52.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963;32:793–800.PubMed
101.
Olsen IE, Groveman SA, Lawson ML, Clark RH, Zemel BS. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e214–24.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, Saari A, Gissler M, Dunkel L. New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks. Ann Med. 2013;45:446–54.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Bonellie S, Chalmers J, Gray R, Greer I, Jarvis S, Williams C. Centile charts for birthweight for gestational age for Scottish singleton births. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
104.
Dobbins TA, Sullivan EA, Roberts CL, Simpson JM. Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998-2007. Med J Aust. 2012;197:291–4.PubMedCrossRef
105.
106.
Luecke RH, Wosilait WD, Young JF. Mathematical modeling of human embryonic and fetal growth rates. Growth Dev Aging. 1999;63:49–59.PubMed
107.
Wosilait WD, Luecke RH, Young JF. A mathematical analysis of human embryonic and fetal growth data. Growth Dev Aging. 1992;56:249–57.PubMed
108.
Lederman SA. Pregnancy. In: Hyeymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going S, editors. Human body composition. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2005. p. 299–312.
109.
Unterscheider J, Geary MP, Daly S, McAuliffe FM, Kennelly MM, Dornan J, et al. The customized fetal growth potential: a standard for Ireland. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166:14–7.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Wilcox M, Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Ray C, Johnson I. Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ. 1993;307:588–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
111.
Salihoglu O, Karatekin G, Uslu S, Can E, Baksu B, Nuhoglu A. New intrauterine growth percentiles: a hospital-based study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62:1070–4.PubMed
112.
Haas J, Rosegger H, Haim M. Intrauterine growth: normal curves for gestational age. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1987;191:91–5.PubMed
113.
Garcia-Munoz Rodrigo F, Garcia-Alix Perez A, Figueras Aloy J, Saavedra Santana P. New population curves in spanish extremely preterm neonates. An Pediatr (Barc). 2014;81(2):107–14.PubMedCrossRef
114.
Janssen PA, Thiessen P, Klein MC, Whitfield MF, Macnab YC, Cullis-Kuhl SC. Standards for the measurement of birth weight, length and head circumference at term in neonates of European, Chinese and South Asian ancestry. Open Med. 2007;1:e74–88.PubMedPubMedCentral
115.
Cussen L, Scurry J, Mitropoulos G, McTigue C, Gross J. Mean organ weights of an Australian population of fetuses and infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1990;26:101–3.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Guihard-Costa AM, Menez F, Delezoide AL. Organ weights in human fetuses after formalin fixation: standards by gestational age and body weight. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5:559–78.PubMedCrossRef
117.
Usher R, McLean F. Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 1969;74:901–10.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Hansen K, Sung CJ, Huang C, Pinar H, Singer DB, Oyer CE. Reference values for second trimester fetal and neonatal organ weights and measurements. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6:160–7.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Phillips JB, Billson VR, Forbes AB. Autopsy standards for fetal lengths and organ weights of an Australian perinatal population. Pathology. 2009;41:515–26.PubMedCrossRef
120.
Thomson AM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE. The weight of the placenta in relation to birthweight. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969;76:865–72.PubMedCrossRef
121.
Sur SD, Clewes JS, Campbell BK, Raine-Fenning NJ. Embryo volume measurement: an intraobserver, intermethod comparative study of semiautomated and manual three-dimensional ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:516–23.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Schwarzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, Campbell S, Ville Y. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:23–9.PubMedCrossRef
123.
Rousian M, Koning AH, van Oppenraaij RH, Hop WC, Verwoerd-Dikkeboom CM, van der Spek PJ, et al. An innovative virtual reality technique for automated human embryonic volume measurements. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2210–6.PubMedCrossRef
124.
Martins WP, Nastri CO, Barra DA, Navarro PA, Mauad Filho F, Ferriani RA. Fetal volume and crown-rump length from 7 to 10 weeks of gestational age in singletons and twins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:32–5.PubMedCrossRef
125.
Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E35.PubMedCrossRef
126.
Kosus A, Kosus N, Turhan NO. Are the first trimester volumetric measurements with two dimensional ultrasonography satisfactory? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1117–21.PubMedCrossRef
127.
Aviram R, Shpan DK, Markovitch O, Fishman A, Tepper R. Three-dimensional first trimester fetal volumetry: comparison with crown rump length. Early Hum Dev. 2004;80:1–5.PubMedCrossRef
128.
Araujo Junior E, Nardozza LM, Rolo LC, Nowak PM, Filho JB, Moron AF. Reference range of embryo volume by 3-D sonography using the XI VOCAL method at 7 to 10 + 6 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27:501–5.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Gruenwald P, Hoang Ngoc M. Evaluation of body and organ weights in perinatal pathology. I. Normal standards derived from autopsies. Am J Clin Pathol. 1960;34:247–53.PubMedCrossRef
130.
Mitropoulos G, Scurry J, Cussen L. Organ weight/bodyweight ratios: growth rates of fetal organs in the latter half of pregnancy with a simple method for calculating mean organ weights. J Paediatr Child Health. 1992;28:236–9.PubMedCrossRef
131.
Shah RS, Rajalakshmi R. Studies on human fetal tissues. I. Fetal weight and tissue weights in relation to gestational age, fetal size and maternal nutritional status. Indian J Pediatr. 1988;55:261–71.PubMedCrossRef
132.
Maroun LL, Graem N. Autopsy standards of body parameters and fresh organ weights in nonmacerated and macerated human fetuses. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8:204–17.PubMedCrossRef
133.
McKeown T, Record RG. The influence of placental size on foetal growth according to sex and order of birth. J Endocrinol. 1953;10:73–81.PubMedCrossRef
134.
Lind T, Kendall A, Hytten FE. The role of the fetus in the formation of amniotic fluid. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79:289–98.PubMedCrossRef
135.
Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal position and size data for dose estimation. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:363–70.PubMedCrossRef
136.
Mayhew TM, Wadrop E, Simpson RA. Proliferative versus hypertrophic growth in tissue subcompartments of human placental villi during gestation. J Anat. 1994;184(Pt 3):535–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
137.
Molteni RA, Stys SJ, Battaglia FC. Relationship of fetal and placental weight in human beings: fetal/placental weight ratios at various gestational ages and birth weight distributions. J Reprod Med. 1978;21:327–34.PubMed
138.
Kustermann A, Zorzoli A, Spagnolo D, Nicolini U. Transvaginal sonography for fetal measurement in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:38–42.PubMedCrossRef
139.
Bagratee JS, Regan L, Khullar V, Connolly C, Moodley J. Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:503–9.PubMedCrossRef
140.
Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ, Ohuma EO, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, et al. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(6):641–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
141.
Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Wisser J, Huch R, Huch A, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry. 1. Head reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:126–35.PubMedCrossRef
142.
Hytten F, Leitch I. Physiology of human pregnancy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1971.
143.
Lampl M, Lee W, Koo W, Frongillo EA, Barker DJ, Romero R. Ethnic differences in the accumulation of fat and lean mass in late gestation. Am J Hum Biol. 2012;24:640–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
144.
Crane SS, Avallone DA, Thomas AJ, Catalano PM. Sonographic estimation of fetal body composition with gestational diabetes mellitus at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:849–54.PubMedCrossRef
145.
Widdowson EM. Growth and composition of the fetus and newborn. In: Assali NS, editor. Biology of gestation. The fetus and neonate, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1968. p. 1–49.
146.
Acta Paediatrica Publication. Extracellular water: previous work. Acta Paediatr. 1957;46:36–42.
147.
Acta Paediatrica Publication. Intracellular water: previous work. Acta Paediatr. 1957;46:43–8.
148.
Acta Paediatrica Publication. Total body water: previous work. Acta Paediatr. 1957;46:19–35.
Metadaten
Titel
Fetal Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models: Systems Information on Fetal Biometry and Gross Composition
verfasst von
Khaled Abduljalil
Trevor N. Johnson
Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Publikationsdatum
20.12.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0618-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Research Article

A Pharmacometric Approach to Substitute for a Conventional Dose-Finding Study in Rare Diseases: Example of Phase III Dose Selection for Emicizumab in Hemophilia A

Systematic Review

Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review

Original Research Article

Tacrolimus Concentration in Saliva of Kidney Transplant Recipients: Factors Influencing the Relationship with Whole Blood Concentrations

Letter to the Editor

Author’s Reply to Woillard et al.: “Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid: an Update”

Original Research Article

Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Ropivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia

Review Article

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in the Central Nervous System