Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2016

14.03.2016 | Computed Tomography

Fine focal spot size improves image quality in computed tomography abdomen and pelvis

verfasst von: Yin P. Goh, Kenneth K. Lau, Keat Low, Kevin Buchan, Lawrence Chia Wei Oh, Ahilan Kuganesan, Minh Huynh

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the image quality between fine focal spot size (FFSS) and standard focal spot size (SFSS) in computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP)

Methods

This retrospective review included all consecutive adult patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CTAP between June and September 2014. Two blinded radiologists assessed the margin clarity of the abdominal viscera and the detected lesions using a five-point grading scale. Cohen’s kappa test was used to examine the inter-observer reliability between the two reviewers for organ margin clarity. Mann–Whitney U testing was utilised to assess the statistical difference of the organ and lesion margin clarity.

Results

100 consecutive CTAPs were recruited. 52 CTAPs were examined with SFSS of 1.1 × 1.2 mm and 48 CTAPs were examined with FFSS of 0.6 × 0.7 mm. Results showed that there was substantial agreement for organ margin clarity (mean κ = 0.759, p < 0.001) among the reviewers. FFSS produces images with clearer organ margins (U = 76194.0, p < 0.001, r = 0.523) and clearer lesion margins (U = 239, p = 0.052, r = 0.269).

Conclusion

FFSS CTAP improves image quality in terms of better organ and lesion margin clarity. Fine focus CT scanning is a novel technique that may be applied in routine CTAP imaging.

Key Points

Fine focal spot improves organ margin clarity.
Fine focal spot improves lesion margin clarity.
Fine focal spot can be used in routine CT abdominal imaging.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA (1980) Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications. Radiology 137:9–14CrossRefPubMed Sickles EA (1980) Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications. Radiology 137:9–14CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ketcham R, Carlson W (2001) Acquisition, optimisation and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences. Comput Geosci 27:381–400CrossRef Ketcham R, Carlson W (2001) Acquisition, optimisation and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences. Comput Geosci 27:381–400CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen K, Martinsen AC, Tingberg A, Aalokken TM, Fosse E (2014) Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study. Eur Radiol 24:2989–3002CrossRefPubMed Jensen K, Martinsen AC, Tingberg A, Aalokken TM, Fosse E (2014) Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study. Eur Radiol 24:2989–3002CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh LC, Lau KK, Devapalasundaram A, Buchan K, Ardley N, Huynh M (2014) Efficacy of ‘fine’ focal spot imaging in CT abdominal angiography. Eur Radiol 24:3010–3016CrossRefPubMed Oh LC, Lau KK, Devapalasundaram A, Buchan K, Ardley N, Huynh M (2014) Efficacy of ‘fine’ focal spot imaging in CT abdominal angiography. Eur Radiol 24:3010–3016CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Arapakis I, Efstathopoulos E, Tsitsia V et al (2014) Using “iDose4” iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults’ chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure. Br J Radiol 87:20130613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arapakis I, Efstathopoulos E, Tsitsia V et al (2014) Using “iDose4” iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults’ chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure. Br J Radiol 87:20130613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Karmazyn B, Liang Y, Ai H et al (2014) Optimization of hybrid iterative reconstruction level in pediatric body CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:426–431CrossRefPubMed Karmazyn B, Liang Y, Ai H et al (2014) Optimization of hybrid iterative reconstruction level in pediatric body CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:426–431CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khawaja RD, Singh S, Gilman M et al (2014) Computed tomography (CT) of the chest at less than 1 mSv: an ongoing prospective clinical trial of chest CT at submillisievert radiation doses with iterative model image reconstruction and iDose4 technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:613–619CrossRefPubMed Khawaja RD, Singh S, Gilman M et al (2014) Computed tomography (CT) of the chest at less than 1 mSv: an ongoing prospective clinical trial of chest CT at submillisievert radiation doses with iterative model image reconstruction and iDose4 technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:613–619CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Noel PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B, Munzel D, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M (2011) Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1404–1409CrossRefPubMed Noel PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B, Munzel D, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M (2011) Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1404–1409CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalra MK, Maher MM, Blake MA et al (2004) Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters. Radiology 232:791–797CrossRefPubMed Kalra MK, Maher MM, Blake MA et al (2004) Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters. Radiology 232:791–797CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951CrossRefPubMed Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT (2012) Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:S64–S70CrossRefPubMed Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT (2012) Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:S64–S70CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A et al (2003) High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1271–1277CrossRefPubMed Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A et al (2003) High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1271–1277CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Fine focal spot size improves image quality in computed tomography abdomen and pelvis
verfasst von
Yin P. Goh
Kenneth K. Lau
Keat Low
Kevin Buchan
Lawrence Chia Wei Oh
Ahilan Kuganesan
Minh Huynh
Publikationsdatum
14.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4313-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

European Radiology 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.