Introduction
Sensory systems provide pathways for the brain to receive, organize, and make sense of information about the world. These processes are foundational for learning and are necessary for enabling adaptive responses to the environment [
1]. Atypical reactions to sensory stimuli are found in individuals with neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions including anxiety, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Fragile X syndrome and schizophrenia [
2]. Sensory atypicalities are particularly common in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), with the majority of studies reporting prevalence of above 90% for both children and adults [
3]. Sensory atypicalities have become increasingly recognised within the diagnostic criteria for ASD with ‘hyperreactivity or hyporeactivity to sensory input, or unusual interests in sensory aspects of environment’ now explicitly included as a symptom subdomain in the latest version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for ASD (5
th edition; DSM-5; [
4]).
There is evidence for a genetic influence on sensory atypicalities [
5,
6]. Goldsmith
et al. [
7] estimated twin similarity on a perceptual sensitivity scale from the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire finding that monozygotic and dizygotic twin correlations were .58 and .37, respectively. Given that ASD itself is a highly heritable disorder [
8] with subclinical autistic traits found in parents [
9], it is surprising that the presence of these problems has not been studied in parents of children with ASD.
Increased understanding of sensory atypicality in parents of children with ASD may contribute to knowledge about their clinical profile. Affective disorders are more frequent in parents of children with ASD than in parents of children with other developmental conditions [
10]. Although the reasons for such a high prevalence of affective disorders are poorly understood, there is evidence that sensory atypicalities present a risk for affective disorders in the general population [
11]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the presence of sensory atypicalities in parents of children and adolescents with ASD.
Findings
Descriptive statistics and internal consistency of AASP quadrants are presented in Table
1 together with mean raw scores for the AASP normative sample. Initial data screening revealed no outliers and no missing data.
Table 1
Descriptive statistics
Low registration | 38.84 (10.24) | 19 to 58 | .796 | 30.29 (6.25) | .82 |
Sensory seeking | 40.32 (8.65) | 24 to 67 | .701 | 49.91 (6.83) | .79 |
Sensory sensitivity | 41.60 (11.70) | 15 to 65 | .795 | 33.71 (7.63) | .81 |
Sensory avoidance | 41.35 (12.08) | 19 to 63 | .866 | 34.57 (7.34) | .66 |
In the original normative sample [
15], 68% showed typical performance, with 28% having scores between one and two SDs outside of normative range and between 2% and 4% with scores of two or more SDs outside of the normative range. In contrast, 98% of mothers of children with ASD scored at least one SD above or below the normative mean for at least one sensory quadrant (32% for one, 18% for two and 48% for either three or four sensory quadrants). Moreover, 44% scored two or more SDs outside the normal range for at least one sensory quadrant (20% for one, 8% for two and 16% for three sensory quadrants). Table
2 provides the classification distributions of mothers for each of the four quadrants. In comparison with typically developing (TD) norms, 62% scored higher on sensory hypo-sensitivity (also known as the low registration) quadrant, 44% higher for the sensory sensitivity quadrant, 48% higher for the sensory avoidance quadrant and 60% of mothers had lower sensory seeking scores than the TD norms.
Table 2
Performance of parents across four sensory quadrants
Low registration | 0 | 1 (2%) | 18 (36%) | 17 (34%) | 14 (28%) |
Sensation seeking | 15 (30%) | 15 (30%) | 18 (36%) | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) |
Sensory sensitivity | 2 (4%) | 1 (2%) | 25(50%) | 7 (14%) | 15 (30%) |
Sensation avoiding | 0 | 7 (14%) | 19 (38%) | 11 (22%) | 13 (26%) |
Discussion
This is the first study to provide evidence of sensory atypicality in parents of individuals with ASD. An exceptionally high number of mothers in this study (49 of 50 (98%) had AASP scores that were atypical; almost half of the sample (22 mothers) scored at least two SDs outside the normative range (only between 2% and 4% of the normative sample had scores in this range).
To date, only one study has looked at the presence of sensory atypicalities in non-twin siblings of ASD individuals who themselves do not have ASD [
17]. The AASP was used to examine sensory processing in 80 ASD adolescents, their 56 non-affected adolescent siblings, and 33 adolescent controls. Results showed that compared with typical controls, non-affected autism siblings exhibited significantly fewer sensory seeking behaviours. The authors suggested, therefore, that sensory atypicalities might be a candidate endophenotype, since they meet some of the criteria proposed by Bearden and Freimer [
18], namely, that the trait should co-occur with the condition of interest, should co-segregate with the disorder in families, and non-affected family members should express the trait more than the general population.
Since evidence of a positive correlation between the presence of sensory atypicalities and autistic traits in the general population has already been reported [
19], it might be argued that our findings can be simply explained by ASD traits-sensory atypicalities association. However, none of the mothers in the study had an ASD diagnosis and we believe that a more complex explanation is likely. Sensory atypicalities are by no means specific to the ASD population and levels of atypicality beyond the general population have been reported in individuals with anxiety and depression, schizophrenia, ADHD and other neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions [
2]. This raises the question of specificity of the ASD traits-sensory atypicalities relationship. To understand further the role of sensory atypicalities, a large-scale systematic study examining the relationship between sensory atypicality, other ASD traits and co-morbid conditions in family members is needed. Sensory atypicalities are associated with affective disorders in both general [
11] and clinical populations including ADHD and ASD [
20,
21]. Therefore, their contribution to anxiety in parents of children with ASD deserves further attention. The contribution may be direct as inability to tolerate sensory stimuli may impact directly on parental stress and anxiety. It may also be indirect as sensory problems can affect the type of coping strategies that individuals adopt in particular situations [
22]. There is evidence that parents of children with ASD, when compared to parents of typically developing children and parents of children with other neuro-developmental disorders, use more avoidant coping strategies and that a higher use of escape-avoidance is associated with higher levels of anxiety [
23]. Future research should examine how sensory atypicalities in parents of children with ASD contribute to their level of anxiety and use of coping strategies, preferably using a longitudinal design.
This study had a number of limitations. Results are limited by the sample size and by the use of a self-report questionnaire. We were also able to only recruit mothers of children with ASD. Difficulties related to engaging fathers in research of this kind are not specific to this study and are also found in research on parents of ASD children, typically developing children and children with other neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions [
24]. Inclusion of fathers in future research is important as research with typically developing children [
25] and ASD adults [
26] indicates that sensory problems are more prevalent in females and it would be important to explore whether the same trend is present in parents of children with ASD. Future work should include replication of these results with a larger sample and the use of carefully designed experimental protocols to disentangle the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sensory atypicalities. Furthermore, comparing sensory atypicalities in parents of children with ASD with parents of children with other neurodevelopmental conditions is important. Finally, this study did not include a control group. As this was the pilot study and the first time that sensory atypicalities were assessed in parents of children with ASD, norms from the AASP were considered a good comparison as these are based on a large, representative sample of individuals without any co-morbid conditions in the appropriate age range. However, in future it will be important to compare sensory problems in parents of children with ASD with parents of children with other neurodevelopmental conditions.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by PhD funding to MU and SL from the Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care, National Institute for Social Care and Health Research and the School of Psychology, Cardiff University. We deeply appreciate the support and time given by the parents who were involved in the research. We thank Dr Sarah Carrington for helpful comments. We also thank Lynda Morgan and Bev Winn for their help with recruitment.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
MU participated in the conception, design, data collection and analysis, draft, revision and final approval of the manuscript. SL contributed to the design, draft, revision and final approval of the manuscript, and financial support for dissemination. MP participated in the revision and final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.