First-intention EUS-guided transluminal drainage with LAMS: an effective and safe method for management of fluid collections after any kind of surgery
- 18.02.2025
- Verfasst von
- Maria Terrin
- Francesca D’Errico
- Hugo Rotkopf
- Thierry Tuszynski
- Jean-Loup Dumont
- Serge Dehry
- Roberta Maselli
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Hadrien Tranchart
- Sébastien Gaujoux
- Ibrahim Dagher
- Olivier Scatton
- Alessandro Repici
- Gianfranco Donatelli
- Erschienen in
- Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2025
Abstract
Background
Symptomatic postoperative collections (PCs) frequently complicate surgery with significant morbidity and mortality. In contrast with pancreatic inflammatory collections, little is known about endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PCs (EUS-PCD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-PCD using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) as the first-line drainage approach for PCs of any kind.
Methods
This is a monocentric retrospective study. We retrieved all consecutive symptomatic PCs treated at our center between February 2019 and September 2024. All cases were considered suitable for EUS-PCD after multidisciplinary discussion. Rates of technical success, clinical success, and AEs were calculated.
Results
We retrieved 66 PCs, mainly resulting from pancreatic and lower gastrointestinal tract surgery. The median size of collections was 7.6 cm and infection occurred in 54 of the cases. The median time from surgery to drainage was 19 days (IQR 13–29); in 10 cases, this occurred ≤ 7 days after surgery. 51 drainages were performed from the gastric/duodenal window, 15 transrectally. LAMS were removed after a median time of 18.5 days (IQR 12–27). After removal, double-pigtail stents were placed in 25 PCs and at least one necrosectomy session was performed in 13. Technical success was achieved in 97.0% of cases. Clinical success was achieved in 95.2%; in 3 cases, collection recurrence occurred and retreatment with LAMS was successful. Overall AEs rate was 9.1%, but only one was severe, requiring surgery. Rates of technical and clinical failure and AEs were not affected by surgery type (pancreatic, non-pancreatic), timing of drainage (≤ 7, 7–10, > 10 days), size of collections (≤ 4, 4–10, > 10 cm), and access window (transgastric/duodenal/rectal). Necrosectomy performance was the only predictor of AEs occurrence (OR 6.9, C.I.: 1.1–46.9, p = 0.048) at univariable analysis.
Conclusion
First-intention EUS-PCD seems to be a safe and effective treatment, regardless of the origin and size of the collection and drainage timing.
Graphical Abstract
Anzeige
- Titel
- First-intention EUS-guided transluminal drainage with LAMS: an effective and safe method for management of fluid collections after any kind of surgery
- Verfasst von
-
Maria Terrin
Francesca D’Errico
Hugo Rotkopf
Thierry Tuszynski
Jean-Loup Dumont
Serge Dehry
Roberta Maselli
Alessandro Fugazza
Hadrien Tranchart
Sébastien Gaujoux
Ibrahim Dagher
Olivier Scatton
Alessandro Repici
Gianfranco Donatelli
- Publikationsdatum
- 18.02.2025
- Verlag
- Springer US
- Erschienen in
-
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2025
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11615-6
Dieser Inhalt ist nur sichtbar, wenn du eingeloggt bist und die entsprechende Berechtigung hast.
Dieser Inhalt ist nur sichtbar, wenn du eingeloggt bist und die entsprechende Berechtigung hast.