Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 5/2018

01.09.2018 | Original Article

First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study

verfasst von: Akitaka Makiyama, Kenji Kunieda, Masaaki Noguchi, Takeshi Kajiwara, Takao Tamura, Koji Takeda, Junko Sugiyama, Keiko Minashi, Toshikazu Moriwaki, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Michitaka Nagase, Yuji Negoro, Takashi Tsuda, Hideki Shimodaira, Naohiro Okano, Akihito Tsuji, Daisuke Sakai, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, Shinya Ueda, Shingo Tamura, Satoshi Otsu, Takuya Honda, Yuzo Matsushita, Tatsuya Okuno, Tomomi Kashiwada, Akira Nozaki, Masahide Ebi, Hiroyuki Okuda, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Shuichi Hironaka, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Eishi Baba, Narikazu Boku, Kei Muro, Taito Esaki

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination is the standard treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). However, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is commonly used for elderly patients with AGC because of its good tolerability.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected clinical data of AGC patients aged 70 years or older, treated with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as the first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2011. Propensity score matched cohorts (PSMC) were used for reducing the confounding effects to compare efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic factors.

Results

PSMC (n = 109 in each group) were selected from among 444 eligible patients (S-1 group, 210; SP group, 234); the S-1 group included more patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy than the SP group (e.g., higher age, poorer PS, poor renal function). In the PSMC, patients’ characteristics were comparable between groups, except the male ratio (S-1 group, 64.2%; SP group, 77.1%; p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in either overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, p = 0.63] or progression-free survival (HR 1.09, p = 0.61). Severe adverse events (AEs) and hospitalization due to AEs were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group (p < 0.001 each).

Conclusion

Our findings do not support the survival benefit of SP over S-1 in elderly patients with AGC. We are now conducting a prospective comparative study to optimize treatment strategy and explore applicability of the geriatric assessment for these patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Bray F, Parkin DM, Pisani P, editors. Globocan 2000: cancer incidence and mortality worldwide (IARC Cancer Bases No. 5). Lyon: IARC Press; 2001. Ferlay J, Bray F, Parkin DM, Pisani P, editors. Globocan 2000: cancer incidence and mortality worldwide (IARC Cancer Bases No. 5). Lyon: IARC Press; 2001.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Older Adult Oncology (version 2. 2017). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Older Adult Oncology (version 2. 2017).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Gastric Cancer (version 5.2017). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Gastric Cancer (version 5.2017).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1063–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Terazawa T, Iwasa S, Takashima A, Nishitani H, Honma Y, Kato K, et al. Impact of adding cisplatin to S-1 in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:2111–6.CrossRefPubMed Terazawa T, Iwasa S, Takashima A, Nishitani H, Honma Y, Kato K, et al. Impact of adding cisplatin to S-1 in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:2111–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsushima T, Hironaka S, Boku N, Machida N, Yamazaki K, Yasui H, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18:10–6.CrossRefPubMed Tsushima T, Hironaka S, Boku N, Machida N, Yamazaki K, Yasui H, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18:10–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe T, Takeda K, Ohe Y, Kudoh S, Ichinose Y, Okamoto H, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy every 3 weeks in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the intergroup trial JCOG0803/WJOG4307L. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:575–81.CrossRefPubMed Abe T, Takeda K, Ohe Y, Kudoh S, Ichinose Y, Okamoto H, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy every 3 weeks in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the intergroup trial JCOG0803/WJOG4307L. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:575–81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Takashima A, Boku N, Kato K, Nakamura K, Mizusawa J, Fukuda H, et al. Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology group trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:522–8.CrossRefPubMed Takashima A, Boku N, Kato K, Nakamura K, Mizusawa J, Fukuda H, et al. Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology group trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:522–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahari D, Boku N, Mizusawa J, Takashima A, Yamada Y, Yoshino T, et al. Determination of prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan clinical oncology group 9912. Oncologist. 2014;19:358–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takahari D, Boku N, Mizusawa J, Takashima A, Yamada Y, Yoshino T, et al. Determination of prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan clinical oncology group 9912. Oncologist. 2014;19:358–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahari D, Mizusawa J, Koizumi W, Hyodo I, Boku N. Validation of the JCOG prognostic index in advanced gastric cancer of the SPIRITS and G-SOX trials, using individual patient data. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:757–63. Takahari D, Mizusawa J, Koizumi W, Hyodo I, Boku N. Validation of the JCOG prognostic index in advanced gastric cancer of the SPIRITS and G-SOX trials, using individual patient data. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:757–63.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard RE, O’Mahony MS, Calver BL, Woodhouse KW. Nutrition, inflammation, and leptin levels in aging and frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:279–84.CrossRefPubMed Hubbard RE, O’Mahony MS, Calver BL, Woodhouse KW. Nutrition, inflammation, and leptin levels in aging and frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:279–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Walston J, McBurnie MA, Newman A, Tracy RP, Kop WJ, Hirsch CH, et al. Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2333–41.CrossRefPubMed Walston J, McBurnie MA, Newman A, Tracy RP, Kop WJ, Hirsch CH, et al. Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities: results from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2333–41.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Balducci L, Extermann M. Cancer chemotherapy in the older patient: what the medical oncologist needs to know. Cancer. 1997;80:1317–22.CrossRefPubMed Balducci L, Extermann M. Cancer chemotherapy in the older patient: what the medical oncologist needs to know. Cancer. 1997;80:1317–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Boku N, Okamoto R, Kandabashi K, Sasaki E, Omuro Y, Maeda Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer in elderly patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2006;33:1099–103.PubMed Boku N, Okamoto R, Kandabashi K, Sasaki E, Omuro Y, Maeda Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer in elderly patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2006;33:1099–103.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Senden C, Vandecasteele T, Vandenberghe E, Versluys K, Piers R, Grypdonck M, et al. The interaction between lived experiences of older patients and their family caregivers confronted with a cancer diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:197–206.CrossRefPubMed Senden C, Vandecasteele T, Vandenberghe E, Versluys K, Piers R, Grypdonck M, et al. The interaction between lived experiences of older patients and their family caregivers confronted with a cancer diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52:197–206.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study
verfasst von
Akitaka Makiyama
Kenji Kunieda
Masaaki Noguchi
Takeshi Kajiwara
Takao Tamura
Koji Takeda
Junko Sugiyama
Keiko Minashi
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Naotoshi Sugimoto
Michitaka Nagase
Yuji Negoro
Takashi Tsuda
Hideki Shimodaira
Naohiro Okano
Akihito Tsuji
Daisuke Sakai
Kazuhiro Yanagihara
Shinya Ueda
Shingo Tamura
Satoshi Otsu
Takuya Honda
Yuzo Matsushita
Tatsuya Okuno
Tomomi Kashiwada
Akira Nozaki
Masahide Ebi
Hiroyuki Okuda
Mototsugu Shimokawa
Shuichi Hironaka
Ichinosuke Hyodo
Eishi Baba
Narikazu Boku
Kei Muro
Taito Esaki
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0797-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Gastric Cancer 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.