Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2022

Open Access 01.04.2022 | Image of the Month

First-time imaging of [89Zr]trastuzumab in breast cancer using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner

verfasst von: Adrienne H. Brouwers, Joyce van Sluis, Johannes H. van Snick, Carolina P. Schröder, Inge O. Baas, Ronald Boellaard, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, Ronald J. H. Borra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 10/2022

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Image of the month

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners have been introduced recently [1, 2], which offer numerous advantages [3]. One important advantage of using LAFOV PET/CT for imaging 89Zr-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), i.e., immunoPET, is the substantial increase in sensitivity compared with standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET/CT systems, which may lead to a remarkable image quality improvement. This first study showcases such improvement for immunoPET with Biograph Vision Quadra™ (VQ) LAFOV PET/CT (Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA).
Two patients suffering from metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer were administered with 37 MBq [89Zr]trastuzumab in order to assist clinical decision-making [4, 5]. Patients were scanned 4 days postinjection with a Biograph™ mCT PET/CT (patient A) or a Biograph Vision™ PET/CT (patient B) (Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA), according to local standard operating procedures with overall scan durations of 45 min and 32 min, for, respectively, mCT and Vision. Following the clinical scans, patients were scanned with VQ. For VQ, we choose to apply a long scan duration of 30 min (patient A) and 32 min (patient B) to improve image quality rather than shortening the overall scan duration, as compared to Vision. For SAFOV systems, the acquisition and reconstruction parameters complied with EARL1, whilst for LAFOV, we also applied clinically (CLIN) recommended settings (Table 1) [6, 7].
Table 1
Acquisition and reconstruction parameters for the different systems
PET/CT system
Acquisition method
Reconstruction protocol name
Reconstruction settings
Biograph mCT
Step and shoot: 5 min per bed position (bp), 9 bp
EARL1
OSEM, 3i21s, size 256 × 256 × 488, voxel size 3.2 × 3.2 × 2.0 mm3, 6.5 mm FWHM Gaussian filter
Biograph Vision
Flow: continuous bed motion, 8 min per body pass, 4 passes
EARL1
OSEM, 4i5s, size 220 × 220 × 706, voxel size 3.3 × 3.3 × 1.5 mm3, 7 mm FWHM Gaussian filter
Biograph Vision Quadra
Single bp
EARL1
OSEM, 4i5s, size 220 × 220 × 708, voxel size 3.3 × 3.3 × 1.5 mm3, 7 mm FWHM Gaussian filter
Single bp
CLIN
OSEM, 4i5s, size 440 × 440 × 708, voxel size 1.6 × 1.6 × 1.5 mm3, no filtering
EARL European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd., OSEM 3D ordered subset expectation maximization with time-of-flight and point spread function, i iterations, s subsets, FWHM full width at half maximum
PET/CT images of patient A are shown in the top two rows (a-h), for patient B in the bottom rows (i-p). The same intensity scale, SUV range 0–10, applies for all images, except the fused images (e, m). Additional reconstructions of the Vision Quadra data were obtained, mimicking 3-min (d, h, l, p) and 10-min (c, g, k, o) acquisitions, illustrating more pragmatic scan durations.
As can be appreciated from these first human immunoPET images on a LAFOV system, the image quality improvement (f) is most spectacular when compared with the mCT (a). For example, in patient A, an additional small bone lesion was visualized with VQ in the pelvic area (f), which was not visible with the SAFOV system (a). Even when compared to the Vision (i), the VQ image (n) shows improved quality without applying any filter after reconstruction. Moreover, this image quality was improved even in the 10 min image compared with the 30–45 min acquisition needed for SAFOV systems.
Thus, this image shows that the large axial FOV system provides substantial improvement in image quality when applying currently preferred overall scan durations on SAFOV systems (45 min for mCT, 32 min for Vision). Additionally, with the new LAFOV system, there is room for further reduction of the overall scan duration with still very acceptable image quality, even for 89Zr-labelled mAb PET/CT studies.

Declarations

The medical Ethics Review Board of the University Medical Center Groningen waived the need for formal ethical review of the validation protocol of the Vision Quadra PET/CT system (waiver number METc2020/554). Both patients were informed about the study aims, procedures (one additional PET/CT scan on the same day with the planned PET/CT), and the need to acquire an additional low-dose CT scan. Informed consent was obtained before the start of the second acquisition on the LAFOV PET/CT system.
Both patients gave written informed consent to anonymously use their clinical and imaging data for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Badawi RD, Shi H, Hu P, Chen S, Xu T, Price PM, et al. First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303.CrossRef Badawi RD, Shi H, Hu P, Chen S, Xu T, Price PM, et al. First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, et al. Performance characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:476–84.CrossRef Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, et al. Performance characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:476–84.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Slart RHJA, Tsoumpas C, Glaudemans AWJM, Noordzij W, Willemsen ATM, Borra RJH, et al. Long axial field of view PET scanners: a road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4236–45.CrossRef Slart RHJA, Tsoumpas C, Glaudemans AWJM, Noordzij W, Willemsen ATM, Borra RJH, et al. Long axial field of view PET scanners: a road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4236–45.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijkers EC, Oude Munnink TH, Kosterink JG, Brouwers AH, Jager PL, De Jong JR, et al. Biodistribution of 89Zr-trastuzumab and PET imaging of HER2-positive lesions in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:586–92.CrossRef Dijkers EC, Oude Munnink TH, Kosterink JG, Brouwers AH, Jager PL, De Jong JR, et al. Biodistribution of 89Zr-trastuzumab and PET imaging of HER2-positive lesions in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:586–92.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensch F. 89Zr-trastuzumab PET supports clinical decision making in breast cancer patients, when HER2 status cannot be determined by standard work up. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2300–6.CrossRef Bensch F. 89Zr-trastuzumab PET supports clinical decision making in breast cancer patients, when HER2 status cannot be determined by standard work up. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2300–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRef Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaalep A, Huisman M, Sera T, Vugts D, Boellaard R. Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonisation for quantitative multicentre 89Zr studies. EJNMMI Phys. 2018;5:26.CrossRef Kaalep A, Huisman M, Sera T, Vugts D, Boellaard R. Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonisation for quantitative multicentre 89Zr studies. EJNMMI Phys. 2018;5:26.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
First-time imaging of [89Zr]trastuzumab in breast cancer using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner
verfasst von
Adrienne H. Brouwers
Joyce van Sluis
Johannes H. van Snick
Carolina P. Schröder
Inge O. Baas
Ronald Boellaard
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
Ronald J. H. Borra
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx
Charalampos Tsoumpas
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05777-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2022 Zur Ausgabe