Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2017

28.07.2016 | Original Article

Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions—a clinical comparative study

verfasst von: Matthias Rödiger, Arthur Heinitz, Ralf Bürgers, Sven Rinke

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

This study focused on the clinical investigation of the internal and marginal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia single crowns produced via conventional and digital impression techniques.

Materials and methods

In a private practice, 20 molar teeth, one from each of 20 patients, were prepared with a circumferential 1.0-mm deep chamfer and an occlusal reduction of 1.5 mm. Conventional impression (CI) taking with a polyvinylsiloxane material (Aquasil Monophase + Aquasil XLV; Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) and intraoral scanning (IS) (Cara TRIOS; Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) of each of the preparations was performed, and then two respective zirconia copings per tooth were produced (20 crowns per group). The marginal and internal fit of the restorations was evaluated employing a replica technique. For statistical analysis, a pairwise comparison (Wilcoxon rank test) was performed.

Results

Zirconia single crowns produced with the IS technique revealed a statistically significant better precision of internal fit only in specific areas (chamfer area/occlusal area). The evaluation of marginal fit showed no significant differences between the two groups. All restorations of both groups offered internal and marginal gaps within the postulated clinical tolerance ranges.

Conclusions

CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia single crowns produced with CI and IS techniques offer adequate marginal and internal precision. However, the IS technique provides lower internal gaps in some specific areas.

Clinical relevance

The clinical precision of fit of restorations produced with a CI and an IS technique appeared to be equivalent. Therefore, the IS technique can be rated as a suitable alternative for the manufacturing of single crowns.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont. doi:10.1111/jopr.12410 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont. doi:10.​1111/​jopr.​12410 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich S, Vollborn T, Mehl A, Zimmermann M (2013) Intraoral optical impression system: an overview. Int J Comput Dent 16:143–162PubMed Reich S, Vollborn T, Mehl A, Zimmermann M (2013) Intraoral optical impression system: an overview. Int J Comput Dent 16:143–162PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ting-Shu S, Jian S (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24:313–321CrossRefPubMed Ting-Shu S, Jian S (2015) Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24:313–321CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S (2015) Intraoral scanning systems—a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 18:101–129PubMed Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, Reich S (2015) Intraoral scanning systems—a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 18:101–129PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO (2013) An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 110(5):420–423CrossRefPubMed Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO (2013) An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 110(5):420–423CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 14:10–17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 14:10–17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter AJ, Hunter AR (1990) Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 64:636–642CrossRefPubMed Hunter AJ, Hunter AR (1990) Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 64:636–642CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsson S (1993) The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:129–134CrossRefPubMed Karlsson S (1993) The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:129–134CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O (2013) Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110:447–454CrossRefPubMed Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O (2013) Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110:447–454CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O (2014) A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 41:853–874CrossRefPubMed Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O (2014) A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 41:853–874CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116(3):272–279CrossRefPubMed Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116(3):272–279CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764CrossRefPubMed Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo É, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth J (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523CrossRefPubMed Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo É, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth J (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30(4):400–407CrossRefPubMed Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30(4):400–407CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tidehag P, Ottosson K, Sjögren G (2014) Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 39(3):308–316CrossRefPubMed Tidehag P, Ottosson K, Sjögren G (2014) Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 39(3):308–316CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D (2015) Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):554–559CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D (2015) Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):554–559CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Güth F (2015) Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Güth F (2015) Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.​1007/​s00784-015-1513-5 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559CrossRefPubMed Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow--the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17(9):2119–2125CrossRefPubMed Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow--the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17(9):2119–2125CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamim H, Skjerven H, Ekfeldt A, Rønold HJ (2014) Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. Int J Prosthodont 27(4):331–337CrossRefPubMed Tamim H, Skjerven H, Ekfeldt A, Rønold HJ (2014) Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. Int J Prosthodont 27(4):331–337CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Selz CF, Bogler J, Vach K, Strub JR, Guess PC (2015) Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 43(12):1428–1435CrossRefPubMed Selz CF, Bogler J, Vach K, Strub JR, Guess PC (2015) Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 43(12):1428–1435CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408CrossRefPubMed Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:866–876CrossRefPubMed Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:866–876CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122CrossRefPubMed Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111CrossRefPubMed McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199CrossRefPubMed Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U (2011) Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 15:521–526CrossRefPubMed Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U (2011) Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 15:521–526CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahrberg D, Lauer CL, Ahrberg M, Weigl P (2015) Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed Ahrberg D, Lauer CL, Ahrberg M, Weigl P (2015) Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.​1007/​s00784-015-1504-6 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B (2015) Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19:2027–2034CrossRefPubMed Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B (2015) Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19:2027–2034CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martínez-Rus F (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martínez-Rus F (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43(2):201–208CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.​1007/​s00784-015-1590-5 [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of the scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21PubMed Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of the scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinke S, Fornefett D, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M (2012) Multifactorial analysis of the impact of different manufacturing processes on the marginal fit of zirconia copings. Dent Mater J 31(4):601–609CrossRefPubMed Rinke S, Fornefett D, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M (2012) Multifactorial analysis of the impact of different manufacturing processes on the marginal fit of zirconia copings. Dent Mater J 31(4):601–609CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH (2010) Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2:33–38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH (2010) Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2:33–38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Su TS, Sun J (2015) Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 59:236–242CrossRefPubMed Su TS, Sun J (2015) Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 59:236–242CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions—a clinical comparative study
verfasst von
Matthias Rödiger
Arthur Heinitz
Ralf Bürgers
Sven Rinke
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.