Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

Open Access 05.02.2025 | Original Article

Five-year outcomes with gefitinib induction and chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study

verfasst von: Katsuyuki Hotta, Sho Saeki, Shinya Sakata, Masafumi Yamaguchi, Daijiro Harada, Akihiro Bessho, Kentaro Tanaka, Koji Inoue, Koji Inoue, Kenichi Gemba, Toshio Kubo, Akiko Sato, Eiki Ichihara, Hiromi Watanabe, Junji Kishimoto, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Kuniaki Katsui, Kenji Sugio, Katsuyuki Kiura

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2025

Abstract

Background

We previously showed the 2-year OS rate, the primary endpoint, of 90% in a phase II trial of gefitinib induction followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in unresectable, stage III, EGFR-mutant, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, neither long-term survival data nor late-phase adverse event profiles have been presented.

Patients and methods

Patients with unresectable, EGFR-mutant, stage III NSCLC were administered gefitinib monotherapy for 8 weeks. After confirming no disease progression during induction therapy, cisplatin and docetaxel on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 with concurrent radiotherapy at a total dose of 60 Gy were subsequently administered.

Results

In the enrolled twenty patients, the 5-year OS rate and median survival time were 70.0% [95% confidence interval: 45.1–85.3] and 5.5 years [4.91-NE], respectively, whereas 5-year PFS rate and median PFS time were 15.0% (3.7–33.5) and 1.4 years [0.69–2.29], respectively. Efficacy did not seem influenced even if radiation field was re-planed in response to the effect of gefitinib induction. As for late adverse events, pulmonary fibrosis occurred in 7 patients (35%). The median time from completion of CRT to the occurrence of the event was 245 days. All were grade 1, and there was no evidence of cavitation of the lesions or chronic infections such as Aspergillus infection during the course of the disease. One case of small cell lung cancer occurred during the period.

Conclusions

With longer follow-up time, we demonstrated favorable efficacy with tolerable toxicity profiles in the EGFR-TKI induction followed by standard CRT in EGFR-mutant, stage III, NSCLC.
Hinweise
Katsuyuki Hotta and Sho Saeki have contributed equally to this work.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The discovery of EGFR mutations has brought us novel targeted therapeutic approaches in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gefitinib, an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), produced a significant progression-free survival (PFS) prolongation over platinum-based chemotherapy [17]. Osimertinib, third-generation EGFR-TKI, has also yielded a greater survival advantage than gefitinib or erlotinib [8, 9]. However, the targeted therapeutic strategy by tumor driver oncogenes has rarely been tested prospectively in unresectable, locally advanced setting, where platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has long been the standard treatment uniformly across this subpopulation [1015].
We performed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib induction followed by standard CRT in patients with unresectable, stage III, EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The study demonstrated favorable 2-year OS rate, the primary endpoint, of 90.0% (90% and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 71.4–96.8 and 65.6–97.4, respectively] that met the pre-defined criteria, and 2-year PFS rate of 36.9% (95% CI 16.6–57.6) at the previously reported analysis [16].
Five-year outcome is an important landmark in cancer treatment, but until recently, there have been limited data with this length of follow-up in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced NSCLC, mainly because of so few patients with the disease. Here, we report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 Phase II Study.

Materials and methods

Patient eligibility

As previously described [1618], eligible patients were ≤ 74 years with pathologically proven, unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB diseases (UICC ver 7.0) with exon 19 or 21 EGFR mutations, measurable disease, and ECOG performance status of 0–1. The N status was radiologically evaluated and pathological confirmation was not mandatory.
The protocol was approved by institutional review boards/independent ethics committees (Okayama University Hospital Ethics Committee; approval No. rin1045) and Clinical Research Network Fukuoka Certified Review Board; approval No. 18-C24). Patients provided written informed consent.

Treatment

In the induction phase, gefitinib, at a dose of 250 mg/day, was administered for 8 weeks, considering the time period of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, typically composed of two cycles [19]. For the CRT phase, CRT treatment was started 2 weeks after completion of the induction phase, under the condition that the disease had not progressed. The regimen consisted of 40 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 40 mg/m2 of cisplatin on days 1, 8, 29, and 36, and no additional cycles were planned as consolidative therapy.
Three-dimensional conformal irradiation was started concurrently from day 1 of chemotherapy with a linear accelerator in 2 Gy single daily fractions (Σ 60 Gy). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the primary tumor and clinically positive lymph nodes detected based on the radiological findings at the time of diagnosis. The internal target volume (ITV) represented the area of gross tumor volume and ventilatory motion. The clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume margins were set to 0.5 cm beyond the ITV and at least 0.5 cm beyond the CTV, respectively. The volume of both lungs receiving more than 20 Gy of the total volume of ≤ 35% was allowed. Along with the response to gefitinib induction, we allowed GTV to shrink its size before CRT phase, according to the discretion of the radiation oncologist in charge of each patient.

Endpoints and statistical analysis

The primary endpoint was 2-year OS rate. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (the standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ver. 1.1) (ORR), adverse events (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 4.0), and PFS.
OS and PFS were calculated from the date of registration until the date of death or the patient’s last visit, and until the first documented date of disease progression or death, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Twenty-one patients were required by the normal approximation to binomial distribution, assuming a 2-year OS rate of 85% (i.e., clinically feasible) [20] versus at most 60% (i.e., clinically infeasible) [10], with a one-sided alfa of 0.05 and 1-beta of 0.8. Although the trial was early terminated with 20 patients because of slow accrual, the pre-defined statistical power was successfully guaranteed with them, considering the planned number of patients initially included potential dropouts.
Detailed procedures and the primary endpoint results have been described in detail previously [17, 18].

Results

Patients and treatment delivery

The patient demographics are listed in Table 1. Ten patients (50%) had tumors with exon 19 deletions. Seventeen (85%) completed gefitinib induction and proceeded with the CRT phase, 16 (94%) of whom completed the entire induction therapy and CRT. The remaining one (6%) developed grade 1 radiation pneumonitis under awaiting recovery from myelosuppression, and discontinued the treatment.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Clinical factors
Whole population
(n = 20)
 
Age (years)
Median (range)
66 (53–74)
Sex
Male
9 (45%)
 
Female
11 (55%)
Performance status
0
12 (60%)
 
1
8 (40%)
Smoking history
Never
10 (50%)
 
Ever
10 (50%)
Type of EGFR mutations
Exon 19
10 (50%)
 
Exon 21
10 (50%)
Disease stage
IIIA
9 (45%)
 
IIIB
11 (55%)
Tumor histology
Adenocarcinoma
20 (100%)

5-year survival

All patients were followed up to the survival assessment. The 5-year OS rate and median survival time were 70.0% [95% confidence interval 45.1–85.3] and 5.5 years [4.91-NE], respectively (Fig. 1A), whereas 5-year PFS rate and median PFS time were 15.0% [3.7–33.5] and 1.4 years [0.69–2.29] (Fig. 1B), respectively (Table 2).
Table 2
Survival outcome
 
OS rate
PFS rate
2-year
90.0% (65.6–97.4a)
35.0% (15.7–55.2a)
5-year
70.0% (45.1–85.3a)
15.0% (3.7–33.5a)
OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival
a95% confidence interval

Late adverse effect

The earlier toxicity profiles for the study treatment have been reported previously [16], and we here show the late adverse effect. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in 7 of the 20 patients (35%) as an adverse event 6 months or later after completion or discontinuation of protocol treatment (gefitinib induction followed by chemoradiation). The median time from completion of chemoradiation therapy to the occurrence of this adverse event in the seven patients was 245 days (100–890 days). All of them were grade 1, and there was no evidence of cavitation of the lesions or chronic infections such as Aspergillus infection during the course of the disease. No patient required oxygen therapy.
We also focused on the events of tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal stricture, esophageal perforation, dysphagia, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, constrictive pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and heart failure during the same period, but none of them occurs. In addition, one case of small cell lung cancer occurred during the period.

Efficacy and safety with and without radiotherapy re-planning

In accordance with the study design, allowing a reduction in radiation field size along with tumor shrinkage by gefitinib treatment, the GTV was re-planed for the subsequent CRT in 8 (47%) of 17 patients who completed the induction treatment, along with the decision of attending radiation oncologists. Despite the limited and exploratory data, efficacy seemed almost comparable between the subgroups (Fig. 2).

Discussion

We showed gefitinib induction followed by CRT yielded a 5-year OS and PFS rates of 70.0% and 15.0% (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The late safety profiles seemed feasible without any toxic deaths.
The 5-year OS, the important endpoint, was favorable in our series as compared to existing survival data from the recent, less robust retrospective study results of approximately 30–40% in EGFR-mutant, stage III disease with standard CRT (Table 3) [2124]. We also found a 5-year PFS rate of 15.0%, which appears comparable to EGFR-mutant population data (around 20%) [2124] with standard CRT alone. Recently, LAURA study evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib consolidation in those without any disease progression from the induction standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy [25]. The study demonstrated 2-year PFS rate of 65% and 3-year OS rate of 84% with the median follow-up time of 22.0 months. Our results appear numerically inferior to those in the LAURA trial. On the other hand, it would be noted that the LAURA trial still had a relatively short follow-up period (median time of less than 2 years), and was limited to those who had successfully received standard CRT without progression at the time of completion of the induction therapy. These factors might have contributed to favorable outcomes. In any case, since it has been reported that distant recurrence is generally more common in EGFR-mutant lung cancer than in wild-typed tumors [16], and it would be of great interest to see what the long-term results of the LAURA trial will bring in the future. In addition, the use of such sequential therapy in combination with the treatment schedule used in our study may further improve the treatment outcome. The ongoing phase II RTOG 1306 (NCT01822496) trial has randomized EGFR-mutated patients to receive either erlotinib induction for 12 weeks followed by chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy only. Such trial would elucidate the significance of EGFR-TKI in the locally advanced setting.
Table 3
Long-term outcome in unresectable, stage III, non-small-cell lung cancer
Author/trial name
Design
Year
Histology
No. of pts
Regimen
% 5-year
% Local
% Distant
% Brain
% 5-year
References
PFS
Rec
Rec
Rec
OS
< EGFR-mutant population > 
           
 Tanaka K
Retro
2015
ad
28
P-based CRT
NR
14
76
35
25a
[21]
 Yagishita S
Retro
2014
nonsq
34
P-based CRT
20a
4
80
16
48
[22]
 Nakamura M
Retro
2019
nonsq
34
P-based CRT
NR
18
85
29
NR
[23]
 Akamatsu H
Retro
2014
ad
13
P-based CRT
20a
15
69
46
35a
[24]
 Laura
p3
2024
nsclc
143
Osimertinib after P-based CRT
     
[25]
    
73
Placebo after P-based CRT
      
Ours
p2
2021b
nsclc
20
Gefitinib followed by DP-conc. RT
15
10
75
30
70
pts patients, ORR objective response rate, PFS progression-free survival, rec. recurrence, OS overall survival, refs. references, retro. retrospective, ad adenocarcinoma, nonsq nonsquamous cell non-small-cell lung cancer, p2 phase 2, nsclc non-small-cell lung cancer, OLCSG Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group, and p3 phase 3
aApproximate values that are able to be read from each Kaplan–Meier curve
bYear when the primary endpoint was reported
Pulmonary fibrosis complications after thoracic radiation therapy can occur with a certain frequency [26], while our series of patients were all grade 1 and considered feasible. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, such as simple aspergilloma and chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis, sometimes occurs even in non-immunocompromised patients with pre-existing or current lung disease, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy are known risk factors [27, 28]. However, in our study, there were no associated adverse events and no deaths, suggesting that our treatment package seems safe in term of this issue.
This study has several limitations. Most importantly, it is a small, exploratory, and hypothesis-generating study, which limits the strength of its conclusions and requires careful interpretation.
In conclusion, we evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of gefitinib induction therapy in a population of unresectable stage III patients with EGFR mutations. Our results may raise important points that should be evaluated in further studies to improve outcomes.

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors wish to acknowledge and thank the investigators, coordinators, and all the others who contributed to this study. This study was conducted with support from the Clinical Research Support Center Kyushu (A. Ouraji, F. Kiyomi, K. Toyoda, and Y. Nakanishi). The authors also thank Tomonari Sasaki for providing support.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Katsuyuki Hotta has personal fees from AZ, Chugai, Lilly, MSD, BMS, Ono, Boehringer-Ingelheim, NipponKayaku, Amgen, Taiho, Merck, and grants from MSD, AZ, Chugai, Lilly, BMS, Abbvie, Ono. Daijiro Harada has personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., Eli Lilly and Company, CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., AstraZeneca K.K., TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, TOWA PHRMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., and grants from MSD K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Eli Lilly and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Akihiro Bessho has personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, ONO Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, and grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Samsung Bioepis. Kentaro Tanaka has personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Johnson and Johnson, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. Koji Inoue has personal fees from AZ, Ono, Takeda, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Lilly, Taiho. Kenichi Gemba has personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, AZ, MSD, Merck, Insmed, Lilly, Taiho, Chugai, NipponKayaku, Takeda. Toshio Kubo has personal fee from AstraZeneca. Eiki Ichihara has personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., Novartis, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim, and receipt of equipment, materials or drugs from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas pharma, and grant from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. Hiromi Watanabe has personal fees from AZ, Chugai, Lilly. Kuniaki Katsui has personal fee from Accuray. Kenji Sugio has personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, MSD, Eli Lilly Japan and grants from Chugai, MSD, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiichi Sankyo. Katsuyuki Kiura has personal fees from TAIHO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., NIPRO PHARMA CORPORATION, CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., AstraZeneca K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and grants from TAIHO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED., Shionogi Pharma Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388CrossRef Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Oda N, Hotta K, Ninomiya K et al (2018) A phase II trial of EGFR-TKI readministration with afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring a sensitive non-T790M EGFR mutation: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 1403. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 82:1031–1038CrossRefPubMed Oda N, Hotta K, Ninomiya K et al (2018) A phase II trial of EGFR-TKI readministration with afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring a sensitive non-T790M EGFR mutation: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 1403. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 82:1031–1038CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato Y, Hotta K, Takigawa N et al (2014) Factor associated with failure to administer subsequent treatment after progression in the first-line chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:943–950CrossRefPubMed Kato Y, Hotta K, Takigawa N et al (2014) Factor associated with failure to administer subsequent treatment after progression in the first-line chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:943–950CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo K, Hotta K, Ichihara E et al (2015) Impact of body surface area on survival in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib monotherapy: observational study of the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group 0703. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76:251–256CrossRefPubMed Kudo K, Hotta K, Ichihara E et al (2015) Impact of body surface area on survival in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib monotherapy: observational study of the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group 0703. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76:251–256CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo K, Hotta K, Bessho A et al (2016) Development of a skin rash within the first week and the therapeutic effect in afatinib monotherapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:1005–1009CrossRefPubMed Kudo K, Hotta K, Bessho A et al (2016) Development of a skin rash within the first week and the therapeutic effect in afatinib monotherapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:1005–1009CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oda N, Hotta K, Yoshioka H et al (2016) Potential influence of being overweight on the development of hepatic dysfunction in Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer undergoing gefitinib monotherapy: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:941–947CrossRefPubMed Oda N, Hotta K, Yoshioka H et al (2016) Potential influence of being overweight on the development of hepatic dysfunction in Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer undergoing gefitinib monotherapy: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:941–947CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura T, Kato Y, Ohashi K et al (2018) Potential influence of interleukin-6 on the therapeutic effect of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 495:360–367CrossRefPubMed Tamura T, Kato Y, Ohashi K et al (2018) Potential influence of interleukin-6 on the therapeutic effect of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 495:360–367CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J et al (2018) Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378:113–125CrossRefPubMed Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J et al (2018) Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378:113–125CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D et al (2020) Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 382(1):41–50CrossRefPubMed Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D et al (2020) Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 382(1):41–50CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Segawa Y, Kiura K, Takigawa N et al (2010) Phase III trial comparing docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: OLCSG 0007. J Clin Oncol 28:3299–3306CrossRefPubMed Segawa Y, Kiura K, Takigawa N et al (2010) Phase III trial comparing docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: OLCSG 0007. J Clin Oncol 28:3299–3306CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Senan S, Brade A, Wang LH et al (2016) PROCLAIM: Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin or etoposide-cisplatin plus thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:953–962CrossRef Senan S, Brade A, Wang LH et al (2016) PROCLAIM: Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin or etoposide-cisplatin plus thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:953–962CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto N, Nakagawa K, Nishimura Y et al (2010) Phase III study comparing second- and third-generation regimens with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group WJTOG0105. J Clin Oncol 28:3739–3745CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto N, Nakagawa K, Nishimura Y et al (2010) Phase III study comparing second- and third-generation regimens with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group WJTOG0105. J Clin Oncol 28:3739–3745CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuyama S, Hotta K, Tabata M et al (2008) Impact of HER2 gene and protein status on the treatment outcome of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:477–482CrossRef Kuyama S, Hotta K, Tabata M et al (2008) Impact of HER2 gene and protein status on the treatment outcome of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:477–482CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotta K, Takigawa N, Matsuo K et al (2011) Cure- or care-oriented regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer? J Clin Oncol 29:e320CrossRef Hotta K, Takigawa N, Matsuo K et al (2011) Cure- or care-oriented regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer? J Clin Oncol 29:e320CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nogami N, Takigawa N, Hotta K et al (2015) A phase II study of cisplatin plus S-1 with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0501. Lung Cancer 87:141–147CrossRefPubMed Nogami N, Takigawa N, Hotta K et al (2015) A phase II study of cisplatin plus S-1 with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0501. Lung Cancer 87:141–147CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotta K, Saeki S, Yamaguchi M et al (2021) Gefitinib induction followed by chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study. ESMO Open 6:100191CrossRefPubMedCentral Hotta K, Saeki S, Yamaguchi M et al (2021) Gefitinib induction followed by chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study. ESMO Open 6:100191CrossRefPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hisamoto A, Sasaki J, Takigawa N et al (2012) A phase II trial of induction gefitinib monotherapy followed by cisplatin-docetaxel and concurrent thoracic irradiation in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 30(Suppl):7045CrossRef Hisamoto A, Sasaki J, Takigawa N et al (2012) A phase II trial of induction gefitinib monotherapy followed by cisplatin-docetaxel and concurrent thoracic irradiation in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 30(Suppl):7045CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotta K, Sasaki J, Saeki S et al (2016) Gefitinib combined with standard chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup study protocol. Clin Lung Cancer 17:75–79CrossRefPubMed Hotta K, Sasaki J, Saeki S et al (2016) Gefitinib combined with standard chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 intergroup study protocol. Clin Lung Cancer 17:75–79CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rusch VW, Giroux DJ, Kraut MJ et al (2007) Induction chemoradiation and surgical resection for superior sulcus non-small-cell lung carcinomas: long-term results of Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9416 (Intergroup Trial 0160). J Clin Oncol 25:313–318CrossRefPubMed Rusch VW, Giroux DJ, Kraut MJ et al (2007) Induction chemoradiation and surgical resection for superior sulcus non-small-cell lung carcinomas: long-term results of Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9416 (Intergroup Trial 0160). J Clin Oncol 25:313–318CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Minato K et al (2015) Randomized phase II study of concurrent versus sequential alternating gefitinib and chemotherapy in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR mutations: NEJ005/TCOG0902. Ann Oncol 26:888–894CrossRefPubMed Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Minato K et al (2015) Randomized phase II study of concurrent versus sequential alternating gefitinib and chemotherapy in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR mutations: NEJ005/TCOG0902. Ann Oncol 26:888–894CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka K, Hida T, Oya Y et al (2015) EGFR mutation impact on definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy for inoperable stage III adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 10:1720–1725CrossRefPubMed Tanaka K, Hida T, Oya Y et al (2015) EGFR mutation impact on definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy for inoperable stage III adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 10:1720–1725CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagishita S, Horinouchi H, Katsui Taniyama T et al (2015) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation is associated with longer local control after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:140–148CrossRefPubMed Yagishita S, Horinouchi H, Katsui Taniyama T et al (2015) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation is associated with longer local control after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:140–148CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura M, Kageyama SI, Niho S et al (2019) Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK 5ranslocation on recurrence pattern after definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 20:e256–e264CrossRefPubMed Nakamura M, Kageyama SI, Niho S et al (2019) Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK 5ranslocation on recurrence pattern after definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 20:e256–e264CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Akamatsu H, Kaira K, Murakami H et al (2014) The impact of clinical outcomes according to EGFR mutation status in patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 37:144–147CrossRefPubMed Akamatsu H, Kaira K, Murakami H et al (2014) The impact of clinical outcomes according to EGFR mutation status in patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 37:144–147CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu S, Kato T, Dong X et al (2024) Osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. N Engl J Med 391:585–597CrossRefPubMed Lu S, Kato T, Dong X et al (2024) Osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. N Engl J Med 391:585–597CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chargari C, Riet F, Mazevet M et al (2013) Complications of thoracic radiation therapy. Presse Med 42:e342-351CrossRefPubMed Chargari C, Riet F, Mazevet M et al (2013) Complications of thoracic radiation therapy. Presse Med 42:e342-351CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C et al (2016) Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J 47:45–68CrossRefPubMed Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C et al (2016) Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J 47:45–68CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Vento S, Cainelli F, Temesgen Z (2008) Lung infections after cancer chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 9:982–992CrossRefPubMed Vento S, Cainelli F, Temesgen Z (2008) Lung infections after cancer chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol 9:982–992CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Five-year outcomes with gefitinib induction and chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study
verfasst von
Katsuyuki Hotta
Sho Saeki
Shinya Sakata
Masafumi Yamaguchi
Daijiro Harada
Akihiro Bessho
Kentaro Tanaka
Koji Inoue
Koji Inoue
Kenichi Gemba
Toshio Kubo
Akiko Sato
Eiki Ichihara
Hiromi Watanabe
Junji Kishimoto
Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Kuniaki Katsui
Kenji Sugio
Katsuyuki Kiura
Publikationsdatum
05.02.2025
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2025
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02696-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Nierenzellkarzinom: Daten zur Lebensqualität unter HIF-Inhibition vorgelegt

Seit wenigen Wochen ist mit Belzutifan eine neue Wirkstoffklasse beim fortgeschrittenen klarzelligen Nierenzellkarzinom in der EU zugelassen. Frisch publizierte Ergebnisse zur Lebensqualität erweitern jetzt die Datenbasis zur Risiko-Nutzen-Bewertung für den HIF-2α-Inhibitor.

Warum genderspezifische Medizin notwendig ist 

Laut Zahlen der WHO aus dem Jahr 2024 sterben zwei Frauen pro Minute an Krankheiten, die mit geschlechtsspezifischen Faktoren zusammenhängen. Außerdem wirken Medikamente bei ihnen oft anders als bei Männern. Zeit für ein genderspezifisches Denken in der Medizin.

Nach Vollremission bei Ösophagus-Ca. – Operation erstmal aussetzen?

Studienziel erreicht, dennoch viele Fragen offen. So lassen sich die Ergebnisse der SANO-Studie zur Active-Surveillance versus sofortigen Ösophagektomie nach neoadjuvanter Komplettremission zusammenfassen. Interessant sind die Daten so oder so.

Mammakarzinom: Bluttest statt Gewebeprobe

Der Einsatz einer Liquid Biopsy reicht von der Prognose bis hin zum Nachweis eines molekularen Relapses bei Krebs. Welche Rolle sie künftig für therapeutische Entscheidungen spielt, wird aktuell intensiv erforscht.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.