Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2020

12.06.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Flooring the Major Vessels with Falciform Ligament to Prevent Post-Pancreatectomy Hemorrhage

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

One of the most severe pancreatic surgery complications is post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). This study’s aim was to evaluate the efficacy of flooring the major vessels with falciform ligament in preventing PPH after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of 500 consecutive patients who underwent PD between Jan 2010 and Dec 2019 at Hiroshima University. Morbidities, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) or PPH and 90-day mortality, were analyzed. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the time of surgery (2010–2016 and 2017–2019), i.e., before and after implementation of falciform ligament flooring method. The patient characteristics, operative parameters, clinicopathological factors, morbidity, and mortality were compared between the two periods.

Results

Morbidity and mortality rates in the entire cohort were 21% and 1.4%, respectively. The incidence of Grade B/C POPF and PPH was 9.0% and 3.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two periods with respect to Grade B/C POPF, morbidity rate, and mortality rate; however, the rate of Grade B/C PPH significantly decreased from 5.2 to 1.6% p = .027. On multivariate analysis, the absence of the falciform ligament flooring method was an independent PPH risk factor p = .003.

Conclusions

Falciform ligament flooring method may help decrease the incidence of PPH after PD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H, Gotoh M, Motoi F, Kumamaru H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H, Gotoh M, Motoi F, Kumamaru H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, Naitoh T, Katayose Y, Egawa S et al (2016) Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 263:664–672CrossRef Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, Naitoh T, Katayose Y, Egawa S et al (2016) Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 263:664–672CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, Hoeppner J, Sick O, Makowiec F et al (2014) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage–incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1000 pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Surg 18:464–475CrossRef Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, Hoeppner J, Sick O, Makowiec F et al (2014) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage–incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1000 pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Surg 18:464–475CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, Busch OR, van Delden OM, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ (2014) Shifting role of operative and nonoperative interventions in managing complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: What is the preferred intervention? Surgery 156:622–631CrossRef Tol JA, Busch OR, van Delden OM, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ (2014) Shifting role of operative and nonoperative interventions in managing complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: What is the preferred intervention? Surgery 156:622–631CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y et al (2014) A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780CrossRef Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y et al (2014) A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 259:773–780CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Hatori T, Imaizumi T, Nakao A et al (2012) Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery 151:183–191CrossRef Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Hatori T, Imaizumi T, Nakao A et al (2012) Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery 151:183–191CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRef McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, Zayaruzny M, Litwin DE, Sullivan ME et al (2007) Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg 246:246–253CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI (2004) Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:186–191CrossRef Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI (2004) Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:186–191CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–7 Discussion 7–9CrossRef DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244:931–7 Discussion 7–9CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15CrossRef Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Nessi C, Sandini M, Maggino L, Malleo G et al (2018) Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront resection for pancreatic cancer: the actual spectrum and clinical burden of postoperative complications. Ann Surg Oncol 25:626–637CrossRef Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Nessi C, Sandini M, Maggino L, Malleo G et al (2018) Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront resection for pancreatic cancer: the actual spectrum and clinical burden of postoperative complications. Ann Surg Oncol 25:626–637CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo N, Murakami Y, Uemura K, Nakagawa N, Okada K, Takahashi S et al (2018) Prognostic impact of postoperative complication after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma stratified by the resectability status. J Surg Oncol 118:1105–1114CrossRef Kondo N, Murakami Y, Uemura K, Nakagawa N, Okada K, Takahashi S et al (2018) Prognostic impact of postoperative complication after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma stratified by the resectability status. J Surg Oncol 118:1105–1114CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Strobel O, Büchler MW et al (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87CrossRef Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Strobel O, Büchler MW et al (2009) Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 250:81–87CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolk S, Grutzmann R, Rahbari NN, Hoffmann RT, Plodeck V, Weitz J et al (2017) Management of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) over two decades—a comparative study of 1 450 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Pancreatology 17:943–950CrossRef Wolk S, Grutzmann R, Rahbari NN, Hoffmann RT, Plodeck V, Weitz J et al (2017) Management of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) over two decades—a comparative study of 1 450 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Pancreatology 17:943–950CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kingham TP et al (2012) Contemporary experience with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: results of 1122 patients resected between 2006 and 2011. J Am Coll Surg 215:616–621CrossRef Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kingham TP et al (2012) Contemporary experience with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: results of 1122 patients resected between 2006 and 2011. J Am Coll Surg 215:616–621CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roulin D, Cerantola Y, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2011) Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1055–1062CrossRef Roulin D, Cerantola Y, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2011) Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1055–1062CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckardt AJ, Klein F, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Warnick P, Bahra M et al (2011) Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy. Br J Surg 98:1599–1607CrossRef Eckardt AJ, Klein F, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Warnick P, Bahra M et al (2011) Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy. Br J Surg 98:1599–1607CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRef Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Darnis B, Lebeau R, Chopin-Laly X, Adham M (2013) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:441–448CrossRef Darnis B, Lebeau R, Chopin-Laly X, Adham M (2013) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:441–448CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mussle B, Zuhlke L, Wierick A, Sturm D, Grählert X, Distler M (2018) Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without prophylactic falciform ligament wrap around the gastroduodenal artery stump for prevention of pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Trials 19:222CrossRef Mussle B, Zuhlke L, Wierick A, Sturm D, Grählert X, Distler M (2018) Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without prophylactic falciform ligament wrap around the gastroduodenal artery stump for prevention of pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Trials 19:222CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujino Y, Sendo H, Oshikiri T, Sugimoto T, Tominaga M (2015) Novel surgical technique to prevent pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy using a patch of the falciform ligament. Surg Today 45:44–49CrossRef Fujino Y, Sendo H, Oshikiri T, Sugimoto T, Tominaga M (2015) Novel surgical technique to prevent pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy using a patch of the falciform ligament. Surg Today 45:44–49CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter TI, Fong ZV, Hyslop T, Lavu H, Tan WP, Hardacre J et al (2013) A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg 17:102–109CrossRef Carter TI, Fong ZV, Hyslop T, Lavu H, Tan WP, Hardacre J et al (2013) A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg 17:102–109CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassenpflug M, Hartwig W, Strobel O, Hinz U, Hackert T, Fritz S (2012) Decrease in clinically relevant pancreatic fistula by coverage of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 152:S164–S171CrossRef Hassenpflug M, Hartwig W, Strobel O, Hinz U, Hackert T, Fritz S (2012) Decrease in clinically relevant pancreatic fistula by coverage of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 152:S164–S171CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters DM, Stokes JB, Adams RB, Bauer TW (2011) Use of a falciform ligament pedicle flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Pancreas 40:595–599CrossRef Walters DM, Stokes JB, Adams RB, Bauer TW (2011) Use of a falciform ligament pedicle flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Pancreas 40:595–599CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Yanagida O, Masaki T, Mori T et al (2009) Falciform ligament in pancreatoduodenectomy for protection of skeletonized and divided vessels. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:184–188CrossRef Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Yanagida O, Masaki T, Mori T et al (2009) Falciform ligament in pancreatoduodenectomy for protection of skeletonized and divided vessels. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:184–188CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Iannitti DA, Coburn NG, Somberg J, Ryder BA, Monchik J, Cioffi WGU (2006) Use of the round ligament of the liver to decrease pancreatic fistulas: a novel technique. J Am Coll Surg 203:857–864CrossRef Iannitti DA, Coburn NG, Somberg J, Ryder BA, Monchik J, Cioffi WGU (2006) Use of the round ligament of the liver to decrease pancreatic fistulas: a novel technique. J Am Coll Surg 203:857–864CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakagawa N et al (2008) No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy. J Surg Oncol 97:205–209CrossRef Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakagawa N et al (2008) No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy. J Surg Oncol 97:205–209CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Uemura K, Murakami Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Kondo N, Nakagawa N et al (2014) Indicators for proper management of surgical drains following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 109:702–707CrossRef Uemura K, Murakami Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Kondo N, Nakagawa N et al (2014) Indicators for proper management of surgical drains following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 109:702–707CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayasidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakagawa N et al (2008) A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:51–56CrossRef Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayasidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Nakagawa N et al (2008) A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:51–56CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Ohge H et al (2008) Long-term pancreatic endocrine function following pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Surg Oncol 97:519–522CrossRef Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Ohge H et al (2008) Long-term pancreatic endocrine function following pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Surg Oncol 97:519–522CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien YW, Lee PH, Yang CY, Ho MC, Chiu YF (2005) Risk factors of massive bleeding related to pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:554–559CrossRef Tien YW, Lee PH, Yang CY, Ho MC, Chiu YF (2005) Risk factors of massive bleeding related to pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:554–559CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleive D, Sahakyan M, Soreide K, Brudvik KW, Line PD, Gladhaug IP et al (2018) Risk for hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:949–957CrossRef Kleive D, Sahakyan M, Soreide K, Brudvik KW, Line PD, Gladhaug IP et al (2018) Risk for hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:949–957CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Flooring the Major Vessels with Falciform Ligament to Prevent Post-Pancreatectomy Hemorrhage
Publikationsdatum
12.06.2020
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05637-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

World Journal of Surgery 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

Prevention of Intra-abdominal Adhesions by Electrical Stimulation

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.