Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 9/2018

20.04.2018 | Original Paper

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection: the importance of diagnostic criteria

verfasst von: Steven J. Verberne, Olivier P. P. Temmerman, Ben Hai Vuong, Pieter G. Raijmakers

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a novel method of assessing suspected periprosthetic hip infection. However, a heterogeneity of sensitivity and specificity using different diagnostic criteria across clinical studies has been published. The objective of this study is to evaluate the various diagnostic criteria using FDG-PET in diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection.

Methods

FDG-PET scans of patients suffering from painful hip prostheses between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The PET images were considered positive for infection using five criteria: any increased uptake at the (1) bone-prosthesis-interface, (2) periprosthetic soft tissue (PST), or (3) both, (4) increased uptake in the bone-prosthesis-interface compared to the PST, and (5) increased uptake along the femoral bone-prosthesis-interface. The final diagnosis of infection was based on the pre-operative and intra-operative findings with clinical follow-up > 12 months.

Results

A total of 33 hip prostheses were evaluated in this study, of which 16 were determined to be infected and 17 uninfected. Any periprosthetic FDG uptake was found in all symptomatic prostheses (sensitivity 100%; specificity 0%). When increased uptake in the bone-prosthesis-interface (sensitivity 100%; specificity 65%) or PST (sensitivity 94%; specificity 59%) was considered infected, specificity increased. A higher intensity of uptake at the bone-prosthesis-interface than PST demonstrated only moderate specificity (sensitivity 44%; specificity 71%). The most specific criterion for infection was an increased FDG uptake along the femoral bone-prosthesis-interface (sensitivity 81%; specificity 94%).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that the accuracy of FDG-PET is highly dependent of the diagnostic criteria used for periprosthetic hip infection. Only an acceptable diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 81%; specificity 94%) was found when increased FDG uptake along the femoral bone-prosthesis-interface was considered positive for infection.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Verberne SJ, Temmerman OPP (2017) 12 - Imaging of prosthetic joint infections A2- arts, J.J. Chris. In: Geurts J (ed) Management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 259–285CrossRef Verberne SJ, Temmerman OPP (2017) 12 - Imaging of prosthetic joint infections A2- arts, J.J. Chris. In: Geurts J (ed) Management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 259–285CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinartz P (2009) FDG-PET in patients with painful hip and knee arthroplasty: technical breakthrough or just more of the same. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:41–50PubMed Reinartz P (2009) FDG-PET in patients with painful hip and knee arthroplasty: technical breakthrough or just more of the same. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:41–50PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Barrecheguren E, Rodriguez FM, Toledo SG, Valenti Nin JR, Richter Echevarria JA (2007) 18FDG-PET: a new diagnostic approach in hip prosthesis infection. In: Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear La 18FDG-PET: Una nueva aproximacion diagnostica en la infeccion protesica de cadera. pp. 208–220 Garcia-Barrecheguren E, Rodriguez FM, Toledo SG, Valenti Nin JR, Richter Echevarria JA (2007) 18FDG-PET: a new diagnostic approach in hip prosthesis infection. In: Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear La 18FDG-PET: Una nueva aproximacion diagnostica en la infeccion protesica de cadera. pp. 208–220
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chacko TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K, Moussavian B, Alavi A (2002) The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun 23:851–855CrossRefPubMed Chacko TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K, Moussavian B, Alavi A (2002) The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun 23:851–855CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Pourdehnad M, Maes A, Van AF, Shnier D, Garino JP, Fitzgerald RH, Alavi A (2001) The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J Nucl Med 42:44–48PubMed Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Pourdehnad M, Maes A, Van AF, Shnier D, Garino JP, Fitzgerald RH, Alavi A (2001) The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J Nucl Med 42:44–48PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Newberg A, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2008) FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1338–1342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Newberg A, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2008) FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1338–1342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Basu S, Kwee TC, Saboury B, Garino JP, Nelson CL, Zhuang H, Parsons M, Chen W, Kumar R, Salavati A, Werner TJ, Alavi A (2014) FDG PET for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses: prospective study in 221 prostheses and subgroup comparison with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging in 88 prostheses. Clin Nucl Med 39:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000464 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basu S, Kwee TC, Saboury B, Garino JP, Nelson CL, Zhuang H, Parsons M, Chen W, Kumar R, Salavati A, Werner TJ, Alavi A (2014) FDG PET for diagnosing infection in hip and knee prostheses: prospective study in 221 prostheses and subgroup comparison with combined (111)In-labeled leukocyte/(99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging in 88 prostheses. Clin Nucl Med 39:609–615. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​RLU.​0000000000000464​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaudemans AW, de Vries EF, Galli F, Dierckx RA, Slart RH, Signore A (2013) The use of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of inflammatory and infectious diseases. Clin Dev Immunol 2013:623036. DOI https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/623036 Glaudemans AW, de Vries EF, Galli F, Dierckx RA, Slart RH, Signore A (2013) The use of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of inflammatory and infectious diseases. Clin Dev Immunol 2013:623036. DOI https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2013/​623036
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, Krauss ES, Tronco GG, Bhargava KK, Nichols KJ, Palestro CJ (2004) Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med 45:1864–1871PubMed Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, Krauss ES, Tronco GG, Bhargava KK, Nichols KJ, Palestro CJ (2004) Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med 45:1864–1871PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zmistowski B, Della VC, Bauer TW, Malizos KN, Alavi A, Bedair H, Booth RE, Choong P, Deirmengian C, Ehrlich GD, Gambir A, Huang R, Kissin Y, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi N, Krenn V, Drago L, Marston SB, Meermans G, Perez J, Ploegmakers JJ, Rosenberg A, Simpendorfer C, Thomas P, Tohtz S, Villafuerte JA, Wahl P, Wagenaar FC, Witzo E (2014) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 29:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.040 CrossRefPubMed Zmistowski B, Della VC, Bauer TW, Malizos KN, Alavi A, Bedair H, Booth RE, Choong P, Deirmengian C, Ehrlich GD, Gambir A, Huang R, Kissin Y, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi N, Krenn V, Drago L, Marston SB, Meermans G, Perez J, Ploegmakers JJ, Rosenberg A, Simpendorfer C, Thomas P, Tohtz S, Villafuerte JA, Wahl P, Wagenaar FC, Witzo E (2014) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 29:77–83. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2013.​09.​040 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection: the importance of diagnostic criteria
verfasst von
Steven J. Verberne
Olivier P. P. Temmerman
Ben Hai Vuong
Pieter G. Raijmakers
Publikationsdatum
20.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3931-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

International Orthopaedics 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.