In some criminal cases a forensic psychiatrist is asked to make an assessment of the state of mind of the defendant at the time of the legally relevant act. A considerable number of people seem to hold that the basis for this assessment is that free will is required for legal responsibility, and that mental disorders can compromise free will. In fact, because of the alleged relationship between the forensic assessment and free will, researchers in forensic psychiatry also consider the complicated metaphysical discussions on free will relevant to the assessment. At the same time, there is concern about the lack of advancement with respect to clarifying the nature of the forensic assessment. In this paper I argue that, even if free will is considered relevant, there may be no need for forensic researchers to engage into metaphysical discussions on free will in order to make significant progress. I will do so, drawing a parallel between the assessment of criminal responsibility on the one hand, and the medical practice of obtaining informed consent on the other. I argue that also with respect to informed consent, free will is considered relevant, or even crucial. This is the parallel. Yet, researchers on informed consent have not entered into metaphysical debates on free will. Meanwhile, research on informed consent has made significant progress. Based on the parallel with respect to free will, and the differences with respect to research, I conclude that researchers on forensic assessment may not have to engage into metaphysical discussions on free will in order to advance our understanding of this psychiatric practice.
Barendregt, M., E. Muller, H. Nijman, and E. de Beurs. 2008. Factors associated with experts’ opinions regarding criminal responsibility in The Netherlands. Behavioral Sciences & The Law 26(5): 619–631. CrossRef
Dennett, D.C. 2003. Freedom evolves. London: Penguin.
Dressing, H., H.J. Salize, and H. Gordon. 2007. Legal frameworks and key concepts regulating diversion and treatment of mentally disordered offenders in European Union member states. European Psychiatry 22: e427–e432. CrossRef
Elliott, C. 1991. Competence as accountability. Journal of Clinical Ethics 2: 167–171. PubMed
Elliott, C. 1996. The rules of insanity. Moral responsibility and the mentally ill offender. Albany: State University of New York.
Felthous, A.R. 2008. The will: From metaphysical freedom to normative functionalism. The Journal of the America Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 36: 16–24.
Gazzaniga, M.S. 2005. The ethical brain. New York: Dana.
Grisso, T., P.S. Applebaum, and C. Hill-Fotouhi. 1997. TheMacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities tomake treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services 48: 1415–1419. PubMed
Grubin, D. 2008. Commentary: Mapping a changing landscape in the ethics of forensic psychiatry. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 36(2): 185–190. PubMed
Gutheil, T.G. 2005. Ethics and forensic psychiatry. In Psychiatric ethics, ed. S. Bloch, P. Chodoff, and S.A. Green, 345–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hondius, A. 2009. Free will not to be neglected in forensic psychiatry (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 51(12): 883–885. PubMed
Kane, R. 1998. The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kane, R. 2002. The oxford handbook of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luthe, R., and M. Rösler. 2004. Freedom of will, freedom of action and psychiatry: Concerning the relationship of empirical to intelligible character and so-called freedom of choice in the view of forensic psychiatry. In Philosophy and psychiatry, ed. T. Schramme, and J. Thome, 295–308. Berlin: De Gruyter.
McMillan, J., and T. Hope. 2008. The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics. In Empirical ethics in psychiatry, ed. G. Widdershoven, T. Hope, J. McMillan, and L. Van der Schee, 9–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meynen, G. 2009a. Should or should not forensic psychiatrists think about free will? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12: 203–212. CrossRef
Meynen, G. 2009b. Exploring the similarities and differences between medical assessments of competence and criminal responsibility. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12: 443–451. CrossRef
Meynen, G. 2009c. Free will in forensic psychiatry (in Dutch). Dutch Journal of Psychiatry 51(12): 873–881.
Morse, S.J. 2007. The non-problem of free will in forensic psychiatry and psychology. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 25: 203–220. CrossRef
Murrie, D.C., and J.I. Warren. 2005. Clinician variation in rates of legal sanity opinions: Implications for self-monitoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 36(5): 519–524. CrossRef
Owen, G., Richardson, G., and David, A.S. 2008. Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.
Palmer, N., and M. Kaufman. 2003. The ethics of informed consent. Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work 12(1): 1–26. CrossRef
Pereboom, D. 2001. Living without free will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Pinals, D.A., and Appelbaum, P.S. 2002. Ethical aspects of neuropsychiatric research with human subjects. In: Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress, ed. Kenneth L. Davis, Dennis Charney, Joseph T. Coyle, and Charles Nemeroff. USA: American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Reich, W. 2005. Psychiatric diagnosis as an ethical problem. In Psychiatric ethics, 3rd ed, ed. S. Bloch, P. Chodoff, and S. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rogers, R., and D.W. Shuman. 2005. Fundamentals of forensic practice: Mental health and criminal law. New York: Springer.
Rosenfeld, B. 2002. The psychology of competence and informed consent: Understanding decision-making with regard to clinical research. Fordham Urban Law Journal 30(1): 173–185. PubMed
Searle, J.R. 2007. Freedom & neurobiology. Reflections on free will, language, and political power. New York: Columbia University Press.
Simon, R.I. 2005. Ethics and forensic psychiatry. In Sadock’s comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 8th ed, ed. B.J. Sadock, and V.A. Sadock. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Stone, A.R. 2008. The ethical boundaries of forensic psychiatry: A view from the ivory tower. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 36(2): 167–174. PubMed
Thomasmaa, D.C. 2000. Model of community substituted consent for research on the vulnerable, p. 52. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3: 47–57. CrossRef
Van der Scheer, L., and G. Widdershoven. 2004. Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7: 71–79. CrossRef
Walter, H. 2001. Neurophilosophy of free will. From libertarian illusions to a concept of natural autonomy. Cambridge: MIT.
Welie, S.P.K. 2001. Criteria for patient decision making (in)competence: A review of and commentary on some empirical approaches. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4: 139–151. CrossRef
Welie, J.V.M., and S.P.K. Welie. 2001. Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4: 127–138. CrossRef
Welie, S.P.K. 2008. Criteria for assessment of patient competence. A conceptual analysis from the legal, psychological and ethical perspectives. Davenport, Iowa (USA): Fidlar Doubleday Inc.
Widdershoven, G., T. Hope, J. McMillan, and L. Van der Scheer. 2008. Empirical ethics in psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widerker, D., and M. McKenna. 2003. Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities: Essays on the importance of alternative possibilities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Free will and psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: a parallel with informed consent
- Springer Netherlands
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II