Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2019

25.01.2019 | Editorial

From the Editors’ Desk: Why Does Not Improvement in Communication Lead to Improvement in “Hard” Outcomes?

verfasst von: Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The quality of communication is important in provider-patient interactions. Studies have consistently shown that encounters that are more interactive result in patients with higher levels of satisfaction and trust.1 What has been more difficult to achieve is translating improvement in communication to other outcomes, such as improved hypertension or diabetes control. Most studies of communication interventions that have looked for effects beyond improvement in satisfaction have found no benefit.13 This is surprising since improvement in communication can lead to improved adherence to treatment regimens46 and adherence has been shown to be critical to improvement in some outcomes, such as blood pressure control.7
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson JL. A Randomized Trial to Improve Communication between Patients and Providers in a Primary Care Walk-in Clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. 33(4):404–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jackson JL. A Randomized Trial to Improve Communication between Patients and Providers in a Primary Care Walk-in Clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. 33(4):404–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Frosch DL, Rincon D, Ochoa S, Mangione CM. Activating seniors to improve chronic disease care: results from a pilot intervention study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58(8):1496–1503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frosch DL, Rincon D, Ochoa S, Mangione CM. Activating seniors to improve chronic disease care: results from a pilot intervention study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58(8):1496–1503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(6):595–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(6):595–608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Roter DL, Hall JA. Communication and adherence: moving from prediction to understanding. Med Care 2009; 47(8):823–825.CrossRefPubMed Roter DL, Hall JA. Communication and adherence: moving from prediction to understanding. Med Care 2009; 47(8):823–825.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Li W, Wilson IB. Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19(11):1096–1103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Li W, Wilson IB. Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19(11):1096–1103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SQ, Raamkumar AS, Li J, Cao Y, Witedwittayanusat K, Chen L, Theng YL. Reasons for Primary Medication Nonadherence: A Systematic Review and Metric Analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(8):778–794.PubMed Lee SQ, Raamkumar AS, Li J, Cao Y, Witedwittayanusat K, Chen L, Theng YL. Reasons for Primary Medication Nonadherence: A Systematic Review and Metric Analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(8):778–794.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kronish IM, Moise N, McGinn T, Quan Y, Chaplin W, Gallagher BD, Davidson KW. An Electronic Adherence Measurement Intervention to Reduce Clinical Inertia in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Hypertension: The MATCH Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(11):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kronish IM, Moise N, McGinn T, Quan Y, Chaplin W, Gallagher BD, Davidson KW. An Electronic Adherence Measurement Intervention to Reduce Clinical Inertia in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Hypertension: The MATCH Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(11):1294–1300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3(5):448–457.CrossRefPubMed Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3(5):448–457.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vo MT, Uratsu CS, Estacio KR, Altschuler A, Kim E, Alexeeff SE, Adams AS, Schmittdiel JA, Heisler M, Grant RW. Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4756-4 Vo MT, Uratsu CS, Estacio KR, Altschuler A, Kim E, Alexeeff SE, Adams AS, Schmittdiel JA, Heisler M, Grant RW. Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11606-018-4756-4
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27(5):520–526.CrossRefPubMed Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27(5):520–526.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
From the Editors’ Desk: Why Does Not Improvement in Communication Lead to Improvement in “Hard” Outcomes?
verfasst von
Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
25.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4819-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.