Introduction
Occipitocervical (OC) and atlantoaxial (AA) fusion in children may be indicated to treat craniocervical instability resulting from developmental, congenital, inflammatory, traumatic, and neoplastic disorders. Craniocervical instability in children is extremely rare, although in some subpopulations like children Down syndrome [
18], the incidence of symptomatic atlantoaxial subluxation is relatively high at 1–10%. Congenital occipitocervical instability may result from a variety of bony or soft-tissue abnormalities, including condylar dysplasia, odontoid dysgenesis, and ligamentous laxity.
Without treatment, “deformity begets deformity” resulting in craniocervical kyphosis and progressive instability leading to nervous system damage by impingement of the high cervical spinal cord and brainstem. Tetraparesis, swallowing and breathing problems, and even sudden death might be the devastating outcome in this young population.
Over the last decades, variable surgical techniques have been employed to achieve fusion of the cranial-cervical junction in children. Generally, one can distinguish (1) non-rigid techniques like external fixation (halo-vest immobilization); (2) internal fixation using posterior wiring and onlay bone only; and (3) variable techniques of internal rigid fixation: occipital plate to C-1 lateral mass screws and C-2 pars or pedicle screws (Harm’s modified Goel technique), C-2 laminar screws, transarticular screw placement (Magerl technique), combinations [
9] or unilateral occipital cervical fixation constructs. [
14] These techniques all need supplemental bone onlay to promote fusion. Most authors employ autograft from patient’s rib, iliac crest, or local bone, with or without addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) or bone marrow aspirate (BMA). The use of autograft in the pediatric population, however, may be limited due to the small size of harvest site. Besides that, harvesting of autograft will result in donor site morbidity, especially pain. In the present study, we describe a single center case series of rigid cranial cervical fusion using allograft instead of autograft.
Discussion
Bony fusion was achieved in all 10 children with craniocervical instability treated with a modified Gallie fusion technique using tightly wired allograft bone blocks. The two failures of fusion occurred in those two patients in whom such wired bone blocks were not employed. Based on this series, it is fair to conclude that there is no need to use autograft for craniocervical fusion in children, which avoids the post-operative donor-site pain and morbidity. Additionally, using rigid screw and rod fixation, post-operative immobilization is not needed, facilitating early rehabilitation. Although there has been some debate among spine surgery experts about the use of bone graft in craniocervical fixation, the current series with 2 failures by not using bone graft and our experience with pseudo-arthrosis in the adult population mandates the use of bone graft.
Limitations of the present study are the following: (1) our patient series is relatively small and includes diverse underlying pathology. This reflects the rareness of the indication for AA or OC fusion in the pediatric population. As our main outcome parameter was bony fusion, as the most appropriate outcome measure for the described surgical technique, we feel that the difference of the underlying pathology is not relevant. (2) In four patients, follow-up was less than 1 year, which is generally considered a minimum for reporting patient outcome. We consider, however, that once bony fusion has been demonstrated, that such can be regarded as irreversible end stage: the patient will not “unfuse.” Thus, for the current purpose to demonstrate the effectiveness of an allograft bone block to ensure bony fusion, the follow-up in our series can be considered adequate.
The use of allograft bone has several advances over autograft, especially in the pediatric population. Morbidity from autograft harvest site are well documented and frequent (9%), including post-operative pain, increased blood loss, increased infection risk, seroma formation, pelvic fracture, the risk of peripheral nerve injury, and donor site pain. Moreover, it is a challenge to harvest and craft a well-fitting bone block from a small costa or thin iliac crest in children. [
8,
19,
21] Allografts are only osteoconductive, weakly osteoinductive, but not osteogenic like autografts; therefore, their use in posterior fixation is associated with a higher rate of nonunion. [
4] An older publication by Koop et al. (1984) noted that pseudoarthrosis occurred in one patient who received allograft instead of autograft in their pediatric OC fusion procedures, strengthening this author’s view that autograft is superior in fusion. [
12] In a recent meta-analysis on OC fusion in children, a strong surgeons’ preference for the use of autologous bone was shown, as it had been used in 539 pediatric cases compared with only 65 children where allograft had been employed using various fixation techniques. Higher fusion rates were seen with autologous bone graft compared with allograft (97% vs 85%). However, in a subgroup analysis for rigid internal fixation techniques including only 18 patients from 5 different studies where allograft was used, the differences were smaller (99% vs 94%, respectively). [
19] In an adult population, Godzik and colleagues reported in adult population bony OC fusion in allograft group in 18 of 19 (95%) and 8 of 8 (100%) in the autograft group after a minimum of 12-month follow-up. [
8]
To overcome the lack of osteoinductive function of allograft, the use of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) [
15] or bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) are advocated. Some case series in lumbar fusion in adults suggest that addition of BMA on an allograft scaffold might improve bony fusion [
11,
16,
24], however, as yet no studies in cervical posterior fixation in children are available. In our series, we used BMA on the site of fusion in 4/13 procedures. BMP is routinely employed in most reports of OC and posterior cervical fusion in adults with allograft. However, in a recent meta-analysis, Reintjes et al. did not find a statistically significant association of BMP with successful fusion in any of the univariate or multivariate analyses. [
19] Sayama also concluded there is no need for routine use of recombinant BMP in the pediatric age group. [
20] Based on our current findings and the literature, we do not consider application of BMP to be essential for fusion if rigid fixation is achieved.
Essential for fusion is an adequate fit of the onlay bone block and proper surgical preparation of the posterior surfaces for optimal bone-to-bone contact. A second requisite for fusion is mechanical stress on the bone-to-bone surface, aka as Wolff’s law. [
2] With rigid fixation, there is a risk that the bone is shielded from mechanical stress by the stiffness of the screw and rod system, which may result in resorption of the graft. [
17] In this series, we described the use of allografts tailored to fit between the occiput or the C1 arch and C2 spinous process and compressed with tensioned wiring around the lateral rods, the C1 arch and/or the C2 spinous process. We believe that tensioning of the graft is essential to achieve bony fusion. On this account, we show with the present series that fusion rates are excellent by using the described technique. For sublaminar wiring, the Deschamps needle [
7] proved to be a very useful instrument.
Some authors reserve rigid instrumentation for children above 5 years of age, or even above 10 years, based on report on abnormal cervical spine growth in children who underwent craniocervical stabilization at young age. [
1,
3,
10] In our series, six patients underwent surgery under the age of 10 years, and all showed bony fusion and no growth difficulties (mean follow-up interval 22.5 months), suggesting that internal rigid fixation is feasible in this population too. In these very young children, the surgical challenge can be considered substantially more profound than in children above 10 years. The youngest patient was a 1-year-old boy (ID11) in whom we performed a C0–C2 fixation after transoral clival chordoma resection. At follow-up imaging at 11 months, there was bony fusion in adequate position. Follow-up may be too short to appreciate growth abnormalities in some of the patients in present series; however, Martinez-del-Campo and colleagues described normal growth, curvature, and alignment parameters in their series of children with OCF constructs. [
13] The retrospective nature, the small number of patients and single center character of this cohort study make it uncertain that our results can be extrapolated to all pediatric patients who need a craniocervical fusion. We feel, however, to have made a strong argument in favor of the described technique.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.