Background
Methods
Results
Subtopic | Study questions | Main observations | |
---|---|---|---|
Monitoring of GI function | |||
i. | Clinical assessment | Can GI symptoms* and/or clinical signs be used to monitor GI function in critically ill patients? | - There is no gold standard for monitoring of GI function in critically ill. - GI symptoms and clinical signs may be used, and the number of GI symptoms is associated with increased mortality. - GI symptoms/signs have not been clearly correlated with other objective methods quantifying GI function. |
ii. | Imaging | Can imaging be used to monitor GI function in critically ill? | - No validated imaging method for bedside monitoring. - GI ultrasound is promising but requires further study. |
iii. | Laboratory (including biomarkers) | Can biomarkers be used to monitor GI function in critically ill? | - No biomarker is validated for clinical use. - Host-, disease- and analytics-related factors may influence potential biomarkers of interest. - Most of the studies assess biomarkers of mesenteric ischaemia or organ dysfunction. |
iv. | Absorption of nutrients | Can absorption of nutrients be measured to monitor GI function? | - No method to measure absorption is available for routine clinical use. |
v. | Barrier function | Can barrier function be measured to monitor GI function? | - No valid method to measure barrier function is available for routine clinical use. |
vi. | Others (including intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)) | Which other monitoring methods can be used to monitor GI function? | - IAP can be easily measured and gives a numeric value reflecting abdominal compartment. - Association with GI function is unclear. - Grossly elevated and increasing IAP may necessitate discontinuation or reduction of EN. |
Management of GI dysfunction | |||
vii. | Prokinetics | -Do prokinetics improve upper GI motility in critically ill? - Do prokinetics improve lower GI motility in critically ill? - Does combined treatment of upper and lower GI intolerance improve GI motility in critically ill? - Do prokinetics improve other clinically relevant outcomes? | Gastric emptying: - Erythromycin accelerates gastric emptying and may be superior to metoclopramide. - The effect of combination metoclopramide and erythromycin is sustained for longer than either drug alone. Lower GI dysmotility: insufficient data. Combined treatment of upper and lower GI motility: insufficient data Uncertainty with regards to: - Recommended dose of erythromycin (3 × 100 mg vs 200–250 mg) and therapy duration. - Repeated treatment with gastroprokinetics. - Definition of lower GI intolerance/dysmotility. - Effect on morbidity and mortality. |
viii. | Laxatives | Do laxatives improve GI function, morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients? | - Possible benefit of prophylactic therapy (polyethylene glycol, lactulose) regarding time to defaecation, but not regarding complications. - Polyethylene glycol probably better than lactulose, suggested to reduce the incidence of Ogilvie’s syndrome. |
ix. | Post-pyloric feeding | Does post-pyloric feeding improve GI function, morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients receiving EN? | - Post-pyloric feeding may reduce the number of patients who develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. - Mostly small studies in patients without feeding intolerance. - Heterogeneity of intervention, i.e. different location of tubes (duodenal and jejunal) pooled. |
x. | Others | Which other management improves GI function, morbidity and mortality in critically ill? | - None confirmed in critically ill in general. - In postoperative patients, ERAS protocol and epidural analgesia may improve GI motility. - Beneficial effect of any specific (e.g. restrictive) fluid management strategy on GI function has not been proven. |
xi. | GI function and nutrition | Does EN improve GI function, morbidity and mortality in critically ill? | - EN may preserve GI immunity and attenuate proinflammatory changes and bacterial overgrowth. - The quantity of nutrients absorbed with EN during critical illness is uncertain. - EN has not been shown to improve patient-centred outcomes. |
Pathophysiological mechanisms in GI dysfunction relevant to the outcome | |||
xii. | The role of the gut in multiple organ failure | What is the evidence on the role of the GI dysfunction in the development and course of MOF? | Indirect evidence supports a role of GI dysfunction in the development/perpetuation of MODS suggested by associations between the severity of GI dysfunction and organ failures. |
xiii. | Microbiome | What is the evidence on the role of the microbiome in GI dysfunction? | Observational data have shown an association between critical illness (severity) and change of the intestinal microbiome as compared to the healthy state (‘dysbiosis’). Change in microbiome is suggested to be associated with GI dysfunction and clinical outcome but has yet to be confirmed by adequately powered studies. |
xiv. | Bacterial translocation/mucosal integrity | What is the evidence on bacterial translocation/mucosal integrity in GI dysfunction? | Reported associations between the presence of enteric bacteria or bacterial products in the circulation, presumably related to gut dysfunction and poor outcome. Gut microbiota or related products (e.g. DAMPs in lymphatic ducts, endotoxins in portal blood) may trigger distant organ damage in GI dysfunction. |
xv. | GI hormones | What is the evidence that endogenous GI hormones are important in modulating GI dysfunction? | A decrease in the plasma concentration of orexigenic hormones (e.g. ghrelin) and an increase of anorexigenic hormones (e.g. PYY) during the early phase have been observed. No direct correlation with the GI function has been reported. |
xvi. | Bile acid signalling | What is the evidence on bile acid signalling in GI dysfunction? | Bile acid signalling as a mechanism of GI dysfunction has not been studied in adult critically ill patients, but increased levels of bile acids in circulation are associated with adverse outcome. |
xvii. | Others | What is the evidence on other mechanisms in GI dysfunction? | Bowel oedema and bowel distension have not been studied in critically ill patients. Bowel oedema impaired motility in experimental study. |
Current knowledge in the field (what we know)
Monitoring of GI function
Clinical assessment
Imaging
Biomarkers
Absorption of nutrients
Barrier function
Other monitoring options
GI dysfunction: reporting and outcome
Management of GI dysfunction
GI motility drugs
Post-pyloric feeding
Systemic management
GI function and nutrition
Pathophysiological mechanisms in GI dysfunction
The role of the gut in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)
Microbiome
Gastrointestinal mucosal integrity
GI hormones
Bile acid signalling
Other pathophysiological mechanisms in GI dysfunction
Key remaining areas of uncertainty (what we do not know)
Subtopic | Remaining areas of uncertainties | |
---|---|---|
Monitoring of GI dysfunction | ||
i. | Clinical assessment | How are GI symptoms* associated with GI function? How to monitor GI function daily at bedside = what is the core set of daily monitoring of GI function? Which symptoms and when should trigger more complex diagnostics? Whether a combination of clinical assessment with specific diagnostics/monitoring methods could allow developing a reliable scoring system for GI dysfunction in critically ill? How to define feeding intolerance? What is the reference method to be used to measure gastric emptying in studies in critically ill patients? Can measurement of gastric residual volumes identify delayed gastric emptying? Can monitoring of gastric residual volumes help in avoiding complications in patients with feeding intolerance? |
ii. | Imaging | What is the best abdominal ultrasound protocol for GI dysfunction? Needs collaboration with radiologists and gastroenterologists. Whether US image quality (which may be affected by air in the GI tract) can be further improved? What imaging technique is associated with high inter-operator and over time reproducibility? How to quantify bowel oedema? |
iii. | Laboratory (including biomarkers) | Which biomarker(s) could be used as a marker of GI dysfunction? Which biomarker(s) could be used in decision-making regarding enteral nutrition? Which biomarkers could be used in decision-making regarding non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia? |
iv. | Absorption of nutrients | What is the reference method to be used to measure absorption of nutrients in studies in critically ill patients? What are the possible novel methods to measure absorption of nutrients at bedside? |
v. | Barrier function | What is the reference method to be used to measure barrier dysfunction in studies in critically ill patients? How to differentiate between pathological and physiological GI mucosal permeability? What are the possible novel methods to measure/detect the presence of barrier dysfunction in studies in critically ill patients? What are the possible novel methods to estimate barrier dysfunction at bedside? What are the possible biomarkers that can rapidly detect barrier dysfunction caused by mesenteric ischaemia? (How) does the microbiome influence the gut-derived immunity? |
vi. | Others | Which GI symptoms could identify the cohort of patients who would benefit from monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure? What are the other possible novel strategies to monitor/assist in monitoring of GI function? |
GI dysfunction: reporting and outcome | ||
What is the natural course of GI dysfunction in survivors of critical illness? Which are the differences between primary and secondary GI injury? What is the core set of daily monitoring of GI function? What are the ‘core outcomes’ for GI dysfunction in critically ill patients? How to define non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (collaboration with radiologists, gastroenterologists and surgeons)? | ||
Management of GI dysfunction | ||
vii. | Prokinetics | Which are the indications to use prokinetics? Which novel prokinetic agents with less side effects could be used in clinical practice? |
viii. | Laxatives | Which are the indications for laxative agents? Which laxatives, when and in which dosage should be applied? |
ix. | Post-pyloric feeding | Which are the indications to use post-pyloric feeding? How does post-pyloric feeding compare to gastric feeding with prokinetic drugs on patient-centred outcomes? Are there differences between duodenal and jejunal feeding? |
x. | Others | Which other management options could be used to prevent and/or improve GI dysfunction? Could specific fluid resuscitation strategy reduce the prevalence and severity of GI dysfunction? Could achievement of high-normal levels of electrolytes (potassium and magnesium) improve GI motility? Could early mobilization improve GI function in ICU patients? Which sedation strategy associated with less GI dysfunction? |
xi. | GI function and nutrition | What is the optimal timing and duration for both trophic EN to ‘feed the mucosa and microbiome’ and ‘full feeding’ to match estimated energy expenditure? Does early EN benefits or harms GI function (e.g. absorptive capacity and barrier function of the gut) when compared to fasting or PN? Should intolerance of EN be accepted as a protective adaptive response to critical illness or treated to increase nutrient delivery? How and when should EN be initiated and/or increased to best maintain and/or improve GI function? |
Pathophysiological mechanisms in GI dysfunction relevant to the outcome | ||
xii. | The role of the gut in multiple organ failure | What is the best definition and estimates of the prevalence of NOMI? How to achieve earlier identification of NOMI (e.g. with additional biomarkers or other tests of gut (hypo)perfusion)? What are the feeding strategies to reduce the rate of NOMI (e.g. early fasting vs early trophic EN)? What interventions are effective in conservative management of NOMI? When and how does GI injury cause multiple organ failure and vice versa? |
xiii. | Microbiome | What mechanisms underlie changes in microbiota density, genus abundance, community structure and function during critical illness? Which role do microbiota-modulated metabolite function and inter-organ cross-talk play in critically ill patients? What are the causes and consequences of dysbiosis on gastrointestinal injury and organ dysfunction? Are there valid biomarkers for microbiome-related GI-dysfunction? Can personalized microbiome type- and function-directed interventions improve organ dysfunction and ICU-related outcomes? What are the best sampling methods for the specimen (e.g. stool vs rectal swabs)? |
xiv. | Bacterial translocation /mucosal integrity | Which are the mechanistic approaches to protect mucosal integrity? Whether and how can/should the immune response on the loss of mucosal integrity be modulated? |
xv. | GI hormones | Which GI hormones are inadequately secreted in critical illness? Quantify response to ‘normal’ endogenous or physiological concentrations? What is the effect of restoring secretion of hormones/levels of hormones to ‘normal’ endogenous or physiological concentrations? |
xvi. | Bile acid signalling | Could plasma concentrations of bile acid signalling molecules be used as a marker of malabsorption? |
xvii. | Others | How does development of bowel oedema impact GI motility and vice versa? What are the differences between the direct GI injury resulting in oedema vs GI injury due to generalized oedema? |
Research agenda (what we need to know)
Final rank and acronym | Research questions/aims | Study design | Study population | Indicator/Intervention | Suggested outcome variables | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Diarrhoea prevention | Does routine use of fibre-enriched EN reduce diarrhoea? | RCT | Critically ill patients with EN with a standard protocol | Fibre-enriched vs non-fibre EN | Bristol stool chart GI symptoms* | 400 |
2. Opioid antagonists for bowel paralysis | Do opioid antagonists reduce time to defaecation and GI symptoms? Potential substudy: study the impact on intestinal absorption | Multicentre RCT | Adult ICU patients with opioid requirement above a minimal dosage | Methylnaltrexone (or other opioid antagonists) vs placebo | Time to the first defaecation COS# GI symptoms* Infections Substudy: absorption | 373 |
3. Diarrhoea management | Does reduction or discontinuation of EN reduce diarrhoea? | RCT (3-armed study) | Patients with severe diarrhoea during EN Severe diarrhoea = requiring interventions (fluids and electrolytes). | 1. Continuation of EN 2. Reduction of EN (50%) 3. Trophic EN + supplemental PN (after 3–7 days) | Bristol stool chart GI symptoms* LOS infections | 343 |
4. Prophylaxis vs treatment of upper GI intolerance | Is the prophylactic use of prokinetics superior to therapeutic use? | Multicentre RCT | Adult ICU patients at high risk for gastroparesis (e.g. patients with high doses of opioids, post-GI surgery) | Two study arms, the same drugs (e.g. erythromycin, metoclopramide, alizapride) and dosages, different timing (routine administration or only in confirmed gastroparesis) | COS# safety outcomes Long-term outcomes (prolonged QT, extrapyramidal side effects, colonization with multi-resistant microbes) | 335 |
5. Prophylaxis vs treatment of lower GI intolerance | Does the prophylactic use of motility agents (prokinetics and laxative drugs) reduce time to defaecation and improve feeding tolerance and GI dysfunction based on AGI grading? | Multicentre RCT | Adult consecutive ICU patients with an expected ICU stay of ≥ 3 days? | Two study arms, the same drugs (e.g. macrogol, laxatives) and dosages, different timing (routine administration or only in confirmed constipation/bowel paralysis) | Time to defaecation AGI dynamics COS (clinical outcomes) Infections Diarrhoea Mesenteric ischaemia | 323 |
6. IAH-GI + NOMI-AGI | 1. Does protocolised monitoring of IAP and management of IAH improve outcome? 2. Is increased IAP associated with GI dysmotility? | 1. RCT 2. Observational substudy | MV patients at risk of IAH | Intervention: monitoring and management of IAP based on the protocol (bundle of preventive measures) Control: standard care US in the intervention group | Mesenteric ischaemia Incidence of infections/sepsis Mortality 90 days, LOS, GI symptoms* Obervational substudy: correlation between IAP and GI motility as assessed by US | 312 |
7. Indication of post-pyloric feeding | Is post-pyloric feeding superior to PN in case of gastroparesis? | Multicentre RCT | Adult ICU patients with gastroparesis (e.g. GRV > 500 mL with prokinetics) | Post-pyloric feeding vs PN | Infections Mortality GI complications (including non-occlusive bowel ischaemia), meeting nutritional target | 290 |
8. GI and IAP | Which GI symptoms* should trigger IAP measurements? Which IAP values should trigger specific monitoring of GI? | Post hoc analysis of combined databases (prospective observational) | Patients in performed studies | Identification and merging of existing databases | Association of GI symptoms with IAH, mesenteric ischaemia and mortality | 274 |
9. AGI prospective | Does AGI score (AGI I–IV) predict the outcome? | Prospective observational | Consecutive ICU patients being mechanically ventilated for non-elective reason (planned MV after elective surgery excluded) | AGI score documented daily Decisions for diagnostics or treatment taken based on daily assessed GI symptoms* documented daily Preferably similar feeding protocol in all centres | GI symptoms* Pneumonia COS# ICU outcome 90-day outcome Long-term patient-centred outcome NOBN GI anastomosis leakage (if relevant) | 272 |
10. PPI and dysbiosis | Does use of PPI vs no PPI alters the intestinal microbiome? | RCT | Mech. ventilated ICU patients in need of EN and without an absolute indication for PPI | PPI vs no PPI | Faecal microbiome pattern Incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis | 249 |