Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology 3/2017

29.03.2017 | Systematic Review

Gemcitabine in Combination with a Second Cytotoxic Agent in the First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Xiu-Wei Zhang, Yu-Xiang Ma, Yang Sun, Yu-Bo Cao, Qin Li, Chong-An Xu

Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

It remains controversial whether the addition of a second cytotoxic agent can further improve the therapeutic effect of gemcitabine monotherapy in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC).

Objective

The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy regimens compared to single-agent gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of unresectable LA/MPC.

Methods

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of gemcitabine monotherapy versus gemcitabine in combination with a second cytotoxic agent in patients with LA/MPC. The last search date was December 31, 2016.

Results

Twenty-seven RCTs were identified and included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis, involving a total of 7343 patients. The meta-analysis showed that gemcitabine-based combination therapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.94; P < 0.0001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P < 0.0001), and overall response rate (ORR) (RR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.62-2.07; P < 0.0001) in comparison to single-agent gemcitabine. Subgroup analysis suggested that the antitumor activity differed between gemcitabine-based combination regimens: doublet regimens of gemcitabine plus a taxoid, and gemcitabine plus a fluoropyrimidine, in particular an oral fluoropyrimidine, resulted in a significant OS benefit for the patients. However, the combination of gemcitabine with other cytotoxic agents, such as platinum compounds or topoisomerase inhibitors failed to reduce the mortality risk. Combination therapy caused more grade 3/4 toxicities, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine-based doublet regimens demonstrated superiority over gemcitabine monotherapy in overall efficacy, but were associated with increased toxicity. Different gemcitabine-based combinations showed different antitumor activity, and doublet regimens of gemcitabine in combination with a taxoid or a fluoropyrimidine, in particular an oral fluoropyrimidine provided significant survival benefits in the first-line treatment of unresectable LA/MPC.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(14):2913–21.CrossRefPubMed Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(14):2913–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fryer RA, Galustian C, Dalgleish AG. Recent advances and developments in treatment strategies against pancreatic cancer. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009;4:102–12.CrossRefPubMed Fryer RA, Galustian C, Dalgleish AG. Recent advances and developments in treatment strategies against pancreatic cancer. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009;4:102–12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackert T, Buchler MW. Pancreatic cancer: advances in treatment, results and limitations. Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):51–6.CrossRefPubMed Hackert T, Buchler MW. Pancreatic cancer: advances in treatment, results and limitations. Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):51–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stathis A, Moore MJ. Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7(3):163–72.CrossRefPubMed Stathis A, Moore MJ. Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7(3):163–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Improving results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 1999;23(9):907–12.CrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Improving results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 1999;23(9):907–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Burris 3rd HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13.CrossRef Burris 3rd HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocha Lima CM, Flores AM. Gemcitabine doublets in advanced pancreatic cancer: should we move on? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):327–9.CrossRefPubMed Rocha Lima CM, Flores AM. Gemcitabine doublets in advanced pancreatic cancer: should we move on? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):327–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Welch SA, Moore MJ. Combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: time to raise the white flag? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2159–61.CrossRefPubMed Welch SA, Moore MJ. Combination chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: time to raise the white flag? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2159–61.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun C, Ansari D, Andersson R, et al. Does gemcitabine-based combination therapy improve the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(35):4944–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sun C, Ansari D, Andersson R, et al. Does gemcitabine-based combination therapy improve the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(35):4944–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciliberto D, Botta B, Correale P, et al. Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:593–603.CrossRefPubMed Ciliberto D, Botta B, Correale P, et al. Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:593–603.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–703.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–703.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17:2815–34.CrossRefPubMed Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17:2815–34.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Levine RJ. Resolving discrepancies between a meta-analysis and a subsequent large controlled trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282(7):664–70.CrossRef DerSimonian R, Levine RJ. Resolving discrepancies between a meta-analysis and a subsequent large controlled trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282(7):664–70.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):105–14.CrossRefPubMed DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):105–14.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Boston RC, Sumner AE. STATA: a statistical analysis system for examining biomedical data. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;537:353–69.CrossRefPubMed Boston RC, Sumner AE. STATA: a statistical analysis system for examining biomedical data. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;537:353–69.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Omuro Y, Ikari T, Ishii H, et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl 15:4029.CrossRef Omuro Y, Ikari T, Ishii H, et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl 15:4029.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel A, Penenberg D, McGovern D, et al. 2358 Efficacy and safety of nab-Paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) vs gem alone in patients (Pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) treated to progressive disease (PD) in the phase III MPACT trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:S455.CrossRef Vogel A, Penenberg D, McGovern D, et al. 2358 Efficacy and safety of nab-Paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) vs gem alone in patients (Pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) treated to progressive disease (PD) in the phase III MPACT trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:S455.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Palacio S, Akunyili II, Ernani V, et al. Gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) in patients (pts) with refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):413.CrossRef Palacio S, Akunyili II, Ernani V, et al. Gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) in patients (pts) with refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):413.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Riess H, Helm A, Niedergethmann M, et al. A randomised, prospective, multicenter, phase III trial of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer J. 2010;8(3):255–62. Riess H, Helm A, Niedergethmann M, et al. A randomised, prospective, multicenter, phase III trial of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer J. 2010;8(3):255–62.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat O’ Reilly EM, Aboualfa GK, Letourneau R, et al. A randomized phase III trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4006.CrossRef O’ Reilly EM, Aboualfa GK, Letourneau R, et al. A randomized phase III trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4006.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, et al. Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial–SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3695–701.CrossRefPubMed Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, et al. Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial–SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3695–701.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlin JD, Catalano P, Thomas JP, et al. Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(20):3270–5.CrossRefPubMed Berlin JD, Catalano P, Thomas JP, et al. Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(20):3270–5.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Costanzo F, Carlini P, Doni L, et al. Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC). Br J Cancer. 2005;93(2):185–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Di Costanzo F, Carlini P, Doni L, et al. Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC). Br J Cancer. 2005;93(2):185–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohkawa S. Randomized controlled trial of gemcitabine in combination with UFT versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4131.CrossRef Ohkawa S. Randomized controlled trial of gemcitabine in combination with UFT versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4131.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheithauer W, Schull B, Ulrich-Pur H, et al. Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):97–104.CrossRefPubMed Scheithauer W, Schull B, Ulrich-Pur H, et al. Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):97–104.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, et al. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2212–7.CrossRef Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, et al. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2212–7.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(33):5513–8.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(33):5513–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl 15:4007.CrossRef Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) versus S-1 versus gemcitabine (GEM) in unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl 15:4007.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(12):1934–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakai Y, Isayama H, Sasaki T, et al. A multicentre randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine alone vs gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: GEMSAP study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(12):1934–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozaka M. et al.Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization PC-01 study). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(5):1197–204.CrossRefPubMed Ozaka M. et al.Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization PC-01 study). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(5):1197–204.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1640–8.CrossRefPubMed Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1640–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudo K, Ishihara T, Hirata N, et al. Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(2):389–96.CrossRefPubMed Sudo K, Ishihara T, Hirata N, et al. Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(2):389–96.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3509–16.CrossRefPubMed Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3509–16.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Poplin E, Feng YJ. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(23):3778–85. Poplin E, Feng YJ. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(23):3778–85.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, et al. Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer. 2002;94:902–10.CrossRefPubMed Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, et al. Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer. 2002;94:902–10.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Ni Q, et al. Gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin for in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2002;24(4):404–7.PubMed Wang X, Ni Q, et al. Gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin for in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2002;24(4):404–7.PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Viret F, Ychou M, Lepille D, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin (GP) versus gemcitabine (G) alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final results of a multicenter randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4118.CrossRef Viret F, Ychou M, Lepille D, et al. Gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin (GP) versus gemcitabine (G) alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final results of a multicenter randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4118.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Li CP, Chao Y. A prospective randomized trial of gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine + cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4144. Li CP, Chao Y. A prospective randomized trial of gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine + cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22 Suppl 14:4144.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3946–52. Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3946–52.
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Colucci G, Labianca R, Di Costanzo F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1645–51.CrossRefPubMed Colucci G, Labianca R, Di Costanzo F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1645–51.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao Y, Wu CY, Wang JP. et al.A randomized controlled trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(3):637–42.CrossRefPubMed Chao Y, Wu CY, Wang JP. et al.A randomized controlled trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72(3):637–42.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulke MH, Tempero MA, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Randomized phase II study of docetaxel, or irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer:CALGB 89904. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5506–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kulke MH, Tempero MA, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Randomized phase II study of docetaxel, or irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer:CALGB 89904. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5506–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohr JM, Haas SL, Bechstein WO, et al. Cationic liposomal paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: randomized controlled phaseIItrial. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1214–22.CrossRefPubMed Lohr JM, Haas SL, Bechstein WO, et al. Cationic liposomal paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: randomized controlled phaseIItrial. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1214–22.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Abou-Alfa GK, Letourneau R, Harker G, et al. Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4441–7. Abou-Alfa GK, Letourneau R, Harker G, et al. Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4441–7.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R, Miller Jr WH, et al. Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(18):3776–83.CrossRefPubMed Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R, Miller Jr WH, et al. Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(18):3776–83.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Stathopoulos GP, Syrigos KG, Polyzos A, et al. A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(5):587–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stathopoulos GP, Syrigos KG, Polyzos A, et al. A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(5):587–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK, et al. A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1639–45.CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK, et al. A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1639–45.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Burris 3rd HA. Recent updates on the role of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(4 Suppl 6):S1–3.CrossRefPubMed Burris 3rd HA. Recent updates on the role of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(4 Suppl 6):S1–3.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Bria E, Milella M, et al. Gemcitabine-based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: have we made real progress? Cancer. 2007;110(3):525–33.CrossRefPubMed Bria E, Milella M, et al. Gemcitabine-based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: have we made real progress? Cancer. 2007;110(3):525–33.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat de Xie R, Liang HL, Wang Y, Guo SS. Meta-analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7:49–54.CrossRef de Xie R, Liang HL, Wang Y, Guo SS. Meta-analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7:49–54.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K, et al. Polychemotherapy or gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(5):452–9.CrossRefPubMed Petrelli F, Coinu A, Borgonovo K, et al. Polychemotherapy or gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(5):452–9.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu J, Zhao G, Wang HX, et al. A meta-analysis of gemcitabine containing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4(2):11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hu J, Zhao G, Wang HX, et al. A meta-analysis of gemcitabine containing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4(2):11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoff PM, Cassidy J, Schmoll HJ. The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral. Oncologist. 2001;6 Suppl 4:3–11.CrossRefPubMed Hoff PM, Cassidy J, Schmoll HJ. The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral. Oncologist. 2001;6 Suppl 4:3–11.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Yardley DA. Nab-paclitaxel mechanisms of action and delivery. J Control Release. 2013;170:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Yardley DA. Nab-paclitaxel mechanisms of action and delivery. J Control Release. 2013;170:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK. Gemcitabine plus nab-pacltaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(34):4548–54.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK. Gemcitabine plus nab-pacltaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(34):4548–54.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, Boeck S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:82. Heinemann V, Boeck S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:82.
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Reni M, Cordio S, Milandri C, et al. Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:369–76.CrossRefPubMed Reni M, Cordio S, Milandri C, et al. Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:369–76.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Fine RL, Fogelman DR, Schreibman SM,et al. The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:167–175. Fine RL, Fogelman DR, Schreibman SM,et al. The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:167–175.
66.
Zurück zum Zitat De Jesus-Acosta A, Oliver GR, Blackford A,et al. A multicenter analysis of GTX chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:415–424. De Jesus-Acosta A, Oliver GR, Blackford A,et al. A multicenter analysis of GTX chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:415–424.
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang ZY, Yuan JQ, et al. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Plos One. 2013;8(3):e57528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang ZY, Yuan JQ, et al. Gemcitabine plus erlotinib for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Plos One. 2013;8(3):e57528.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B(CALGB80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3617–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B(CALGB80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3617–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3605–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3605–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonçalves A, Gilabert M, François E, et al. BAYPAN study: a double blind phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2799–805.CrossRefPubMed Gonçalves A, Gilabert M, François E, et al. BAYPAN study: a double blind phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2799–805.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Boeck S, Hinke A, et al. Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(2):224–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boeck S, Hinke A, et al. Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(2):224–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Gemcitabine in Combination with a Second Cytotoxic Agent in the First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Xiu-Wei Zhang
Yu-Xiang Ma
Yang Sun
Yu-Bo Cao
Qin Li
Chong-An Xu
Publikationsdatum
29.03.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Targeted Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Elektronische ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-017-0486-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Targeted Oncology 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.