Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence 8/2016

28.09.2016 | Original Article

Gender Arguments and Paradigmatic Challenges within Intimate Partner Violence Research: A Call for a more Inclusive Paradigm of Understanding Regarding Physical Partner Violence Perpetration

verfasst von: Melissa Corbally, Judy Hughes, David Delay

Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This paper suggests that the epistemology surrounding intimate partner violence (IPV) is flawed due to two areas in particular: 1) an overreliance on quantitative methodologies that lack the detailed and contextual information required for complex understandings of IPV and 2) the minimization of alternative theoretical perspectives on the meaning of gender. Although an ecological perspective to understanding IPV has been advocated by the World Health Organization as a useful theoretical framework from which to understand IPV (Krug et al. 2002), few empirical studies have tested this complex perspective. We suggest that broader research approaches may prove useful in shedding light on non-conventional IPV experiences, potentially broadening our understanding of this complex phenomenon.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, K.L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1444–1457.CrossRefPubMed Anderson, K.L. (2009). Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women, 15(12), 1444–1457.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, K.L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15(3), 358–380.CrossRef Anderson, K.L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15(3), 358–380.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651.CrossRefPubMed Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Boonzaier, F. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: the relational construction of woman abuse: gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18(2), 183–206.CrossRef Boonzaier, F. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: the relational construction of woman abuse: gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18(2), 183–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Butler, J. (2010) Gender trouble. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (2010) Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbally, M. (2011). Making sense of the unbelievable: a biographical narrative study of men’s stories of female abuse (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Salford, England. Corbally, M. (2011). Making sense of the unbelievable: a biographical narrative study of men’s stories of female abuse (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Salford, England.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbally, M. (2014). Accounting for intimate partner violence; a biographical analysis of narrative strategies used by men experiencing IPV from their female partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(7), 3112–3132.PubMed Corbally, M. (2014). Accounting for intimate partner violence; a biographical analysis of narrative strategies used by men experiencing IPV from their female partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(7), 3112–3132.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Durfee, A. (2011). “I’m not a victim, she’s an abuser”: masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gender and Society, 25(3), 316–334.CrossRef Durfee, A. (2011). “I’m not a victim, she’s an abuser”: masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gender and Society, 25(3), 316–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton, D.G., & Nicholls, T.L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1. The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 680–714.CrossRef Dutton, D.G., & Nicholls, T.L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1. The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 680–714.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gaffney, K., & Manno, A.J. (2011). Navigating the gender box: locating masculinity in the introduction to women and gender studies course. Men and Masculinities, 14(2), 190–209.CrossRef Gaffney, K., & Manno, A.J. (2011). Navigating the gender box: locating masculinity in the introduction to women and gender studies course. Men and Masculinities, 14(2), 190–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel, J. (2007). Toward a gender-inclusive conception of intimate partner violence research and theory: Part 1-traditional perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 6(1), 36–53.CrossRef Hamel, J. (2007). Toward a gender-inclusive conception of intimate partner violence research and theory: Part 1-traditional perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 6(1), 36–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel, J. (2009). Toward a gender-inclusive conception of intimate partner violence research and theory: Part 2-new directions. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 41–59.CrossRef Hamel, J. (2009). Toward a gender-inclusive conception of intimate partner violence research and theory: Part 2-new directions. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 41–59.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, M.P. (2008) A typology of domestic violence. USA, Northeastern University Press. Johnson, M.P. (2008) A typology of domestic violence. USA, Northeastern University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, M.P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: a response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent. Behaviour, 16(4), 289–296. Johnson, M.P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: a response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent. Behaviour, 16(4), 289–296.
Zurück zum Zitat Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn, T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat LeCouteur, A., & Oxlad, M. (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 5–28.CrossRef LeCouteur, A., & Oxlad, M. (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 5–28.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perry, J., (2012) Digital stalking: A guide to technology risks for victims - Version 2. England: Network for Surviving Stalking and Women’s Aid Federation of England. Perry, J., (2012) Digital stalking: A guide to technology risks for victims - Version 2. England: Network for Surviving Stalking and Women’s Aid Federation of England.
Zurück zum Zitat Straus, M.A. (2007). Processes explaining the concealment and distortion of evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 227–232.CrossRef Straus, M.A. (2007). Processes explaining the concealment and distortion of evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 227–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Straus, M.A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252–275.CrossRef Straus, M.A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252–275.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Straus, M.A. (2009a). Gender symmetry in partner violence: evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. In D. J. Whitaker & J. R. Lutzker (Eds.), Preventing partner violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 245–271). Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Straus, M.A. (2009a). Gender symmetry in partner violence: evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. In D. J. Whitaker & J. R. Lutzker (Eds.), Preventing partner violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 245–271). Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Straus, M.A. (2009b). Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence by women has not been perceived and is often denied. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(6), 552–571.CrossRef Straus, M.A. (2009b). Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence by women has not been perceived and is often denied. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(6), 552–571.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Straus, M.A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Violence, 1(3), 332–361. Straus, M.A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Violence, 1(3), 332–361.
Zurück zum Zitat Winstock, Z. (2011). The paradigmatic cleavage on gender differences in partner violence perpetration and victimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 303–311.CrossRef Winstock, Z. (2011). The paradigmatic cleavage on gender differences in partner violence perpetration and victimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 303–311.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Gender Arguments and Paradigmatic Challenges within Intimate Partner Violence Research: A Call for a more Inclusive Paradigm of Understanding Regarding Physical Partner Violence Perpetration
verfasst von
Melissa Corbally
Judy Hughes
David Delay
Publikationsdatum
28.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Family Violence / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9875-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Journal of Family Violence 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.