nach oben

Journal of Family Violence

Erschienen in:

02.09.2016 | Original Article

Gender Differences in Risk Markers for Perpetration of Physical Partner Violence: Results from a Meta-Analytic Review

verfasst von: Chelsea Spencer, Bryan Cafferky, Sandra M. Stith

Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus on whether the use of intimate partner violence (IPV) is distinctly different between men and women, or if men and women share similar risk markers for perpetrating IPV. In this study, we compared 60 different risk markers for IPV perpetration for men and women using a meta-analysis. We found three out of 60 risk markers significantly differed between men and women. Our results suggest that there are more similarities between men and women than there are differences in risk markers for IPV perpetration.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothsteine, H. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) [Computer software}. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, England: Wiley.CrossRef

Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York. NY: Guilford Press.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2005). Investigating three explanations of women’s relationship aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 270–277.CrossRef

Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(5), 723.CrossRefPubMed

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., McCullars, A., & Misra, T. A. (2012). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 429–468.CrossRef

Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424–1448.CrossRef

Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45(8), 921–933.CrossRefPubMed

Stith, S. M., Cafferky, B., Bird, N., Lawson, N., Smith, E., Luu, S., Mallory, A., & Barros Gomez, P. (2014). Overview of a meta-analytic review of risk markers for IPV, International Family Violence and Child Victimization Research Conference, Portsmouth, NH.

Straus, M. A. (2005). Women’s violence toward men is a serious social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 55–77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRef

Straus, M. A. (2011). Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 279–288.CrossRef

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 08–4343, NSDUH Series H-34). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Caldwell, J. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Snow, D. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23, 301–314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Taft, C. T., O’Farrell, T. J., Doron-LaMarca, S., Panuzio, J., & Suvak, M. K. (2010). Longitudinal risk factors for intimate partner violence3 among men in treatment for alcohol use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(6), 924–935.CrossRefPubMed

Yllo, K. A. (2005). Through a feminist lens: Gender, diversity, and violence: Extending the feminist framework. In D. R. Loseke, R. J. Gelles, & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies of family violence (2nd ed., pp. 19–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Titel: Gender Differences in Risk Markers for Perpetration of Physical Partner Violence: Results from a Meta-Analytic Review
verfasst von: Chelsea Spencer
Bryan Cafferky
Sandra M. Stith
Publikationsdatum: 02.09.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9860-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

23.04.2024 | Demenz | Nachrichten

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Gender Differences in Risk Markers for Perpetration of Physical Partner Violence: Results from a Meta-Analytic Review

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

The Rate of False Allegations of Partner Violence

Intimate Partner Violence and the Duluth Model: An Examination of the Model and Recommendations for Future Research and Practice

Acknowledgment of Reviewers for Volume 31

Methodological Contributions to the Gender Symmetry Debate and its Resolution

The Impact of the Gender Differences Controversy on Female-Specific Physical Dating Violence Prevention Programming

When Agreements Blur Disputes: Do Common Assumptions Regarding General Implications of Intimate Physical Partner Violence Mediate or Intensify the Controversy?

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie