Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

11.10.2019 | 2019 SAGES Oral

Gender distribution of speakers on panels at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting

verfasst von: T. C. Dumitra, M. Trepanier, L. Lee, G. M. Fried, C. L. Mueller, D. B. Jones, L. S. Feldman

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Speaking invitations are used by faculty promotion committees as evidence of external recognition. However, women are underrepresented as speakers at specialty society conferences despite the rise in women physicians. The purpose of this study was to estimate to what extent the gender of session conveners is associated with the gender distribution of invited speakers at SAGES meetings.

Methods

A retrospective audit of annual SAGES meeting programs during 2009–2018 was performed. All invited panel speakers, defined as faculty delivering a prepared oral presentation in a session under the organization of one or more chairs, were identified. The gender of speakers and chairs/co-chairs was determined. Hands-on courses, paper sessions, military symposia, mock trials, and jeopardy sessions were excluded. We compared the proportion of all-male panels in sessions with all-male conveners versus sessions with at least one woman convener. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and t tests.

Results

There were 3405 speakers and 459 panels identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2836 invited speakers on 402 panels were analyzed. Women represented 15% of all speakers, increasing from 9 to 19% (2009 to 2018). This reflects the rise in the proportion of women overall members (11% in 2010 to 19% in 2018). The proportion of panels with at least one woman convener increased from 12 to 58%. All-male panels represented 40% of all panels (n = 163) and their proportion significantly decreased over time from 50 to 31% (p trend < 0.000). Sessions with all-male conveners had 52% all-male panels, while sessions with at least one woman convener had 19% all-male panels (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The proportion of women invited speakers at the annual SAGES meeting has significantly increased over time. All-male convener sessions were more likely to convene all-male speaker panels. Including a woman chair/co-chair increased the number of women speakers and is a successful strategy to achieve gender balance in conference planning.

Graphic abstract

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abelson JS, Chartrand G, Moo TA, Moore M, Yeo H (2016) The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015. Am J Surg 212:566–572CrossRef Abelson JS, Chartrand G, Moo TA, Moore M, Yeo H (2016) The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015. Am J Surg 212:566–572CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raezer CL (2014) The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership, 2013–2014. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM, Raezer CL (2014) The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership, 2013–2014. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maykel JA (2013) Leadership in surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:254–258CrossRef Maykel JA (2013) Leadership in surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:254–258CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CS, Smith PK, Wang C (2017) Sage on the stage: women’s representation at an academic conference. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 43:493–507CrossRef Johnson CS, Smith PK, Wang C (2017) Sage on the stage: women’s representation at an academic conference. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 43:493–507CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nittrouer CL, Hebl MR, Ashburn-Nardo L, Trump-Steele RCE, Lane DM, Valian V (2018) Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:104–108CrossRef Nittrouer CL, Hebl MR, Ashburn-Nardo L, Trump-Steele RCE, Lane DM, Valian V (2018) Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:104–108CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Morton MJ, Sonnad SS (2007) Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. J Natl Med Assoc 99:764–771PubMedPubMedCentral Morton MJ, Sonnad SS (2007) Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. J Natl Med Assoc 99:764–771PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Casadevall A, Handelsman J (2014) The presence of female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female speakers at scientific symposia. MBio 5:e00846-13CrossRef Casadevall A, Handelsman J (2014) The presence of female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female speakers at scientific symposia. MBio 5:e00846-13CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D, Herridge M, Owais S, Metaxa V (2018) The speaker gender gap at critical care conferences. Crit Care Med 46:991–996CrossRef Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D, Herridge M, Owais S, Metaxa V (2018) The speaker gender gap at critical care conferences. Crit Care Med 46:991–996CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Isbell LA, Young TP, Harcourt AH (2012) Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS ONE 7:e49682CrossRef Isbell LA, Young TP, Harcourt AH (2012) Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline. PLoS ONE 7:e49682CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Carley S, Carden R, Riley R, May N, Hruska K, Beardsell I, Johnston M, Body R (2016) Are there too few women presenting at emergency medicine conferences? Emerg Med J 33:681–683CrossRef Carley S, Carden R, Riley R, May N, Hruska K, Beardsell I, Johnston M, Body R (2016) Are there too few women presenting at emergency medicine conferences? Emerg Med J 33:681–683CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein RS, Voskuhl R, Segal BM, Dittel BN, Lane TE, Bethea JR, Carson MJ, Colton C, Rosi S, Anderson A, Piccio L, Goverman JM, Benveniste EN, Brown MA, Tiwari-Woodruff SK, Harris TH, Cross AH (2017) Speaking out about gender imbalance in invited speakers improves diversity. Nat Immunol 18:475–478CrossRef Klein RS, Voskuhl R, Segal BM, Dittel BN, Lane TE, Bethea JR, Carson MJ, Colton C, Rosi S, Anderson A, Piccio L, Goverman JM, Benveniste EN, Brown MA, Tiwari-Woodruff SK, Harris TH, Cross AH (2017) Speaking out about gender imbalance in invited speakers improves diversity. Nat Immunol 18:475–478CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JL (2014) Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003903CrossRef Martin JL (2014) Ten simple rules to achieve conference speaker gender balance. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003903CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Casadevall A (2015) Achieving speaker gender equity at the american society for microbiology general meeting. MBio 6:e01146PubMedPubMedCentral Casadevall A (2015) Achieving speaker gender equity at the american society for microbiology general meeting. MBio 6:e01146PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroeder J, Dugdale HL, Radersma R, Hinsch M, Buehler DM, Saul J, Porter L, Liker A, De Cauwer I, Johnson PJ, Santure AW, Griffin AS, Bolund E, Ross L, Webb TJ, Feulner PG, Winney I, Szulkin M, Komdeur J, Versteegh MA, Hemelrijk CK, Svensson EI, Edwards H, Karlsson M, West SA, Barrett EL, Richardson DS, van den Brink V, Wimpenny JH, Ellwood SA, Rees M, Matson KD, Charmantier A, Dos Remedios N, Schneider NA, Teplitsky C, Laurance WF, Butlin RK, Horrocks NP (2013) Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. J Evol Biol 26:2063–2069CrossRef Schroeder J, Dugdale HL, Radersma R, Hinsch M, Buehler DM, Saul J, Porter L, Liker A, De Cauwer I, Johnson PJ, Santure AW, Griffin AS, Bolund E, Ross L, Webb TJ, Feulner PG, Winney I, Szulkin M, Komdeur J, Versteegh MA, Hemelrijk CK, Svensson EI, Edwards H, Karlsson M, West SA, Barrett EL, Richardson DS, van den Brink V, Wimpenny JH, Ellwood SA, Rees M, Matson KD, Charmantier A, Dos Remedios N, Schneider NA, Teplitsky C, Laurance WF, Butlin RK, Horrocks NP (2013) Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. J Evol Biol 26:2063–2069CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, Osgood MJ, Cheung-Flynn J, Komalavilas P, Campbell KE, Dattilo JB, Brophy CM (2012) Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 69:84–90CrossRef Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, Osgood MJ, Cheung-Flynn J, Komalavilas P, Campbell KE, Dattilo JB, Brophy CM (2012) Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 69:84–90CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Telem DA, Qureshi A, Edwards M, Jones DB, Force WRST (2018) SAGES climate survey: results and strategic planning for our future. Surg Endosc 32:4105–4110CrossRef Telem DA, Qureshi A, Edwards M, Jones DB, Force WRST (2018) SAGES climate survey: results and strategic planning for our future. Surg Endosc 32:4105–4110CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dossa F, Baxter NN (2018) Reducing gender bias in surgery. Br J Surg 105:1707–1709CrossRef Dossa F, Baxter NN (2018) Reducing gender bias in surgery. Br J Surg 105:1707–1709CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnad SS, Colletti LM (2002) Issues in the recruitment and success of women in academic surgery. Surgery 132:415–419CrossRef Sonnad SS, Colletti LM (2002) Issues in the recruitment and success of women in academic surgery. Surgery 132:415–419CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Gender distribution of speakers on panels at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting
verfasst von
T. C. Dumitra
M. Trepanier
L. Lee
G. M. Fried
C. L. Mueller
D. B. Jones
L. S. Feldman
Publikationsdatum
11.10.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07182-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.