Skip to main content

01.12.2015 | Research Article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2015

Geographic variation in the intended choice of adjuvant treatments for women diagnosed with screen-detected breast cancer in Queensland

BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2015
Jeff Ching-Fu Hsieh, Susanna M. Cramb, James M. McGree, Nathan A. M. Dunn, Peter D. Baade, Kerrie L. Mengersen
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s12889-015-2527-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All of the authors helped to design the study. JCH conducted the literature review and performed the statistical analysis in collaboration with PDB, SMC, JMM and KLM. JCH, PDB and NAMD undertook data collection. JCH drafted the manuscript, assisted by JMM and KLM. All of the authors helped in critical revision and approved the final version of manuscript.



Although early diagnosis and improved treatment can reduce breast cancer mortality, there still appears to be a geographic differential in patient outcomes. This study aims to determine and quantify spatial inequalities in intended adjuvant (radio-, chemo- and hormonal) therapy usage among women with screen-detected breast cancer in Queensland, Australia.


Linked population-based datasets from BreastScreen Queensland and the Queensland Cancer Registry during 1997−2008 for women aged 40−89 years were used. We adopted a Bayesian shared spatial component model to evaluate the relative intended use of each adjuvant therapy across 478 areas as well as common spatial patterns between treatments.


Women living closer to a cancer treatment facility were more likely to intend to use adjuvant therapy. This was particularly marked for radiotherapy when travel time to the closest radiation facility was 4 + h (OR =0.41, 95 % CrI: [0.23, 0.74]) compared to <1 h. The shared spatial effect increased towards the centres with concentrations of radiotherapy facilities, in north-east (Townsville) and south-east (Brisbane) regions of Queensland. Moreover, the presence of residual shared spatial effects indicates that there are other unmeasured geographical barriers influencing women’s treatment choices.


This highlights the need to identify the additional barriers that impact on treatment intentions among women diagnosed with screen-detected breast cancer, particularly for those women living further away from cancer treatment centers.
Additional file 1 Supplementary Tables. (PDF 88 kb)
Additional file 2 Supplementary Figures. (ZIP 28672 kb)
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe