Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2021

09.10.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Geometry of Sleeve Gastrectomy Measured by 3D CT Versus Weight Loss: Preliminary Analysis

verfasst von: Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Yuki Tomozawa, Satoshi Ugi, Sachiko Kaida, Toru Miyake, Katsutaro Morino, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Hiroshi Maegawa, Masaji Tani

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The size of the remnant stomach with respect to weight loss failure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the actual size and volume of the remnant stomach, as measured by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry, on weight loss after LSG.

Methods

The clinical outcomes of 52 patients who underwent LSG between October 2008 and February 2019 were assessed. Weight metrics were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. 3D-CT volumetry was performed 1 year postoperatively, and the total remnant stomach volume (TSV), proximal stomach volume (PSV), antral stomach volume (ASV), and the distance between the pylorus and the distal edge of staple line (DPS) were measured. The relationship between the weight metrics and aforementioned factors was analyzed.

Results

Of the 52 patients who underwent LSG, 40 patients participated in this study. The average body mass index preoperatively was 38.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2, and the average percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) 1 year after LSG was 26.6 ± 9.3%. The average TSV, PSV, ASV, and DPS were 123.2 ± 60.3 ml, 73.4 ± 37.2 ml, 49.8 ± 30.3 ml, and 59.9 ± 18.5 mm, respectively. The DPS (r = − 0.394, p = 0.012) and ASV (r = − 0.356, p = 0.024) were correlated with %TWL 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusions

The actual DPS and ASV measured by 3D-CT affected weight loss after LSG. 3D-CT may be useful for the immediate identification of factors affecting insufficient weight loss in patients; this may, in turn, aid in the implementation of early intervention treatments.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 12:3783–3794CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P et al (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 12:3783–3794CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:750–756CrossRef Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:750–756CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes-5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376:641–651CrossRef Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes-5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376:641–651CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal R, Li X, Samuel S et al (2009) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on patients with diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:429–434CrossRef Rosenthal R, Li X, Samuel S et al (2009) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on patients with diabetes mellitus. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:429–434CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH et al (2011) Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 146:143–148CrossRef Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH et al (2011) Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 146:143–148CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JM, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E et al (2015) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:1273–1280CrossRef Cho JM, Kim HJ, Lo Menzo E et al (2015) Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:1273–1280CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G (2017) Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:693–699CrossRef Juodeikis Ž, Brimas G (2017) Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:693–699CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Yi X, Li Q et al (2016) The effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy in the obese elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3023–3030CrossRef Wang Y, Yi X, Li Q et al (2016) The effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy in the obese elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 26:3023–3030CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saul D, Stephens D, Hofstätter Rde C et al (2012) Preliminary outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a Veterans affairs medical center. Am J Surg 204:e1–6CrossRef Saul D, Stephens D, Hofstätter Rde C et al (2012) Preliminary outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a Veterans affairs medical center. Am J Surg 204:e1–6CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Obeidat F, Shanti H (2016) Early weight loss as a predictor of 2-year weight loss and resolution of comorbidities after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1173–1177CrossRef Obeidat F, Shanti H (2016) Early weight loss as a predictor of 2-year weight loss and resolution of comorbidities after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1173–1177CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottam A, Billing J, Cottam D et al (2017) Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1266–1270CrossRef Cottam A, Billing J, Cottam D et al (2017) Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13:1266–1270CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saiki A, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka S et al (2019) Background characteristics and postoperative outcomes of insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 26:638–647CrossRef Saiki A, Yamaguchi T, Tanaka S et al (2019) Background characteristics and postoperative outcomes of insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 26:638–647CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Kefurt R et al (2016) Weight loss, weight regain, and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1655–1662CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J et al (2016) Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1778–1786CrossRef Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J et al (2016) Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1778–1786CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McNickle AG, Bonomo SR (2017) Predictability of first-year weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 31:4145–4149CrossRef McNickle AG, Bonomo SR (2017) Predictability of first-year weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 31:4145–4149CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T et al (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24:1587–1594CrossRef Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T et al (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24:1587–1594CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK et al (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30:446–450CrossRef Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK et al (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30:446–450CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto H, Kaida S, Yamaguchi T et al (2016) Potential mechanisms mediating improved glycemic control after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Surg Today 46:268–274CrossRef Yamamoto H, Kaida S, Yamaguchi T et al (2016) Potential mechanisms mediating improved glycemic control after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Surg Today 46:268–274CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabench Pereferrer F, Molina López A, Vives Espelta M et al (2017) Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:1254–1260CrossRef Sabench Pereferrer F, Molina López A, Vives Espelta M et al (2017) Weight loss analysis according to different formulas after sleeve gastrectomy with or without antral preservation: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:1254–1260CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalifa IG, Tobar WL, Hegazy TO et al (2019) Food tolerance after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with total antral resection. Obes Surg 29:2263–2269CrossRef Khalifa IG, Tobar WL, Hegazy TO et al (2019) Food tolerance after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with total antral resection. Obes Surg 29:2263–2269CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Garay M, Balagué C, Rodríguez-Otero C et al (2018) Influence of antrum size on gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (preliminary analysis of a randomized trial). Surg Endosc 32:2739–2745CrossRef Garay M, Balagué C, Rodríguez-Otero C et al (2018) Influence of antrum size on gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (preliminary analysis of a randomized trial). Surg Endosc 32:2739–2745CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M et al (2018) Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:857–864CrossRef McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M et al (2018) Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:857–864CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E et al (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1286–1291CrossRef Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E et al (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1286–1291CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Braghetto I, Davanzo C, Korn O et al (2009) Scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying in obese patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy compared to normal subjects. Obes Surg 19:1515–1521CrossRef Braghetto I, Davanzo C, Korn O et al (2009) Scintigraphic evaluation of gastric emptying in obese patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy compared to normal subjects. Obes Surg 19:1515–1521CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vives M, Molina A, Danús M et al (2017) Analysis of gastric physiology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with or without antral preservation in relation to metabolic response: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:2836–2844CrossRef Vives M, Molina A, Danús M et al (2017) Analysis of gastric physiology after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with or without antral preservation in relation to metabolic response: a randomised study. Obes Surg 27:2836–2844CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264:464–473CrossRef Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264:464–473CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bekheit M, Abdel-Baki TN, Gamal M et al (2016) Influence of the resected gastric volume on the weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1505–1510CrossRef Bekheit M, Abdel-Baki TN, Gamal M et al (2016) Influence of the resected gastric volume on the weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26:1505–1510CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sista F, Abruzzese V, Clementi M et al (2016) Effect of resected gastric volume on ghrelin and glp-1 plasma levels: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1931–1941CrossRef Sista F, Abruzzese V, Clementi M et al (2016) Effect of resected gastric volume on ghrelin and glp-1 plasma levels: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1931–1941CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Noel P et al (2011) Re-sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Obes Surg 21:832–835CrossRef Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Noel P et al (2011) Re-sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study. Obes Surg 21:832–835CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat De Angelis F, Avallone M, Albanese A et al (2018) Re-sleeve gastrectomy 4 years later: is it still an effective revisional option? Obes Surg 28:3714–3716CrossRef De Angelis F, Avallone M, Albanese A et al (2018) Re-sleeve gastrectomy 4 years later: is it still an effective revisional option? Obes Surg 28:3714–3716CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Geometry of Sleeve Gastrectomy Measured by 3D CT Versus Weight Loss: Preliminary Analysis
verfasst von
Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Yuki Tomozawa
Satoshi Ugi
Sachiko Kaida
Toru Miyake
Katsutaro Morino
Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Hiroshi Maegawa
Masaji Tani
Publikationsdatum
09.10.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05807-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

World Journal of Surgery 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.