Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 3/2018

09.08.2017 | Originalien

German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools

PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator

verfasst von: Tobias Braun, Christian Grüneberg, Christian Thiel

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Routine screening for frailty could be used to timely identify older people with increased vulnerability und corresponding medical needs.

Objective

The aim of this study was the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRISMA-7 questionnaire, the FRAIL scale and the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) into the German language as well as a preliminary analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of these instruments used to screen for frailty.

Methods

A diagnostic cross-sectional study was performed. The instrument translation into German followed a standardized process. Prefinal versions were clinically tested on older adults who gave structured in-depth feedback on the scales in order to compile a final revision of the German language scale versions. For the analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (criterion validity), PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and GFI were considered the index tests. Two reference tests were applied to assess frailty, either based on Fried’s model of a Physical Frailty Phenotype or on the model of deficit accumulation, expressed in a Frailty Index.

Results

Prefinal versions of the German translations of each instrument were produced and completed by 52 older participants (mean age: 73 ± 6 years). Some minor issues concerning comprehensibility and semantics of the scales were identified and resolved. Using the Physical Frailty Phenotype (frailty prevalence: 4%) criteria as a reference standard, the accuracy of the instruments was excellent (area under the curve AUC >0.90). Taking the Frailty Index (frailty prevalence: 23%) as the reference standard, the accuracy was good (AUC between 0.73 and 0.88).

Conclusion

German language versions of PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and GFI have been established and preliminary results indicate sufficient diagnostic test accuracy that needs to be further established.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Manas L, Feart C, Mann G et al (2013) Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(1):62–67CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Manas L, Feart C, Mann G et al (2013) Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(1):62–67CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381(9868):752–762CrossRefPubMed Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381(9868):752–762CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenig J, Zychiewicz B, Olszewska U et al (2015) Six screening instruments for frailty in older patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 61(3):437–442CrossRefPubMed Kenig J, Zychiewicz B, Olszewska U et al (2015) Six screening instruments for frailty in older patients qualified for emergency abdominal surgery. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 61(3):437–442CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue Q‑L, Varadhan R (2014) What is missing in the validation of frailty instruments? J Am Med Dir Assoc 15(2):141–142CrossRefPubMed Xue Q‑L, Varadhan R (2014) What is missing in the validation of frailty instruments? J Am Med Dir Assoc 15(2):141–142CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg A, Rogers L, Young J (2015) Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing 44(1):148–152CrossRefPubMed Clegg A, Rogers L, Young J (2015) Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing 44(1):148–152CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD et al (2011) Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10(1):104–114CrossRefPubMed de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD et al (2011) Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10(1):104–114CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):146–156CrossRef Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):146–156CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoogendijk EO, van der Horst HE, Deeg DJH et al (2013) The identification of frail older adults in primary care: comparing the accuracy of five simple instruments. Age Ageing 42(2):262–265CrossRefPubMed Hoogendijk EO, van der Horst HE, Deeg DJH et al (2013) The identification of frail older adults in primary care: comparing the accuracy of five simple instruments. Age Ageing 42(2):262–265CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Metzelthin SF, Daniels R, van Rossum E et al (2010) The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health 10:176CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Metzelthin SF, Daniels R, van Rossum E et al (2010) The psychometric properties of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community. BMC Public Health 10:176CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B (2012) Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int 12(2):189–197CrossRefPubMed Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B (2012) Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int 12(2):189–197CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun T, Thiel C, Grüneberg C (2016) Diagnostic and screening tools for frailty in older people – overview of systematic reviews. Physioscience 12(4):142–151CrossRef Braun T, Thiel C, Grüneberg C (2016) Diagnostic and screening tools for frailty in older people – overview of systematic reviews. Physioscience 12(4):142–151CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 31:3–10CrossRefPubMed Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 31:3–10CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hebert R, Durand PJ, Dubuc N et al (2003) Frail elderly patients. New model for integrated service delivery. Can Fam Physician 49:992–997PubMedPubMedCentral Hebert R, Durand PJ, Dubuc N et al (2003) Frail elderly patients. New model for integrated service delivery. Can Fam Physician 49:992–997PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK (2012) A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 16(7):601–608CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK (2012) A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 16(7):601–608CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardiner PA, Mishra GD, Dobson AJ (2015) Validity and responsiveness of the FRAIL scale in a longitudinal cohort study of older Australian women. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:781–783CrossRefPubMed Gardiner PA, Mishra GD, Dobson AJ (2015) Validity and responsiveness of the FRAIL scale in a longitudinal cohort study of older Australian women. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:781–783CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung H‑W, Yoo H‑J, Park S‑Y et al (2016) The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly. Korean J Intern Med 31(3):594–600CrossRefPubMed Jung H‑W, Yoo H‑J, Park S‑Y et al (2016) The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly. Korean J Intern Med 31(3):594–600CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Steverink N, Slaets J, Schuurmans H et al (2001) Measuring frailty: developing and testing the GFI (Groningen frailty indicator). Gerontologist 41:236–237 Steverink N, Slaets J, Schuurmans H et al (2001) Measuring frailty: developing and testing the GFI (Groningen frailty indicator). Gerontologist 41:236–237
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bielderman A, van der Schans CP, Lieshout M‑RJ et al (2013) Multidimensional structure of the Groningen frailty indicator in community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatr 13(1):86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bielderman A, van der Schans CP, Lieshout M‑RJ et al (2013) Multidimensional structure of the Groningen frailty indicator in community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatr 13(1):86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 351:h5527CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S et al (2004) Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(9):962–965CrossRef Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Lindenberg S et al (2004) Old or frail: what tells us more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(9):962–965CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pohontsch N, Meyer T (2015) Cognitive interviewing – a tool to develop and validate questionnaires. Rehabilitation 54(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed Pohontsch N, Meyer T (2015) Cognitive interviewing – a tool to develop and validate questionnaires. Rehabilitation 54(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts H, Denison H, Martin H et al (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40(4):423–429CrossRefPubMed Roberts H, Denison H, Martin H et al (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40(4):423–429CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor HL, Jacobs DR, Schucker B et al (1978) A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis 31(12):741–755CrossRefPubMed Taylor HL, Jacobs DR, Schucker B et al (1978) A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis 31(12):741–755CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun T, Thiel C, Schulz R‑J et al (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of physical frailty. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 142(2):117–122CrossRefPubMed Braun T, Thiel C, Schulz R‑J et al (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of physical frailty. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 142(2):117–122CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2007) A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(7):738–743CrossRefPubMed Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2007) A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(7):738–743CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M et al (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(11):1021–1027CrossRefPubMed Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M et al (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(11):1021–1027CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy JM, Berwick DM, Weinstein MC et al (1987) Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44(6):550–555CrossRefPubMed Murphy JM, Berwick DM, Weinstein MC et al (1987) Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44(6):550–555CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA et al (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60(8):1487–1492CrossRefPubMed Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA et al (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60(8):1487–1492CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamliyan T, Talley KMC, Ramakrishnan R et al (2013) Association of frailty with survival: a systematic literature review. Ageing Res Rev 12(2):719–736CrossRefPubMed Shamliyan T, Talley KMC, Ramakrishnan R et al (2013) Association of frailty with survival: a systematic literature review. Ageing Res Rev 12(2):719–736CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F (2015) A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 68(4):435–441CrossRefPubMed Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F (2015) A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 68(4):435–441CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein J, Osborne RH, Elsworth GR et al (2015) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol 68(4):360–369CrossRefPubMed Epstein J, Osborne RH, Elsworth GR et al (2015) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol 68(4):360–369CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT et al (2012) What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol 259(12):2681–2694CrossRefPubMed Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT et al (2012) What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol 259(12):2681–2694CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J et al (2015) Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Ageing Res Rev 21:78–94CrossRefPubMed Theou O, Cann L, Blodgett J et al (2015) Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Ageing Res Rev 21:78–94CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Freitag S, Schmidt S, Gobbens RJJ (2016) Tilburg frailty indicator. German translation and psychometric testing. Z Gerontol Geriatr 49(2):86–93CrossRefPubMed Freitag S, Schmidt S, Gobbens RJJ (2016) Tilburg frailty indicator. German translation and psychometric testing. Z Gerontol Geriatr 49(2):86–93CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Romero-Ortuno R, Walsh CD, Lawlor BA et al (2010) A Frailty Instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr 10(1):57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Romero-Ortuno R, Walsh CD, Lawlor BA et al (2010) A Frailty Instrument for primary care: findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). BMC Geriatr 10(1):57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H et al (2008) The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging 12(1):29–37CrossRefPubMed Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H et al (2008) The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging 12(1):29–37CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner G, Clegg A (2014) Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report. Age Ageing 43(6):744–747CrossRefPubMed Turner G, Clegg A (2014) Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report. Age Ageing 43(6):744–747CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools
PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator
verfasst von
Tobias Braun
Christian Grüneberg
Christian Thiel
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-6704
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-017-1295-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen des BV Geriatrie

Mitteilungen des BV Geriatrie

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.