Background
-
To describe changes in patient outcomes after participation in GLA:D Back and evaluate if these are of a magnitude comparable with those observed in RCTs on combined patient education and exercise interventions for persistent and recurrent back pain,
-
To determine to what extent patterns of health care utilisation and sick leave change in individuals from one year before participation in GLA:D Back to one year after,
-
To determine if patient outcomes are associated with clinicians’ treatment orientation and confidence,
-
To identify subgroups of patients who do not benefit sufficiently from the GLA:D Back clinical intervention, and
-
To investigate potential mechanisms of change in patient outcomes.
-
To monitor outcomes of learning activities and adapt the delivery of the clinician course accordingly,
-
To determine if there is a change in treatment orientation from a biomedical to a more behavioural orientation and an increase in clinicians’ confidence in managing people with back pain following the GLA:D Back course,
-
To identify clinician factors related to treatment orientation and confidence in managing back pain, and
-
To determine if treatment orientation and clinicians’ confidence are associated with clinical behaviours.
-
To monitor the promotion of GLA:D Back courses and adapt the promotion strategy when prespecified criteria are not met,
-
To describe the penetration, adoption, and fidelity of GLA:D Back including the degree of uniformity across clinicians, clinics, and regions,
-
To identify individual and organisational determinants of adoption and fidelity, and
-
To evaluate the effects of the implementation on referrals to imaging and secondary care for back pain, opioid prescription, and sick leave rates at the national level.
Methods
Theoretical framework
Context
Interventions
The GLA:D Back clinical intervention
The clinician educational intervention
COM-B TDF domains | Learning goals | Learning Activity (Interventions) | Evaluation tools |
---|---|---|---|
Motivation | |||
Social/professional role and identity | Clinicians perceive their role in ensuring high-quality care as important | A ‘state-of-the-art’ lecture including an overview of the evidence on the burden of back pain, the prognosis of back pain and the call for non-pharmacological, non-surgical interventions in clinical guidelines (Ed) | DIBQ (Social influences) |
Beliefs about capabilities | Clinicians feel confident that they are able to deliver GLA:D Back | Reinforcement that most of the skills needed are pre-exiting among educated clinicians (Ed) Group exercises focused on practising delivery of key messages of the patient education. Participants take turns in playing the roles of the teaching clinician and mentor. A scoring guide (rubric) is used to facilitate feed-back (En, T) Clinicians receive the patient education content as a slideshow with manuscript, exercise programs and handouts containing examples of language to be used in delivering key messages (En) | Practitioner Confidence Scale DIBQ (Skills, Knowledge, Beliefs of capabilities) |
Optimism | Clinicians believe that GLA:D Back will add value | A recording of a patient interview providing a patient’s views on what was gained from taking part in GLA:D Back (P) Posters placed at the course venue with quotes from clinicians and patients who have experienced GLA:D Back (P) | DIBQ (Beliefs about consequences) |
Beliefs about consequences | Clinicians agree with a need for standardised evidence-based back pain care Clinicians have positive attitudes towards a behavioural model for back pain treatment | Presentation of facts about the adoption of GLA:D knee and hip and the achieved political agreements for integrating GLA:D in disease management programs with reduced out-of-pocket expenses (Ed, I, M) Lecture about ‘state-of-the-art’, pain mechanisms, the evidence-base for GLA:D Back and the hypothesised mechanisms of action (Ed) Presentation of patient outcomes and statements from clinicians about experiences with GLA:D Back (P, I) A recording of a patient interview providing a patient’s views on what was gained from taking part in GLA:D Back (P) | DIBQ (Beliefs about consequences, Patients, Innovation) The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale |
Intentions | Clinicians intend to offer GLA:D Back in their clinics | Facilitated group discussion about practical organisation with examples of solutions from test-sites (M) Participants documenting a plan on when, where, who, and how to initiate the GLA:D Back-program in their clinic (P, En) | DIBQ (Behavioural regulation, Intentions) Intended time point for starting the first GLA:D Back-group |
Reinforcement | Clinicians are aware that GLA:D for hip and knee has been well received by physiotherapists, patients, general practitioners and politicians | Presentation of facts about the spread of GLA:D knee and hip, the patient outcomes, and the achieved political agreements for integrating GLA:D in disease management programs with reduced out-of-pocket expenses (Ed, I, M) | Not measured |
Emotion | Clinicians appreciate the value of being a GLA:D Back instructor | A recording of a patient interview providing a patient’s views on what was gained from taking part in GLA:D Back (I) | Not measured |
Capability | |||
Knowledge | Clinicians know current recommendations for treatment of back pain Clinicians know the GLA:D Back approach to support patients’ self-management Clinicians know why SMART value-based goals are used | A ‘state-of-the-art’ lecture including an overview of the content of clinical guidelines on treatment (Ed) A lecture on the patient education that links the content of GLAD Back to self-efficacy (Ed) A lecture about value-based goals, demonstration of web-tool for goal registration, examples from the pilot (Ed, T, I) | DIBQ: Knowledge |
Skills | Clinicians can identify relevant patients for the program Clinicians can deliver the key messages of the patient education Clinicians can support patients in identifying goals Clinicians know how to perform the exercises in the program Clinicians can apply knowledge of the non-structural pain model in the supervision of exercises Clinicians can supervise exercises in a manner that helps patients explore movement Clinicians can enter data in the database | Definition of the target group for the clinical intervention (Ed) Provision of examples of explaining back pain using the educational material (T) Provision of examples of questioning technique for identifying goals (T) Instructions on how to perform Texercises in the program (T) Group exercises focused on practising the delivery of central messages of the patient education. Participants take turns in playing the roles of the clinician teaching and the patients with diverse issues and worries (En) Exercise based on video cases to practice how messages from the patient education are used in the instruction of exercises. A scoring guide (rubric) is used to facilitate the evaluation of cases (En) A lecture on using the digital platform to enter data (Ed) | Enrolled patients report long-lasting or recurrent LBP and have similar profiles across clinicians Delivery of central messages (patient reported) Use of individual goals registration in the registry DIBQ: Skills, beliefs about capabilities Clinicians use the register |
Behavioural regulation (action planning, breaking habits) | Clinicians know how to get started with GLA:D Back | Clinicians documenting a plan for when, where and how to start their first GLA:D Back-group and discuss their plan in groups (En) A lecture on using the digital platform to enter data (Ed) Following the course, access to educational materials, exercise programs and instructions for clinical tests are available online. Clinicians have access to the technical support and to the research team for guidance when questions arise (En) | Patients are enrolled in and complete the GLAD programme |
Opportunity | |||
Environmental context and resources | Clinicians know that the programme does not require high-tech equipment | Emphasising the use of low-tech equipment while delivering the GLA:D programme throughout the course and demonstrating this when teaching the exercises (E, En) | DIBQ (knowledge) |
Clinicians see how the programme can fit into existing routines and payment structures | Workshop where clinicians share experiences with implementing back programs and are able to ask questions of expert clinician | DIBQ (knowledge) |
The national implementation
Planned promotion activity | Interval | Minimum standard |
Article on the Danish Physiotherapists’ web site | Completed 2017 | NA |
Poster presentation Danish Chiropractors’ Association meeting | Completed 2017 | NA |
Series of three letters on standardised care in a magazine for members of Danish Chiropractors’ Association | Completed 2017 | NA |
The Danish Chiropractic Association (DCA) informs members that course registration is open | Once before registration opens | One newsletter e-mailed to members of the DCA News posted on the DCA’s website |
The Danish Physiotherapy Association informs members that course registration is open | Once before registration opens | One newsletter e-mailed to members of the Association News posted on the Association’s website |
Information about the GLA:D Back courses at websites of physiotherapy special interest groups - Musculoskeletal physiotherapy - Sports physiotherapy - Physiotherapists in private practice - Physiotherapists without a contract with the board of wages and fees | Once before first course registration closes | One of the listed groups posts the information |
Direct e-mail to the five regions’ private practice consultants from chiropractic, physiotherapy and general practice | Once when information about opening the registration is known | Mail send before registration opens |
Information to clinicians who deliver GLA:D for knee/hip patients on the front page of the knee/hip clinical registry | When registration is open | Information posted one time before opening |
Promotion of GLA:D Back via social media (Twitter, Facebook, ResearchGate, LinkedIn) | When GLA:D Back related external activities (courses, talks) and publications occur | One posting per month during 2018 |
Workshop at the yearly seminar for general practitioners “Lægedage” | November 2018 + November 2019 | One workshop accepted |
Clinicians who participated in the course and wanted to deliver the intervention listed at the GLA:D Back website | After courses are conducted for a region | Updated within 2 weeks of the last course for a region |
Target | Group definition | Minimum standard |
Number of clinicians educated in 2018 | The Capital Region of Denmark | 60 |
Region Zealand | 60 | |
Region of Southern Denmark | 60 | |
Central Denmark Region | 60 | |
The North Denmark Region | 60 | |
Total | 300 | |
Years of clinical experience (min. proportion) | 0–5 | 10% |
> 15 | 10% | |
Sex | Proportion males | Min 33% Max 66% |
Work place and role (min. proportion) | Municipality | 5% |
Private clinics | 60% | |
Clinic owner | 5% | |
Employed clinician | 50% | |
Profession (minimum proportion) | Physiotherapist | 70% |
Chiropractor | 10% |
Effectiveness and process evaluations
Data collection
Evaluation of the clinical intervention
Evaluation of the clinician educational intervention
Evaluation of the national implementation
Process | Definition/Measurement | Data Source |
---|---|---|
Spread (promotion of GLA:D Back)
Newsletter from professional organisations Information to GLA:D Knee/Hip deliverers Description of GLA:D Back in magazine for general practitioners Information on the GLA:D Back web site Use of social media | The extent to which the intended promotion activities are delivered (Table 2) | Web sites, social media, e-mails |
Clinician reach
| The proportion of chiropractors and physiotherapists, on a contract with the universal health insurance, participating in GLA:D Back courses. Profile of enrolled clinicians. | Course registration |
Penetration and adoption (extent of implementation)
| Geographical penetration measured as the number of municipalities with at least one GLA:D Back deliverer. Rate of adoption will be measured as the proportion of clinics with trained clinicians offering GLA:D Back (defined as having entered at least five patients in the clinical registry) within 6 months of course participation. The number of patients starting GLA:D Back | GLA:D Back registry |
Fidelity (quality of implementation)
| The extent to which the core elements of the clinical intervention are delivered | Observations in selected clinics Patient 4 month surveys |
Determinants of implementation
| The domains of knowledge, skills, beliefs about capability, beliefs about consequences, innovation, patients, intentions, organisation, social influences, social context, and behavioural regulation are captured by the Determinants of Implementation Questionnaire (DIBQ) [16]. | Clinician surveys |
Patient participation
| Proportion of patients enrolled in GLA:D Back that complete the program Profile of enrolled patients and of completers/non-completers Reasons that patients do not want to participate | Patient surveys in the GLA:D Back Registry Clinician surveys |
Outcome measures
Outcomes of the clinical intervention
Construct | Instrument | Patient reported | Clinician reported | National registries | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | 3-months | 6-months | 12-months | Pre- intervention | Post- intervention | |||
Demographics | Age, sex, height, weight, education | x | ||||||
Work situation | Job type, working hours | x | ||||||
Risk profile | The START Back screening tool | x | ||||||
LBP history | Pain duration (0–2 weeks; 2–4 weeks; 4–12 weeks; 3–12 months; > 1 year) Pain trajectory last 12 months (one of seven patterns or ‘I don’t recognise any of the patterns) | x | ||||||
Comorbid pain | Pain in any of nine regions on body chart in the last 2 weeks | x | x | |||||
Comorbidity | Any chronic disease (yes/no) on a list of 15 conditions | x | ||||||
Illness perceptions | x | x | x | x | ||||
Ability to move with variation | How confident are you in performing exercises in a beneficial way?’ (0–10 scale from ‘not confident at all’ to ‘absolutely confident’) | x | x | x | x | |||
Physical back performance | Standing forward bending [46] Sit-to-stand test | x | x | |||||
Perceived physical fitness | Self-assessed physical capacity [57] | x | x | x | x | |||
Fear of movement | x | x | x | x | ||||
Self-efficacy | The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (subscales pain + other symptoms) [59] | x | x | x | x | |||
Pain intensity | Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 for LBP and leg pain [64] | x | x | x | x | |||
Activity limitation | x | x | x | x | ||||
Quality of life | SF-36 general health, social functioning, mental health | x | x | x | x | |||
Work ability | Current work ability Number of days with LBP related sick leave within last 3 months | x | x | x | x | |||
Content of intervention | Received listed intervention yes/no | x | ||||||
Satisfaction | Overall are you satisfied with your course of care (5-point Likert scale) | x | ||||||
Harms | Did you experience any side effects or problems in relation to your participation in GLA:D Back? | x | ||||||
Back pain treatment | Consultations to general practice, chiropractors, physiotherapists and other clinicians due to back pain | x | x | x | x | |||
Health care utilisation | Reimbursed consultations to general practice, chiropractors and physiotherapists; Secondary care visits for back pain; Imaging for back pain Prescriptions for pain medication | x | ||||||
Long-term sick leave | Number of reimbursed days with sick leave | x |
Outcomes of the clinician educational intervention
Construct | Instrument | Course registration | Before course | After course | 5-months | Patient baseline registration | Patient reported at 3-months |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual characteristics | Age, sex, profession | x | |||||
Experience | Years of clinical experience Experience with GLA:D for knee and hip | x | |||||
Clinic characteristics | Workplace (Private clinic, municipality, secondary care) Number and professional background of clinicians in the workplace | x | |||||
Treatment orientation | x | x | |||||
Confidence and capability | The Practitioner Confidence Scale [73] + 2 added items The Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (knowledge, skills, beliefs about capabilities) [74] | x | x | ||||
Motivation | The Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (Beliefs about consequences, innovation, patients, intentions) [74] | x | x | ||||
Opportunity | The Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (organisation, social influences, social context, and behavioural regulation) [74] | x | x | ||||
Delivery of key messages | Patients asked to what extent they during the course of care they have heard about key messages of GLA:D Back (e.g. that pain does not signal harm) and messages contradictory to GLA:D Back (e.g. that certain positions or movements have to be avoided) | x | |||||
Establishing individual goals | SMART value-based goal registered at the initial consultation | x |