Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende Patientenratgeber
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Erschienen in:

06.09.2024 | Review

Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US

verfasst von: Emily L. DeMaio, Guido Marra, Linda I. Suleiman, Vehniah K. Tjong

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The burden of musculoskeletal disease is increasing globally and disproportionately affecting people in low and middle income countries (LMIC). We sought to review global access to orthopaedic care, burden of trauma, research infrastructure, impact of surgical mission trips, implant availability, and the effect of COVID-19 upon the delivery of orthopaedic care worldwide.

Recent Findings

The majority of people in LMIC do not have access to safe, quality surgical care, and there are few fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists. Road traffic accidents are the leading cause of long bone fractures in LMIC and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Of the orthopaedic literature published globally in the last 10 years, less than 15% had authors from LMIC. There has been growth in surgical mission trips to LMIC, but few organizations have established bidirectional partnerships. Among the challenges to delivering quality musculoskeletal care in LMIC is timely access to quality orthopaedic implants. Implant options in LMIC are more limited and subjected to less rigorous testing and regulation than high income countries (HIC). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reduced elective surgeries but saw the increase in telemedicine utilization which has prevailed in both HIC and LMIC.

Summary

Awareness of global inequities in orthopaedic care is growing. Much can be learned through collaborations between orthopaedic surgeons from HIC and LMIC to advance patient care worldwide. There is a need for high quality, accurate data regarding incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disease, care utilization/availability, and postoperative outcomes so resources can be allotted to make orthopaedic care more equitable globally.
Literatur
1.
King ML. Presentation at the second national convention of the medical committee for human rights. Chic IL March 1966;25.
2.
Liu S, Wang B, Fan S, Wang Y, Zhan Y, Ye D. Global burden of musculoskeletal disorders and attributable factors in 204 countries and territories: a secondary analysis of the global burden of Disease 2019 study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e062183.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Lencucha R, Neupane S. The use, misuse and overuse of the ‘low-income and middle-income countries’ category. BMJ Glob Health 2022;7(6).
4.
5.
Gómez-Galán M, Pérez-Alonso J, Callejón-Ferre ÁJ, López-Martínez J. Musculoskeletal disorders: OWAS review. Ind Health. 2017;55(4):314–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Briggs AM, Huckel Schneider C, Slater H et al. Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6).
7.
Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Elzinga K, Chung KC. Treating Hand Trauma in Low-Resource setting: a challenge for low- and Middle-Income Countries. Hand Clin. 2019;35(4):479–86.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Patel KG, Eberlin KR, Vyas RM, Hamdan US. Use of Safety measures, including the Modified World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist, during International Outreach Cleft missions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(5):597–604.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Agarwal-Harding KJ, von Keudell A, Zirkle LG, Meara JG, Dyer GS. Understanding and addressing the Global need for Orthopaedic Trauma Care. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(21):1844–53.PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
14.
Tibor LM, Hoenecke HR. Jr. Introducing arthroscopy to a developing nation: when and how to make it sustainable. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(2):e8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Goldhaber NH, Qudsi RA, Polinsky S, et al. International comparative analysis to understand the capacity for arthroscopy training and practice in developing countries. Global Surg Educ - J Association Surg Educ. 2023;2(1):36.CrossRef
16.
Haukipuro K, Ohinmaa A, Winblad I, Linden T, Vuolio S. The feasibility of telemedicine for orthopaedic outpatient clinicsa randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(4):193–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tiwari BB, Kulkarni A, Zhang H, Khan MM, Zhang DS. Utilization of telehealth services in low- and middle-income countries amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative summary. Glob Health Action. 2023;16(1):2179163.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Owolabi EO, Mac Quene T, Louw J, Davies JI, Chu KM. Telemedicine in Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income countries: a scoping review. World J Surg. 2022;46(8):1855–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Petersen W, Karpinski K, Backhaus L, Bierke S, Häner M. A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(10):1731–9.
20.
Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.CrossRef
21.
Global regional. National burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2(9):e580–92.CrossRef
22.
Joshipura M, Gosselin RA. Surgical Burden of Musculoskeletal conditions in low- and Middle-Income Countries. World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1026–32.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Cordero DM, Miclau TA, Paul AV, et al. The global burden of musculoskeletal injury in low and lower-middle income countries: a systematic literature review. OTA Int. 2020;3(2):e062.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Stewart BT, Kushner AL, Kamara TB, et al. Backlog and burden of fractures in Sierra Leone and Nepal: results from nationwide cluster randomized, population-based surveys. Int J Surg. 2016;33(Pt):49–54.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Bayray A, Enquselassie F, Gebreegziabher Z. Magnitude and pattern of osteoporotic fractures among adults in Tigiray, Ethiopia; a retrospective hospital based study. Ethiop Med J. 2012;50(4):297–305.PubMed
26.
Beck NI, Arif I, Paumier MF, Jacobsen KH. Adolescent injuries in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Uruguay: results from the 2012–2013 Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). Injury. 2016;47(12):2642–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Alonge O, Agrawal P, Talab A, et al. Fatal and non-fatal injury outcomes: results from a purposively sampled census of seven rural subdistricts in Bangladesh. Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(8):e818–27.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Weinberg DS, Narayanan AS, Boden KA, Breslin MA, Vallier HA. Psychiatric illness is common among patients with Orthopaedic Polytrauma and is linked with poor outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(5):341–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
McQuillan TJ, Franco JR, Sorg EM, Baller E, Quijije N, Rozental TD. Understanding and addressing Psychiatric comorbidities and Upper-Extremity Trauma: surgeons in a Multidisciplinary Care Model. J Hand Surg. 2021;46(4):328–34.CrossRef
30.
O’Hara NN, Mugarura R, Potter J, et al. The socioeconomic implications of isolated tibial and femoral fractures from Road Traffic Injuries in Uganda. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(7):e43.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Whiting PS, Anderson DR, Galat DD, Zirkle LG, Lundy DW, Mir HR. State of pelvic and acetabular surgery in the developing world: A Global Survey of Orthopaedic surgeons at Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) hospitals. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(7):e217–23.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Slobogean G, Sprague S, Furey A, Pollak A. Orthopaedic Trauma Care specialist program for developing countries. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(Suppl 10):S26–28.PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
Pasqualini I, Piuzzi NS. New CMS Policy on the Mandatory Collection of patient-reported outcome measures for total hip and knee arthroplasty by 2027: what Orthopaedic surgeons should know. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024.
35.
Bernstein DN, Agarwal-Harding KJ, Dyer GSM, Rozental TD. Outcomes measurement in global hand surgery. J Hand Surg. 2020;45(9):865–8.CrossRef
36.
Fontaine G, Poitras M-E, Sasseville M, et al. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review. Syst Reviews. 2024;13(1):96.CrossRef
37.
Elliott IS, Sonshine DB, Akhavan S, et al. What Factors Influence the Production of Orthopaedic Research in East Africa? A qualitative analysis of interviews. Clin Orthop Relat Research®. 2015;473(6):2120–30.CrossRef
38.
Graham SM, Brennan C, Laubscher M, et al. Orthopaedic research in low-income countries: a bibliometric analysis of the current literature. Sicot j. 2019;5:41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Brown K, Flores MJ, Haonga B, et al. Best Practices for Developing International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(10):924–30.
40.
Conway DJ, Coughlin R, Caldwell A, Shearer D. The Institute for Global Orthopedics and Traumatology: a model for academic collaboration in orthopedic surgery. Front Public Health. 2017;5:146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Young J, Chen R, Choi S, Hayes IB, Bain PA, May C. Evaluation of low- and Middle-Income Country authorship in the global Orthopaedic Literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023;7.
42.
Zgouridou A, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(2):1219–51.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Coughlin RR, Kelly NA, Berry W. Nongovernmental organizations in musculoskeletal care: Orthopaedics Overseas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(10):2438–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Derkash RS, Kelly N. The history of orthopaedics overseas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;396:30–5.CrossRef
45.
Elena Z, Holly B, Rahul MJ. Accountability in global surgery missions. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(6):e001025.CrossRef
46.
Leversedge C, Castro S, Appiani LMC, Kamal R, Shapiro L. Patient follow-up after Orthopaedic Outreach trips – do we know whether patients are improving? World J Surg. 2022;46(10):2299–309.
47.
Torchia MT, Schroder LK, Hill BW, Cole PA. A patient follow-up program for Short-Term Surgical Mission Trips to a developing country. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(3):226–32.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Nolte MT, Nasser JS, Chung KC. A systematic review of Orthopedic Global Outreach efforts based on WHO-CHOICE thresholds. Hand Clin. 2019;35(4):487–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Evans DB, Edejer TT, Adam T, Lim SS. Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1137–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Carey JN, Caldwell AM, Coughlin RR, Hansen S. Building Orthopaedic Trauma Capacity: IGOT International SMART Course. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(Suppl 10):S17–19.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Chung KC, Billig JI, Nasser JS. Educating hand surgeons in the developing world: where do we go from here? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44(2):221–2.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Pean CA, Premkumar A, Pean MA, et al. Global orthopaedic surgery: an ethical Framework to Prioritize Surgical Capacity Building in Low and Middle-Income Countries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(13):e64.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Vij N, Beyda D. An Analysis of Global Orthopedic Organizations through the Lens of the four pillars of global surgery. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35031.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Kozin SH. Global hand surgery: initiatives that work (the touching hands Project): why, when, and how! Hand Clin. 2019;35(4):499–506.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Rovinsky D, Brown HP, Coughlin RR, Paiement GD, Bradford DS. Overseas volunteerism in orthopaedic education. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(3):433–6.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Haonga BT, Zirkle LG. The SIGN nail: factors in a successful device for low-resource settings. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(Suppl 10):S37–39.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Chen AT, Morris WZ, Zirkle LG, Liu RW. Evaluation of Intramedullary Fixation for Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures in developing countries. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(6):e210–4.PubMedCrossRef
58.
59.
MacKenzie JS, Suresh KV, Margalit A, Shafiq B, Zirkle L, Ficke J. Rate of Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) Fusion using the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Intramedullary Nail in developing countries. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2023;32(3):187–92.PubMed
60.
Usoro AO, Bhashyam A, Mohamadi A, Dyer GS, Zirkle L, von Keudell A. Clinical outcomes and complications of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Intramedullary nail: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(1):42–8.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Sekimpi P, Okike K, Zirkle L, Jawa A. Femoral fracture fixation in developing countries: an evaluation of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(19):1811–8.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Franssen BB, Schuurman AH, Brouha PC, Kon M. Hammering K-wires is superior to drilling with irrigation. Hand (N Y). 2009;4(2):108–12.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Henshaw F, Karasouli E, King R, et al. Engineering standards for trauma and orthopaedic implants worldwide: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e021650.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Ikwuegbuenyi CA, Lohkamp LN, Maruthanal J, Kassim KO, Shabani H, Härtl R. Regulation, approval, and access of spinal implants in low-middle-income countries: a narrative review and case study. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20(12):1173–81.
65.
Gupta RK, Singh H, Dev B, Kansay R, Gupta P, Garg S. Results of operative treatment of acetabular fractures from the Third World–how local factors affect the outcome. Int Orthop. 2009;33(2):347–52.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Shelton J, Dorman S, Long K, Ngiep HO, Gollogly O. Total hip arthroplasty in Cambodia - our experience of two hundred and fifty six consecutive total hip arthroplasties in a low-income country & the challenge of service delivery in this setting. Trop Doct. 2022;52(2):246–52.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Ikeda AJ, Grabowski AM, Lindsley A, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Reisinger KD. A scoping literature review of the provision of orthoses and prostheses in resource-limited environments 2000–2010. Part two: research and outcomes. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(5):343–62.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Hetherington A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prosthesis provision for patients with transfemoral amputation in Tanzania. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46(5):523–31.
69.
Abbady H, Klinkenberg ETM, de Moel L, et al. 3D-printed prostheses in developing countries: a systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46(1):19–30.
70.
71.
Hsu C-H, Huang H-T, Chen C-H, Fu Y-C, Chou P-H, Hsu N-C. Global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orthopedics and the implications of Telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):2983.
72.
Luengo-Alonso G, Pérez-Tabernero FG-S, Tovar-Bazaga M, Arguello-Cuenca JM, Calvo E. Critical adjustments in a department of orthopaedics through the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Orthop. 2020;44(8):1557–64.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Cole PA Jr., Lezak BA, Schroder LK, Cole PA. Global orthopaedic trauma surgeons highlight telenomics during the COVID-19 era: a case for advancing telemedicine in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;17:182–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):483.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Kumar A, Sinha S, Jameel J, Kumar S. Telemedicine trends in orthopaedics and trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric analysis and review. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;17(2):203–13.PubMed
76.
Kumar S, Kumar A, Kumar M, Kumar A, Arora R, Sehrawat R. Feasibility of telemedicine in maintaining follow-up of orthopaedic patients and their satisfaction: a preliminary study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 5):S704–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Chaudhry H, Nadeem S, Mundi R. How satisfied are patients and surgeons with Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(1):47–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US
verfasst von
Emily L. DeMaio
Guido Marra
Linda I. Suleiman
Vehniah K. Tjong
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2024
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-024-09917-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2024

Achieving Health Equity: Combatting the Disparities in American Access to Musculoskeletal Care

  • REVIEW

Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • REVIEW

Arthroscopic Bone Block Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Glenohumeral Bone Loss

  • REVIEW

Patient Expectations and Satisfaction in Pediatric Orthopedics

  • Open Access

What’s in a Name? Defining ‘Failure’ in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

  • REVIEW

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications

  • REVIEW

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).


Jetzt entdecken!

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Leitlinienkonformes Management thermischer Verletzungen

Thermische Verletzungen gehören zu den schwerwiegendsten Traumen und hinterlassen oft langfristige körperliche und psychische Spuren. Die aktuelle S2k-Leitlinie „Behandlung thermischer Verletzungen im Kindesalter (Verbrennung, Verbrühung)“ bietet eine strukturierte Übersicht über das empfohlene Vorgehen.

Positive Daten für supraskapulären Nervenblock bei Schultersteife

Daten einer aktuellen Metaanalyse sprechen dafür, dass eine Blockade des Nervus suprascapularis bei Schultersteife mit Blick auf Funktion und Schmerzlinderung mindestens so effektiv ist wie eine Physiotherapie oder intraartikulär injizierte Steroide.

Wirbelgleiten: Dem persönlichen Drang zum Versteifen widerstehen!

In einer norwegischen Studie schnitt die alleinige Dekompressions-Op. bei Personen mit Wirbelgleiten auch dann nicht schlechter ab, wenn erfahrene Chirurgen/ Chirurginnen eigentlich für eine zusätzliche Versteifung plädiert hätten.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise