Introduction
Trachoma is a chronic form of conjunctivitis caused by recurrent infection with specific strains of
Chlamydia trachomatis [
1,
2]. This disease can cause conjunctival scarring, entropion, trichiasis, and, if left untreated, may eventually progress to corneal opacity and blindness [
3]. Currently, trachoma is the most common infectious cause of blindness, accounting for 1.3 million cases of blindness worldwide [
4].
In 1996, the World Health Organization (WHO), in cooperation with several nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), embarked on an ambitious international trachoma control program titled “the WHO Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma by the year 2020 (GET2020)” [
5]. This groundbreaking program has, to some extent, succeeded in reducing the burden of trachoma on a global scale [
6]. However, trachoma currently remains a public health challenge in many countries and regions, with 125 million people still living in trachoma-endemic areas and facing the risk of trachoma-related blindness [
7]. According to the WHO, the annual economic burden attributed to productivity losses by trachoma is approximated US $8 billion [
7]. However, as a “neglected tropical disease”, few studies have comprehensively investigated its disease burden, such as its geographical distribution and health inequalities.
To advance the understanding of trachoma epidemiology, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the burden, trends, and inequalities of trachoma using the latest data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study (GBD) 2021. This research included: (1) a descriptive analysis of the global, regional, and national trachoma burden from 1990 to 2021; (2) a trend analysis for the dynamic changes in trachoma burden over time; (3) a decomposition analysis dissecting changes in trachoma burden into population aging, population growth, and epidemiological changes; (4) a health inequality analysis quantifying the cross-country inequalities in trachoma burden in relation to the sociodemographic index (SDI); and (5) a prediction for the anticipated global trachoma burden up to 2040.
Discussion
The current study provided a comprehensive and up-to-date picture of the global, regional, and national trachoma burden from 1990 to 2021 and systematically assessed this burden through trend, decomposition, health inequality, and burden prediction analyses. Despite cross-country variations, the overall global burden exhibited a declining trend from 1990 to 2021. Decomposition analysis revealed epidemiological changes as positive contributors to burden reduction, whereas population aging and growth as factors driving the increase in trachoma burden. Health inequality analysis revealed significant inverse associations between SDI and the ASR of trachoma prevalence/DALYs, with low-SDI countries disproportionately bearing the heaviest burden. Notably, projections indicate that while the ASR of prevalence and DALYs are anticipated to decline from 2022 to 2040, the prevalent cases and DALY numbers will increase, underscoring the upcoming challenge in global trachoma eradication efforts over the next two decades.
Worldwide, trachoma accounted for 1,414,047 prevalent cases and 123,190 DALY numbers in 2021. The heaviest burden was observed in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa, where the ASR of prevalence was 25.7 times the global average. Poor sanitation conditions, inadequate awareness of trachoma, economic constraints, and limited access to medical care were all contributing factors responsible for the widespread transmission of trachoma in this region [
15‐
17]. In addition, Western Sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa and the Middle East, as well as South Asia, were also noteworthy regions because their ASR of prevalence and DALYs were all significantly higher than the global average. At the national level, Ethiopia stood out in 2021 with the highest number of prevalent cases and DALYs, whereas Somalia reported the highest ASR of prevalence and DALYs. Despite the implementation of the SAFE strategy (surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental improvements) and mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin, which led to a decrease in trachomatous inflammation–follicular in Ethiopia, trachoma continues to pose a significant public health concern in this country [
18,
19]. In 2021, the WHO estimated that nearly 460,000 patients in Ethiopia were still in need of surgical intervention for trachomatous trichiasis, the advanced, vision-threatening stage of the disease [
20]. Recently published literature indicates that the prevalence of active trachoma among children aged 1–9 years varies between 9.5 and 47.7% across different regions of Ethiopia, with an estimated pooled prevalence of 24% using a random effects model [
21‐
24]. This underscores the persistent challenge that trachoma presents to Ethiopia's public health system, highlighting the necessity for consistent and focused intervention strategies. Despite advancements in reducing specific manifestations of the disease, the high incidence of active trachoma among young children emphasizes the pressing need for sustained efforts to eradicate this avoidable cause of blindness. Although literature on the trachoma epidemic in Somalia is limited, its geographical proximity and epidemiological similarities with Ethiopia underscore the need for urgent attention to the trachoma problem in this country. Another country of attention is India. In 2021, India accounted for approximately a quarter of the global patients with trachoma, ranking second in the world, partly owing to its enormous population base and a prevalence rate that was twice the global average. This underscores the urgency of intensifying efforts to eliminate trachoma as a public health issue in this populous country [
25]. Moreover, despite having a relatively lower trachoma burden compared to the aforementioned countries, Kenya and Mexico were the only two countries where the prevalence rate of trachoma increased amidst the overall global decline in trachoma burden. In a certain region of Kenya, the treatment coverage of mass drug administration for trachoma in 2021 was still below the 80% threshold recommended by the WHO, which may partly account for the increase in the prevalence of trachoma in the country [
26]. In short, more health investments are needed to halt and reverse the emerging trend of trachoma in these two countries.
Notably, from 1990 to 2021, female patients have consistently borne a heavier trachoma burden than male patients. Gender roles, rather than biological differences, are recognized as the reason for the female predilection of trachoma [
27]. For example, in many societies of developing countries, women predominantly take on the role of caregivers within families, which exposes them more frequently to unsanitary environments, as well as contaminated water sources. As a result, they become more susceptible to trachoma infections [
27‐
29]. In summary, future initiatives to control trachoma should take into account the disadvantaged position of female patients in this health predicament.
Decomposition analysis revealed that the reduction in trachoma burden was driven mainly by global epidemiological changes, which masked the burden increase by population growth and aging. Ultimately, this resulted in an overall reduction in the burden. This pattern holds for most SDI quintiles, with the exception of the high-SDI quintile, where the impact of population aging and population growth surpassed that of epidemiological changes. This phenomenon may be attributed to the already low prevalence of trachoma in the high SDI quintile, leaving limited scope for further reduction.
We observed pronounced inequalities in the trachoma burden that correlated with the SDI. Specifically, the disease burden tended to increase as the SDI decreased, with low-SDI countries disproportionately bearing the greatest proportion of the burden. For a long time, trachoma has been seen as a “disease of poverty”, which stands in line with some previous studies declaring strong associations between trachoma and indicators of poverty [
30‐
32]. In fact, the relationship between poverty and trachoma is more intricate, potentially involving a bidirectional causality [
33]. Poor hygiene conditions, inadequate awareness of trachoma, and limited medical resources that stem from poverty can contribute to a greater risk of trachoma. Conversely, productivity loss in patients with trachoma (with trachoma-induced blindness rendering individuals completely unproductive in extreme cases) and medical expenses associated with trachoma can both exacerbate poverty [
33,
34]. To alleviate the cross-country inequalities in trachoma burden, while adhering to the implementation of the SAFE strategy, targeted policies should be adopted for countries with different development levels. Furthermore, international organizations and developed countries should strengthen medical assistance and guidance for low-income countries, helping them break the vicious cycle between trachoma and poverty.
Notably, despite predictions indicating a continued decline in the ASR of prevalence and DALYs for trachoma between 2022 and 2040, the number of prevalent cases and DALYs is projected to increase, highlighting the heavy disease burden in the future fight against trachoma. According to the decomposition analysis, population growth and aging (especially the former) are responsible for the anticipated increases in the prevalent cases and DALY numbers. To address this upcoming challenge, it is important that prevention and control strategies be tailored to the specific needs of different regions and populations. This includes targeting high-risk groups, such as the younger generations and implementing interventions that are culturally appropriate. Additionally, there is a need for continued monitoring and evaluation of trachoma control programs to ensure their effectiveness and make necessary adjustments. By adopting a proactive and targeted approach, we can anticipate progress in eliminating trachoma and reducing health inequalities across regions.
This study has several limitations. First, the burden estimates for some underdeveloped countries with limited resources may be underestimated because of the potential under-registration of trachoma data. Second, although advanced disease models were developed by GBD investigators, variations in the quality of raw data across countries might cause potential bias. Third, since DALYs were calculated on the basis of chronic ocular conditions, i.e., visual impairment, DALYs caused by trachoma without visual impairment could be ignored, leading to an underestimation of the disease burden. In addition, since the data provided by GBD is up to the year 2021, the latest trends in the global burden of trachoma have not been studied. Despite these limitations, this study has offered valuable up-to-date information for international organizations and health policy makers to formulate targeted strategies for the prevention and control of trachoma.