Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2020

19.04.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers

verfasst von: Nikhil Panda, Luca Koritsanszky, Megan Delisle, Theophilus T. K. Anyomih, Eesha V. Desai, Yves Sonnay, George Molina, Katayoun Madani, Dominique Vervoort, Thomas G. Weiser, Evan M. Benjamin, Alex B. Haynes

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce perioperative complications across global health systems. We sought to assess perceptions of the SSC and suggestions for its improvement among medical students, trainees, and early career providers.

Methods

From July to September 2019, a survey assessing perceptions of the SSC was disseminated through InciSioN, the International Student Surgical Network comprising medical students, trainees, and early career providers pursuing surgery. Individuals with ≥2 years of independent practice after training were excluded. Respondents were categorized according to any clinical versus solely non-clinical SSC exposure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between clinical/non-clinical exposure and promoting future use of the SSC, adjusting for potential confounders/mediators: training level, human development index, and first perceptions of the SSC. Thematic analysis was conducted on suggestions for SSC improvement.

Results

Respondent participation rate was 24%. Three hundred and eighteen respondents were included in final analyses; 215 (67%) reported clinical exposure and 190 (60%) were promoters of future SSC use. Clinical exposure was associated with greater odds of promoting future SSC use (aOR 1.81 95% CI [1.03–3.19], p = 0.039). A greater proportion of promoters reported “Improved Operating Room Communication” as a goal of the SSC (0.21 95% CI [0.15–0.27]-vs.-0.12 [0.06–0.17], p = 0.031), while non-promoters reported the SSC goals were “Not Well Understood” (0.08 95% CI [0.03–0.12]-vs.-0.03 [0.01–0.05], p = 0.032). Suggestions for SSC improvement emphasized context-specific adaptability and earlier formal training.

Conclusions

Clinical exposure to the SSC was associated with promoting its future use. Earlier formal clinical training may improve perceptions and future use among medical students, trainees, and early career providers.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes AB et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499CrossRef Haynes AB et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Faherty LJ, Mate KS, Moses JM (2016) Leveraging trainees to improve quality and safety at the point of care: three models for engagement. Acad Med 91(4):503–509CrossRef Faherty LJ, Mate KS, Moses JM (2016) Leveraging trainees to improve quality and safety at the point of care: three models for engagement. Acad Med 91(4):503–509CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D et al (2020) Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 29:122–134CrossRef Lenguerrand E, Winter C, Siassakos D et al (2020) Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 29:122–134CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care Medical School Objectives Project (2001) Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Quality of Care Medical School Objectives Project (2001)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehlbach H, Artino AR (2018) The survey checklist (Manifesto). Acad Med 93(3):360–366CrossRef Gehlbach H, Artino AR (2018) The survey checklist (Manifesto). Acad Med 93(3):360–366CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley K (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266CrossRef Kelley K (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krol MW, de Boer D, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJDJM (2015) The Net Promoter Score—an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expect 18(6):3099–3109CrossRef Krol MW, de Boer D, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJDJM (2015) The Net Promoter Score—an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expect 18(6):3099–3109CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Delisle M, Ward MAR, Pradarelli JC, Panda N, Howard JD, Hannenberg AA (2019) Comparing the learning effectiveness of healthcare simulation in the observer versus active role: systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 14(5):318–332CrossRef Delisle M, Ward MAR, Pradarelli JC, Panda N, Howard JD, Hannenberg AA (2019) Comparing the learning effectiveness of healthcare simulation in the observer versus active role: systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthc 14(5):318–332CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vohra RS, Cowley JB, Bhasin N, Barakat HM, Gough MJ (2015) Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: a global survey of frontline medical professionals. Ann Med Surg 4(2):119–123CrossRef Vohra RS, Cowley JB, Bhasin N, Barakat HM, Gough MJ (2015) Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: a global survey of frontline medical professionals. Ann Med Surg 4(2):119–123CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilduff CLS, Leith TO, Drake TM, Fitzgerald JEF (2018) Surgical safety checklist training: a national study of undergraduate medical and nursing student teaching, understanding and influencing factors. Postgrad Med J 94(1109):143–150CrossRef Kilduff CLS, Leith TO, Drake TM, Fitzgerald JEF (2018) Surgical safety checklist training: a national study of undergraduate medical and nursing student teaching, understanding and influencing factors. Postgrad Med J 94(1109):143–150CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng-Kamstra JS et al (2016) Global surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors. BMJ Global Health 1(1):2016CrossRef Ng-Kamstra JS et al (2016) Global surgery 2030: a roadmap for high income country actors. BMJ Global Health 1(1):2016CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA (2012) The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 21(1):13–20CrossRef Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA (2012) The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 21(1):13–20CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers
verfasst von
Nikhil Panda
Luca Koritsanszky
Megan Delisle
Theophilus T. K. Anyomih
Eesha V. Desai
Yves Sonnay
George Molina
Katayoun Madani
Dominique Vervoort
Thomas G. Weiser
Evan M. Benjamin
Alex B. Haynes
Publikationsdatum
19.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05518-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

World Journal of Surgery 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.