Graft failure of IgA nephropathy in renal allografts following living donor transplantation: predictive factor analysis of 102 biopsies

The widespread use of effective immunosuppression has markedly reduced the risk of graft failure due to rejection in recent year s[1]. Conversely, de novo or recurrent renal disease has become a major cause of graft dysfunction, which was confirmed in our previous study,[2] and it is the second leading cause of death-censored graft failure and the third leading cause of uncensored graft failur e[3, 4].

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common recurrent nephropathy after transplantation, especially living donor transplantatio n[5, 6]. Some scholar s[5, 7] have suggested that IgAN recurrence is an independent risk factor for graft failure, but few studies have investigated the risk factors of IgAN in renal allografts that are predictive of disease progression and the outcomes compared to native IgA N[8, 9]. Therefore, the prognosis of IgAN in renal allografts remains controversia l[7, 10, 11]. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive factors related to graft failure of IgAN in renal allografts following living donor transplantation.

Ninety-three patients who were diagnosed with IgAN in renal allografts underwent a biopsy for initial symptoms. Proteinuria occurred in 72 patients (70.6%), hematuria occurred in 65 patients (63.7%), hypoproteinemia occurred in 18 patients (17.6%), and increased sCr (> 30% of the baseline) occurred in 28 patients (27.4%). Nine patients (8.8%) did not have abnormalities and were diagnosed using the protocol biopsy.

Graft failure occurred in 26 patients. The 5-year graft cumulative survival rate was 91.4% after transplantation (mean ± SD follow up, 7.6 ± 3.7 years), and the 4-year graft cumulative survival rate after diagnosis of IgAN by biopsy was 59.6% (the 5-year graft cumulative survival rate after diagnosis was not obtained, because the mean ± SD follow up was 3.4 ± 1.9 years). The mean time ± SD to occurrence was 4.7 ± 3.5 years. Sixty-four cases (62.7%) occurred within 5 years after transplantation, and 38 cases (37.2%) occurred after more than 5 years (Fig. 2).

The color doppler ultrasound and blood flow imagine showed the echo enhancement (p <  0.01), the reduced blood flow distribution (p = 0.02), the reduced Vs of main renal artery (MRA) (p = 0.04), and the increased RI of arcuate renal artery (ARA) (p = 0.04) were valuable in diagnosing and evaluating the graft dysfunction (Table 2). There was a positive correlation between Lee’s classifications and echo enhancement (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.4, p <  0.01), the reduced blood flow distribution (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.3, p <  0.01), the reduced Vs of MRA (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.3, p = 0.03), and the increased RI of ARA (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.3, p = 0.03).

The univariate analysis revealed that age (p = 0.05), time to disease occurrence (p = 0.05), the 24-h urinary protein level (p <  0.01), eGFR (p <  0.01), hypoproteinemia (ALB < 35.0 g/L) (p <  0.01), Lee’s classification (p = 0.02), mesangial C1q deposition (p <  0.01) at the time of biopsy were predictive of graft failure. We found significant correlations between the abovementioned characteristics. For instance, the time to disease occurrence was directly correlated with age (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.4, p <  0.01), Lee’s classification (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.3, p <  0.01), and mesangial C1q deposition (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.2, p = 0.02). The 24-h urinary protein level was directly correlated with hypoproteinemia (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.4, p <  0.01). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the 24-h urinary protein level, eGFR and mesangial C1q deposition at the time of the biopsy were independent predictive factors related to graft failure. The hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.6 for 1-g increased 24-h urinary protein (95%CI 1.2–2.0), 1.0 for 1-mL/min/1.73 m^2 declined eGFR (95%CI 1.0–1.1), 3.0 for mesangial C1q deposition (95%CI 1.2–7.4) (Table 3).

Although some characteristics were not independent predictive factors of graft failure in our study, the log-rank test revealed a significant difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves of Lee’s classification (p <  0.01) (Table 4). Figure 3 shows the significant differences in the 24-h urinary protein level (p <  0.01) and other factors.

Due to differences in diagnostic criteria, discrepancies have been reported in recurrence rates, with a range from 9 to 61 %[5]. Family history of IgAN is a known factor of its recurrence,[15] combined with a review of the Australia-New Zealand registry,[6] IgAN patients accepted low HLA-mismatched living donor transplantation with higher risk of recurrence, thus the family history in cases who accepted related donors should be given more attention.

More and more recent studies confirmed that IgAN in renal allografts had impact on long-term graft survival,[9, 10, 16] which were inconsistent with early research suggested that it exhibited slow progression and benign outcomes,[11] especially in patients with asymptomatic hematuria and/or proteinuria. Floege et al .[17] reported that ∼5% of patients lost their grafts due to occurrence at 5 years after transplantation, and our study demonstrated a similar result. However, the 4-year graft cumulative survival rate was only 59.6% after the IgAN diagnosis, which showed a worse outcome in our study.

We found that IgAN occurred frequently within 5 years postoperatively and then declined sharply in subsequent years, which was consistent with a previous repor t[18]. Few patients diagnosed with IgAN in renal allografts showed a remarkable increased sCr level when accepted biopsy,[2] as reported in previous study on IgAN in renal allografts, it had little impact on graft function in the early years after transplantation,[19] but Ortiz et al .[20] found that the histopathological injury was not accompanied by abnormalities in the urinalysis in half of early recurrent IgAN patients. Therefore, the disease progression could be concealed, a protocol biopsy was recommended to prevent missed diagnoses, especially in clinically silent patients.

An increased sCr level or declined eGFR as the initial symptoms was generally associated with a high risk of graft failure. This result was confirmed in a previous study on native IgA N[21]. Another independent predictive factor related to renal failure in native and graft IgAN was the 24-h urinary protein level, which was confirmed in our and other recent studie s[22, 23]. This risk was obviously increased when proceeding to hypoproteinemia. Hematuria is a typical clinical symptom of IgAN, and one prognostic factor study in Chinese patients concluded that hematuria was a useful marker for patients who were at high risk for disease progression of native IgA N[24]. However, no correlation was found between hematuria and graft failure in our study, possibly for the following reasons: 1) IgAN in renal allografts is not the only cause of hematuria following transplantation, which is different than native IgAN, and drug toxicity damage, infection, use of a Double-J catheter and other factors may induce hematuria in these patients; 2) some patients with initial asymptomatic hematuria did not accept a biopsy in a timely manner; and 3) only 26 cases of graft failure were observed in this series. Thus, more samples and a longer-term follow-up are needed to test the predictive value of hematuria.

The color doppler ultrasound is helpful to evaluate the progress of renal graft diseases, the change in cortical thickness, echo enhancement and the reduced blood flow distribution are typical features of graft dysfunction, like echo enhancement denotes glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis, which showed in our results. The results indicate that patients with severe histopathological injury (grade IV-V of Lee’s classification) may show lower Vs and higher RI in blood flow than mild or moderate (grade I-III), it coincide partly with early research,[25] which is concluded that it can be diagnosed as renal disease when RI > 0.65 in interlobar renal artery (IRA), but we found that the RI fluctuated between 0.6 and 0.7 in most cases of IgAN in renal allografts, even if they had a good graft function, moreover, the blood flow in MRA and ARA had more significant changes than it in IRA. These differences may be concerned with the baseline level influenced by donor factors, in addition, handlers’ skills and experience are important influence factors.

Lee’s classification and the Oxford classification are useful prognostic indicators of disease progression and clinical outcomes of native IgAN, but their utility in IgAN in after transplantation remains unknown. Lee’s classification includes criteria for histopathological grading, such as glomerular sclerosis, crescent formation, interstitial inflammation and tubular atrophy, which were established based on and considered suitable for East Asian patients. Patients with mild or moderate (grade I-III) lesions have been reported to have a benign outcome, whereas patients with grade IV or V lesions develop end-stage renal failure,[26] which is completely consistent with our results. Thus, Lee’s classification exhibits the same utility for prediction of the outcome of IgAN in renal allografts. The 2009 Oxford classification includes the following histological components: mesangial (M) and endocapillary (E) hypercellularity, segmental sclerosis (S) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (T). This classification provided a clear definition and accurate criteria for the various pathological lesions of IgAN. It is widely used, and its utility has been validated in many studie s[27, 28]. However, the advantages of this classification system for the clinical prediction of IgAN in renal allografts was not observed in our study. We considered that immunosuppressive therapy and donor factors might influence the pathological lesions represented by the four parameters in the Oxford classification. One study confirmed that immunosuppressive therapy reduced the predictive value of the pathological parameters in recurrent IgA N[28] compared with native IgAN. A simple “present” or “absent” for these parameters, such as M and E, cannot precisely reflect the degree of histopathological graft injury. Therefore, these parameters exhibit lower specificity in patients who accept long-term immunosuppressive therapy. The significance of crescent formation was not listed as a prognostic parameter in the 2009 Oxford classification, but in many follow-up validation studie s[29, 30] this parameter was considered prognostic, as a result, the Oxford classification was updated to MEST-C (crescent) in 201 7[31]. This study is the first report to assess the predictive value of these two classifications for IgAN in renal allografts, and the advantages and disadvantages of these classifications should be further assessed. We support the use of a combination of the pathological parameters with clinical features at the time of biopsy to provide earlier risk prediction in IgAN.

Sixteen cases with mesangial C1q deposition in this series. Traditionally, the presence of C1q staining is viewed as a typical pathological lesion of LN rather than IgA N[13]. However, a more recent stud y[32, 33] confirmed that this parameter played a role and occurred in 0 to 45% of patients with IgAN. Lee et al .[32] concluded that mesangial C1q deposition in the glomerulus was associated with a poor renal outcome and severe pathological features in native IgAN. We demonstrated that this parameter exhibited a higher predictive value in IgAN after transplantation. The absence of C1q deposition is a positive predictive sign as a response to steroid pulse therapy and relief of proteinuri a[33]. Therefore, steroid-resistance nephrotic syndrome and a poorer outcome should be taken seriously when C1q staining presents during long-term immunosuppression.

Maintenance therapy with medium/low prednisone is used to relieve IgAN progression in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) to reduce proteinuria. Early steroid withdrawal is a safe intervention in living donor transplantation,[34, 35] but steroid withdrawal should be handled with caution when choosing maintenance immunosuppressive treatments for patients with a high risk of recurrence. Based on our experience of treatment of native IgAN and related references,[36, 37] a maintenance therapy of oral prednisone at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg (qod) for Chinese patients after a IgAN in renal allografts diagnosis may be worthwhile. One recent stud y[38] suggested that other immunosuppressive therapy did not improve outcomes in patients with native IgAN and exhibited a more limited effect in IgAN in renal allografts, which occurred under existing immunosuppression after transplantation. Moreover, patients with IgAN in renal allografts exhibited favorable outcomes after tonsillectomy,[39, 40] but no reliable treatment strategy was proven to cure it.

Our study analyzed the 5-year graft cumulative survival rates after transplantation, but longer-term follow-up from biopsy is needed to observe more outcome events. In most cases, the primary diseases of the recipients were unknown, only 67 cases have been proven primary IgAN by biopsy for native renal in this series, the differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between de novo and recurrent IgAN couldn’t be found in this study. Although major confounding variables were adjusted and our results were consistent with other studies in the literature, bias was unavoidable in the univariate Cox proportional hazards models due to the influence of the lack of information for the intraoperative and donor factors.

IgAN is the most common de novo or recurrent nephropathy, especially in living donor transplantation, and occurs frequently within 5 years after transplantation. The color doppler ultrasound and blood flow imagine were valuable in diagnosing and evaluating the graft dysfunction. The risk of graft failure should be taken seriously in patients who exhibit heavy proteinuria (24-h urinary protein level > 2 g) and/or a declined eGFR as the initial symptoms, especially with hypoproteinemia, a high lesion grade (grade IV-V of Lee’s classification) and/or mesangial C1q deposition.